Nondestructive determination of spruce lumber wood density using drilling resistance (Resistograph) method

Nondestructive determination of spruce lumber wood density using drilling resistance (Resistograph) method

The use of Resistograph for the purpose of nondestructive evaluation of certain properties of standing trees and wooden materials has increased in recent years. The resistance to penetration of a fine drill bit is measured and recorded by the device. A number of properties of the wood can be assessed by the amplitude values obtained from the Resistograph. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of the IML-Resistograph F 500 as a nondestructive tool for estimating spruce wood density using the amplitude data generated and the application of statistical modeling. Wood density data were determined using a volumetric method and were compared with the density data generated by the model. In this model, amplitude was used as an independent variable and the dependent variable for experimental purposes was wood density. No statistical difference (P = 0.176 > 0.05; 95% confidence level) was found between the groups. Moisture content was added as second independent variable and a second model was built. The results demonstrated that wood density can be estimated nondestructively using Resistograph data from lumber and/or large wooden materials, but more comprehensive models are required for the practical use of the device in the forest products industry

___

  • Acuna L, Basterra LA, Casado M, Lopez G, Ramon-Cueto G, Relea E, Martinez C, Gonzalez A (2011). Application of resistograph to obtain the density and to differentiate wood species. Mater Construcc 61: 451-464.
  • Bouffier L, Charlot C, Raffin A, Rozenberg P, Kremer A (2008). Can wood density be efficiently selected at early stage in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.)? Ann For Sci 65: 1-8.
  • Bozkurt Y, Erdin N (1997). Ağaç Teknolojisi. İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul University Press (in Turkish).
  • Brashaw BK, Vatalaro RJ, Wacker JP, Ross RJ (2005). Condition Assessment of Timber Bridges. 1. Evaluation of a MicroDrilling Resistance Tool. FPL-GTR-159. Madison, WI,USA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
  • Bucur V (2003). Nondestructive Characterization and Imaging of Wood. Springer Series in Wood Science. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Chantre G, Rozenberg P (1997). Can drill resistance profiles (Resistograph) lead to within-profile and within-ring density parameters in Douglas fir wood? In:  Timber Management toward Wood Quality and Endproduct Values. CTIA/IUFRO International Wood Quality Workshop;  18–22 August 1997; Quebec City, Canada, pp. 41-47.
  • De Ridder M, Van den Bulcke J, Vansteenkiste D, Van Loo D, Dierick M, Masschaele B, De Witte Y, Mannes D, Lehmann E, Beeckman H (2011). High-resolution proxies for wood density variations in Terminalia superba. Ann Bot 107: 293-302.
  • Dunster JA (2000). A Manual for Users of the Resistograph Decay Detection Instrument. Bowen Island, Canada: Dunster and Associates Environmental Consultants.
  • Eckard JT (2007). Rapid screening for solid wood quality traits in clones of Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) by indirect measurements. PhD, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Faggiano B, Grippa MR, Marzo A, Mazzolani FM (2009). Combined non-destructive and destructive tests for the mechanical characterization of old structural timber elements. In:  3rd International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering; 15–19 October 2009; San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 657-666.
  • Feio AO, Lourenço PB, Machado JS (2007). Non-destructive evaluation of the mechanical behavior of chestnut wood in tension and compression parallel to grain. Int J Archit Herit 1: 272-292.
  • Gantz CH (2002). Evaluating the efficiency of the resistograph to estimate genetic parameters for wood density in two softwood and two hardwood species. MSc, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
  • Güller B (2005). İç kısımlarında oluşan çürük ve boşlukların termografi yöntemi ile belirlenmesi. In: Natural Protected Areas Symposium; 8–10 September 2005; Isparta, Turkey, pp. 54-62 (in Turkish).
  • Guller B (2012). Effects of heat treatment on density, dimensional stability and color of Pinus nigra wood. Afr J Biotechnol 11: 2204-2209.
  • Güller B, Güller A, Genç M (2011). Dikili durumdaki ağaçların iç kısımlarında oluşan ve belirgin bir emare göstermeyen çürük ve boşlukların tahribatsız belirlenmesi. In: 1st National Mediterranean Forest and Environment Symposium; 26–28 October 2011; Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, pp. 306-314 (in Turkish).
  • Haygreen JG, Bowyer JL (1996). Forest Products and Wood Science. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press.
  • Isik F, Li B (2003). Rapid assessment of wood density of live trees using the Resistograph for selection in tree improvement programs. Can J Forest Res 33: 2426-2435.
  • Johnstone D, Ades P, Moore GM, Smith IW (2011). Using an IMLResi drill to assess wood density in Eucalyptus globulus subsp. pseudoglobulus. Aust Forestry 74: 190-196.
  • Kappel R, Mattheck C (2003). Inspection of timber construction by measuring drilling resistance using Resistograph F300-S. WIT Trans Built Env 66: 825-834.
  • Kloiber M, Tippner J, Hrivnák J (2014). Mechanical properties of wood examined by semi-destructive devices, Mater Struct 47: 199-212.
  • Kollmann FF, Côté WA Jr (1968). Principles of Wood Science and Technology. Vol. I. Solid Wood. Berlin, Germany: SpringerVerlag.
  • Lima JT, Sartorio RC, Trugilho PF, da Cruz CR, da Silva RV (2007). Use of the resistograph for Eucalyptus wood basic density and perforation resistance estimative. Sci For 75: 85-93.
  • Lin CJ, Tsai MJ, Wang SY (2006). Nondestructive evaluation techniques for assessing dynamic modulus of elasticity of moso bamboo (Phyllosachys edulis) lamina. J Wood Sci 52: 342-347.
  • Lin CJ, Wang SY, Lin FC, Chiu CM (2003). Effect of moisture content on the drill resistance value in Taiwania plantation wood. Wood Fiber Sci 35: 234-238.
  • Lourenço PB, Feio AO, Machado JS (2007). Chestnut wood in compression perpendicular to the grain: non-destructive correlations for test results in new and old wood. Constr Build Mater 21: 1617-1627.
  • Mee RW, Chua TC (1991). Regression toward the mean and the paired sample t test. Am Stat 45: 39-42.
  • Miller SJ (2006). The method of least squares. MSc, Williams College, Williamstown, MA, USA.
  • Nowak TP, Jasienko J, Hamrol-Bielecka K (2016). In situ assessment of structural timber using the resistance drilling method – evaluation of usefulness. Constr Build Mater 102: 403-415.
  • Rinn F (1994). One minute pole inspection with resistograph micro drillings. In: International Conference on Wood Poles and Piles; 21–23 March 1994; Fort Collins, CO, USA, pp. 12-18.
  • Rinn F (1996). Resistographic visualization of tree-ring density variations. In: Tree Rings, Environment, and Humanity: Proceedings of the International Conference; 17–21 May 1994; Tucson, AZ, USA, pp. 871-878.
  • Rinn F, Schweingruber FH, Schär E (1996). Resistograph and X-ray density charts of wood. Comparative evaluation of drill resistance profiles and X-ray density charts of different wood species. Holzforschung 50: 303-311.
  • Ross R (2010). Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. Madison, WI, USA: Forest Products Society.
  • Ross RJ, Pellerin RF (1991). Stress wave evaluation of green material: preliminary results using dimension lumber. For Prod J 41: 57- 59.
  • Rowell RM, Konkol P (1987). Treatments that Enhance Physical Properties of Wood. Madison, WI, USA: Forest Products Laboratory.
  • Siau JF (1995). Wood: Influence of Moisture on Physical Properties. Blacksburg, VA, USA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  • Simmons HL (2011). Olin’s Construction: Principles, Materials and Methods. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Treacy M, Evertsen J, Dhubháin A (2000). A Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Wood Properties. Dublin, Ireland: COFORD (National Council for Forest Research and Development).
  • Tsai PH, Chen CJ, Hsu MF, Yeh YH (2004). Estimation of modulus of wooden components by using non-destructive testing strategy. In: World Conference on Timber Engineering; 14–17 June 2004; Lahti, Finland, pp. 701-704.
  • Tseng YJ, Hsu MF (2008). Evaluating the mechanical properties of wooden components using drill resistance method. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering; 2–5 June 2008; Miyazaki, Japan, pp. 1439-1446.
  • Turkish Standards Institution (1976). TS 2472. Wood - Determination of Density for Physical and Mechanical Tests. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Standards Institution.
  • Wacker JP, Wang X, Ross RJ, Brashaw BK (2008). Condition assessment of historic wood vessels. In: 15th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood; 10–12 September 2007; Duluth, MN, USA, pp. 223-226.
  • Zobel BJ (1992). Silvicultural effects on wood properties. IPEF Int 2: 31-38.
  • Zobel BJ, Van Buijtenen JP (1989). Wood Variation-Its Causes and Control. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
  • Zombori B (2001). “In situ” nondestructive testing of built in wooden members. NDT.net 6: 212-220.