Determination of forage quality by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy in soybean

Determination of forage quality by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy in soybean

: Soybeans have been a favored livestock forage for centuries. However, only a few studies have been conducted to estimate the forage quality of soybean by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). In this study, 353 forage soybean samples were used to develop near-infrared reflectance (NIR) equations to estimate four forage quality parameters: crude protein (CP), crude fat (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). Samples included 181 recombinant inbred lines derived from PI 483463 (G. soja) × Hutcheson (G. max), 104 cultivated soybeans (G. max), and 68 wild soybeans (G. soja). Two NIR equations developed for CP and CF (2,5,5,1; multiple scatter correction [MSC]) and for NDF and ADF (1,4,4,1; MSC) were the best prediction equations for estimating these parameters. The coefficients of determination in the external validation set (r2 ) were 0.934 for CF, 0.909 for CP, 0.767 for NDF, and 0.748 for ADF. The relative predictive determinant ratios for MSC (2,5,5,1) calibration indicate that the CP (3.25) and CF (3.85) equations were acceptable for quantitative prediction of soybean forage quality, whereas the NDF (2.07) and ADF (1.97) equations were useful for screening purposes. The NIR calibration equations developed in this study will be useful in predicting soybean forage quality for these four quality parameters.

___

  • Acikgöz E, Oz M, Sincik M, Albayrak S, Wietgrefe G, Turan ZM, Goksoy AT, Bilgili U, Karasu A, Tongel O et al. (2007). Forage soybean performance in Mediterranean environments. Field Crop Res 103: 239–247.
  • Açıkgöz E, Sincik M, Wietgrefe G, Sürmen M, Çeçen S, Yavuz T, Erdurmuş C, Göksoy AT (2013). Dry matter accumulation and forage quality characteristics of different soybean genotypes. Turk J Agric For 37: 22–32.
  • AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th ed. Arlington, Virginia, USA: AOAC International.
  • Asekova S, Shannon JG, and Lee JD (2014). The current status of forage soybean. Plant Breed Biotech 2: 334–341.
  • Berardo N, Dzowela BH, Hove L, Odoardi M (1997). Near infrared calibration of chemical constituents of Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea) used as forage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 69: 201–206.
  • Buxton DR, Mertens DR (1991). Errors in forage-quality data predicted by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Sci 31: 212–218.
  • Chang SR, Lu CH, Lur HS, Hsu FH (2012). Forage yield, chemical contents, and silage quality of manure soybean. Agron J 104: 130–136.
  • Cozzolino D, Moron A (2004). Exploring the use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to predict trace minerals in legumes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 111: 161–173.
  • Dimov Z, Suprianto E, Hermann F, Möllers C (2011). Genetic variation for seed hull and fibre content in a collection of European winter oilseed rape material (Brassica napus L.) and development of NIRS calibrations. Plant Breed 131: 361–368.
  • Drewnoski ME, Poore MH (2012). Effects of supplementation frequency on ruminal fermentation and digestion by steers fed medium-quality hay and supplemented with soybean hull and corn gluten feed blend. J Anim Sci 90: 881–891.
  • Font R, Rio-Celestino M, Haro-Bailon A (2003). Acid detergent fiber analysis in oilseed brassicas by near-infrared spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem 51: 2917–2922.
  • Galvez-Sola L, Moral R, Perez-Murcia MD, Perez-Espinosa A, Bustamante MA, Martinez-Sabater E, Paredes C (2010). The potential of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) for the estimation of agroindustrial compost quality. Sci Total Environ 408: 1414–1421.
  • Gibson L, Benson G (2005). Origin, History, and Uses of Soybean (Glycine max). Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Department of Agronomy.
  • Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970). Forage Fiber Analysis: Apparatus, Reagents, Pocedures and some Applications. Washington, DC, USA: USDA-ARS Agricultural Handbook 379.
  • Ha BK, Vuong TD, Velusamy V, Nguyen HT, Shannon JG, Lee JD (2013). Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci conditioning salt tolerance in wild soybean (Glycine soja) PI 483463. Euphytica 193: 79–88.
  • Heitholt JJ, Kee D, Farr JB, Read JC, Metz S, MacKown CT (2004). Forage from soybean provides an alternative to its poor grain yield in the southern Great Plains. Crop Manag 3: 1–12.
  • Hintz RW, Albrecht KA (1992). Dry matter partitioning and forage nutritive value of soybean plant components. Agro J 86: 59–62.
  • Hintz RW, Albrecht KA, Oplinger ES (1994). Yield and quality of soybean forage as affected by cultivar and management practices. Agro J 84: 795–798.
  • Hoffman PC, Brehm NM, Bauman LM, Peters JB, Undersander DJ (1998). Prediction of laboratory and in situ protein in legume and grass silages using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Dairy Sci 82: 764–770.
  • Isaksson T, Næs T (1988). The effect of multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) and linearity improvement in NIR spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 42: 1273–1284.
  • Lee EJ, Choi HJ, Shin DH, Kwon CH, Shannon JG, Lee JD (2014). Evaluation of forage yield and quality for the accessions derived from inter-specific cross between wild and cultivated soybean. Korean J Breed Sci 46: 66–77.
  • Lee JD, Shannon JG, Choung MG (2011). Application of nondestructive measurement to improve soybean quality by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. In: Ng T-B, editor. Soybean Applications and Technology. InTech, pp. 287–304.
  • Lima-Orozco R, Castro-Alegría A, Fievez V (2013). Ensiled sorghum and soybean as ruminant feed in the tropics, with emphasis on Cuba. Grass Forage Sci 68: 20–32.
  • Locher F, Heuwinkel H, Gutser R, Schmidhalter U (2005). LEGUMES: Development of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy calibrations to estimate legume content of multispecies legume–grass mixtures. Agro J 97: 11–17.
  • Mihailović V, Mikić A, Đorđević V, Ćupina B, Perić V, Krstić Đ, Srebrić M, Antanasović S, Devine TE (2013). Performance of forage soya bean (Glycine max) cultivars in the Northern Balkans. In: Barth S, Milbourne D, editors. Breeding Strategies for Sustainable Forage and Turf Grass Improvement. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 353–358.
  • Moe AJ, Carr SB (1985). Laboratory analyses and near infrared reflectance for predicting in vitro digestibility of rye silage. J Dairy Sci 67: 1301–1305.
  • Montes JJ, Mirdita V, Prasad K, Blummel M, Dhillon SB, Melchinger EA (2009). A new near infrared spectroscopy sample presentation unit for measuring feeding quality of maize stover. JNIRS 17: 195–201.
  • Munoz AE, Holt E, Weaver RW (1983). Yield and quality of soybean hay as influenced by stage of growth and plant density. Agro J 75: 147–149.
  • Patil AG, Oak MD, Taware SP, Tamhankar SA, Rao VS (2010). Nondestructive estimation of fatty acid composition in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] seeds using near-infrared transmittance spectroscopy. Food Chem 120: 1210–1217.
  • Roggo Y, Duponchel L, Huvenne JP (2004). Quality evaluation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) by near-infrared spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem 52: 1055–1061.
  • Sheaffer CC, Orf JH, Devine TE, Jewett JG (2001). FORAGES: Yield and quality of forage soybean. Agro J 93: 99–106.
  • Shenk JS, Westerhaus MO (1996). Calibration the ISI Way. In: Davies AMC, Williams PC, editors. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: The Future Waves. Chichester, UK: NIR Publications, pp. 198–202.
  • Starks PJ, Brown MA (2010). Prediction of forage quality from remotely sensed data: comparison of cultivar-specific and cultivar-independent equations using three methods of calibration. Crop Sci 50: 2159–2170.
  • Tremblay GF, Broderick GA, Abrams SM (1996). Estimating ruminal protein degradability of roasted soybeans using near infrared spectroscopy. J Dairy Sci 79: 276–278.
  • Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74: 3583–3597.
  • Vargas-Bello-Perez E, Mustafa AF, Seguin P (2008). Effects of feeding forage soybean silage on milk production, nutrient digestion, and ruminal fermentation of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 91: 229–235.
  • Volkers KC, Wachendorf M, Loges NJ, Jovanovic NJ, Taube F (2003). Prediction of the quality of forage maize by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Anim Feed Sci Technol 109: 183–194.
  • Wheeler RA, Chaney WR, Johnson KD, Butler LG (1996). Leucaena forage analysis using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Anim Feed Sci Technol 64: 1–9.
  • Williams PC, Norris K 2001. Near-Infrared Technology in the Agricultural and Food Industries. St. Paul, MN, USA: American Association of Cereal Chemists.
  • Williams PC, Sobering DC (1996). How do we do it: a brief summary of the methods we use in developing near infrared calibrations. In: Davies AMC, Williams PC, editors. Near Infrared Spectroscopy: The Future Waves. Chichester, UK: NIR Publications, pp. 185–188.
  • Windham WR, Mertens DR, Bartons II FE (1989). Protocol for NIR calibration: sample selection and equation development and validation. In: Martens GC, Shenk JS, Barton FE, editors. Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS): Analysis of Forage Quality. Washington, DC, USA: USDA-ARS Agricultural Handbook 643: 96–103.
  • Zambom MA, Alcalde CR, Kazama DCS, Martins EN, Hashimoto JH, Matsushita M, Ramos CECO, Grande PA (2012). Soybean hulls replacing ground corn in diets for early lactation Saanen goats: intake, digestibility, milk production and quality. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41: 1525–1532.
  • Zhai G, Shen Y, Zhai Y, Liu X, Jiang H (2008). Forage yield performance and nutritive value of selected wild soybean ecotypes. Can J Plant Sci 88: 465–472.