Fibrous bone tissue engineering scaffolds prepared by wet spinning of PLGA

Fibrous bone tissue engineering scaffolds prepared by wet spinning of PLGA

Having a self-healing capacity, bone is very well known to regenerate itself without leaving a scar. However, critical size defectsdue to trauma, tumor, disease, or infection involve bone graft surgeries in which complication rate is relatively at high levels. Bone tissueengineering appears as an alternative for grafting. Fibrous scaffolds are useful in tissue engineering applications since they have a highsurface-to-volume ratio, and adjustable, highly interconnected porosity to enhance cell adhesion, survival, migration, and proliferation.They can be produced in a wide variety of fiber sizes and organizations. Wet spinning is a convenient way to produce fibrous scaffoldswith consistent fiber size and good mechanical properties. In this study, a fibrous bone tissue engineering scaffold was produced usingpoly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA). Different concentrations (20%, 25%, and 30%) of PLGA (PLA:PGA 75:25) (Mw = 66,000–107,000)were wet spun using coagulation baths composed of different ratios (75:25, 60:40, 50:50) of isopropanol and distilled water. Scanningelectron microscopy (SEM) and in vitro degradation studies were performed to characterize the fibrous PLGA scaffolds. Mesenchymalstem cells were isolated from rat bone marrow, characterized by flow cytometry and seeded onto scaffolds to determine the mostappropriate fibrous structure for cell proliferation. According to the results of SEM, degradation studies and cell proliferation assay, 20%PLGA wet spun in 60:40 coagulation bath was selected as the most successful condition for the preparation of wet-spun scaffolds. Wetspinning of different concentrations of PLGA (20%, 25%, 30%) dissolved in dichloromethane using different isopropanol:distilled waterratios of coagulation baths (75:25, 60:40, 50:50) were shown in this study.

___

  • Abay N, Gurel Pekozer G, Ramazanoglu M, Kose GT (2016). Bone formation from porcine dental germ stem cells on surface modified polybutylene succinate scaffolds. Stem Cells International 2016: 8792191.
  • Ahmad AL, Ramli WKW, Fernando WJN, Daud WRW (2012). Effect of ethanol concentration in water coagulation bath on pore geometry of PVDF membrane for membrane gas absorption application in CO2 removal. Separation and Purification Technology 88: 11-18.
  • Ali N, Rahim NA, Ali A, Sani W, Nik W et al. (2007). Effect of ethanol composition in the coagulation bath on membrane performance. Journal of Applied Sciences 7 (15): 2131-2136.
  • Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP (2012). Bone tissue engineering: Recent advances and challenges. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 40 (5): 363-408.
  • Azimi B, Nourpanah P, Rabiee M, Arbab S (2014). Poly (lactide -coglycolide) fiber: An overview. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics 9 (1): 47-66.
  • Bakeri G, Ismail AF, Shariaty-Niassar M, Matsuura T (2010). Effect of polymer concentration on the structure and performance of polyetherimide hollow fiber membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 363: 103-111.
  • Burkersroda FV, Schedl L, Göpferich A (2002). Why degradable polymers undergo surface erosion or bulk erosion. Biomaterials 23: 4221-4231.
  • Deshmukh SP, Li K (1998). Effect of ethanol composition in water coagulation bath on morphology of PVDF hollow fibre membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 150: 75-85.
  • Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS (2011). Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. International Journal of Polymer Science 2011: 290602.
  • Gentile P, Chiono V, Carmagnola I, Hatton PV (2014). An overview of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15: 3640-3659.
  • Gupta VB. Solution-Spinning processes (1997). In: Gupta VB, Kothari VK (editors). Manufactured Fibre Technology. London, UK: Chapman and Hall Publishing, pp. 124-138.
  • Holy CE, Dang SM, Davies JE, Shoichet MS (1999). In vitro degradation of a novel poly(lactide- co -glycolide) 75/25 foam. Biomaterials 20 (13): 1177-1185.
  • Idris A, Man Z, Maulud AS, Khan MS (2017). Effects of phase separation behavior on morphology and performance of polycarbonate membranes. Membranes (Basel) 7 (2): 21.
  • Lanao RPF, Jonker AM, Wolke JGC, Jansen JA, van Hest JCM et al. (2013). Physicochemical properties and applications of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) for use in bone regeneration. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews 19: 380-390.
  • Langer R, Tirrell DA (2004). Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 428 (6982): 487-492.
  • Lu L, Peter SJ, Lyman MD, Lai HL, Leite SM et al. (2000). In vitro degradation of porous poly(L-lactic acid) foams. Biomaterials 21: 1595-1605.
  • Makadia HK, Siegel SJ (2011). Poly Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers (Basel); 3: 1377-1397.
  • Nelson KD, Romero A, Waggoner P, Crow B, Borneman A et al. (2003). Technique paper for wet-spinning poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) monofilament fibers. Tissue Engineering 9 (6): 1323-1330.
  • Neves SC, Moreira Teixeira LS, Moroni L, Reis RL, Van Blitterswijk CA et al. (2011). Chitosan/poly(ε-caprolactone) blend scaffolds for cartilage repair. Biomaterials 32:1068-1079
  • Pati F, Adhikari B, Dhara S (2012). Development of chitosantripolyphosphate non-woven fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering application. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 23 (4): 1085-1096.
  • Phua KKL, Roberts ERH, Leong KW (2011). Degradable Polymers. In: Ducheyne P, Healy KE, Hutmacher DW, Grainger DW, Kirkpatrick CJ (editors). Comprehensive Biomaterials. Elsevier, vol. 1, pp. 381-415.
  • Puppi D, Dinucci D, Bartoli C, Mota C, Migone C et al. (2011). Development of 3D wet-spun polymeric scaffolds loaded with antimicrobial agents for bone engineering. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymer 26:478-492.
  • Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR (2006). Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27 (18): 3413-31.
  • Salamian N, Irani S, Zandi M, Saeed SM, Atyabi SM (2013). Cell attachment studies on electrospun nanofibrous PLGA and freeze-dried porous PLGA. Nano Bulletin 2 (1): 130103.
  • Sukitpaneenit P, Chung TS (2009). Molecular elucidation of morphology and mechanical properties of PVDF hollow fiber membranes from aspects of phase inversion, crystallization and rheology. Journal of Membrane Science 340 (1–2): 192- 205.
  • Tamayol A, Akbari M, Annabi N, Paul A, Khademhosseini A et al. (2013). Fiber-based tissue engineering: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Biotechnology Advances 31: 669-687.
  • Verma NK, Khanna SK, Kapila B (2010). Comprehensive Chemistry XI. New Delhi, India: Laxmi Publications.
  • Via AG, Frizziero A, Oliva F (2012). Biological properties of mesenchymal stem cells from different sources. Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal 16: 154-162.
  • Wu XS, Wang N (2001). Synthesis, characterization, biodegradation, and drug delivery application of biodegradable lactic/glycolic acid polymers. Part II: Biodegradation. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 12: 21-34.
  • Zolnik BS, Burgess DJ (2007). Effect of acidic pH on PLGA microsphere degradation and release. Journal of Controlled Release 122: 338-344.
  • Zuo DY, Zhu BK, Cao JH, Xu YY (2006). Influence of alcohol-based nonsolvents on the formation and morphology of PVDF membranes in phase inversion process. Chinese Journal of Polymer Science 24 (3): 281-289.