Morphological and physiological differences between bareroot and container Juniperus excelsa seedlings

The effects of stock type on morphological and physiological characteristics were compared in 1 + 0 Crimean juniper (Juniperus excelsa Bieb.) seedlings. In October 2010, the morphological characteristics of both stock types were determined. The physiological condition of both stock types was evaluated by measuring water relation, root growth potential (RGP), and root electrolyte leakage (REL) parameters in seedlings at periodic intervals from October 2010 to April 2011. Container seedlings had greater root collar diameter, higher height, and greater shoot dry weight than bareroot seedlings, but these differences were not significant. However, the shoot-to-root ratios of the container seedlings were significantly lower than those of the bareroot seedlings, but their root dry weights were higher. In both stock types, osmotic potential at turgor loss point, osmotic potential at full turgor, relative water at turgor loss point, apoplastic water fraction, symplastic water at saturated point per dry weight, dry weight fraction, RGP, and REL showed a seasonal variation. The differences between stock types in terms of the water relation parameters were not generally significant. The RGP values of the bareroot seedlings were higher than those of the container seedlings in January, February, and March, but their REL values were generally lower than those of the container seedlings on most lifting dates. For each type of stock, seedlings lifted in January and February had greater stress resistance than seedlings lifted in the autumn or spring. If the weather conditions are suitable, the safe period for lifting and planting is mid-January to mid-March.

Morphological and physiological differences between bareroot and container Juniperus excelsa seedlings

The effects of stock type on morphological and physiological characteristics were compared in 1 + 0 Crimean juniper (Juniperus excelsa Bieb.) seedlings. In October 2010, the morphological characteristics of both stock types were determined. The physiological condition of both stock types was evaluated by measuring water relation, root growth potential (RGP), and root electrolyte leakage (REL) parameters in seedlings at periodic intervals from October 2010 to April 2011. Container seedlings had greater root collar diameter, higher height, and greater shoot dry weight than bareroot seedlings, but these differences were not significant. However, the shoot-to-root ratios of the container seedlings were significantly lower than those of the bareroot seedlings, but their root dry weights were higher. In both stock types, osmotic potential at turgor loss point, osmotic potential at full turgor, relative water at turgor loss point, apoplastic water fraction, symplastic water at saturated point per dry weight, dry weight fraction, RGP, and REL showed a seasonal variation. The differences between stock types in terms of the water relation parameters were not generally significant. The RGP values of the bareroot seedlings were higher than those of the container seedlings in January, February, and March, but their REL values were generally lower than those of the container seedlings on most lifting dates. For each type of stock, seedlings lifted in January and February had greater stress resistance than seedlings lifted in the autumn or spring. If the weather conditions are suitable, the safe period for lifting and planting is mid-January to mid-March.

___

  • Alm AA (1983) Black and white spruce plantings in Minnesota: container vs bareroot stock and fall vs spring planting. For Chron 59: 189-191.
  • Awada T, Dunigan DD, Dickman MB (2003) Animal anti-apoptotic genes ameliorate the loss of turgor in water stressed transgenic tobacco. Can J Plant Sci 83: 499-506.
  • Ayan S (2007) Tüplü fi dan üretimi. In: Fidan Standardizasyonu: Standart Fidan Yetiştirmenin Biyolojik ve Teknik Esasları (Eds. Z Yahyaoğlu, M Genç). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, No. 75, Isparta, pp. 301-352.
  • Barnett JP, McGilvray JM (1993) Performance of container and bareroot loblolly pine seedlings on bottomlands in South Carolina. South J Appl For 17: 80-83.
  • Blake TJ, Sutton RF (1987) Variation in water relations of black spruce stock types planted in Ontario. Tree Physiol 3: 331-344.
  • Burdett AN (1990) Physiological processes in plantation establishment and development of specifi cation for forest planting stock. Can J For Res 20: 415-427.
  • Burr KE (1990) Th e target seedling concepts: bud dormancy and cold hardiness. In: Th e Target Seedling Symposium (Eds. R Rose, SJ Campbell, TD Landis). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-200, pp. 79-90.
  • Colombo SJ (1987) Changes in osmotic potential, cell elasticity, and turgor relationships of 2nd-year black spruce container seedlings. Can J For Res 17: 365-369.
  • Colombo SJ, Teng Y (1992) Seasonal variation in the tissue water relations of Picea glauca. Oecologia 92: 410-415.
  • Correia MJ, Torres F, Pereira JS (1989) Water and nutrient supply regimes and the water relations of juvenile leaves of Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Physiol 5: 459-471.
  • Deligöz A (2011) Seasonal changes in the physiological characteristics of Anatolian black pine and the eff ect on seedling quality. Turk J Agric For 35: 23-30.
  • Dirik H (1999) Dikim mevsiminde karaçam (Pinus nigra Arn. ssp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe) fi danlarındaki fi zyolojik değişiklikler ve bunun dikim başarısı üzerindeki etkileri. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 49A: 59-74.
  • Doi K, Morikawa Y, Th omas MH (1986) Seasonal trends of several water relation parameters in Cryptomeria japonica seedlings. Can J For Res 16: 74-77.
  • Dumroese RK, Jacobs DF, Landis TD (2005) Successful stock production for forest regeneration: what foresters should ask nursery managers about their crops (and vice versa). In: Th e Th in Green Line: Proceedings of a Symposium on the State-of- the-art in Reforestation (Ed. SJ Colombo). Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Th under Bay, Ontario, Canada, pp. 14-20.
  • Fennessy J, O’Reilly C, Harper CP, Th ompson D (2000) Th e morphology and seasonal changes in cold hardiness, dormancy intensity and root growth potential of rooted cuttings of Sitka spruce. Forestry 73: 489-497.
  • Freyman RC, Feret PP, Dewald LE (1986) Variation in Loblolly pine seedling root growth potential over two lift ing seasons. In: Proceedings of the 1986 Meeting of the Southern Forest Nursery Association, pp. 224-231.
  • Genç M, Yahyaoğlu Z (2007) Kalite sınıfl amasında kullanılan özellikler ve tespiti. In: Fidan Standardizasyonu: Standart Fidan Yetiştirmenin Biyolojik ve Teknik Esasları (Eds. Z Yahyaoğlu, M Genç). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, No. 75, Isparta, pp. 355-465.
  • Gouvra E, Grammatikopoulos G (2007) Diurnal and seasonal trends of water relations in fi ve co-occurring chasmophytic species. Flora 202: 237-248.
  • Grossnickle SC (1992) Relationship between freezing tolerance and shoot water relations of western red cedar. Tree Physiol 11: 229-240.
  • Guo J, Yang Y, Wang G, Yang L, Sun X (2010) Ecophysiological responses of Abies fabri seedlings to drought stress and nitrogen supply. Physiol Plant 139: 335-347.
  • Gültekin HC (2007) Türkiye Ardıç (Juniperus L.) Türlerinin Ekolojisi ve Silvikültür Teknikleri. TMMOB Orman Mühendisleri Odası Yayın No. 27, Ankara.
  • Leugner J, Jurásek A, Martincová J (2009) Comparison of morphological and physiological parameters of the planting material of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) from intensive nursery technologies with current bareroot plants. J For Sci 55: 511-517.
  • McDonald PM (1991) Container seedlings outperform bareroot stock: survival and growth aft er 10 years. New For 5: 147-156.
  • McKay HM (1992) Electrolyte leakage from fi ne roots of conifer seedlings: a rapid index of plant vitality following cold storage. Can J For Res 22: 1371-1377.
  • McKay HM (1997) A review of the eff ect of stresses between lift ing and planting on nursery stock quality and performance. New For 13: 369-399.
  • McKay HM (1998a) Root electrolyte leakage and root growth potential as indicators of spruce and larch establishment. Silva Fenn 32: 241-252.
  • McKay HM (1998b) Optimal planting times for freshly lift ed bare- rooted conifers on the North York moors. Forestry 71: 33-48.
  • McKay HM, Milner AD (2000) Species and seasonal variability in the sensitivity of seedling conifer roots drying and rough handling. Forestry 73: 259-270.
  • Mena-Petite A, Ortega-Lasuen U, González-Moro MB, Lacuesta M, Muñoz-Rueda A (2001) Storage duration and temperature eff ect on the functional integrity of container and bare-root Pinus radiata D. Don stock-types. Trees 15: 289-296.
  • Mexal JG, Landis TD (1990) Target seedling concepts: height and diameter. In: Target Seedling Symposium: Combined Proceedings of the Western Forest Nursery Associations (Eds. R Rose, SJ Campbell, TD Landis), Roseburg, Oregon, USA, pp. 17-35.
  • Miki N, Otsuki K, Nishimoto KST, Yoshikawa K (2003) Leaf water relations in Pinus densifl ora Sieb. et Zucc. on diff erent soil moisture conditions. J For Res 8: 153-161.
  • Monson RK, Smith SD (1982) Seasonal water potential components of Sonoran Desert plants. Ecol 63: 113-123.
  • Mortazavi M, O’Reilly C, Keane M (2004) Stress resistance levels change little during dormancy in ash, sessile oak and sycamore seedlings. New For 28: 89-108.
  • O’Reilly C, Harper CP, McCarthy N, Keane M (2001) Seasonal changes in physiological status, cold storage tolerance and fi eld performance of hybrid larch seedlings i n Ireland. Forestry 74: 407-421.L
  • OGM (2006) Orman Varlığımız. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı (Orman Genel Müdürlüğü), Ankara.
  • Özpay Z, Tosun S (1993) Kayın (Fagus orientalis Lipsky.) fi danlarının kalite sınıfl arının belirlenmesi üzerine araştırmalar. Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları 238-241: 107-137.
  • Parker WC, Pallardy SG, Hinckley TM, Teskey RO (1982) Seasonal changes in tissue water relations of three woody species of the Quercus-Carya forest type. Ecol 63: 1259 - 1267.
  • Parker WC, Pallardy SG (1987) Th e infl uence of resaturation method and tissue type on pressure-volume analysis of Quercus alba L. seedlings. J Exp Bot 38: 535-549.
  • Perk MP, Osborne BA, Mitchell DT (2004) Rapid predictions of cold tolerance in Douglas-fi r seedlings using chlorophyll fl uorescence aft er freezing. New For 29: 49-62.
  • Radoglou K, Raft oyannis Y (2002) Th e impact of storage, desiccation and planting date on seedling quality and survival of woody plant species. Forestry 75: 179-190.
  • Ritchie GA (1984) Assessing seedling quality. In: Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot Seedlings (Eds. ML Duryea, DL Th omas). Martinus Nijhoff /Dr W. Junk, Th e Netherlands, pp. 243-260.
  • Ritchie GA (1985) Root growth potential: principles, procedures and predictive ability. In: Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests (Ed. ML Duryea). Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA, pp. 93-105.
  • Ritchie GA, Dunlap JR (1980) Root growth potential: its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. New Zea J For Sci 10: 218-248.
  • Ritchie GA, Schula RG (1984) Seasonal changes of tissue-water relations in shoots and root systems of Douglas-fi r seedlings. For Sci 30: 538-548.
  • Semerci A (2002) Toros sediri (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) fi danlarına ait bazı morfolojik ve fi zyolojik karakteristikler ile İç Anadolu’daki dikim başarısı arasındaki ilişkiler. İç Anadolu Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, No. 279, p. 142.
  • Serrano L, Peñuelas J, Ogaya R, Savé R (2005) Tissue-water relations of two co-occurring evergreen mediterranean species in response to seasonal and experimental drought conditions. J Plant Res 118: 263-269.
  • South DB, Harris SW, Barnett JP, Hainds MJ, Gjerstad DH (2005) Eff ect of container type and seedling size on survival and early height growth of Pinus palustris seedlings in Alabama, USA. For Ecol Manag 204: 385-398.
  • Tinus RW (2002) Using electrolyte leakage tests to determine lift ing windows and detect tissue damage. In: National Proceedings of the Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations -1999, 2000, and 2001 (Eds. RK Dumroese, LE Riley, TD Landis), USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah, USA, pp. 12-14.
  • Tyree MT, Cheung YNS, MacGregor ME, Talbot AJB (1978) Th e characteristics of seasonal and ontogentic changes in the tissue-water relations of Acer, Populus, Tsuga and Picea. Can J For Res 56: 635-647.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK