Biochemical identification and numerical taxonomy of Aeromonas spp. isolated from food samples in Turkey

Numerical taxonomy was used to analyze phenotypic data obtained from 126 new isolates of Aeromonas strains taken from red meat, raw chicken, minced meat, and fish samples. Each strain was tested for 86 characters but only the final data including 63 characters were analysed using the SSM coefficients and the UPGMA clustering algorithm. At SSM values of => 83%, the strains clustered into 10 aggregate groups consisting of 7 major (5 and up strains) and 3 minor (2-4 strains), and 5 single member clusters, each of which was identified as A. hydrophila, A. caviae, and A. sobria, respectively. It was proved that the food isolates showed a relative phenotypical distance and the groups of strains that had atypical profiles were compared with the type species by the present identification schemes. It was clearly seen that the phenetic approach was a necessary tool to delimitate and identify the Aeromonas species. Numerical taxonomy of Aeromonas strains isolated from different sources revealed the presence of potentially pathogenic Aeromonas spp., especially in food.

Biochemical identification and numerical taxonomy of Aeromonas spp. isolated from food samples in Turkey

Numerical taxonomy was used to analyze phenotypic data obtained from 126 new isolates of Aeromonas strains taken from red meat, raw chicken, minced meat, and fish samples. Each strain was tested for 86 characters but only the final data including 63 characters were analysed using the SSM coefficients and the UPGMA clustering algorithm. At SSM values of => 83%, the strains clustered into 10 aggregate groups consisting of 7 major (5 and up strains) and 3 minor (2-4 strains), and 5 single member clusters, each of which was identified as A. hydrophila, A. caviae, and A. sobria, respectively. It was proved that the food isolates showed a relative phenotypical distance and the groups of strains that had atypical profiles were compared with the type species by the present identification schemes. It was clearly seen that the phenetic approach was a necessary tool to delimitate and identify the Aeromonas species. Numerical taxonomy of Aeromonas strains isolated from different sources revealed the presence of potentially pathogenic Aeromonas spp., especially in food.

___

  • Colwell RR, MacDonell MT, Deley J. Proposal to recognize the family Aeromonadaceae fam. nov. Int J System Bacteriol 36: 473-477, 1986.
  • Carnahan A, Marril M, Fanning G et al. Characterization of A. schubertii strains recently isolated from traumatic wound infection. J Clin Microbiol 27: 1826-1830, 1989.
  • Holmes P, Niccolls LM, Sartory DP. Th e ecology of mesophilic Aeromonas in the aquatic environment. In: Austin B, Altwegg M, Gosling PJ, Joseph S. eds. Th e Genus Aeromonas. Wiley and Sons; 1996: pp. 127-150.
  • Huys G, Kampfer P, Altwegg M et al. Aeromonas popoffi i sp. nov., a mesophilic bacterium isolated from drinking water production plants and reservoirs. Int J System Bacteriol 47: 1165-1171, 1997.
  • Palumbo SA. Th e Aeromonas hydrophila group in food. In: Austin B, Altwegg M, Gosling PJ, Joseph S. eds. Th e Genus Aeromonas. Wiley and Sons; 1996: pp. 287-310.
  • Janda JM, Duff ey PS. Mesophilic aeromonads in human disease: current taxonomy, laboratory identifi cation and infectious disease spectrum. Rev Infect Dis 10: 980-997, 1988.
  • Janda, JM. Recent advances in the study of the taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infectious syndromes associated with the genus Aeromonas. Clin Microbiol Rev 4: 397-410, 1991.
  • Valera L, Esteve C. Phenotypic study by numerical taxonomy of strains belonging to the genus Aeromonas. J Appl Microbiol, 93: 77-95, 2002.
  • Popoff MY. Genus III. Aeromonas. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG. Eds. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins; 1984: pp. 545-548.
  • Esteve C, Gutiérrez MC, Ventosa A. Aeromonas encheleia sp. nov., isolated from European eels. Int J System Bacteriol 45: 462-466, 1995.
  • Ali A, Carnahan AM, Altwegg, M et al. Aeromonas bestiarum sp. nov. (formerly genomospecies DNA group 2 A. hydrophila), a new species isolated from non-human sources. Med Microbiol Letters 5: 156-165, 1996.
  • Martínez-Murcía AJ, Esteve C, Garay E et al. Aeromonas allosaccharophila sp. nov., a new mesophilic member of the genus Aeromonas. FEMS Microbiol Letters 91: 199-206, 1992.
  • Altwegg M, Reeves MW, Altwegg-Bissig R et al. Multilocus enzyme analysis of the genus Aeromonas and its use for species identifi cation. Zentralbl für Bakteriol 275: 28-45, 1991.
  • Martineti-Lucchini G, Altwegg M. rRNA gene restriction patterns as taxonomic tools for the genus Aeromonas, Int J System Bacteriol 42: 384-389, 1992.
  • Miñana-Galbis D, Farfán M, Lorén JG et al. Biochemical identifi cation and numerical taxonomy of Aeromonas spp. isolated from environmental and clinical samples in Spain. J Appl Microbiol 93: 420-430, 2002.
  • Martínez-Murcía AJ. Phylogenetic positions of Aeromonas encheleia, Aeromonas popoffi , Aeromonas DNA hybridization group 11 and Aeromonas group 501. Int J System Bacteriol 49: 1403-1408, 1999.
  • Figueras M-J, Guarro J, Martínez-Murcía AJ. Use of restriction fragment length polymorphism of the PCR-amplifi ed 16S rRNA gene for the identifi cation of Aeromonas spp. J Clin Microbiol 38: 2023-2025, 2000.
  • Figueras M-J, Soler L, Chacón MR et al. Extended method for discrimination of Aeromonas spp. by 16S rDNA RFLP analysis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 2069-2073, 2000.
  • Carnahan AM, Fanning GR, Joseph SW. Aeromonas jandaei (formerly genospecies DNA group 9 A. sobria), a new sucrose- negative species isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 29: 560-564, 1991.
  • Abbot SL, Cheung WKW, Kroske-Bystrom S et al. Identifi cation of Aeromonas strains to the genospecies level in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 30: 1262-1266, 1992.
  • Joseph SW, Carnahan AM. Update of the genus Aeromonas. ASM News 66: 218-223, 2000.
  • Sneath PH, Johnson R. Th e infl uence on numerical taxonomy similarities of errors in microbiological tests. J Gen Microbiol 72: 377-392, 1972.
  • Oakey HJ, Ellis JT, Gibson LF. A biochemical protocol for the diff erentiation of current genomospecies of Aeromonas. Zentralbl für Bakteriol 284: 32-46, 1996.
  • Holt JC, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA et al. “Subgroup 2: Family Vibrionaceae” Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore; 1994.
  • Hugh R, Leifson E. Th e taxonomic signifi cance of fermentative versus oxidative metabolism of carbohydrates by various gram- negative bacteria. J Bacteriol 66: 24-26, 1953.
  • Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA et al. Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology. Washington DC; 1994.
  • MacFaddin JF. Biochemical tests for identifi cation of medical bacteria. Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore; 1981.
  • Janda JM, Reitano M Bottone EJ. Biotyping of Aeromonas isolates as a correlate to delineating a species-associated disease spectrum. J Clin Microbiol 19: 44-47, 1984.
  • Twedt RM. Recovery of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related halophilic vibrios. In Bacteriological Analytical Manual. Association of Offi cial Analytical Chemists, Food & Drug Administration, Arlington; 1984. pp.1201-1208.
  • Véron, M. Nutrition et taxonomie des Enterobacteriaceae et bactéries voisines. Annal Microbiol 126A: 267-274, 1975.
  • Popoff M, Lallier R. Biochemical and serological characteristics of Aeromonas. Methods in Microbiol 16: 127-145, 1984.
  • Jorgensen JH, Turnidge JD, Washington JA. Antibacterial susceptibility tests: dilution and disk diff usion methods. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH. eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, American Society for Microbiology; 1999: pp. 1526-1543.
  • Kielwein G. Ein Nährboden zur selektiven Züchtung von Pseudomonaden und Aeromonaden. Arch. F. Lebensmittelyg 20: 131-133, 1969.
  • Lallier R, Mittal KR, Leblanc D et al. Rapid methods for the diff erentiation of virulent and nonvirulent Aeromonas hydrophila strains. Dev Biol Standards 49: 119-123, 1981.
  • Güven K, Mutlu MB. Properties of Bacillus cereus collected from diff erent food sources. Turk J Biol 33: 101-108, 2009.
  • Carnahan A, Hammontree L, Bourgeois L et al. Pyrazinamidase activity as a phenotypic marker for several Aeromonas spp. isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 28: 391-392, 1990.
  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. Th e principles and practice of numerical classifi cation. In: Kenedy D, Park RB. eds. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman; 1973. pp. 278-280.
  • Chun J. Computer-assisted classifi cation and identifi cation of actinomycetes, PhD Th esis. Department of Microbiology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne (UK), 1995.
  • Huys G, Kersters I, Coopman R et al. Genotypic diversity among Aeromonas isolates recovered from drinking water production plants as revealed by AFLPTM analysis. System Appl Microbiol 19: 428-435, 1996.
  • Altwegg M, Steigerwalt AG, Altwegg-Bissig R et al. Biochemical identifi cation of Aeromonas genospecies isolated from humans. J Clin Microbiol 28: 258-264, 1990.
  • Noterdaeme L, Bigawa S, Willems KA et al. Biochemical and physiological characteristics and plasmid profi les of Aeromonas hydrophila strains, isolated from freshwater fi sh and from fresh water. J Fish Dis 14: 313-321, 1991.
  • Borrell N, Figueras MJ, Guarro J. Phenotypic identifi cation of Aeromonas genomospecies from clinical and environmental sources. Canadian J Microbiol 44, 103-108, 1998.
  • Croci L, Serratore P, Cozzi L et al. Detection of Vibrionaceae in mussels and in their seawater growing area. Lett Appl Microbiol 32: 57-61, 2001.
  • Kämpfer P, Altwegg M. Numerical classifi cation and identifi cation of Aeromonas genospecies. J Appl Bacteriol 72: 341-351, 1992.
  • Santos Y, Toranzo AE, Barja JL et al. Virulence properties and enterotoxin production of Aeromonas strains isolated from fi sh. Infect. Immun. 56: 3285-3293, 1988.
  • Carnahan AM, Joseph SW. Systematic assessment of geographically and clinically diverse aeromonads. System Appl Microbiol 16: 72-84, 1993.
  • Sugita H, Nakamura T, Tanaka K et al. Identifi cation of Aeromonas species isolated from freshwater fi sh with the microplate hybridisation method. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 3036-3038, 1994.
  • Huys G, Kersters I, Vancanneyt M et al. Diversity of Aeromonas sp. in Flemish drinking water production plants as determined by gas–liquid chromatographic analysis of cellular fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). J Appl Bacteriol 78: 445-455, 1995.
  • Rohlf FJ. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 1.80. Exeter Soft ware. New York; 1993.
Turkish Journal of Biology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0152
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

In vitro antagonistic activity of fungi isolated from sclerotia on potato tubers against Rhizoctonia solani

Erkol DEMİRCİ, Elif DANE, Cafer EKEN

Infl uence of diff erent sterilization methods on callus initiation and production of pigmented callus in Arnebia densifl ora Ledeb

Hatice ÇÖLGEÇEN, Ufuk KOCA, Gülnur TOKER

Biochemical response of Olea europaea cv. Gemlik to short-term salt stress

Mehmet Ali DEMİRAL, Deniz AKTAŞ UYGUN, Murat UYGUN, Erkan KASIRĞA

Effects of cold and salicylic acid treatments on nitrate reductase activity in spinach leaves

Belinda AYDIN, Barbaros NALBANTOĞLU

Phenolic constituents of Hypericum triquetrifolium Turra (Guttiferae) growing in Turkey: variation among populations and plant parts

Cüneyt ÇIRAK*, Jolita RADUSIENE, Valdimaras JANULIS, Liudas IVANAUSKAS, Necdet ÇAMAŞ

The interaction between renin-angiotensin system and sympathetic nervous system in the peripheral vasculature of normal Sprague-Dawley rats

Mohammed H. ABDULLA, - *, Munavvar A. SATTAR, Nor A. ABDULLAH

The application of ISSR-PCR to determine the genetic relationship and genetic diversity between narrow leaved bluegrass (Poa angustifolia) and rough bluegrass (Poa trivialis) accessions

Emine ARSLAN, Ahmet TAMKOÇ

Biochemical identification and numerical taxonomy of Aeromonas spp. isolated from food samples in Turkey

Belgin ERDEM, Ergin KARİPTAŞ, Elif ÇİL, Kamil IŞIK

Expression of β-(1,3-1,4)-glucanase gene of Orpinomyces sp. GMLF18 in Escherichia coli EC1000 and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363

Uğur ÇÖMLEKCİOĞLU, Emin ÖZKÖSE, İsmail AKYOL, Ferit Can YAZDIÇ, Mehmet Sait EKİNCİ

Expression of β-(1,3-1,4)-glucanase gene of Orpinomyces sp. GMLF18 in Escherichia coli EC1000 and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363

Uğur ÇÖMLEKCİOĞLU, Emin ÖZKÖSE, İsmail AKYOL, Ferit Can YAZDIÇ, Mehmet Sait EKİNCİ