Efficiency of using RAPD and ISSR markers in evaluation of genetic diversity in sugar beet

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were used for comparative analysis of genetic variation in 42 sugar beet accessions. A total of 24 polymorphic primers (12 RAPD and 12 ISSR) were used. The RAPD primers generated 204 amplification products and the ISSR primers produced 178 fragments, 190 and 173 of which were polymorphic, respectively. The average polymorphism level with the ISSR markers (97.2%) was higher than that with the RAPD primers (93%). High genetic diversity indices for both marker types (0.86 for RAPD and 0.91 for ISSR) suggested that these methods were equally effective in determining genetic variation in sugar beet accessions. Cluster analysis of the RAPD, ISSR, and combined datasets revealed similar grouping patterns. However, the dendrogram created from analysis of the combined RAPD+ISSR data was more similar to the RAPD-only dendrogram than the ISSR-only analysis, indicating that RAPD could determine genetic diversity with higher resolution than ISSR in the cultivars tested. High correlation between the RAPD and ISSR marker systems was shown using a Mantel test (r = 0.92). Screening a higher number of anonymous loci in sugar beet using these molecular markers will enable the selection of the best parent cultivars for the development of novel varieties.

Efficiency of using RAPD and ISSR markers in evaluation of genetic diversity in sugar beet

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were used for comparative analysis of genetic variation in 42 sugar beet accessions. A total of 24 polymorphic primers (12 RAPD and 12 ISSR) were used. The RAPD primers generated 204 amplification products and the ISSR primers produced 178 fragments, 190 and 173 of which were polymorphic, respectively. The average polymorphism level with the ISSR markers (97.2%) was higher than that with the RAPD primers (93%). High genetic diversity indices for both marker types (0.86 for RAPD and 0.91 for ISSR) suggested that these methods were equally effective in determining genetic variation in sugar beet accessions. Cluster analysis of the RAPD, ISSR, and combined datasets revealed similar grouping patterns. However, the dendrogram created from analysis of the combined RAPD+ISSR data was more similar to the RAPD-only dendrogram than the ISSR-only analysis, indicating that RAPD could determine genetic diversity with higher resolution than ISSR in the cultivars tested. High correlation between the RAPD and ISSR marker systems was shown using a Mantel test (r = 0.92). Screening a higher number of anonymous loci in sugar beet using these molecular markers will enable the selection of the best parent cultivars for the development of novel varieties.

___

  • Aliyev RT, Abbasov MA, Mammadov AC (2007). Genetic identification of diploid and tetraploid wheat species with RAPD markers. Turk J Biol 31: 173–180.
  • Ateş Sönmezoğlu Ö, Bozmaz B, Yıldırım A, Kandemir N, Aydın N (2012). Genetic characterization of Turkish bread wheat landraces based on microsatellite markers and morphological characters. Turk J Biol 36: 589–597.
  • Babayeva S, Akparov Z, Abbasov MA, Mammadov A, Zaifizadeh M, Kenneth S (2009). Diversity analysis of Central Asia and Caucasian lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) germplasm using SSR fingerprinting. Genet Res Crop Evol 56: 293–298.
  • Curcic Z, Nagl N, Taski-Ajdukovic K, Danojevic D, Kovacev L (2013). Evaluation of genetic diversity among open-pollinated populations of sugar beet using quantitative root traits. In: EUCARPIA Genetic Resources Section Meeting, 10–13 June, Alnarp, Sweden.
  • Eröz Poyraz İ, Sözen E, Ataşlar E, Poyraz İ (2012). Determination of genetic relationships among Velezia L. (Caryophyllaceae) species using RAPD markers. Turk J Biol 36: 293–302.
  • Eshghi R, Ebrahimpour F, Ojaghi J, Salayeva S, Baraty M, Rahimi M (2012). Evaluation of genetic variability in naked barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Intl J Agri Crop Sci 4: 1166–1179.
  • Fischer HE (1989). Origin of the ‘Weisse Schlesische Rube’ (white Silesian beet) and resynthesis of sugarbeet. Euphytica 41: 75– 80.
  • Hu D, Zhang Z, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Li J (2005). Genetic relationship of ornamental peach determined using AFLP markers. HortScience 40: 1782–1786.
  • Jaccard P (1908). New researches on the floral distribution. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Natl 44: 223–270.
  • Jarvis D, Sthapit B, Sears L (2000). Conserving Agricultural Biodiversity in Situ: A Scientific Basis for Sustainable Agriculture. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
  • Josiah CC, George DO, Eleazae OM, Nyamu WF (2008). Genetic diversity in Kenyan populations of Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. revealed by combined RAPD and ISSR markers. Afr J Biotechnol 7: 2333–2340.
  • Khlestkina EK, Salina EA (2006). SNP-markers: methods of analysis, ways of development and comparative analysis on the example of wheat. Genetics 42: 725–736.
  • Kumar M, Mishra GP, Singh R, Kumar J, Naik PK, Singh SB (2009). Correspondence of ISSR and RAPD markers for comparative analysis of genetic diversity among different apricot genotypes from cold arid deserts of trans-Himalayas. Physiol Mol Biol Plant 15: 225–235.
  • Liao L, Guo Q, Wang Z, Liu L, Zhu Z (2012). Genetic diversity analysis of Prunella vulgaris in China using ISSR and SRAP markers. Biochem System and Ecol 45: 209–217.
  • Liu K, Muse CV (2005). PowerMarker: Integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–2129.
  • Liu Q, Cheng D, Yang L, Luo C, Kong F, Wu Y (2012a). Construction of digital fingerprinting and cluster analysis using ISSR markers for sugar beet cultivars (lines). Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 28: 280–284.
  • Liu Q, Cheng D, Yang L, Luo C, Zhang H, Wu Y, Liu N, Zhou Q (2012b). Identification of DNA fingerprinting and cluster analysis using ISSR markers for 13 sugar beet cultivars (lines) from China and Holland. In: International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, pp. 325–328.
  • Loveless MD, Hamrick JL (1984). Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27: 237–277.
  • Mantel M (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209–220.
  • Mathur P, Habibi N, Chittora M, Purohit SD (2013). Molecular analysis of variability among genotypes of Abrus precatorius L. with different seed coat colours using RAPD and ISSR markers. Ind J Biotech 12: 273–276.
  • McGrath JM, Derrico CA, Yu Y (1999). Genetic diversity in selected, historical US sugarbeet germplasm and Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Theor Appl Genet 98: 968–976.
  • Muthusamy S, Kanagarajan S, Ponnusamy S (2008). Efficiency of RAPD and ISSR markers system in accessing genetic variation of rice bean (Vigna umbellata) landraces. Elect J Biotech 11 DOI 10.2225/vol11-issue3-fulltext-8.
  • Nagamine T, Caty JP, Ford-Lloyd BV (1989). Phenotypic polymorphism and allele differentiation of isozymes in folder beet, multigerm sugar beet and monogerm sugar beet. Theor Appl Genet 77: 711–720.
  • Nagl N, Taški K, Popovic A, Curcic Z, Danojevic D, Kovacev L (2011). Estimation of genetic variation among related Sugar beet genotypes by using RAPD. Genetika 3: 575–582.
  • Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590.
  • Ojaghi J, Akhundova E (2010). Genetic diversity in doubled haploids wheat based on morphological traits, gliadin protein patterns and RAPD markers. Afr J Agric Res 5: 1701–1712.
  • Richards CM, Brownson M, Mitchell S, Kresovich S, Panella L (2004). Polymorphic microsatellite markers for inferring diversity in wild and domesticated sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Mol Ecol Notes 4: 243–245.
  • Seehalak W, Tomooka N, Warayuwat A, Thipyapong P, Laosuwan P, Kaga A, Vaughan DA (2006). Genetic diversity of the Vigna germplasm from Thailand and neighbouring regions revealed by AFLP analysis. Genet Res Crop Evol 53: 1043–1059.
  • Smith GA (1987). Principles of Cultivar Development. In: Fehr WR, editor. Crop Species. Sugar Beet. Vol. 2. New York, NY, USA: MacMillan, pp. 577–625.
  • SPSS Inc. (2003). SPSS Base 12.0 for Windows User’s Guide. Chicago, IL, USA: SPSS Inc.
  • Srivastava S, Gupta PS, Saxena VK, Srivastava HM (2007). Genetic diversity analysis in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) using isozymes, RAPD and ISSR markers. Cytologia 72: 265–274.
  • Surgun Y, Çöl B, Bürün B (2012). Genetic diversity and identification of some Turkish cotton genotypes (Gossypium hirsutum L.) by RAPD-PCR analysis. Turk J Biol 36: 143–150.
  • Torres AM, Weeden NF, Martin A (1993). Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theor Appl Genet 85: 937–945.
  • Uphoff H, Wricke G (1995). A genetic map of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) based on RAPD markers. Plant Breeding 114: 355– 357.
  • Weir BS (1990). Genetic-Data Analysis Methods for Discrete Genetic Data. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates Inc.
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Herbicide-tolerant sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plants: an unconventional method of weed removal

Idrees Ahmad NASIR, Bushra TABASSUM, Zahida QAMAR, Muhammad Aslam JAVED, Muhammad TARIQ

Characterization of dehydrin AhDHN from Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus)

Monther Taha SADDER, Abdullah Abdulaziz AL-DOSS

Polyploidy and apomixis in accessions of Senna rugosa (G.Don) H.S.Irwin & Barneby

Kátia RESENDE, Clara PRADO, Lisete DAVIDE, Giovana TORRES

Efficiency of using RAPD and ISSR markers in evaluation of genetic diversity in sugar beet

Vusala IZZATULLAYEVA, Zeynal AKPAROV, Sevda BABAYEVA, Javid OJAGHI, Mehraj ABBASOV

Preconditioning effect of cytokinins on in vitro multiplication of embryonic node of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) cultivar Gürbüz

Surendra BARPETE, Muhammad AASIM, Khalid Mahmood KHAWAR, Sancar Fatih ÖZCAN, Sebahattin ÖZCAN

Evaluation of orange peel, an industrial waste, for the production of Aspergillus sojae polygalacturonase considering both morphology and rheology effects

Nihan GÖĞÜŞ, Bengi Hakgüder TAZE, Hande DEMİR, Canan TARI, Sevcan ÜNLÜTÜRK, Marcelo Fernandez LAHORE

Styrian oil pumpkin pollen germinability at higher irradiation doses: optimization of the in vitro germination protocol and irradiation procedure

Kristina KOSMRLJ, Damijana KASTELEC, Borut BOHANEC

Peripheral administration of kisspeptin antagonist does not alter basal plasma testosterone but decreases plasma adiponectin levels in adult male rhesus macaques

Tanzeel HUMA, Farhad ULLA, Farnaz HANIF, Joshua D. RIZAK, Muhammad SHAHAB

Melatonin is effective in reducing stress-induced organ damage in Wistar albino rats

Mukaddes EŞREFOĞLU, Ayşin AKINCI, Hülya ELBE, Elif TAŞLIDERE, Aslı ÇETİN, Burhan ATEŞ

Polyploidy and apomixis in accessions of Senna rugosa (G.Don) H.S.Irwin & Barneby

Kátia RESENDE, Clara PRADO, Lisete DAVIDE, Giovana TORRES