Methyl bromide alternatives for presowing fumigation in tobacco seedling production

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of soil fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide (MeBr) on the weeds, damping-off, and seedling growth of tobacco. Methyl bromide (90 g m-2), dazomet (D) (50 g m-2), and metam sodium (MS) (100 mL m-2) were evaluated in 2 locations in the Karacasu district of Aydın province, Turkey, February-April 2005. In addition, half doses of D and MS were investigated in 2006. MeBr treatment had 52.5% control against the postemergence damping-off caused by Pythium spp., while alternative treatments had no effect on the disease in 2005. In 2006, MeBr and MS (100 mL m-2) showed 77.6% and 100% control against the disease, respectively. All fumigant treatments significantly controlled pigweed species (Amaranthus spp.), common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), nettleleaf goosefoot (Chenopodium murale L.), burning nettle (Urtica urens L.), and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.), except dazomet (50 g m-2) on pigweed (86.2%), common lambsquarters (68.6%), nettleleaf goosefoot (60.5%), and burning nettle (64.3%) at one location in 2005. Similarly, all fumigants, including low doses of MS (50 mL m-2) and D (25 g m-2), significantly decreased the populations of pigweed species, common purslane, common lambsquarters, prostrate knotweed (Polygonum aviculare L.), and sowthistle species (Sonchus spp.) in 2006. Tobacco (cv. Akhisar) seedling height and fresh weight increased significantly with treatments of MeBr, MS (100 mL m-2), and D (50 g m-2) at the 2 locations in both years.

Methyl bromide alternatives for presowing fumigation in tobacco seedling production

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of soil fumigant alternatives to methyl bromide (MeBr) on the weeds, damping-off, and seedling growth of tobacco. Methyl bromide (90 g m-2), dazomet (D) (50 g m-2), and metam sodium (MS) (100 mL m-2) were evaluated in 2 locations in the Karacasu district of Aydın province, Turkey, February-April 2005. In addition, half doses of D and MS were investigated in 2006. MeBr treatment had 52.5% control against the postemergence damping-off caused by Pythium spp., while alternative treatments had no effect on the disease in 2005. In 2006, MeBr and MS (100 mL m-2) showed 77.6% and 100% control against the disease, respectively. All fumigant treatments significantly controlled pigweed species (Amaranthus spp.), common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), nettleleaf goosefoot (Chenopodium murale L.), burning nettle (Urtica urens L.), and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.), except dazomet (50 g m-2) on pigweed (86.2%), common lambsquarters (68.6%), nettleleaf goosefoot (60.5%), and burning nettle (64.3%) at one location in 2005. Similarly, all fumigants, including low doses of MS (50 mL m-2) and D (25 g m-2), significantly decreased the populations of pigweed species, common purslane, common lambsquarters, prostrate knotweed (Polygonum aviculare L.), and sowthistle species (Sonchus spp.) in 2006. Tobacco (cv. Akhisar) seedling height and fresh weight increased significantly with treatments of MeBr, MS (100 mL m-2), and D (50 g m-2) at the 2 locations in both years.

___

  • Ajwa H, Trout T, Nelson S, Schutter M (2001) Drip fumigation: Water and fumigant distribution in soil. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, USA, pp. 50-1-2.
  • Anonymous (2008) Final Report of Phasing out Methyl Bromide in Turkey (Ed. M Pizano), Antalya, Turkey, ISBN: 9789754072549.
  • Bello A, López-Pérez JA, Díaz-Viruliche L, Tello J (2001) Alternatives to Methyl Bromide for Soil Fumigation in Spain, in Global Report on Validated Alternatives to the Use of Methyl Bromide for Soil Fumigation (Eds. R Labrada, L Fornasari), FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 166, pp. 31-42.
  • Benlioğlu S, Benlioğlu K, Yıldız A, Boz Ö, Kaskavalcı G (2001) Studies on methyl bromide alternatives of strawberries in Aydın Province. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, USA, 5-9 November 2001, pp. 107-1-3.
  • Benlioğlu S, Boz Ö, Yıldız A, Kaskavalcı G, Benlioğlu K (2002) Soil solarization options in Aydın strawberry without methyl bromide. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, Orlando, USA, 6-8 November 2002, pp. 8-1-5.
  • Boesten, JJTI, Van der Pas LJT, Smelt JH, Leistra M (1991) Transformation rate of methyl isothiocyanate and 1,3- dichloropropene in water-saturated sandy subsoils. Neth J Agric Sci 39: 179-190.
  • Chilembwe E, Butao D, Munthali F, Ngirazie L (2005) Evaluation of local substrates as growth media for raising tobacco seedlings in Malawi. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, USA, 31 October-3 November 2005, pp. 125-1-9.
  • Chryssochoou AP (1999) Alternative methods of methyl bromide in tobacco crop in Greece, 3rd International Workshop on Methyl Bromide Alternatives, Heraklio of Crete, Greece, 7-10 December 1999. At: http://www.minagric.gr/greek/data/ files2251/CHRYSO1.DOC.
  • Csinos AS, Johnson WC, Johnson AW, Sumner DR, McPherson RM, Gitatis RD (1997) Alternative fumigants for methyl bromide in tobacco and pepper transplant production. Crop Protection 16: 585-594.
  • Csinos AS, Sumner DR, Johnson WC, Johnson AW, McPherson RM, Dowler CC (2000) Methyl bromide alternatives in tobacco, tomato and pepper transplant production. Crop Protection 19: 39-49.
  • Desaeger JA, Seebold KW, Csinos AS (2008) Effect of application timing and method on efficacy and phytotoxicity of 1,3-D, chloropicrin and metam-sodium combinations in squash plasticulture. Pest Manag Sci 64: 230-238.
  • Di Primo P, Gamliel A, Austerweil M, Peretz-Alon I, Beniches M, Steiner B, Katan J (2001) Evidence for accelerated degradation of metham-sodium and dazomet in Israel. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, USA, 5-9 November 2001, pp. 88-1-5.
  • Dungan RS, Yates SR (2003) Degradation of fumigant pesticides: 1,3- dichloropropene, methyl isothiocyanate, chloropicrin, and methyl bromide. Vadose Zone J 2: 279-286.
  • Dungan RS, Gan J, Yates SR (2002) Accelerated degradation of methyl isothiocyanate in soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 142: 299-310.
  • Gerstl Z, Mingelgrin U, Yaron B (1977) Behavior of Vapam and methyl isothiocyanate in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41: 545-548.
  • Mattner SW, Wite DA, Baxter GG, Hayes GA, Mann RC, Porter IJ (2007) Disinfestation of expanded-polystyrene seedling trays in the Australian tobacco industry. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, USA, 29 October-1 November 2007, pp. 82-1-4.
  • MBTOC (2002) 2002 Assessment Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee. At: http://www.unep.org/ozone/ teap/Reports/MBTOC/MTOC2002.pdf.
  • Meyvaci KB, Aksoy U, Şen F, Altindişli A, Turanli F, Emekçi M, Ferizli AG (2003) Project to phase-out methyl bromide in the dried fig sector in Turkey. Acta Hort (ISHS) 628: 73-81.
  • Porter IJ, Mattner SW, Brett RW, Nicholls JW, Rae J, Bianco V (2000) Plant-back, IGR and soil health influences the selection of MB alternatives in Australia. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, Orlando, USA, 6-9 November 2000, pp. 23-1-4.
  • Ruzo LO (2006) Physical, chemical and environmental properties of selected chemical alternatives for the pre-plant use of methyl bromide as soil fumigant. Pest Manag Sci 62: 99-113.
  • Salles LA (2001) Effective Alternatives to Methyl Bromide in Brazil, in Global Report on Validated Alternatives to the Use of Methyl Bromide for Soil Fumigation (Eds. R Labrada, L Fornasari), FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 166, pp. 12-22.
  • Salles LA, Sosa DA, Valeiro A (2001) Alternatives for the Replacement of Methyl Bromide in Argentina, in Global Report on Validated Alternatives to the Use of Methyl Bromide for Soil Fumigation (Eds. R Labrada, L Fornasari), FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 166, pp. 3-10.
  • Seebold KW, Csinos AS (2001) Comparison of application timing on the efficacy of metam sodium and chloropicrin against soilborne fungi and yellow nutsedge. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions, San Diego, USA, 5-9 November 2001, pp. 101-1-4.
  • Smelt JH, Crum SJH, Teunissen W (1989) Accelerated transformation of the fumigant methyl isothiocyanate in soil after repeated application of metam-sodium. Environ Sci Health 24: 437-455.
  • Smelt JH, Leistra M (1974) Conversion of metam-sodium to soil. Pestic Sci 5: 401-407.
  • Tomlin C (2003) The Pesticide Manual, 13th ed. British Crop Protection Council Publications, Surrey, United Kingdom.
  • Unruh JB, Brecke BJ, Dusky JA, Godbehere JS (2002) Fumigant alternatives for methyl bromide prior to turfgrass establishment. Weed Technology 16: 379-387.
  • Wharton B, Matthiessen JN (2000) Enhanced biodegradation of metham sodium soil fumigant - a hidden pest management risk. Proc. 7th Australasian Conference on Grassland Invertebrate Ecology, Perth, Australia, 4-6 October 1999, pp. 127-131.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Winter wheat yield and yield components as affected by soil tillage systems

İrena JUG, Danijel JUG, Mirjana SABO, Bojan STIPESEVIC, Miro STOSIC

Effect of exogenously applied spermidine on growth and physiology of citrus rootstock Troyer citrange under saline conditions

Muhammad Akbar ANJUM

Anatomical, physical, and mechanical properties of eldar pine (Pinus eldarica Medw.) grown in the Kelardasht region

Majid KIAEI

Genetic analysis of preharvest sprouting tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.)

Cemal YÜCEL, Faheem Shehzad BALOCH, Rüştü HATİPOĞLU, Hakan ÖZKAN

Micropropagation of the apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cv. Hacıhaliloğlu by means of single node culture

Hakan YILDIRIM, Ahmet ONAY, Engin TİLKAT, Zafer AKTÜRK

Soil texture fractions and fractal dimension of particle size distribution as predictors of interrill erodibility

Mohammad Reza NEYSHABOURI, Abbas AHMADI, Hassan ROUHIPOUR, Hossein ASADI, Mehdi IRANNAJAD

Türkiye’de Cercospora beticola popülasyonlarının *utriafol, mancozeb ve fentin acetate’a duyarlılıkları

Aynur Çolak TÜMBEK, Pınar ÖZEREN, Rıza KAYA, Yakup Zekai KATIRCIOĞLU, Salih MADEN

The use of artifcial neural networks for forecasting the monthly mean soil temperatures in Adana, Turkey

Mehmet BİLGİLİ

Seasonal changes in the physiological characteristics of Anatolian black pine and the effect on seedling quality

Ayşe DELİGÖZ

Methyl bromide alternatives for presowing fumigation in tobacco seedling production

Özhan BOZ, Ayhan YILDIZ, Kemal BENLİOĞLU, Hatice Seher BENLİOĞLU