Genotype × environment interaction and stability of grain yield and selected quality traits in winter wheat in Central Asia

Abstract: High grain yield and improved quality determine the commercial success of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties in Central Asia. This study was conducted to determine the effect of environment on grain yield, 1000-kernel weight (TKW), test weight (TWT), protein, and gluten content, and to identify superior wheat genotypes for yield and quality. Thirty winter wheat genotypes were evaluated in 3 years (2010-2012) over multiple locations. A genotype and genotype × environment interaction biplot analysis was used to determine the superior genotypes. There were significant effects of environment and genotype × environment interaction on yield and quality traits. The 30 wheat genotypes showed variations for grain yield (3.7-5.6 t ha-1), TKW (33.6-42.4 g), TWT (753-797 g/L), protein (13.3%-14.8%), and gluten (27.2%-29.5%) content. There was a significant positive correlation between grain yield and TKW in three out of seven environments. There was no correlation of grain yield with TWT, protein, and gluten content with one exception. There were different sets of five most superior genotypes for individual traits. However, certain genotypes were superior based on grain yield and quality traits. Gozgon, Elomon, ID800994.W/Vee//Lagos-12, Jaikhun, and Kroshka were the five most superior genotypes for four quality traits. Elomon, Gozgon, Jaikhun, ID800994.W/Vee//Lagos-12, and Kiriya were the five most superior genotypes based on grain yield, TKW, TWT, protein, and gluten content. This study demonstrates success in wheat breeding for combined high yield and improved quality in winter wheat. This study provides information on the combined stability of high yield and improved quality of the internationally important winter wheat genotypes. Therefore, the results of this study could be valuable for national and international winter wheat breeding programs to develop new varieties with high stable grain yield and quality.

Genotype × environment interaction and stability of grain yield and selected quality traits in winter wheat in Central Asia

Abstract: High grain yield and improved quality determine the commercial success of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties in Central Asia. This study was conducted to determine the effect of environment on grain yield, 1000-kernel weight (TKW), test weight (TWT), protein, and gluten content, and to identify superior wheat genotypes for yield and quality. Thirty winter wheat genotypes were evaluated in 3 years (2010-2012) over multiple locations. A genotype and genotype × environment interaction biplot analysis was used to determine the superior genotypes. There were significant effects of environment and genotype × environment interaction on yield and quality traits. The 30 wheat genotypes showed variations for grain yield (3.7-5.6 t ha-1), TKW (33.6-42.4 g), TWT (753-797 g/L), protein (13.3%-14.8%), and gluten (27.2%-29.5%) content. There was a significant positive correlation between grain yield and TKW in three out of seven environments. There was no correlation of grain yield with TWT, protein, and gluten content with one exception. There were different sets of five most superior genotypes for individual traits. However, certain genotypes were superior based on grain yield and quality traits. Gozgon, Elomon, ID800994.W/Vee//Lagos-12, Jaikhun, and Kroshka were the five most superior genotypes for four quality traits. Elomon, Gozgon, Jaikhun, ID800994.W/Vee//Lagos-12, and Kiriya were the five most superior genotypes based on grain yield, TKW, TWT, protein, and gluten content. This study demonstrates success in wheat breeding for combined high yield and improved quality in winter wheat. This study provides information on the combined stability of high yield and improved quality of the internationally important winter wheat genotypes. Therefore, the results of this study could be valuable for national and international winter wheat breeding programs to develop new varieties with high stable grain yield and quality.

___

  • Balla K, Rakszegi M, Li Z, Békés F, Bencze S, Veisz O (2011). Quality of winter wheat in relation to heat and drought shock after anthesis. Czech J Food Sci 29: 117–128.
  • Bilgin O, Korkut KZ, Baser I, Daglioglu O (2010). Variation and heritability for some semolina characteristics and grain yield and their relations in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). World J Agric Sci 6: 301–308.
  • Genstat (2013). GenStat 64 bit Release 14.2. Rothamsted Experimen- tal Station, UK: Lawes Agricultural Trust.
  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gómez-Becerra HF, Abugalieva A, Morgounov A, Abdullaev K, Bekenova L, Yessimbekova M, Sereda G, Shpigun S, Tsygankov V, Zelenskiy Y, Peña RJ, Cakmak I (2010). Phenotypic correlations, G × E interactions and broad sense heritability analysis of grain and flour quality characteristics in high latitude spring bread wheats from Kazakhstan and Siberia. Euphytica 171: 23–38.
  • Grausgruber H, Oberforster M, Werteker M, Ruckenbauer J, Vollmann J (2000). Stability of quality traits in Austrian-grown winter wheats. Field Crops Res 66: 257–267.
  • Johansson E, Svensson G (1998). Variation in bread-making quality: effects of weather parameters on protein concentration and quality in some Swedish wheat cultivars grown during the period 1975–1996. J Sci Food Agric 78: 109–118.
  • Koppel R, Ingver A (2008). A comparison of the yield and quality traits of winter and spring wheat. Latvian J Agronomy 11: 83–89.
  • Osmanzai M, Sharma RC (2008). High yielding stable wheat genotypes for the diverse environments in Afghanistan. Int J Agric Res 3: 340–348.
  • Peterson CJ, Graybosch RA, Shelton DR, Baenziger PS (1998). Baking quality of hard red winter wheat: response of cultivars to environment in the Great Plains. Euphytica 100: 157–162.
  • Roozeboom KL, Schapaugh WT, Tuinstra MR, Vanderlip RL, Milliken GA (2008). Testing wheat in variable environments: genotype, environment, interaction effects, and grouping test locations. Crop Sci 48: 317–330.
  • Sakin MA, Akinci C, Duzdemir O, Donmez (2011). Assessment of genotype × environment interaction on yield and yield components of durum wheat genotypes by multivariate analyses. African J Biotechnol 10: 2875–2885.
  • Sharma RC, Morgounov A, Akin B, Bespalova L, Lang L, Litvinenko M, Mustatea P, Ozturk I, Postolatiy A, Rajaram S et al. (2014a). Winter wheat East European regional yield trial: identification of superior genotypes and characterization of environments. Crop Sci 54: 2469–2480.
  • Sharma RC, Morgounov AI, Braun HJ, Akin B, Keser M, Bedoshvili D, Bagci A, Martius C, van Ginkel M (2010). Identifying high yielding stable winter wheat genotypes for irrigated environments in Central and West Asia. Euphytica 171: 53–64.
  • Sharma RC, Morgounov AI, Braun HJ, Akin B, Keser M, Kaya Y, Khalikulov Z, van Ginkel M, Yahyaoui A, Rajaram S (2012). Yield stability analysis of winter wheat genotypes targeted to semi-arid environments in the International Winter Wheat Improvement Program. Int J Plant Breeding 6: 7–13.
  • Sharma RC, Rajaram S, Alikulov S, Ziyaev Z, Hazratkulova S, Khodarahami M, Nazeri M, Belen S, Khalikulov Z, Mosaad M et al. (2013). Improved winter wheat germplasm for Central and West Asia. Euphytica 190: 19–31.
  • Sharma RC, Ziyaev Z, Amanov O, Khalikulov Z, Eshonova Z, Bedoshvili D, Keser M, Morgounov A (2013). Yellow rust resistant, new winter wheat genotypes for Central Asia and the Caucasus. In: International Plant Breeding Congress Abstract Book. 10–14 November 2013; Antalya, Turkey. p. 251.
  • Sharma RK, Osmanzai M, Singh RP, Braun HJ, Sharma RC (2014b). Identification of high yielding wheat genotypes through evaluation of international nurseries. Cereal Res Commun 42: 303–313.
  • Simmonds NW (1981). Principles of Crop Improvement. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Longman Group.
  • Sokoto MB, Abubakar IU, Dikko AU (2012). Correlation analysis of some growth, yield, yield components and grain quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Nigerian J Basic Appl Sci 20: 349–356.
  • Tayyar S (2010). Variation in grain yield and quality of Romanian bread wheat varieties compared to local varieties in northwestern Turkey. Romanian Biotechnol Lett 15: 5189– 5196.
  • Yan W, Kang MS (2002). GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press.
  • Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci 47: 643–653.
  • Zecevic V, Kneževic D, Boškovic J, Madic M (2009). Effect of genotype and environment on wheat quality. Genetika 41: 247–253.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Compatible merchantable stem volume and taper equations for eucalyptusplantations in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey

RAMAZAN ÖZÇELİK, MEHMET FATİH GÖÇERİ

Tomato salt tolerance: impact of grafting and water compositionon yield and ion relations

GÜLÜZAR DUYGU SEMİZ, DONALD L. SUAREZ

Yield, quality, and growing degree days of anise (Pimpinella anisum L.)under different agronomic practices

Nimet KARA

Assessing the impact of azadirachtin application to soil on ureaseactivity and its kinetic parameters

Ridvan KIZILKAYA, İraida SAMOFALOVA, Natalya MUDRYKH, Fariz MİKAİLSOY, İzzet AKÇA, Svetlana SUSHKOVA, Tatiana MINKINA

The antioxidant capacity and macroelement content of several onion cultivars

Jiri MLCEK, Magdalena VALSIKOVA, Helena DRUZBIKOVA, Pavel RYANT, Tunde JURIKOVA, Jiri SOCHOR, Marie BORKOVCOVA

Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions through retrotransposon-based interprimer binding sites (iPBSs) markers

SEDA NEMLİ, TALA KIANOOSH, MUHAMMED BAHATTİN TANYOLAÇ

Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karası grape variety

SERPİL TANGOLAR, SEMİH TANGOLAR, SEVİLAY TOPÇU

Seasonal variation in amino acid and phenolic compound profiles of three Turkish white wine grapes

Mustafa Ümit ÜNAL, Aysun ŞENER, Kemal ŞEN, Murat YILMAZTEKİN

Study on the expression of dehydrin genes and activities of antioxidativeenzymes in floral buds of two sand pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) cultivarsrequiring different chilling hours for bud break

SAYED HUSSAIN, GUOQIN LIU, DONGFEN LIU, MAQSOOD AHMED, NAZIM HUSSAIN, YUANWEN TENG

Construction of dense genetic linkage maps of apple cultivars Kaşel-41and Williams? Pride by simple sequence repeat markers

Elmira Ziya MOTALEBIPOUR, Salih KAFKAS, Şerif ÖZONGUN, Ayşe Nilgün ATAY