Kırşehir Ekolojik Koşullarında Bazı Silajlık Sorgum ile Sorgum-Sudanotu Melez Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi
Bu araştırma Kırşehir ilinde 2016-2017 yaz yetiştirme sezonunda bazı sorgum ve sorgum-sudanotu melez çeşitlerinin verim ve kalite özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla tek lokasyonda yürütülmüştür. Bölünmüş parseller deneme desenine göre üç tekerrürlü olarak yürütülen bu çalışmada, üç sorgum (Gözde 80, Early Sumac, Rox) ve altı sorgum-sudanotu (Aneto, Greengo, Teide, Sugar Graze, Gardavan, Jumbo) melez çeşidi kullanılmıştır. Denemeye alınan sorgum ve sorgum-sudanotu melez çeşitleri arasında özellikler bakımından önemli derecede farklılıkların olduğu belirlenmiştir. İki yıllık ortalama sonuçlara göre; çeşitlerin kuru madde verimleri 1185.3 (Gözde 80) – 28957.3 (Jumbo) kg ha-1, ham protein verimleri 8777.5 (Gözde 80) ve 2799.8 (Jumbo) kg ha-1 ve sindirilebilir kuru madde verimleri 7396.5 (Gözde 80) ve17908.3 (Jumbo) kg ha-1. Protein oranı % 7.3 (Gözde 80) - 10.4 (Aneto), ADF oranı % 30.1 (Rox) - 37.4 (Early Sumac), NDF % 44.6 (Rox)- 57.2 (Early Sumac), ADL % 4.2 (Early Sumac) - 5.6 (Teide ) SKMO % 59.7 (Early Sumac) - 65.5 (Rox) arasında değişmiştir. Kırşehir ekolojik koşullarında verim ve kalite bakımdan Jumbo çeşidi ile Greengo çeşidi alternatif bir yem bitkisi olarak yetiştirilebileceği belirlenmiştir.
Yield and Quality Feature of Some Silage Sorghum and Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Cultivars in Ecological Conditions of Kırşehir Province
This current study was conducted to determine adaption and quality characters of sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid during 2016-2017 summer growing seasons in Kırşehir province. The experimental was a randomized complete block design with three replications, three sorghum cultivars (Gözde 80, Early Sumac, Rox) and six sorghum-sudangrass (Aneto, Greengo, Teide, Sugar Graze, Gardavan, Jumbo) hybrid cultivars. There were significant differences in tested characters among sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid cultivars. According to average two years; dry matter yield of the cultivars was between 11855.3 (Gözde 80) and 28957.3 (Jumbo) kg ha-1, crude protein yield was between 877.5 (Gözde 80) and 2799.8 (Jumbo) kg ha-1 and digestible dry matter yield was between 7396.5 (Gözde 80) and 17908.3 (Jumbo) kg ha-1. Crude protein ratio ranged from 7.3 (Gözde 80) to 10.4 (Aneto) %, ADF from 30.1 (Rox) to 37.4 (Early Sumac) %, NDF from 44.6 (Rox) to 57.2 (Early Sumac) %, ADL from 4.2 (Early Sumac) to 5.6 (Teide ) % and digestible dry matter from 59.7 (Early Sumac) to 65.5 (Rox) %. To conclude; Greengo and Jumbo that had better results among the studied cultivars, are suggested as alternative forage crops in Kırşehir ecological condition.
___
- Acar, R., Akbudak, M., Sade, B. 2002. The
determination of yield and some yield
components of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid
cultivars for silage production in Konya
ecological conditions. Selcuk University
Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 16(29): 88-95.
- Açıkgöz, E. 2001. Yem Bitkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi,
Bursa 2001, 568 p.
- Akdeniz, H., Karslı, A. M., Nursoy, H., Yılmaz, İ. 2003.
Determination of the chemical composition
and digestible dry matter yields of some
grain sorghum varieties. 27(6): 1349-1355.
- Anonymous, 2019. Analytical Methods Fiber
Analyzer A200. Retrieved from
www.ankom.com/analytical-methodssupport/
fiber-analyzer-a200.
- AOAC, 2005. Official methods of analysis.
association of official analytical chemists
(18th), (18th ed.)Association of Official
Analytical Chemists International, Maryland,
USA.
- Atis, I., Konuskan, O., Duru, M., Gozubenli, H.,
Yilmaz, S. 2012. Effect of harvesting time on
yield, composition and forage quality of
some forage sorghum cultivars. International
Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 14(6):
879-886.
- Ayaz, M., Özpinar, H., Yaman, S., Acar, A., Yasemin,
A., Yavrutürk, Y., Niksarligil, F., Serhat, A.,
Aygün, Y. 2013. Analysing yield and quality
characteristics of silage maize cultivars
which are used commonly or may be use for
main crop. Harran Journal of Agricultural,
17(2): 23-35.
- Canbolat, Ö. 2012. Comparison of İnvitro gas
production, organic matter digestibility,
relative feed value and metabolizable energy
contents of some cereal forages. Journal of
the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas
University, 18(4): 571-577.
- Gençoğlan, C., Yazar, A. 1999. The effects of deficit
irrigations on corn yield and water use
efficiency. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and
Forestry, 23: 233-241.
- Geren, H., Avcioğlu, R., Kır, B., Demiroğlu, G., Yılmaz,
M.F., Cevheri, A.C. 2003. Effect of different
sowing dates on the yield and quality
characteristics of some maize cultivars
grown as second crop for silage. Ege Journal
of Agricultural Research, 40(3): 57-64.
- Geren, H., Kavut, Y.T. 2009. An investigation on
comparison of sorghum (Sorghum sp.)
species with corn (Zea mays L.) grown under
second crop production. Ege Journal of
Agricultural Research, 46(1): 9-16.
- Güneş, A., Acar, R. 2005. The determination of
growing possibilties of sorghum-sudangrass
cultivars as second crop under Karaman
ecolojical conditions. Selcuk University
Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 19(35): 8-15.
- Horrocks, R.D., Valentine, J.F. 1999. Harvested
Forages. Academic Press, 415 p.
- Jung, H.J.G., Vogel, K.P. 1992. Lignification of
switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and big
bluestem (Andropogon gerardii) plant parts
during maturation and its effect on fibre
degradability. Journal of the Science of Food
and Agriculture, 59(2): 169-176.
- Kacar, B., Katkat, A.V. 2014. Gübreler ve Gübreleme
Tekniği. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 574 p.
- Kaplan, M., Kızılşimşek, M. 2012. Determination of
nutritional values of different grain sorghum
(Sorghum bicolor L.) strains and varieties.
Erciyes University Journal of Natural and
Applied Sciences, 28(1): 11-14.
- Karadağ, Y., Uygur, E. 2013. Determining of
adaptation ability of some sorghum cultivar
for silage as second crop in Tokat ecological
conditions. 10. Field Crops Congress of
Turkey, Konya.
- Karadağ, Y., Özkurt, M. 2014. Effect of different row
spacings on the yield and quality of silage
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)
cultivars to be second crop grown. Journal of
Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa
University, 31(1): 19-24.
- Keskin, B., Yılmaz, İ. H. and Akdeniz, H. 2005. Yield
and yield component of forage sorghum
hybrid (Sorghum bicolor x Sorghum
sudanense Stapf.) as influenced by varieties
and maturity. Journal of the Faculty of
Agriculture, 36(2): 145-150.
- Millner, J. P., Silungwe, D. and McGill, C. R. 2011.
Forage quality of sorghum, sudan-grass
sorghumxsudangrass and pearl millet
cultivars in manawatu. Agronomy New
Zealand, 41: 13-22.
- Nazlı, İ., R., İnal, İ., Kuşvuran, A., Sezer, M., C., Tansı,
V. 2013. Determinaton of yield and quality
properties of some sorghumxsudangrass
hybrid cultivars under Cukurova conditions.
10. Field Crops Congress of Turkey, Konya.
- Özköse, A., Mülayim, M., Acar, R. 2015. Effect of row
spacing on some yield and yield components
of silage sorghum cultivars in Konya
conditions. Selcuk University Faculty of
Agriculture Journal, 2(1): 10-18.
- Parlak, M., Özaslan, A. 2006. The effect of different
irrigation water salinities on silage sorghum
(Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) yield and soil
salinity. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(1): 8-13.
- Pedersen, J., Gorz, H.J., Haskins, F.A., Ross, W. 1982. Variability for quality and agronomic traits in forage sorghum hybrids. Crop Science, 22:4, 853-856.
- Petersen, R.G. 1994. Agricultural Field Experiments: Design and Analysis. CRC Press, 426, 105 p.
- Pires, D.A. d. A., Moura, M.M.A., Costa, R.F., Rodrigues, J.A.S., Alves, K.A. 2017. Nutritional characteristics of sorghum hybrids hay (Sorghum sudanense vs. Sorghum bicolor). Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 39(3): 229-234.
- Pushparajah, S., Sinniah, J. 2018. Evaluation of dry matter yield and nutritive value of sugar graze and Jumbo plus at different spacing in the yala season in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. Pushparajah and Sinniah Agric & Food Secur (2018) 7:22 7(1): 22.
- Salman, A., Budak, B. 2015. A study on yield and yield properties of different varieties of hybrid sorghum x sorghum sudan grass (Sorghum bicolor x Sorghum sudanense Stapf.). Journal of Adnan Menderes University Agricultural Faculty, 12(2): 93-100.
- Siefers, M., Turner, J., Huck, G., Anderson, S., Bolsen, K., Young, M.A., Pope, R.V. 1997. Agronomic and silage quality traits of forage sorghum cultivars in 1995 Kansas Agric. Exp. Sta. Rep. Prog., 783: 75-79.
- Tiryaki, İ. 2005. Sorghum: genetics root, usage, breeding techniques and biotechnological developments. K.S.U Journal of Science and Engineering, 8(1): 84-90.
- Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci, 74(10): 3583-3597.
- Yavuz, M. 2005. Detergent fiber system. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, 2005(1) 93-96.