Investigating sampling accuracy to estimate sediment concentrations in erosion plot tanks

Significant errors when sampling from collection tanks installed at the lower end of soil erosion plots may lead researchers toward wrong conclusions. Limited research has been found on sampling accuracy. In this study, a cylindrical sampler is introduced as a new sampling device and its sampling accuracy is investigated and compared with 2 other manual methods, namely bottle and pipette. Three target sediment concentrations were prepared in separate 213.5-L collection tanks as 3 replications with 3 mixing periods. The results using the bottle and pipette in all mixing periods and all target sediment concentrations showed that the concentration of sediment increases with the depth of the tank, which implies that making a uniform sediment concentration in the collection tank for sampling is impossible. The results indicated that the cylindrical sampler had the highest sampling efficiency of 88.68%. Computed sampling efficiencies in tanks of 20, 40, 60, and 80 cm in depth were 34.76%, 43.94%, 54.45%, and 67.21% for the bottle and 34.58%, 43.05%, 49.20%, and 56.42% for the pipette, respectively. There was no significant difference between sampling from the center and from the side of the collection tank and among mixing periods of 1, 2, and 5 min. In order to maximize the accuracy of the sampling, a 10-L bucket was placed in the collection tank to trap the coarse material. Weighing collected coarse material and adding the sampled part improved the accuracy by 9.45%. In fact, using a cylindrical sampler and a bucket together resulted in 98.13% sampling accuracy.

Investigating sampling accuracy to estimate sediment concentrations in erosion plot tanks

Significant errors when sampling from collection tanks installed at the lower end of soil erosion plots may lead researchers toward wrong conclusions. Limited research has been found on sampling accuracy. In this study, a cylindrical sampler is introduced as a new sampling device and its sampling accuracy is investigated and compared with 2 other manual methods, namely bottle and pipette. Three target sediment concentrations were prepared in separate 213.5-L collection tanks as 3 replications with 3 mixing periods. The results using the bottle and pipette in all mixing periods and all target sediment concentrations showed that the concentration of sediment increases with the depth of the tank, which implies that making a uniform sediment concentration in the collection tank for sampling is impossible. The results indicated that the cylindrical sampler had the highest sampling efficiency of 88.68%. Computed sampling efficiencies in tanks of 20, 40, 60, and 80 cm in depth were 34.76%, 43.94%, 54.45%, and 67.21% for the bottle and 34.58%, 43.05%, 49.20%, and 56.42% for the pipette, respectively. There was no significant difference between sampling from the center and from the side of the collection tank and among mixing periods of 1, 2, and 5 min. In order to maximize the accuracy of the sampling, a 10-L bucket was placed in the collection tank to trap the coarse material. Weighing collected coarse material and adding the sampled part improved the accuracy by 9.45%. In fact, using a cylindrical sampler and a bucket together resulted in 98.13% sampling accuracy.

___

  • Ananda J, Herath G (2003) Soil erosion in developing countries: a socio-economic appraisal. J Environ Manage 68: 343-353.
  • Arabkhedri M (2003) Th e condition of suspended sediment yield of Iran watersheds. Abkhiz Bulletin, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, Iran 11: 4-5 (in Farsi).
  • Bagnold RA (1966) An Approach to the Sediment Transport Problem from General Physics. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 422-I. U.S. Government Printing Offi ce, Washington, DC.
  • Blazejewski R, Pilarczyk KW, Przedwojski B (1995) River Training Techniques: Fundamentals, Design and Applications, 1st ed. Taylor and Francis, Rotterdam.
  • Ciesiolka CAA, Yu B, Rose CW, Ghadiri H, Lang D, Rosewell C (2004) A simple method for improving soil loss measurement in USLE type experiments. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference (Eds. SR Raine, AJW Biggs, NW Menzies, DM Freebairn, PE Tolmie), ASSSI/IECA, Brisbane.
  • Cook MJ, Valentine WH (1979) Monitoring cut slope erosion by close range photogrammetry. U.S. Forest Service Field Notes 11: 5-9.
  • Eswaran H, Lal R, Reich PF (2001) Land degradation: an overview. In: Response to Land Degradation, 1st ed. (Eds. EM Bridges, ID Hannam, LR Oldeman, FWT Penning de Vries, SJ Scherr, S Sombatpanit), Science Publishers Inc., Enfi eld, NH, USA, pp. 20-35.
  • Flanagan DC, Huang C, Norton LD, Parker SC (1995) Laser scanner for erosion plot measurements. Trans ASAE 38: 703-710.
  • Foster GR (1988) Modeling soil erosion and sediment yield. In: Soil Erosion Research Methods, 2nd ed. (Ed. R Lal), Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA, USA.
  • Lang RD (1992) Accuracy of two sampling methods used to estimate sediment concentrations in runoff from soil-loss plots. Earth Surf Processes Landforms 17: 841-844.
  • Morgan RPC (1979) Soil Erosion, 1st ed. Longman Group Limited, London.
  • Mutchler CK, Murphree CE, McGregor KC (1994) Laboratory and fi eld plots for erosion research. In: Soil Erosion Research Methods, 2nd ed. (Ed. R Lal), Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA, USA, pp. 11-37.
  • Nikkami D, Ardakani AJ, Movahed FB (2008) Tillage management on sustainable rainfed agricultural resources. J Appl Sci 8: 3255-3260.
  • Nikkami D, Shabani M, Ahmadi H (2009) Land use scenarios and optimization in a watershed. J Appl Sci 9: 287-295.
  • Ouyang D, Bartholic J (1997) Predicting sediment delivery ratio in Saginaw Bay watershed. In: Proceedings of the 22nd National Association of Environmental Professionals Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 659-671.
  • Samadi Broujeni H, Shamsaei MR (2007) Th e role and position of watershed management in the future of control and utilization of water resources in Iran. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Iranian Water Resources Management Conference, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran (in Farsi).
  • Toebes C, Ouryvaev V (1970) Representative and Experimental Basins: An International Guide for Research and Practice. UNESCO, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
  • Wanielista MP, Yousef AY (1992) Stormwater Management, 1st ed. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto.
  • Zobisch MA, Klingspor P, Oduor AR (1996) Th e accuracy of manual runoff and sediment sampling from erosion plots. J Soil Water Conserv 51: 231-233.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Root length, root mass, and distribution of dry matter in different parts of Thompson Seedless grapevine grafted on different rootstocks in heavy soil of Maharashtra

Ramhari G. SOMKUWAR, Pravin B. TAWARE, Devanand D. BONDAGE, Supriya NAVALE

Comparison of harvester and motor-manual logging in intermediate cuttings of deciduous stands

Remigijus ZINKEVICIUS, Dainius STEPONAVICIUS, Dalius VITUNSKAS, Gintautas CINGA

Research on antifungal and inhibitory effects of DL-limonene on some yeasts

Mustafa Ümit ÜNAL, Filiz UÇAN, Aysun ŞENER, Sadık DİNÇER

Load-carrying capacity of mitered furniture corner joints with dovetail keys under diagonal tension load

Sadegh MALEKI, Mohammad DERIKVAND, Mosayeb DALVAND, Ghanbar EBRAHIMI

Optimizing water and nitrogen use for maize production under semiarid conditions

Hafiz Mohkum HAMMAD, Ashfaq AHMAD, Farhat ABBAS, Wajid FARHAD

Determination of the bread-making quality of flours using an automatic bread machine

İsmail Sait DOĞAN, Önder YILDIZ, Burhan TAŞAN

Combined treatment of modified atmosphere packaging and 1-methylcyclopropene improves postharvest quality of Japanese plums

Mustafa ERKAN, Hakan ESKİ

Black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) standing volume in the riparian forests of the Czech Republic

Lubomir SALEK, Daniel ZAHRADNIK, Lubomir TIPMANN, Robert MARUSAK

Irrigation intervals affect physicochemical quality attributes and skin cracking in litchi fruit

Abdur RAB

Use of discriminant analysis for selection of hybrid maize parent lines

Ahmet ÖZ