Sap flux and stem radius variations in mature Cedrus libani trees during the growing season

Sap flux and stem radius variations in mature Cedrus libani trees during the growing season

Analysis of continuous sap flux and stem growth measurements can help to elucidate how environmental conditions influencewater status and stem growth in trees. Stem radius variations and sap flux densities of the drought-tolerant conifer Cedrus libani weremeasured using automatic point dendrometers and heat dissipation sensors, respectively. The study was conducted at the Elmalı CedarResearch Forest at 1665 m a.s.l. From April to September 2009, stem radius variation was measured hourly for nine C. libani trees.Concurrently, environmental variables (e.g., air temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, soil water content) were monitored withinthe study site. From the dendrometer records, maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) of the stem radius was calculated. From June to August,a time period of 2 months, four of the nine study trees were selected for hourly measurements of sap flux density (Js). Daily coursesof stem radius variation and Js were very uniform and similar for all studied trees. A daily hysteresis effect was observed, reflectingthe pattern of water storage and retrieval. Means of MDS and Js varied between 0.09 and 0.15 mm and between 4.3 and 10.6 g m–2s–1, respectively. Daily maximum Js varied between 8.0 and 33 g m–2 s–1. Correlation and regression analyses between MDS and Js andenvironmental variables revealed that MDS and Js were most closely related to vapor pressure deficit and photosynthetic active radiation,respectively. We conclude that C. libani is well adapted to the current environmental conditions at the study site (natural habitat) andthat atmospheric conditions play a primary role in transpiration and tree growth.

___

  • Akkemik Ü (2003). Tree rings of Cedrus libani at the northern boundary of its natural distribution. IAWA J 24: 63-73.
  • Anfodillo T, Rento S, Carraro V, Furlanetto L, Urbinati C, Carrer M (1998). Tree water relations and climatic variations at the alpine timberline: seasonal changes of sap flux and xylem water potential in Larix decidua Miller, Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Pinus cembra L. In: Annales des Sciences Forestières, 1998. Vols. 1–2. Paris: EDP Sciences, pp. 159-172.
  • Atalay I (1987). General ecological properties of natural occurrence areas of cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich) forests and regioning of seed transfer of cedar in Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: OGM Yayın (in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Basaran M (2008). Determining the Actual State of Cedar Research Forest Elmali by GIS-based Digital Maps. Antalya, Turkey: South-West Anatolia Forest Research Institute.
  • Betsch P, Bonal D, Breda N, Montpied P, Peiffer M, Tuzet A, Granier A (2011). Drought effects on water relations in beech: the contribution of exchangeable water reservoirs. Agr Forest Meteorol 151: 531-543.
  • Boisvenue C, Running SW (2006). Impacts of climate change on natural forest productivity: evidence since the middle of the 20th century. Glob Change Biol 12: 862-882.
  • Boydak M (2003). Regeneration of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) on karstic lands in Turkey. Forest Ecol Manag 178: 231-243.
  • Boydak M, Çalıkoğlu M (2008). Biology and Silviculture of Lebanon Cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.). Ankara, Turkey: OGEM-VAK (in Turkish).
  • Brito P, Wieser G, Oberhuber W, Gruber A, Lorenzo J, GonzálezRodríguez Á, Jiménez M (2017). Water availability drives stem growth and stem water deficit of Pinus canariensis in a drought-induced treeline in Tenerife. Plant Ecol 218: 277-290.
  • Brooks JR, Jiang L, Ozçelik R (2008). Compatible stem volume and taper equations for Brutian pine, Cedar of Lebanon, and Cilicica fir in Turkey. Forest Ecol Manag 256: 147-151.
  • Camarero JJ, Guerrero-Campo J, Gutiérrez E (1998). Tree-ring growth and structure of Pinus uncinata and Pinus sylvestris in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Arctic Alpine Res 30. 1: 1-10.
  • Čermák J, Kučera J, Bauerle WL, Phillips N, Hinckley TM (2007). Tree water storage and its diurnal dynamics related to sap flow and changes in stem volume in old-growth Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiol 27: 181-198.
  • Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogée J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A et al. (2005). Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437: 529-533.
  • Cocozza C, Marino G, Giovannelli A, Cantini C, Centritto M, Tognetti R (2015). Simultaneous measurements of stem radius variation and sap flux density reveal synchronisation of water storage and transpiration dynamics in olive trees. Ecohydrology 8: 33-45.
  • Delzon S, Sartore M, Granier A, Loustau D (2004). Radial profiles of sap flow with increasing tree size in maritime pine. Tree Physiol 24: 1285-1293.
  • Deslauriers A, Anfodillo T, Rossi S, Carraro V (2007). Using simple causal modeling to understand how water and temperature affect daily stem radial variation in trees. Tree Physiol 27: 1125-1136.
  • Ducci F, Fusaro E, Lucci S, Ricciotti L (2005). Strategies for finalizing conifers experimental tests to the production of improved reproductive materials. In: Leone V, Lovreglio R, editors. Proceedings of the International Workshop MEDPINE3: Conservation, Regeneration and Restoration of Mediterranean Pines and Their Ecosystems, (Valenzano-BA, 2005) Options Médit., Vol 75, Serie A. Bari, Italy: CIHEAM, pp. 99-104.
  • Ehrenberger W, Rüger S, Fitzke R, Vollenweider P, Günthardt-Goerg M, Kuster T, Zimmermann U, Arend M (2012). Concomitant dendrometer and leaf patch pressure probe measurements reveal the effect of microclimate and soil moisture on diurnal stem water and leaf turgor variations in young oak trees. Func Plant Biol 39: 297-305.
  • Evcimen BS (1963). Türkiye Sedir Ormanlarının Ekonomik Önemi, Hasılat ve Amenajman Esasları. Ankara, Turkey: OGM Yayın (in Turkish).
  • Fady B, Lefèvre F, Reynaud M, Vendramin GG, Bou DagherKharrat M, Anzidei M, Pastorelli R, Savouré A, Bariteau M (2003). Gene flow among different taxonomic units: evidence from nuclear and cytoplasmic markers in Cedrus plantation forests. Theor Appl Genet 107. 6: 1132-1138.
  • Ford CR, McGuire MA, Mitchell RJ, Teskey RO (2004). Assessing variation in the radial profile of sap flux density in Pinus species and its effect on daily water use. Tree Physiol 24: 241- 249.
  • Giovannelli A, Deslauriers A, Fragnelli G, Scaletti L, Castro G, Rossi S, Crivellaro A (2007). Evaluation of drought response of two poplar clones (Populus× canadensis Mönch ‘I-214’ and P. deltoides Marsh. ‘Dvina’) through high resolution analysis of stem growth. J Exp Bot 58: 2673-2683.
  • Granier A (1985). A new method of sap flow measurement in tree stems. Ann For Sci 42: 193-200.
  • Granier A (1987). Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 3: 309-320.
  • Güney A (2018). Sapwood area related to tree size, tree age, and leaf area index in Cedrus libani. Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research 2: 83-91.
  • Güney A, Küppers M, Rathgeber C, Şahin M, Zimmermann R (2017). Intra-annual stem growth dynamics of Lebanon Cedar along climatic gradients. Trees 31: 587-606.
  • Güney A, Zimmermann R, Krupp A, Haas K (2016). Needle characteristics of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.): degradation of epicuticular waxes and decrease of photosynthetic rates with increasing needle age. Turk J Agric For 40: 386-396.
  • Herzog KM, Häsler R, Thum R (1995). Diurnal changes in the radius of a subalpine Norway spruce stem: their relation to the sap flow and their use to estimate transpiration. Trees 10: 94-101.
  • Horna V, Schuldt B, Brix S, Leuschner C (2011). Environment and tree size controlling stem sap flux in a perhumid tropical forest of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ann For Sci 68: 1027- 1038.
  • Huber G, Storz C (2014). Zedern und Riesenlebensbaum- Welche Herkünfte sind bei uns geeignet? LWF-Wissen 74: 63-71 (in German).
  • IPCC (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
  • Kavgacı A, Başaran S, Başaran M (2010). Cedar forest communities in Western Antalya (Taurus Mountains, Turkey). Plant Biosyst 144: 271-287.
  • Köstner B, Granier A, Cermák J (1998). Sapflow measurements in forest stands: methods and uncertainties. In: Annales des Sciences Forestières, Vols. 1–2. Paris, France: EDP Sciences, pp. 13-27.
  • Küppers M (1982). Kohlenstoffhaushalt, Wasserhaushalt, Wachstum und Wuchsform von Holzgewächsen im Konkurrenzgefüge eines Heckenstandortes. PhD, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany (in German).
  • Larcher W (1994). Ökophysiologie der Pflanzen. Stuttgart, Germany: Eugen Ulmer (in German).
  • Linares JC, Camarero JJ, Carreira JA (2009). Plastic responses of Abies pinsapo xylogenesis to drought and competition. Tree Physiol 29: 1525-1536.
  • Martínez-Vilalta J, Mangirón M, Ogaya R, Sauret M, Serrano L, Peñuelas J, Piñol J (2003). Sap flow of three co-occurring Mediterranean woody species under varying atmospheric and soil water conditions. Tree Physiol 23: 747-758.
  • Meinzer FC, James SA, Goldstein G, Woodruff D (2003). Whole‐ tree water transport scales with sapwood capacitance in tropical forest canopy trees. Plant Cell Environ 26: 1147-1155.
  • Messinger J, Güney A, Zimmermann R, Ganser B, Bachmann M, Remmele S, Aas G (2015). Cedrus libani: a promising tree species for Central European forestry facing climate change? Eur J Forest Res 134: 1005-1017.
  • Michelot A, Simard S, Rathgeber C, Dufrene E, Damesin C (2012). Comparing the intra-annual wood formation of three European species (Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris) as related to leaf phenology and non-structural carbohydrate dynamics. Tree Physiol 32: 1033-1045.
  • Nuri O, Uysal M (2009). Usability of the Taurus Cedar and Crimean Pine in green belt afforestations in semiarid regions in Turkey: a case study in Konya Province Loros Mountain-Akyokus. Afr J Agric Res 4: 1049-1057.
  • Oberhuber W, Hammerle A, Kofler W (2015). Tree water status and growth of saplings and mature Norway spruce (Picea abies) at a dry distribution limit. Front Plant Sci 6: 703.
  • Oren R, Zimmermann R, Terbough J (1996). Transpiration in upper Amazonia floodplain and upland forests in response to drought‐breaking rains. Ecology 77: 968-973.
  • Phillips N, Bond BJ, McDowell NG, Ryan MG (2002). Canopy and hydraulic conductance in young, mature and old Douglas-fir trees. Tree Physiol 22: 205-211.
  • Rossi S, Deslauriers A, Anfodillo T (2006). Assessment of cambial activity and xylogenesis by microsampling tree species: an example at the Alpine timberline. IAWA J 27: 383-394.
  • Sánchez-Costa E, Poyatos R, Sabaté S (2015). Contrasting growth and water use strategies in four co-occurring Mediterranean tree species revealed by concurrent measurements of sap flow and stem diameter variations. Agr Forest Meteorol 207: 24-37.
  • Sarris D, Christodoulakis D, Körner C (2007). Recent decline in precipitation and tree growth in the eastern Mediterranean. Global Change Biol 13: 1187-1200.
  • Schmitt D, Ohlemacher C, Küppers M (2007). Continuous high resolution dendrometry-a tool for quantifying vine and tree transpiration. In: Tropical Diversity in the Anthropocene - 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Tropical Ecology (GTÖ). Conference Program & Abstracts.
  • Schulze ED, Čermák J, Matyssek M, Penka M, Zimmermann R, Vasícek F, Gries W, Kučera J (1985). Canopy transpiration and water fluxes in the xylem of the trunk of Larix and Picea trees: a comparison of xylem flow, porometer and cuvette measurements. Oecologia 66: 475-483.
  • Schütt P, Weisgerber H, Schuck HJ, Lang U, Stimm B, Roloff A (2004). Lexikon der Nadelbäume: Verbreitung, Beschreibung, Ökologie, Nutzung; die grosse Enzyklopädie. Hamburg, Germany: Nikol (in German).
  • Senitza E (1989). Waldbauliche Grundlagen der Libanonzeder (Cedrus libani A.Rich) im Westtaurus/Türkei. PhD, Universität für Bodenkultur, Vienna, Austria (in German). Swidrak I, Schuster R, Oberhuber W (2013). Comparing growth phenology of co-occurring deciduous and evergreen conifers exposed to drought. Flora 208: 609-617.
  • Touchan R, Akkemik Ü, Hughes MK, Erkan N (2007). May–June precipitation reconstruction of southwestern Anatolia, Turkey during the last 900 years from tree rings. Quaternary Res 68: 196-202.
  • Tyree MT (1988). A dynamic model for water flow in a single tree: evidence that models must account for hydraulic architecture. Tree Physiol 4: 195-217.
  • Vieira J, Rossi S, Campelo F, Freitas H, Nabais C (2013). Seasonal and daily cycles of stem radial variation of Pinus pinaster in a drought-prone environment. Agr Forest Meteorol 180: 173- 181.
  • Yaman B (2007). Anatomy of Lebanon Cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) wood with indented growth rings. Acta Biol Cracov Bot 49: 19-23.
  • Zweifel R, Häsler R (2000). Stem radius changes and their relation to stored water in stems of young Norway spruce trees. Trees 15: 50-57.
  • Zweifel R, Häsler R (2001). Link between diurnal stem radius changes and tree water relations. Tree Physiol 21: 869-877.
  • Zweifel R, Zimmermann L, Newbery D (2005). Modeling tree water deficit from microclimate: an approach to quantifying drought stress. Tree Physiol 25: 147-156.
  • Zweifel R, Zimmermann L, Zeugin F, Newbery DM (2006). Intraannual radial growth and water relations of trees: implications towards a growth mechanism. J Exp Bot 57: 1445-1459.