Technological Characteristics Comparative Study of Pamid Variety Clones

Anahtar Kelimeler:

-

Technological Characteristics Comparative Study of Pamid Variety Clones

Comparative study of the technological characteristics of the newly-selected clone 5/76 of Pamid variety and clone Pamid Ruse 1, grown in the soil and climatic conditions of Pleven (Central Northern Bulgaria) was carried out. The study included three consecutive vintages . It was found that Pamid clone 5/76 greatly surpassed the productivity and grapes quality of the control - Pamid Ruse 1. The mechanical analysis did not reveal any significant differences in the cluster and berry structure and composition of the investigated clones, as well as in their theoretical yield. Pamid clone 5/76 showed better sugar accumulation capacity. There were no significant differences in the acidity content of the grapes of the two clones. The wines produced from the newly-selected clone Pamid 5/76 had higher alcohol, sugar-free extract, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanins content compared to the control samples from Pamid Ruse 1. In the organoleptic analysis the samples from Pamid 5/76 were assessed the highest. These variants had more intense, vivid color, the soft, elegant tannins dominated in their taste

___

  • Ivanov T., S. Gerov, A. Yankov, G. Bambalov, T. Tonchev, D. Nachkov, M. Marinov. 1979. Practicum in Wine Technology. Plovdiv, Publishing “Hristo G. Danov”, 531 p.
  • Katerov K. et al. 1990. Bulgarian Ampelography. Clonal and Sanitary Selection. Publishing of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 195- 200.
  • Kondarev M., P. Kurtev, B. Tsankov, L. Radulov. 1972. Ampelography. Plovdiv, Publishing “Hristo G. Danov”, 238-242.
  • Kondarev M., P. Kurtev, B. Tsankov. 1976. Ampelography. “Hristo G. Danov”, 311 p. Publishing
  • Kondarev M. 1984. Vine variety Pamid clone 2. Horticultural and Viticultural Science, 21, 4, 70-74.
  • Kondarev M., S. Krastanova, P. Geogriev, D. Prodanski, S. Georgiev. 1985. Pamid clone 1. Newly-selected and introduced grapes varieties in Bulgaria, 67-68.
  • Nakov Z., I. Simeonov, M. Ivanov. 2011. Pamid clone 5/76 – new highly productive clone. Agricultural Science, v. 44, 6, 47- 53.
  • Petrov V. S., T. A. Nudga, A. I. Talash, T. I. Guguchkina, E. A. Daurova, B. V. Chigrik, M. A. Gruner. 2009. Formation of high- quality winemaking. International conference grapes for of scientific “Scientific and applied present stage”, Russia,
  • Prodanova N. 2008. Tasting or how to know wine. Sofia, Publishing “Economedia”, 115-118.
  • Radulov L., P. Abrasheva, M. Ivanov. 2004. Perspective wine grape varieties for Bulgaria. Issued by Project FAMAD, 65 p.
  • Todorov I. 1989. Pamid Ruse 1 (new grape variety). Plant Science, 10, 64-68.
  • Todorov I. 1991. Pamid Ruse 1 – clone with expressed dessert qualities. Viticulture and Enology Journal, 1, 1-2, 5-7.
  • Tsvetanov O. 2001. How to taste wine. Sofia, Publishing “Gourmet” Ltd., 43-46.
  • Yankov A. 1992. Technology of Winemaking. Sofia, Publishing “Zemizdat”.
  • Amerine M. A., H. W. Berg, W. V. Cruess. 1972. Technology of Winemaking. The Avi Publishing Connecticut, 380-392. Westport,
  • Constantinescu G. et al., 1960. Ampelografia, V. 3, Bucuresti, Editura ARFR, 41-52.
  • Loureiro M. D., Р. Moreno-Sanz, В. Suárez. 2011. Clonal preselection of grapevine cultivars of the appellation "Cangas Quality Horticultural Science. Vol. 38 No. 2 pp. 71-80. Spain).
  • Zirojevic D., 1974. Poznavanje sorata vinove loze. Vol.1, Beograd, Nolit. 15-30.
Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-3647
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Mevlüt AKÇURA
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Comparative Analysis of Options for Investing in the Production of Table Grapes from Seed and Seedless Varieties

Daniela DIMITROVA, Iliyan SIMEONOV, Valeriy PEYKOV, Emil TSVETANOV, Vladimir DIMITROV

Larvicidal Activity of Aegle marmelos, Coleus aromaticus and Vitex negundo Leaf Extract Against Filarial Vector Culex quinquefasciatus

Kaliyamoorthy DASS, Pitchaimuthu MARIAPPAN

Cluster Analysis in Common Bean Genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Ali KAHRAMAN, Mustafa ONDER, Ercan CEYHAN

Stability Valuation of Some Mixtures between Foliar Fertilizers and Combined Herbicides for the Grain Yield of Durum Wheat

Grozi DELCHEV, Tsenka ZHELYAZKOVA, Antonia STOYANOVA

Study Of Several Traits Related To Productivity In Lines Of Winter Feed Barley

Darina DIMOVA, Darina VALCHEVA, Boryana DYULGEROVA

Technological Investigations for Improvement of Grapevine Propagation Material Production in Bulgaria. Part II. Testing of Agritechnical Practices in Vine Nursery

Emil TSVETANOV, Neli Prodanova – MARINOVA, Hrisanta ENCHEVA, Violeta DIMITROVA, Anatoli ILIEV

Effect of Interstocks In Photosynthesis and Growth Rates for ‘Navelina’ Orange And ‘Kütdiken’ Lemon

Muge U. KAMILOGLU, Turgut YESILOGLU

Determination Of Yield And Yield Components In Some Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars Under Giresun Conditions

Nuri YILMAZ, Ferda OZKORKMAZ ATICI, Fatih ONER

Productivity and economic effect for cotton cultivated under different inter – row space and irrigation rate

İvan SALDZHIEV, Angelina MUHOVA, Stefka DOBREVA

Extraction and valuation of the hemicelluloses of the cell wall of Retama monosperma (l.) boiss in the pharmaceutical domain

Nadia BOUREDJA, Zouhir MEHDADI, Mustapha BOUREDJA