Genotypic-unspecific protocols for the commercial micropropagation of Eucalyptus grandis × nitens and E. grandis × urophylla

Clones of Eucalyptus grandis × nitens and E. grandis × urophylla were subjected to various culture conditions at every culture stage leading to plantlet regeneration directly from axillary buds. The objective was to determine the possibility of using the same protocol for all clones. Although genotypic effects were evident, generally most clones responded similarly to the tested variations in each of the protocol stages, i.e. bud break, multiplication, and rooting. Estimated yields for the clones of one of the tested E. grandis × nitens hybrids ranged from 24 to 90 acclimatised plants per explant, but those of a natural hybrid were much lower (8 to 15 plants). The tested clones of E. grandis × urophylla produced approximately 10 to 27 plants per explant. It is suggested that such an all-purpose protocol has applications in a commercial environment, such as the production of hedge plants and retrieval from in vitro storage, when large numbers of plants are not required. This would save time, labour, and other costs as compared with having to develop and implement clone-specific protocols.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Clonal propagation, eucalyptus hybrids, forestry, tissue culture

Genotypic-unspecific protocols for the commercial micropropagation of Eucalyptus grandis × nitens and E. grandis × urophylla

Keywords:

Key words: Clonal propagation, eucalyptus hybrids, forestry, tissue culture,

PDF

___

Alpoim GC, Wallis JT, Blakeway F, van Staden, J, Watt MP (2004). Hydroponics: A new technology in Mondi Forests Eucalyptus vegetative propagation programme. In: Borralho, NM, Perreira JS, Marques C, Coutinho J, Madeira M, Tomé M, editors. Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference on Eucalyptus in a Changing World, 11–15 October 2004; Aveiro, Portugal. Aveiro: RAIZ, Instituto Investigação de Floresta e Papel, pp. 493–499.
Arya ID, Sharma S, Arya S (2009). Micropropagation of superior eucalyptus hybrids FRI-5 (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn × E. tereticornis Sm) and FRI-14 (Eucalyptus torelliana FV Muell × E. citriodora Hook): a commercial multiplication and field evaluation. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 5718–5726.
Borges SR, Xavier A, de Oliveira LS, Lopes AP, Otonis WC (2011). In vitro multiplication of hybrid clones of Eucalyptus globulus. Revista Arvore 35: 173–182 (in Portuguese with an English abstract).
Blomstedt C, Cameron J, Whiteman P, Chandler SF (1991). Micropropagation of juvenile Eucalyptus regans (Mountain Ash). Aust J Bot 39: 179–186.
Butcher PA, Skinner AK, Gardiner CA (2005). Increased inbreeding and inter-species gene flow in remnant populations of the rare Eucalyptus benthamii. Conserv Genet 6: 213–226. de Assis TF, Fett-Neto AG, Alfenas AC (2004). Current techniques and prospects for the clonal propagation of hardwoods with emphasis on Eucalyptus. In: Walter C, Carson M, editors. Plantation Forest Biotechnology for the 21st Century. Trivandrum, India: Research Signpost, pp. 303–333.
Denison NP, Kietzka JE (1993). The use and importance of hybrid intensive forestry in South Africa. South Afr For J 165: 55–61.
Donald DGM, Newton DJ (1991) In vitro propagation of Eucalyptus radiata. South Afr For J 157: 66–68.
Eldridge K, Davidson J, Harwood C, van Wyk G (1994). Eucalypt Domestication and Breeding. London, UK: Claredon Press.
Fantini GR Jr, Cortezzi-Graça ME (1989). A micropropagation system for Eucalyptus dunnii × Eucalyptus species. Annals Sci For 46: 136–139.
George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk GJ (2008). Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. 3rd ed. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 175–204.
Jones NB, van Staden J (1994). Micropropagation and establishment of Eucalyptus grandis hybrids. South Afr J Bot 60: 123–126.
Le Roux JJ, van Staden J (1991). Micropropagation and tissue culture of Eucalyptus: a review. Tree Physiol 9: 435–477.
MacAllister B, Finnie J, Watt MP, Blakeway FC (2005). Use of temporary immersion bioreactor system (RITA) for the production of commercial Eucalyptus clones at Mondi Forests (SA). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 81: 347–358.
Mokotedi MEO, Watt MP, Pammenter NW, Blakeway FC (2000). In vitro rooting and subsequent survival of two clones of a coldtolerant Eucalyptus grandis × nitens hybrid. Hort Science 35: 1163–1165.
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.
Nourissier S, Monteuuis O (2008). In vitro rooting of two Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis mature clones. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 44: 263–272.
Puddephat IJ, Alderson PG, Wright NA (1997). Influence of explant source, plant growth regulators, and culture environment on culture initiation and establishment of Quercus robur L. in vitro. J Exp Bot 48: 951–962.
Turnbull JW (1999). Eucalypt plantations. New Forests 17: 37–52.
Warrag EI, Lesney MS, Rockwood DL (1990). Micropropagation of field-tested superior Eucalyptus grandis species. New Forests 4: 67–
Watt MP, Berjak P, Makhatini A, Blakeway FC (2003a). In vitro field collection techniques for Eucalyptus micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 75: 233–240.
Watt MP, Blakeway FC, Herman B, Denison N (1997). Biotechnology developments in tree improvement programmes in commercial forestry in South Africa. South Afr J Sci 93: 100–102.
Watt MP, Blakeway FC, Mokotedi MEO, Jain SM (2003b). Micropropagation of Eucalyptus. In: Jain SM, Ishii K, editors. Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 217–244.
Watt MP, Gauntlett BA, Blakeway F (1996). Effect of anti-fungal agents on in vitro cultures of Eucalyptus grandis. S Afr For J 175: 23–27.
Yasodha R, Sumathi R, Gurumuthi K (2004). Micropropagation for quality propagule production in plantation forestry. Indian J Biotechnol 3: 159–170.