Direk doku bastırma ve DAS-ELISA yöntemleriyle Türkiye' de yetiştirilen turunçgillerde hastalık oluşturan tristeza closterovirüsü (CTV) izolatlarının saptanması

In this study, the direct tissue blot immunoassay (DTBIA) procedure was tested for the detection of 10 different Turkish isolates of the citrus tristeza virus (CTV) by employing monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. The DAS-ELISA and DTBIA procedures were compared using two different monoclonal antibodies (3E10 and MCA-13) for 10 CTV isolates. The storage effects of blotted membranes on the blot assay were also investigated by using different temperatures (4 and 25 °C) and storage intervals (1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks). In addition, 258 Satsuma trees in one orchard were tested using ELISA and DTBIA. All polyclonal (1212-1, 981-1 and 908-7) and monoclonal (ECTV-175, ECTV-176, 11B1-3 and 3E10-6) antibodies reacted to CTV isolates, except MCA-13, which only reacted to Igdir and Cyprus CTV isolates. DAS-ELISA was also positive for all CTV isolates that reacted to DTBIA. Membranes kept at 25 °C gave better results than those kept at 4 °C, whereas there were no clear differences between storage periods for the same treatment combinations. Assays of 258 Satsuma trees by ELISA and DTBIA indicated similar rates of CTV infection. Seven trees were infected and 251 trees were virus-free in both tests. DTBIA is a rapid, sensible and reliable procedure for the detection of CTV. It requires little sample preparation and tissue blots can be stored at 25 °C for at least 4 weeks prior to the assay. Moreover, blotted membranes can be sent safely to another place for testing.

Application of direct tissue blot immunoassay in comparison with DAS-ELISA for detection of Turkish ısolates of citrus tristeza closterovirus (CTV)

In this study, the direct tissue blot immunoassay (DTBIA) procedure was tested for the detection of 10 different Turkish isolates of the citrus tristeza virus (CTV) by employing monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. The DAS-ELISA and DTBIA procedures were compared using two different monoclonal antibodies (3E10 and MCA-13) for 10 CTV isolates. The storage effects of blotted membranes on the blot assay were also investigated by using different temperatures (4 and 25 °C) and storage intervals (1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks). In addition, 258 Satsuma trees in one orchard were tested using ELISA and DTBIA. All polyclonal (1212-1, 981-1 and 908-7) and monoclonal (ECTV-175, ECTV-176, 11B1-3 and 3E10-6) antibodies reacted to CTV isolates, except MCA-13, which only reacted to Igdir and Cyprus CTV isolates. DAS-ELISA was also positive for all CTV isolates that reacted to DTBIA. Membranes kept at 25 °C gave better results than those kept at 4 °C, whereas there were no clear differences between storage periods for the same treatment combinations. Assays of 258 Satsuma trees by ELISA and DTBIA indicated similar rates of CTV infection. Seven trees were infected and 251 trees were virus-free in both tests. DTBIA is a rapid, sensible and reliable procedure for the detection of CTV. It requires little sample preparation and tissue blots can be stored at 25 °C for at least 4 weeks prior to the assay. Moreover, blotted membranes can be sent safely to another place for testing.

___

  • Bar-Joseph, M., S.M. Garnsey, D. Gonsalves, M. Moscovits, D.E. Purcifull, M.F. Clark, and G. Loebenstein. 1979. The use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of citrus tristeza virus. Phytopathology 69:190-194.
  • Bar-Joseph, M. and M. Malkinson. 1980. Hen yolk as a source of antiviral antibodies in the enzyme-linked immunusorbent assay (ELISA): A comparison of two plant viruses. J. Virol. Methods 1:179-183.
  • Bar-Joseph, M., R. Marcus and R.F. Lee. 1989. The continuous challenge of citrus tristeza virus control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27:292-316.
  • Bar-Joseph, M. and R.F. Lee. 1990. Citrus tristeza virus. Description of Plant Viruses No. 353. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists. Kew, Surrey, U.K. 7 pp.
  • Brlansky, R.H., S.M. Garnsey, R.F. Lee, and D.E. Purcifull. 1984. Application of citrus tristeza virus antisera in labelled antibody, immunoelectron microscopical, and sodium dodecyl sulfateimmunodiffusion tests. In: Proc. 9th Conf. IOCV. Riverside, CA. p. 337-342.
  • Cinar, A., U. Kersting, N. Onelge, S. Korkmaz, and G. Sas. 1993. Citrus virus and virus-like diseases in the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. In: Proc. 12th Conf. IOCV. Riverside, CA. p. 397-400.
  • Clark, M.F. and M. Bar-Joseph. 1984. Enzyme immunosorbent assay in plant virology. p.51-85. In: K. Maramoroch and H. Koprowski (eds.). Methods in Virology Vol. VII. Academic Press, Unc., Orlando, FL. 332 pp.
  • Garnsey, S.M., D. Gonsalves, and D.E. Purcifull. 1979. Rapid diagnosis of citrus tristeza virus infections by sodium dodecyl sulphateimmunodiffusion procedures. Phytopathology 69:88-95.
  • Garnsey, S.M., R.G. Christie, K.S. Derrick, and M. Bar-Joseph. 1980. Detection of citrus tristeza virus. II. Light and electron microscopy of inclusion and viral particles. In: Proc. 8th Conf. IOCV. Riverside, CA. p.9-16.
  • Garnsey, S.M., M. Bar-Joseph, and R.F. Lee. 1981. Applications of serological indexing to develop control strategies for citrus tristeza virus. Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture 1. p. 448-452.
  • Garnsey, S.M., T. Kano, T.A. Permar, M. Cambra, M. Koizumi, and C. Vela. 1989. Epitope diversity among citrus tristeza virus isolates. Phytopathology 79: 1174 (Abst.).
  • Garnsey, S.M. and M. Cambra. 1991. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for citrus pathogens, p.193-216. In: C.N. Roistacher (ed). Graft transmissible diseases of citrus - Handbook for detection and diagnosis. FAO, Rome. 286 pp.
  • Garnsey, S.M., E.L. Civerolo, D.J. Gumpf, R.K. Yokomi, and R.F. Lee. 1991. Development a worldwide collection of citrus tristeza virus isolates. In: Proc. 11th Conf. IOCV. Riverside, CA. p.113-120,
  • Garnsey, S.M., T.A. Permar, M. Cambra, and C.T. Henderson. 1993. Direct tissue blot immunoassay (DTBIA) for detection of citrus tristeza virus (CTV). In: Proc. 12th Conf. IOCV. Riverside, CA. p.39- 50.
  • Gonsalves, D., D.E. Purcifull, and S.M. Garnsey. 1978. Purification and serology of citrus tristeza virus. Phytopathology 68: 553-559.
  • Hsu, H.T. and R.H. Lawson. 1991. Direct tissue blotting for detection of tomato spotted wilt virus in Impatiens. Plant Dis. 75:292-295.
  • Irey, M.S., T.A. Permar, and S.M. Garnsey. 1988. Identification of severe isolates of citrus tristeza virus in young field plantings by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 101. p.73-76.
  • Lin, N.S., Y.H. Hsu, and H.T. Hsu. 1990. Immunological detection of plant viruses and a mycoplasmalike organism by direct tissue blotting on nitrocellulose membranes. Phytopathology 80:824- 828.
  • Lin, Y.J., P.A. Rundell, L.H. Xie, and C.A. Powell. 2000. In situ immunoassay for detection of citrus tristeza virus. Plant Disease 84:937-940.
  • Mestre, P.F., M.J. Asins, E.A. Carbonell, and L. Navarro. 1997. New gene(s) involved in the resistance of Poncirus trifoliate (L.) Raf. to citrus tristeza virus. Theoretical and App. Genetics 95:691-695.
  • Permar, T.A., S.M. Garnsey, D.J. Gumpf, and R.F. Lee. 1990. A monoclonal antibody that discriminates strains of citrus tristeza virus. Phytopathology 80: 224-228.
  • Permar, T.A., S.M. Garnsey, and C.T. Henderson. 1992. Direct tissue blot immunoassays for detection of citrus tristeza virus (CTV). Phytopathology 82: 609 (Abstr.).
  • Rocha-Pena, M.A. and R.F. Lee. 1991. Serological techniques for detection of citrus tristeza virus. J. Virol. Methods 34: 311-331.
  • Vela, C., M. Cambra, A. Sanz, and P. Moreno. 1988. Use of specific monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis of citrus tristeza virus. In: Proc. 10th Conf. IOCV. Riverside, CA. p.55-61.
  • Zeman, V. (1931). Una enfermadad nueva en los naranjales de Corrientes. Physis 19 :410-411.