The comparison of botanical composition and the condition and health class of different rangeland sites in forest ecosystem

The comparison of botanical composition and the condition and health class of different rangeland sites in forest ecosystem

In this study conducted in Erzurum province’s Oltu district Kırdağı location during 2015, 2016 and 2017 concerning the above forest, forest interior and forest edge rangeland sites, the botanical composition of rangeland sites, canopy coverage rate, rangeland condition scores, and comparison of the condition of rangeland and the health class were emphasized. According to the results, although the grass and legume rations in the forest edge rangeland was lower, the others families’ ratio was higher than that of the other sites. Hence, it was determined that the ratio of canopy coverage rate was higher in the forest top rangelandsite compared to other sites. Consequently, the health class of the rangeland is in the risky class in the forest edge site. Rangeland status class, which is a comparison of vegetation for climax, was found to be weak in this site. As a result, these values clearly indicate that the forest edge rangeland was seriously damaged compared to the other sites.

___

  • Açıkgöz E (2001). Yem Bitkileri. Bursa, Turkey: Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı Yayınları (in Turkish).
  • Allred BW, Fuhlendorf SD, Smeins FE, Taylor CA (2012). Herbivore species and grazing intensity regulate community composition and an encroaching woody plant in semi-arid rangeland. Basic and Applied Ecology 13 (2): 149-158.
  • Alp S, Ercisli S, Dogan H, Temim E, Leto A et al. (2016). Chemical composition and antioxidant activity Ziziphora clinopodioides ecotypes from Turkey. Romanian Biotechnological Letters 21: 11298-11303.
  • Altın M, Gökkuş A, Koç A (2011). Çayır ve Mera Yönetimi. Ankara, Turkey: Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Tarımsal Üretim ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları (in Turkish).
  • Avcıoğlu R, Tung T, Akbari N, Özel N(1996). Seferihisar Yöresi Orman içi ve Orman Kenarı Doğal Meralarının Islahı Olanakları Üzerinde Ön Araştırmalar. Ankara, Turkey: Orman Bakanlığı, Ege Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü (in Turkish).
  • Bakır Ö (1987). Çayır-Mera Amenajmanı. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish).
  • Bakoğlu A (1999). Otlatılan ve Korunan İki Farklı Mera Kesiminin Bazı Toprakve A Comparison for some vejetations and soil properties in crazed and closed range areas. MSc, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH (1998). Forest Ecology. 4th ed. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Belsky AJ, Blumenthal DM (1997). Effects of livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in upland forests of the interior West. Conservation Biology 11 (2): 315-327.
  • Bremm C, Carvalho PC, Fonseca L, Amaral GA, Mezzalira JC et al. (2016). Diet switching by mammalian herbivores in response to exotic grass invasion. PLoS ONE 11 (2): 1-16.
  • Bilgili A (2016). Effects of cattle grazing on the scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) plantations in Northeastern Anatolia Region (Oltu, Erzurum). PhD, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Bilgili A, Koç A. (2020). Determination of some vegetation characteristics in forest gap rangelands of Sarıkamış. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 51(1): 88-96 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Can M, Ayan İ (2017). Some feature and yield changes depending on growth periods on cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) populations. Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 20 (2): 160-166 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Chartier MP, Rostogno CM, Roig FA (2009). Soil erosion rates in rangelands of northeastern Potagonia: a dendrogeomorphological analysis using exposed shrubroots. Geomorphology 106 (3-4): 334-351.
  • Çomaklı B, Daşcı M, Koç A (2008). The effects of traditional grazing practices on upland (yayla) rangeland vegetation and forage quality. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 32 (4): 259-265.
  • Çomaklı B, Öner T, Daşcı M (2012). Changing of the vegetation on rangeland sites with different using history. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2 (2): 75-82 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Ercan A (2018). Determination of range condition and vegetation properties of the Karaören Village rangeland of Seyitgazi district in Eskişehir province. MSc, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Erkovan Hİ (2000). A Study on the state of range vegetation of Çiğdemlik village of Bayburt. MSc, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Erkovan Ş, Güllap MK, Erkovan Hİ, Koç A (2016). Rangeland health and ecological site classification of the rangeland with grazed different type animals. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 25 (2): 174-178 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Fırıncıoglu HK, Seefeldt SS, Sahin B (2007). The effect of long-term grazing exclosures on range plants in Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Environmental Management 39 (3): 326-337.
  • Gökkuş A, Koç A (2001). Merave Çayır Yönetimi. Erzurum, Turkey: Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish).
  • Güllap MK (2010). Effect of different grazing system applications on rangeland vegetation in Kargapazari mountain (Erzurum). PhD, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Gür M, Altın M (2015). Some features of floristik composition of diffrent using history of natural pastures in Thrace Region. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 30 (1): 60-67 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Hoffman T, Ashwell A (2001). Nature Divided: Land Degradation in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.
  • Holechek JL, Pieper RD (1992). Estimation of stocking rate on New Mexico rangelands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47: 116-119.
  • Kaskoniene V, Bimbiraite-Surviliene K, Kaskonas P, Tiso N, Cesoniene L et al. (2020). Changes in the biochemical compounds of Vaccinium myrtillus, Vaccinium vitis-idaea, and forest litter collected from various forest types. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 44: 557-566.
  • Koç A (1995). Topographically related to the surface coverings of the soil pasture plants. PhD, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Koç A, Gökkuş A, Altın M (2003). Comparison of the WorldWidely Used Methods in Definition of Range Condition and a Suggestion for Turkey. In: 5. Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi; Diyarbakır, Turkey. pp. 36-42 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Koç A, Erkovan Hİ, Serin Y (2008). Changes in vegetation and soil properties under semi-nomadic animal raising areas in highlands, rangelands of Turkey. Current World Environment 3 (1): 15-20.
  • Koc A, Schacht WA, Erkovan HI (2014). The history and current direction of rangeland management in Turkey. Rangelands 37 (1): 39-46.
  • Koç A, İleri O (2016). Comparison of cattle and sheep grazed sub-irrigated rangelands vegetation in Eskişehir Plain. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 25 (2): 179-184 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Lawrence JH, Hardesty LH (1992). Mapping the territory: agroforestry awareness among Washington state land managers. Agroforestry Systems 19(1):27–36.
  • Manga İ, Acar Z, Ayan İ (2002). Buğdaygil Yem Bitkileri. Samsun, Turkey: Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish).
  • Marshall JK (1973). Drought, land use and soil erosion. In: Lovett JV (editor). The Environmental, Economic and Social Significance of Drought. Lidcombe, NSW, Autsralia: Angus & Robertson Publishers, pp. 55-77.
  • Mayer AL, Kauppi P, Tikka PM, Angelstam P (2006). Conservation implications of exporting domestic wood harvest to neighboring countries. Environmental Science & Policy 9 (3): 228-236.
  • Oztas T, Koc A, Comakli B (2003). Changes in vegetation and soil properties along a slope on overgrazed and eroded rangelands. Journal of Arid Environments 55 (1): 93-100.
  • Sankey TT (2007). Woody-herbaceous-livestock species interaction. Annals of Arid Zone 46: 1-28.
  • Severoğlu S (2018). Changes of vegetation along slope gradient on the rangelands. MSc, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Gullap M, Severoglu S (2020). Effects of animal grazing on favorable forage yield and quality of rangelands with different slope. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 25 (2): 168-173.
  • Short LR, Woolfolk EJ (1956). Plant vigour asacretion of range condition. Journal of Range Management 9: 66-69.
  • Škornik S, Vidrih M, Kaligarič M (2010). The effect of grazing pressure on species richness, composition and productivity in North Adriatic Karst rangelands. Plant Biosystems 144 (2): 355-364.
  • Soil Science Division Staff (2017). Soil survey manual. In: Ditzler C, Scheffe K, Monger HC (editors). USDA Handbook 18. Washington, DC, USA: Government Printing Office.
  • Sternberg M, Gutman M, Perevolotsky A, Ungar ED, Kigel J (2000). Vegetation response to grazing management in a Mediterranean herbaceous community: a functional group approach. Journal of Applied Ecology 37 (2): 224-237.
  • Sürmen M, Kara E (2018). Yield and quality characteristics of rangelands which have different slopes in Aydın ecological conditions. Derim 35 (1): 67-72 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Tamartash R, Jalilvand H, Tatian MR (2007). Effects of grazing on chemical soil properties and vegetation cover (case study: Kojour rangelands, Noushahr, Islamic Republic of Iran). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10: 4391-4398.
  • T.C. Tarım Bakanlığı (1968). Orman Genel Müdürlüğü Mera Envanteri. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Tarım Bakanlığı, Orman Genel Müdürlüğü (in Turkish).
  • Tekeli S, Mengül Z (1991). Orman içi merada topoğrafyanın botanic kompozisyona ve verim üzerine etkisi. In: Türkiye II. ÇayırMera ve Yembitkileri Kongresi; İzmir, Türkiye. pp. 139-149 (in Turkish).
  • Türk M, Albayrak S, Bozkurt Y (2015). The effects of grazing on botanical composition in different artificial pastures. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 10 (1): 27-34 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (2012). Tarım Verileri. Ankara, Turkey: Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (in Turkish).
  • Vetter S, Goqwana WM, Bond WJ, Trollope WW (2006). Effects of land tenure, geology and topography on vegetation and soils of two grassland types in South Africa. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 23 (1): 13-27.
  • Wray PH (1998). Grazing Iowa’s Woodlands. Forestry Extension Notes F-350. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University.
  • Wroe RA, Smoliak S, Adams BW, Willims WD, Anderson ML (1988). Guide to range condition and stocking rates for Alberta Grasslands. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Forestry, Lands and Wildlife Public Lands Division.
  • Yavuz T, Sürmen M (2016). Vegetation features of alpine and subalpine rangelands in Eastern Black Sea region. Scientific Papers Series A Agronomy 59: 474-477.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effects of melatonin applications on certain biochemical characteristics of strawberry seedlings in lime stress conditions

Gülden BALCI

Differences of flavonoid structural genes preferentially expressed in brown and green natural colored cotton

Öner CANAVAR, Mark D. RAUSHER

Hydropriming associated physiological and biochemical changes responsible for the enhanced planting value of maize hybrid and its parental line seeds

Heena Rasool MIR, Shiv Kumar YADAV, Sangita YADAV

Evaluation of powdery mildew resistance of a diverse set of grape cultivars and testing the association between powdery mildew resistance and PR gene expression

Semih TANGOLAR, Serpil TANGOLAR, Sinem DEMİREL AŞÇI, Kemal KAZAN, Canan YÜKSEL ÖZMEN, Mert ÖKTEM, Umut KİBAR, Muhammad MUJTABA, Ali ERGÜL

Genetic diversity for agro-morphological characters and nutritional compositions of some local faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes

Tolga KARAKÖY, Aybegün TON, Meltem TÜRKERİ, Adem Emin ANLARSAL

Refining a protocol for somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Phalaenopsis amabilis cv. Jinan from mature tissues

Reza GHAHREMANI, Shirin Dianati DAYLAMI, Masoud MIRMASOUMI, Naser ASKARI, Kourosh VAHDATI

The comparison of botanical composition and the condition and health class of different rangeland sites in forest ecosystem

Emre ÇOMAKLI, M. Kerim GÜLLAP, Adnan BİLGİLİ, Tuğba ÇOMAKLI

Rapid and efficient in vitro regeneration of transplastomic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants after particle bombardment

Emre AKSOY, Allah BAKHSH, Md Jakir HOSSAIN, Neslihan Zahide ÖZTÜRK GÖKÇE, Faiz Ahmad JOYIA, Muhammad Sarwar KHAN

Growth and nutrient responses of Betula platyphylla, Larix kaempferi, and Chamaecyparis obtusa to different application methods of solid compound fertilizer

Jeong Min SEO, Huong Thi Thuy DAO, Byung Bae PARK

Stimulation of plant secondary metabolites synthesis in soilless cultivated strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duchesne) using zinc-alginate microparticles

Slaven JURIĆ, Kristina VLAHOVIČEK-KAHLINA, Boris DURALIJA, Luna MASLOV BANDIĆ, Petra NEKIĆ, Marko VINCEKOVIĆ