Genotypic-unspecifc protocols for the commercial micropropagation of Eucalyptus grandis × nitens and E. grandis × urophylla

Genotypic-unspecifc protocols for the commercial micropropagation of Eucalyptus grandis × nitens and E. grandis × urophylla

Clones of Eucalyptus grandis × nitens and E. grandis × urophylla were subjected to various culture conditions at every culturestage leading to plantlet regeneration directly from axillary buds. Te objective was to determine the possibility of using the sameprotocol for all clones. Although genotypic efects were evident, generally most clones responded similarly to the tested variations ineach of the protocol stages, i.e. bud break, multiplication, and rooting. Estimated yields for the clones of one of the tested E. grandis× nitens hybrids ranged from 24 to 90 acclimatised plants per explant, but those of a natural hybrid were much lower (8 to 15 plants).Te tested clones of E. grandis × urophylla produced approximately 10 to 27 plants per explant. It is suggested that such an all-purposeprotocol has applications in a commercial environment, such as the production of hedge plants and retrieval from in vitro storage,when large numbers of plants are not required. Tis would save time, labour, and other costs as compared with having to develop andimplement clone-specifc protocols.

___

  • Alpoim GC, Wallis JT, Blakeway F, van Staden, J, Watt MP (2004). Hydroponics: A new technology in Mondi Forests Eucalyptus vegetative propagation programme. In: Borralho, NM, Perreira JS, Marques C, Coutinho J, Madeira M, Tomé M, editors. Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference on Eucalyptus in a Changing World, 11–15 October 2004; Aveiro, Portugal. Aveiro: RAIZ, Instituto Investigação de Floresta e Papel, pp. 493–499.
  • Arya ID, Sharma S, Arya S (2009). Micropropagation of superior eucalyptus hybrids FRI-5 (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn × E. tereticornis Sm) and FRI-14 (Eucalyptus torelliana FV Muell × E. citriodora Hook): a commercial multiplication and feld evaluation. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 5718–5726.
  • Borges SR, Xavier A, de Oliveira LS, Lopes AP, Otonis WC (2011). In vitro multiplication of hybrid clones of Eucalyptus globulus. Revista Arvore 35: 173–182 (in Portuguese with an English abstract).
  • Blomstedt C, Cameron J, Whiteman P, Chandler SF (1991). Micropropagation of juvenile Eucalyptus regans (Mountain Ash). Aust J Bot 39: 179–186.
  • Butcher PA, Skinner AK, Gardiner CA (2005). Increased inbreeding and inter-species gene fow in remnant populations of the rare Eucalyptus benthamii . Conserv Genet 6: 213–226.
  • de Assis TF, Fett-Neto AG, Alfenas AC (2004). Current techniques and prospects for the clonal propagation of hardwoods with emphasis on Eucalyptus. In: Walter C, Carson M, editors. Plantation Forest Biotechnology for the 21st Century. Trivandrum, India: Research Signpost, pp. 303–333.
  • Denison NP, Kietzka JE (1993). Te use and importance of hybrid intensive forestry in South Africa. South Afr For J 165: 55–61.
  • Donald DGM, Newton DJ (1991) In vitro propagation of Eucalyptus radiata. South Afr For J 157: 66–68.
  • Eldridge K, Davidson J, Harwood C, van Wyk G (1994). Eucalypt Domestication and Breeding. London, UK: Claredon Press.
  • Fantini GR Jr, Cortezzi-Graça ME (1989). A micropropagation system for Eucalyptus dunnii × Eucalyptus species. Annals Sci For 46: 136–139.
  • George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk GJ (2008). Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture. 3rd ed. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 175–204.
  • Jones NB, van Staden J (1994). Micropropagation and establishment of Eucalyptus grandis hybrids. South Afr J Bot 60: 123–126.
  • Le Roux JJ, van Staden J (1991). Micropropagation and tissue culture of Eucalyptus: a review. Tree Physiol 9: 435–477.
  • MacAllister B, Finnie J, Watt MP, Blakeway FC (2005). Use of temporary immersion bioreactor system (RITA) for the production of commercial Eucalyptus clones at Mondi Forests (SA). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 81: 347–358.
  • Mokotedi MEO, Watt MP, Pammenter NW, Blakeway FC (2000). In vitro rooting and subsequent survival of two clones of a cold- tolerant Eucalyptus grandis × nitens hybrid. Hort Science 35: 1163–1165.
  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.
  • Nourissier S, Monteuuis O (2008). In vitro rooting of two Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis mature clones. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 44: 263–272.
  • Puddephat IJ, Alderson PG, Wright NA (1997). Infuence of explant source, plant growth regulators, and culture environment on culture initiation and establishment of Quercus robur L. in vitro. J Exp Bot 48: 951–962.
  • Turnbull JW (1999). Eucalypt plantations. New Forests 17: 37–52.
  • Warrag EI, Lesney MS, Rockwood DL (1990). Micropropagation of feld-tested superior Eucalyptus grandis species. New Forests 4: 67–79.
  • Watt MP, Berjak P, Makhatini A, Blakeway FC (2003a). In vitro feld collection techniques for Eucalyptus micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 75: 233–240.
  • Watt MP, Blakeway FC, Herman B, Denison N (1997). Biotechnology developments in tree improvement programmes in commercial forestry in South Africa. South Afr J Sci 93: 100–102.
  • Watt MP, Blakeway FC, Mokotedi MEO, Jain SM (2003b). Micropropagation of Eucalyptus. In: Jain SM, Ishii K, editors. Micropropagation of Woody Trees and Fruits. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 217–244.
  • Watt MP, Gauntlett BA, Blakeway F (1996). Efect of anti-fungal agents on in vitro cultures of Eucalyptus grandis. S Afr For J 175: 23–27.
  • Yasodha R, Sumathi R, Gurumuthi K (2004). Micropropagation for quality propagule production in plantation forestry. Indian J Biotechnol 3: 159–170.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Xanthium strumarium L. impact on corn yield and yield components

Zahid HUSSAIN, Khan Bahadar MARWAT, John CARDINA, Ijaz Ahmad KHAN

Utilization of related wild species (Echinacea purpurea) for genetic enhancement of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

Roumiana VASSILEVSKA-IVANOVA, Boris KRAPTCHEV, Ira STANCHEVA, Maria GENEVA

Dynamic base-age invariant site index models based on generalized algebraic difference approach for mixed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands

İlker ERCANLI, Aydın KAHRİMAN, Hakkı YAVUZ

Variation in soil C and microbial functions across tree canopy projection and open grassland microenvironments

Roberto LAI, Alessandra LAGOMARSINO, Luigi LEDDA, Pier Paolo ROGGERO

Genotypic-unspecific protocols for the commercial micropropagation of Eucalyptus grandis × nitens and E. grandis × urophylla

Maria Paula WATT

Use of N and P biofertilizers reduces inorganic phosphorus application and increases nutrient uptake, yield, and seed quality of chickpea

Moin UDDIN, Sajad HUSSAIN, Mohammad Masroor Akhtar KHAN, Nadeem HASHMI, Mohammad IDREES, Mohammad NAEEM, Tariq Ahmad DAR

Potential of Moringa oleifera L. as livestock fodder crop: a review

Wasif NOUMAN, Shahzad Maqsood Ahmed BASRA, Muhammad Tahir SIDDIQUI

Artificial neural networks in online semiautomated pest discriminability: an applied case with 2 Thrips species

Peter FEDOR, Eladia Maria PEÑA-MÉNDEZ, Halina KUCHARCZYK, Jaromír VAŇHARA, Josef HAVEL, Martina DORIČOVÁ, Pavol PROKOP

Transferability of SSR markers from distantly related legumes to Glycyrrhiza species

Mustafa ERAYMAN, Emre İLHAN, Yelda GÜZEL, Abdil Hakan EREN

Using plant extracts to reduce asexual reproduction of apple scab (Venturia inaequalis)

János BÁLINT, Szilveszter NAGY, Rezso THIESZ, Imre-István NYÁRÁDI, Adalbert BALOG