Assessment of yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by deficit irrigation

A field experiment was conducted for 2 consecutive years to evaluate the response of cotton crop to deficit irrigation under drip irrigation conditions. Water use efficiency (WUE), seed cotton yield, and fiber quality parameters were assessed at various irrigation levels. The experiment was set up to apply water at 4 different application rates: 50%, 65%, 80%, and 100% of the soil water depletion. These were abbreviated as DI50, DI65, DI80, and FI, respectively. The total amounts of irrigation water applied were 408 and 773 mm and the average seed cotton yields were 2909 and 5090 kg ha-1 for the DI50 and FI treatments, respectively. The highest seed cotton yield was obtained with full irrigation treatment in both years. Values of WUE were 0.65 and 0.70 kg m-3 for the FI and DI80 treatments, respectively, in the 2007 season. In the 2008 season, WUE values were 0.65 and 0.72 kg m-3 for the FI and DI80 treatments, respectively. The highest values of WUE and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) were observed in DI80 (0.71 and 0.75 kg m-3, respectively), and the lowest IWUE in both years was seen with the FI treatment (0.66 kg m-3). The yield response factor (ky) was 1.00 during the entire growing season, based on averages of the 2 years. No significant differences in fiber length, strength, uniformity, elongation, or fineness were observed between the FI and DI80 treatments in the 2008 season. The DI80 treatment showed significant benefits in terms of irrigation water savings and better WUE, indicating an attainable advantage of deficit irrigation employment under water shortage conditions.

Assessment of yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by deficit irrigation

A field experiment was conducted for 2 consecutive years to evaluate the response of cotton crop to deficit irrigation under drip irrigation conditions. Water use efficiency (WUE), seed cotton yield, and fiber quality parameters were assessed at various irrigation levels. The experiment was set up to apply water at 4 different application rates: 50%, 65%, 80%, and 100% of the soil water depletion. These were abbreviated as DI50, DI65, DI80, and FI, respectively. The total amounts of irrigation water applied were 408 and 773 mm and the average seed cotton yields were 2909 and 5090 kg ha-1 for the DI50 and FI treatments, respectively. The highest seed cotton yield was obtained with full irrigation treatment in both years. Values of WUE were 0.65 and 0.70 kg m-3 for the FI and DI80 treatments, respectively, in the 2007 season. In the 2008 season, WUE values were 0.65 and 0.72 kg m-3 for the FI and DI80 treatments, respectively. The highest values of WUE and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) were observed in DI80 (0.71 and 0.75 kg m-3, respectively), and the lowest IWUE in both years was seen with the FI treatment (0.66 kg m-3). The yield response factor (ky) was 1.00 during the entire growing season, based on averages of the 2 years. No significant differences in fiber length, strength, uniformity, elongation, or fineness were observed between the FI and DI80 treatments in the 2008 season. The DI80 treatment showed significant benefits in terms of irrigation water savings and better WUE, indicating an attainable advantage of deficit irrigation employment under water shortage conditions.

___

  • Aujla MS, Th ind HS, Buttar GS (2005) Cotton yield and water use effi ciency at various levels of water and N through drip irrigation under two methods of planting. Agric Water Manag 71: 167-179.
  • Aujla MS, Th ind HS, Buttar GS (2008) Response of normally sown and paired sown cotton to various quantities of water applied through drip system. Irrig Sci 26: 357-366.
  • Balkcom KS, Reeves DW, Shaw JN, Burmester CH, Curtis LM (2006) Cotton yield and fi ber quality from irrigated tillage systems in the Tennessee Valley. Agron J 98: 596-602.
  • Basal H, Dagdelen N, Unay A, Yilmaz E (2009) Eff ects of defi cit drip irrigation ratios on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and fi bre quality. J Agron Crop Sci 195: 19-29.
  • Booker JD, Bordovsky JR, Lascano J, Segarra E (2006) Variable rate irrigation on cotton lint yield and fi ber quality. In: Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference. San Antonio, Texas, pp. 1768- 1776.
  • Bradow JM, Davidonis GH (2000) Quantization of fi ber quality and the cotton production-processing interface: a physiologist’s perspective. J Cotton Sci 4: 34-64.
  • Cotton Bureau Report (2002) Th e status of cotton cultivation in Syria for the 2001 growing season. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Cotton Conference, Cotton Bureau Publication No. 33. Aleppo, pp. 52-68.
  • Cotton Bureau Report (2008) Th e status of cotton cultivation in Syria for the 2008 growing season. In: Proceedings of the 37thCotton Conference, Cotton Bureau Publication. Aleppo, pp. 1-48.
  • Dağdelen N, Başal H, Yılmaz E, Gürbüz T, Akçay S (2009) Diff erent drip irrigation regimes aff ect cotton yield, water use effi ciency and fi ber quality in western Turkey. Agric Water Manag 96: 111-120.
  • Dağdelen N, Yılmaz E, Sezgin F, Gürbüz T (2006) Water-yield relation and water use effi ciency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and second crop corn (Zea mays L.) in western Turkey. Agric Water Manag 82: 63-85.
  • DeTar WR (2008) Yield and growth characteristics for cotton under various irrigation regimes on sandy soil. Agric Water Manag 95: 69-76.
  • Du T, Kang S, Zhang J, Li F (2008) Water use and yield responses of cotton to alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation in the arid area of north-west China. Irrig Sci 26: 147-159.
  • Elms MK, Green CJ, Johnson PN (2001) Variability of cotton yield and quality. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32: 351-368.
  • Ertek A, Kanber R (2003) Eff ects of diff erent drip irrigation programs on the boll number and shedding percentage and yield of cotton. Agric Water Manag 60: 1-11.
  • Fereres E, Soriano MA (2007) Defi cit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Experimental Botany 58: 147-159.
  • Gerik TJ, Faver KL, Th axton PM, El-Zik KM (1996) Late season water stress in cotton. I. Plant growth, water use, and yield. Crop Sci 36: 914-921.
  • Howell TA, Evett SR, Tolk JA, Schneider AD (2004) Evapotranspiration of full-, defi cit-irrigated, and dryland cotton on the Northern Texas High Plains. J Irrig Drainage Eng 130: 277-285.
  • Janat M (2004) Assessment of nitrogen content, uptake, partitioning, and recovery by cotton crop grown under surface irrigation and drip fertigation using isotopic technique. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 35: 2515-2535.
  • Janat M, Somi G (2001) Performance of cotton crop grown under surface irrigation and drip fertigation. I. Seed cotton yield, dry matter production and lint properties. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32: 3045-3061.
  • Johnson RM, Downer RG, Bradow JM, Bauer PJ, Sadler EJ (2002) Variability in cotton fi ber yield, fi ber quality, and soil properties in a southeastern coastal plain. Agron J 94: 1305-1316.
  • Kang SZ, Shi P, Pan YH, Liang ZS, Hu XT, Zhang J (2000) Soil water distribution, uniformity and water-use effi ciency under alternate furrow irrigation in arid areas. Irrig Sci 19:181-190.
  • Karam F, Rafi c L, Randa M, Daccache A, Mounzer O, Rouphael Y (2006) Water use and lint yield response of drip irrigated cotton to length of season. Agric Water Manag 85: 287-295.
  • Mert M (2005) Irrigation of cotton cultivars improves seed cotton yield, yield components and fi bre properties in the Hatay region, Turkey. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Plant Soil Sci 55: 40-55.
  • Onder D, Akiscan Y, Onder S, Mert M (2009) Eff ect of diff erent irrigation water level on cotton yield and yield components. African J Biotech 8: 1536-1544.
  • Orgaz F, Mateos L, Fereres E (1992) Season length and cultivars determine the optimum evapotranspiration defi cit in cotton. Agron J 84: 700-706.
  • Pace PF, Harry TC, Sherif HM, El-Halawany J, Tom C, Scott AS (1999) Drought-induced changes in shoot and root growth of young cotton plants. J Cotton Sci 3: 183-187.
  • Pettigrew WT (2004) Moisture defi cit eff ects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution. Agron J 96: 377-383.
  • Tang LS, Li Y, Zhang J (2005) Physiological and yield responses of cotton under partial rootzone irrigation. Field Crops Res 94: 214-223.
  • Wanjura DF, Upchurch DR, Mahan JR, Bruke JJ (2002) Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation. Agric Water Manag 55: 217-237.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Mapping paddy rice yield in Zhejiang Province using MODIS spectral index

Qian CHENG*, Xiuju WU

Micrometeorological observations above a Japanese red pine forest within the growing season

Pedram ATTAROD, Masatoshi AOKI, Vilma BAYRAMZADEH, Mohammad Taghi AHMADI

Bioactivities of jimsonweed extract, Datura stramonium L. (Solanaceae), against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Habib ABBASIPOUR, Mohammad MAHMOUDVAND, Fahimeh RASTEGAR

Assessment of yield and water use efficiency of drip-irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as affected by deficit irrigation

Fuad HUSSEIN, Mussaddak JANAT, Abdallah YAKOUB

Estimation of single leaf chlorophyll content in sugar beet using machine vision

Parviz Ahmadi MOGHADDAM, Mohammadali Haddad DERAFSHI, Vine SHIRZAD

Estimating the soil water retention curve from soil particle size distribution using the Arya and Paris model for Iranian soils

Leila REZAEE, Mahmoud SHABANPOUR, Naser DAVATGAR

Fertilization enhances growth, yield, and xanthophyll contents of marigold

İftikhar AHMAD*, Muhammad ASIF, Atyab AMJAD, Sagheer AHMAD

Exploration of genotype specific fingerprinting of Nigella sativa L. using RAPD markers

Muhammad Sajjad IQBAL, Shahid NADEEM, Shahid MEHBOOB, Abdul GHAFOOR

Control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) adults on glasshouse-grown cucumbers in four different growth substrates: an efficacy comparison of foliar application of Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) and spraying with thiamethoxamn

Ziga LAZNIK, Dragan ZNIDARCIC, Stanislav TRDAN*

Antioxidant properties of methanolic extract from Inula graveolens L.

Adnan J. M. AL-FARTOSY