Postharvest performance of cut marigold, rose, and sunflower stems as influenced by homemade and commercial floral preservatives

Effects of homemade or commercial floral preservatives, applied as 48-h grower treatments or continuous retailer/consumer applications, were studied on cut Double Eagle marigold, Red Bentley rose, and Sunbright sunflower. Cut stems of marigold placed in preservative solutions, irrespective of the duration, had a longer vase life than stems in tap water. Continuous use of soda (7 Up) or citric-Kathon and short-term use of citric-Al resulted in the longest extension of vase life. Cut stems of rose had the longest vase life when pulsed with citric-Kathon for 48 h or continuously placed in citric-Al until termination. For sunflower, use of citric-Kathon or citric-Greenshield both as a pulse and as a vase solution extended the vase life similar to commercial preservatives such as Floralife or Chrysal; it was 1.8 days longer than the vase life of stems in tap water. Continuous use of lemon juice plus sugar or citric acid plus sugar reduced the vase life of rose and sunflower stems. The pH of tap water solutions became more acidic when used after 48 h of pulsing with preservative solutions, while greater changes in electrical conductivity were recorded when the preservative solutions containing soda, lemon juice plus sugar, or citric-Al were used until termination. Stems of all species tested kept continuously in soda had the highest dry weight, while citric-Kathon had higher fresh weight at termination, compared to initial fresh weight at harvest, and higher solution uptake. In summary, continuous vase application of citric-Kathon, soda, or citric-Greenshield resulted in the best postharvest performance of marigold and sunflower, and continuous treatment with citric-Al or pulsing with citric-Kathon resulted in the best postharvest performance of cut roses; all of the aforementioned treatments resulted in a vase life similar to those of commercial preservatives. However, mixtures containing lemon juice or citric acid plus sugar had detrimental effects and should not be used for longer periods to handle cut stems of rose or sunflower.

Keywords:

Aluminum sulfate, citric acid, cut flowers, folk recipes rose, vase life,

PDF

___

Ahmad I, Dole JM, Amjad A, Ahmad S (2012). Dry storage effects on postharvest performance of selected specialty cut species. HortTechnology 44: 463–469.
Ahmad I, Dole JM, Clark EMR, Blazich FA (2014). Floral foam and/ or conventional or organic preservatives affect the vase-life and quality of cut rose (Rosa × hybrida L.) stems. J Hortic Sci Biotech 89: 41–46.
Ahmad I, Dole JM, Saleem M, Khan MA, Akram A, Khan AS (2013). Preservatives and packaging material have an impact on the post-harvest longevity of cut Rosa hybrida L. ‘Kardinal’ flowers. J Hortic Sci Biotech 88: 251–256.
Byczynski L (1997). The Flower Farmer. White River Junction, VT, USA: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Çelikel FG, Reid MS (2002). Postharvest handling of stock (Matthiola incana). HortScience 37: 144–147.
De Stigter HCM (1981). Effects of glucose with 8-hydroxyquinoline sulfate or aluminum sulfate on the water balance of cut ‘Sonia’ roses. Z Pflanzenphysiol 101: 95–105.
Dole JM, Wilkins HF (2005). Floriculture: Principles and Species. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
Elhindi KM (2012). Effects of postharvest pretreatments and preservative solutions on vase life longevity and flower quality of sweet pea (Lathyrus odoratus L.). Photosynthetica 50: 371– 379.
Fanourakis, D, Carvalho SMP, Almeida DPF, van Kooten O, van Doorn WG, Heuvelink E (2012). Postharvest water relations in cut rose cultivars with contrasting sensitivity to high relative air humidity during growth. Postharv Biol Technol 64: 64–73.
Fanourakis D, Pieruschka R, Savvides A, Macnish AJ, Sarlikioti V, Woltering EJ (2013). Sources of vase life variation in cut roses: a review. Postharv Biol Technol 78: 1–15.
Fariman ZK, Tehranifar A (2011). Effect of essential oils, ethanol and methanol to extend the vase-life of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) flowers. J Biol Environ Sci 5: 91–94.
Greer L, Einert AE (1994). Folk recipes to extend the vase life of cut roses. HortScience 29: 736.
Ichimura K, Taguchi M, Norikoshi R (2006). Extension of the vase life in cut roses by treatment with glucose, isothiazolinonic germicide, citric acid and aluminum sulfate solution. JARQ 40: 263–269.
Jones RB, Hill M (1993). The effect of germicides on the longevity of cut flowers. J Am Soc Hort Sci 118: 350–354.
Jones RB, Serek M, Reid MS (1993). Pulsing with Triton X-100 improves hydration and vase life of cut sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). HortScience 28: 1178–1179.
Jowkar MM, Kafi M, Khalighi A, Hasanzadeh N (2012). Reconsideration in using citric acid as vase solution preservative for cut rose flowers. Curr Res J Biol Sci 4: 427–436.
Jowkar MM, Salehi H (2006). The effects of different preservative solutions on the vase life of cut tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) cv. Goldorosht-e-mahallat. J Sci Techn Agri Natur Res 10: 299–309.
Kazemi M, Hadavi E, Hekmati J (2012). Effect of salicylic acid, malic acid, citric acid and sucrose on antioxidant activity, membrane stability and ACC-oxidase activity in relation to vase life of carnation cut flowers. J Plant Sci 7: 78–84.
Kiamohammadi M, Hashemaabadi D (2011). The effects of different floral preservative solutions on vase life of lisianthus cut flowers. J Ornam Hort Pl 1: 115–122.
Kuiper D, Ribot S, van Reenen HS, Marissen N (1995). The effect of sucrose on the flower bud opening of ‘Madelon’ cut roses. Scientia Hortic 60: 325–336.
Liao LJ, Lin YH, Huang KL, Chen WS (2001). Vase life of Eustoma grandiflorum as affected by aluminum sulfate. Bot Bull Acad Sin 42: 35–38.
Locke EL (2010). Extending cut flower vase life by optimizing carbohydrate status: preharvest conditions and preservative solution. PhD, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Markhart AH, Harper MS (1995). Deleterious effects of sucrose in preservative solutions on leaves of cut roses. HortScience 30: 1429–1432.
McDaniel GL (1996). Floral Design and Arrangement. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
Mensuali-Sodi A, Ferrante A (2005). Physiological changes during postharvest life of cut sunflowers. Acta Hort 669: 219–224.
Molenaar P, van der Schaaf T (2004). Cut Flower Care & Handling: 75 Frequently Asked Questions. Naarden, the Netherlands: Pokon & Chrysal Intl. B.V.
Nan SJS (2007). Effects of pre- and postharvest calcium supplementation on longevity of sunflower (Helianthus annuus cv. Superior Sunset). MSc, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Nowak J, Rudnicki RM (1990). Postharvest Handling and Storage of Cut Flowers, Florist Greens and Potted Plants. Portland, OR, USA: Timber Press.
Samiee M, Zarchini M, Vand SH, Hashemabadi D (2013). Improvement of vase life, protein content and postharvest quality of Dendranthema grandiflorum L. cv. White by Artemisia oil. Annal Biol Res 4: 127–129.
van Doorn WG (1997). Water relations of cut flowers. Hortic Rev 18: 1–85.
van Doorn WG, Zagory D, de Witte Y, Harkema H (1991). Effects of vase-water bacteria on the senescence of cut carnation flowers. Postharvest Biol Technol 1: 161–168.
Woodson WR (1987). Postharvest handling of bud-cut Freesia flowers. HortScience 22: 456–458.
Woodson WR (1991). Biotechnology of floricultural crops. HortScience 26: 1029–1033.