___

• Albacete A, Ghanem ME, Dodd IC, Pérez-Alfocea F (2010). Principal component analysis of hormone profling data suggests an important role for cytokinins in regulating leaf growth and senescence of salinized tomato. Plant Signal Behav 5: 45–48.
• Alsadon AA, Sadder MT, Wahb-Allah MA (2013). Responsive gene screening and exploration of genotypes responses to salinity tolerance in tomato. Aust J Crop Sci 7: 1383–1395.
• Amtmann A (2009). Learning from evolution: Tellungiella generates new knowledge on essential and critical components of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Mol Plant 2: 3–12.
• Areshchenkova T, Ganal M (1999). Long tomato microsatellite are predominantly associated with centromeric regions. Genome 42: 536–544.
• Chen Y, Qiu K, Kuai B, Ding Y (2011). Identifcation of an NAP- like transcription factor BeNAC1 regulating leaf senescence in bamboo (Bambusa emeiensis ‘Viridifavus’). Physiol Plantarum 142: 361–371.
• Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK (2005). Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci 45: 437–448.
• Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ (2000). Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 117–124.
• Daldoul S, Höfer MU, Linhard C, Jallouli N, Mliki A, Reustle GM, Ghorbel A (2008). Expression analysis of salt stress responsive genes in grapevines. In: Abdelly C, Öztürk M, Ashraf M, Grignon C, editors. Biosaline Agriculture and High Salinity Tolerance. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag, pp. 297–303.
• Dombrowski JE (2003). Salt stress activation of wound-related genes in tomato plants. Plant Physiol 132: 2098–2107.
• Foolad R (2004). Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Tiss Org 76: 101–119.
• Grover A, Chandan S, Sanan N, Grover A (1999). Taming abiotic stresses in plants through genetic engineering: current strategies and perspective. Plant Sci 143: 101–111.
• Halford NG, Hey S, Jhurreea D, Laurie S, McKibbin RS, Paul M, Zhang Y (2003). Metabolic signaling and carbon partitioning: role of Snf1‐related (SnRK1) protein kinase. J Exp Bot 54: 467–475.
• Hazen SP, Wu Y, Kreps JA (2003). Gene expression profling of plant responses to abiotic stress. Funct Integr Genomics 3: 105–111.
• Herbers K, Prat S, Willmitzer L (1994). Cloning and characterization of a cathepsin D inhibitor gene from Solanum tuberosum L. Plant Mol Biol 26: 73–83.
• Kant S, Bi YM, Zhu T, Rothstein ST (2009). SAUR39, a small auxin- up RNA gene, acts as a negative regulator of auxin synthesis and transport in rice. Plant Physiol 151: 691–701.
• Kawasaki S, Borchert C, Deyholos M, Wang H, Brazille S, Kawai K (2001). Expression profles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell 13: 889–905.
• Knight H, Knight MR (2001). Abiotic stress signalling pathways: specifcity and cross-talk. Trends Plant Sci 6: 262–267.
• Kodaira KS, Qin F, Tran LS, Maruyama K, Kidokoro S, Fujita Y, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2011). Arabidopsis Cys2/His2 zinc-fnger proteins AZF1 and AZF2 negatively regulate abscisic acid-repressive and auxin-inducible genes under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Physiol 157: 742–756.
• Krasensky J, Jonak C (2012). Drought, salt, and temperature stress- induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J Exp Bot 63: 1593–1608.
• Liu X, Baird WV (2003). Diferential expression of genes regulated in response to drought or salinity stress in sunfower. Crop Sci 43: 678–87.
• Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 –ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402–408.
• Ma S, Gong Q, Bohnert HJ (2006). Dissecting salt stress pathways. J Exp Bot 57: 1097–1107.
• Mahajan S, Tuteja N (2005). Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophy 444: 139–158.
• Mosolov VV, Valueva TA (2011). Inhibitors of proteolytic enzymes under abiotic stresses in plants. Appl Biochem Microbiol 47: 453–459.
• Munns R, Tester M (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 651–681.
• Nakashima K, Ito Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2009). Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol 149: 88–95.
• Orellana S, Yañez M, Espinoza A, Verdugo I, González E, Ruiz-Lara S, Casaretto JA (2010). Te transcription factor SlAREB1 confers drought, salt stress tolerance and regulates biotic and abiotic stress-related genes in tomato. Plant Cell Environ 33: 2191–2208.
• Ouyang B, Yang T, Li H, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Fei Z, Ye Z (2007). Identifcation of early salt stress response genes in tomato root by suppression subtractive hybridization and microarray analysis. J Exp Bot 58: 507–520.
• Park JM, Park CJ, Lee SB, Ham BK, Shin R, Paek KH (2001). Overexpression of the tobacco Tsi1 gene encoding an EREBP/ AP2-type transcription factor enhances resistance against pathogen attack and osmotic stress in tobacco. Plant Cell 13: 1035–1046.
• Poysa V, He C, Yu K (2003). Development and characterization of simple repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars. Teor Appl Genet 106: 363–373.
• Rai A, Mishra U, Singh M, Kumar R, Dubey RS, Singh NK, Jain N, Pandey HP (2010). Expression Data in Response to Abiotic Stresses in Tomato at Flowering Stage. Gene Expression Omnibus, Series: GSE22304. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University.
• Reviron MP, Vartanian N, Sallantin M, Huet JC, Pernollet JC, de Vienne D (1992). Characterization of a novel protein induced by progressive or rapid drought and salinity in Brassica napus leaves. Plant Physiol 100: 1486–1493.
• Rolan P, Atkinson AJ, Lesko LJ (2003). Use of biomarkers from drug discovery through clinical practice: Report of the Ninth European Federation of Pharmaceutical Sciences Conference on Optimizing Drug Development. Clin Pharmacol Ter 73: 284–291.
• Seo PJ, Xiang F, Qiao M, Park JY, Lee YN, Kim SG, Lee YH, Park WJ, Park CM (2009). Te MYB96 transcription factor mediates abscisic acid signaling during drought stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 151: 275–289.
• Shan L, Li C, Chen F, Zhao S, Xia G (2008). A Bowman-Birk type protease inhibitor is involved in the tolerance to salt stress in wheat. Plant Cell Environ 31: 1128–1137.
• Sun W, Xu X, Zhu H, Liu A, Liu L, Li J, Hua X (2010). Comparative transcriptomic profling of a salt-tolerant wild tomato species and a salt-sensitive tomato cultivar. Plant Cell Physiol 51: 997– 1006.
• Swami AK, Alam SI, Sengupta N, Sarin R (2011). Diferential proteomic analysis of salt stress response in Sorghum bicolor leaves. Environ Exp Bot 71: 321–32.
• Taji T, Seki M, Satou M, Sakurai T, Kobayashi M, Ishiyama K, Narusaka Y, Narusaka M, Zhu JK, Shinozaki K (2004). Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray. Plant Physiol 135: 1697–1709.
• Tamoi M, Kurotaki H, Fukamizo T (2007). Beta-1,4-glucanase-like protein from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803 is a beta-1,3-1,4-glucanase and functions in salt stress tolerance. Biochem J 405: 139–146.
• Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A (2003). Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218: 1–14.
• Zamboni A, Zanin L, Tomasi N, Pezzotti M, Pinton R, Varanini Z, Cesco S (2012) Genome-wide microarray analysis of tomato roots showed defned responses to iron defciency. BMC Genomics 13: 101.
• Zhang H, Han B, Wang T, Chen S, Li H, Zhang Y, Dai, S (2012). Mechanisms of plant salt response: insights from proteomics. J Proteome Res 11: 49–67.
• Zhang L, Zhao G, Xia C, Jia J, Liu X, Kong X (2012). A wheat R2R3- MYB gene, TaMYB30-B, improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 63: 5873–5885.
• Zhang X, Zhang Z, Chen J, Chen Q, Wang XC, Huang R (2005). Expressing TERF1 in tobacco enhances drought tolerance and abscisic acid sensitivity during seedling development. Planta 222: 494–450.
• Zhu C, Schraut D, Hartung W, Schäfner AR (2005). Diferential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA. J Exp Bot 56: 2971–2981.
• Zhu JK (2002). Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 53: 247–273.