Employing an analytic hierarchy process to prioritize factors influencing surface roughness of wood and wood-based materials in the sawing process

Employing an analytic hierarchy process to prioritize factors influencing surface roughness of wood and wood-based materials in the sawing process

This paper focuses on the prioritization of factors having substantial effects on the surface roughness of wood and wood-basedmaterials in the sawing process. Within the model, four main factors were defined: cutting tool properties, machining parameters, woodstructure and properties, and cutting phenomena. Furthermore, each main factor was subdivided into various subfactors. The analytichierarchy process method was proposed to obtain the priorities of the factors. The results showed that feed speed, tooth shape andgeometry, and cutting speed are the most important factors. Based on the obtained results, it can be said that the most important factorscan be easily determined by the proposed method. Consequently, this study presents a road map for the wood industry to achieve a highquality surface.

___

  • Abdollahzadeh G, Damalas CA, Sharifzadeh MS, Ahmadi-Gorgi H (2016). Selecting strategies for rice stem borer management using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Crop Prot 84: 27- 36.
  • Aguilera A (2011). Cutting energy and surface roughness in medium density fiberboard rip sawing. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 69: 11- 18.
  • Ahammed F, Azeem A (2013). Selection of the most appropriate package of solar home system using analytic hierarchy process model in rural areas of Bangladesh. Renew Energ 55: 6-11.
  • Albayrak E, Erensal YC (2004). Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: an application of multiple criteria decision making problem. J Intell Manuf 15: 491-503.
  • Aminbakhsh S, Gunduz M, Sonmez R (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. J Safety Res 46: 99-105.
  • Aragonés-Beltrán P, Chaparro-González F, Pastor-Ferrando JP, Pla-Rubio A (2014). An AHP (analytic hierarchy process)/ ANP (analytic network process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy 66: 222-238.
  • Aydin I, Colakoglu G (2005). Effects of surface inactivation, high temperature drying and preservative treatment on surface roughness and colour of alder and beech wood. Appl Surf Sci 252: 430-440.
  • Azizi M (2008). A model of supplying poplar wood for Iranian paper & wood factories. J Forestry Res 19: 323-328.
  • Azizi M, Modarres M (2011). A decision making model for investment and development of construction panels. J Forestry Res 22: 301-310.
  • Azizi M, Momeni E, Mohebbi N (2012). Providing a decision-making model for importing medium-density fiberboard product. J Indian Acad Wood Sci 9: 115-129.
  • Budakçı M, İlçe AC, Korkut DS, Gürleyen T (2011). Evaluating the surface roughness of heat-treated wood cut with different circular saws. BioResources 6: 4247-4258.
  • Burdurlu E, Usta İ, Ulupınar M, Aksu B, Erarslan TÇ (2005). The effect of the number of blades and the grain size of abrasives in planing and sanding on the surface roughness of European black pine and Lombardy poplar. Turk J Agric For 29: 315-321.
  • Csanády E, Magoss E, Tolvaj L (2015). Quality of Machined Wood Surfaces. Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Fuentes-Bargues JL, Ferrer-Gisbert PS (2015). Selecting a small runof-river hydropower plant by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): a case study of Miño-Sil river basin, Spain. Ecol Eng 85: 307-316.
  • Hadidi LA, Khater MA (2015). Loss prevention in turnaround maintenance projects by selecting contractors based on safety criteria using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). J Loss Prevent Proc 34: 115-126.
  • Hernández RE, Cool J (2008). Effects of cutting parameters on surface quality of paper birch wood machined across the grain with two planing techniques. Holz Roh Werkst 66: 147-154.
  • Ho CC (2011). Optimal evaluation of infectious medical waste disposal companies using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Waste Manage 31: 1553-1559.
  • Iskra P, Hernández RE (2009). The influence of cutting parameters on the surface quality of routed paper birch and surface roughness prediction modeling. Wood Fiber Sci 41: 28-37.
  • Jovanović B, Filipović J, Bakić V (2015). Prioritization of manufacturing sectors in Serbia for energy management improvement - AHP method. Energ Convers Manage 98: 225- 235.
  • Karakuş K, Aydemir D, Öztel A, Gunduz G, Mengeloglu F (2017). Nanoboron nitride-filled heat-treated wood polymer nanocomposites: comparison of different multicriteria decision-making models to predict optimum properties of the nanocomposites. J Compos Mater 51: 4205-4218.
  • Kminiak R, Gašparík M, Kvietková M (2015). The dependence of surface quality on tool wear of circular saw blades during transversal sawing of beech wood. BioResources 10: 7123- 7135.
  • Kuzman MK, Grošelj P (2012). Wood as a construction material: comparison of different construction types for residential building using the analytic hierarchy process. Wood ResSlovakia 57: 591-600.
  • Kvietková M, Gašparík M, Gaff M (2015). Effect of thermal treatment on surface quality of beech wood after plane milling. BioResources 10: 4226-4238.
  • Lee S, Kim W, Kim YM, Oh KJ (2012). Using AHP to determine intangible priority factors for technology transfer adoption. Expert Syst Appl 39: 6388-6395.
  • Lipušček I, Bohanec M, Oblak L, Stirn LZ (2010). A multi-criteria decision-making model for classifying wood products with respect to their impact on environment. Int J Life Cycle Ass 15: 359-367.
  • Lu C (2008). Study on prediction of surface quality in machining process. J Mater Process Tech 205: 439-450.
  • Magoss E (2015). Evaluating of the surface roughness of sanded wood. Wood Res-Slovakia 60: 783-790.
  • Nikou S, Mezei J (2013). Evaluation of mobile services and substantial adoption factors with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Telecommun Policy 37: 915-929.
  • Prakash S, Palanikumar K (2011). Modeling for prediction of surface roughness in drilling MDF panels using response surface methodology. J Compos Mater 45: 1639-1646.
  • Rolleri A, Burgos F, Aguilera A (2016). Surface roughness and wettability variation: the effect of cutting distance during milling of Pinus radiata wood. Drvna Ind 67: 223-228.
  • Saaty TL (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15: 234-281.
  • Sarfi F, Azizi M, Arian A (2013). A multiple criteria analysis of factors affecting markets of engineered wood products with respect to customer preferences: a case study of particleboard and MDF. Forest Sci Pract 15: 61-69.
  • Smith RL, Bush RJ, Schmoldt DL (1995). A hierarchical model and analysis of factors affecting the adoption of timber as a bridge material. Wood Fiber Sci 27: 225-238.
  • Sofuoğlu SD, Kurtoğlu A (2015). Effects of machining conditions on surface roughness in planing and sanding of solid wood. Drvna Ind 66: 265-272.
  • Söğütlü C, Nzokou P, Koc I, Tutgun R, Döngel N (2016). The effects of surface roughness on varnish adhesion strength of wood materials. J Coat Technol Res 13: 863-870.
  • Sulaiman O, Hashim R, Subari K, Liang CK (2009). Effect of sanding on surface roughness of rubberwood. J Mater Process Tech 209: 3949-3955.
  • Sutadian AD, Muttil N, Yilmaz AG, Perera BJC (2017). Using the analytic hierarchy process to identify parameter weights for developing a water quality index. Ecol Indic 75: 220-233.
  • Tiryaki S, Malkoçoğlu A, Özşahin Ş (2014). Using artificial neural networks for modeling surface roughness of wood in machining process. Constr Build Mater 66: 329-335.