Hande İşıl AKBAĞ, Onur Sinan TÜRKMEN, Harun BAYTEKİN, İsmail Yaman YURTMAN

Effects of Harvesting Time on Nutritional Value of Hydroponic Barley Production

Bu çalışma, hidroponik sistemde yetiştirilen arpa bitkisinin besleme değerliliği üzerine farklı hasat zamanlarının etkisinin araştırılması amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Bu amaçla arpa hasılı 4, 7, 10 ve 13. günlerde hasat edilmiş, bitki örnekleri üzerinde kimyasal bileşimin belirlenmesine yönelik analizler ve in vitro gaz üretim tekniği kullanılarak OMS ve ME içerikleri belirlenmiştir. Bitkide hasat gününün ilerlemesiyle KM içeriğinin düştüğü, HP içeriğinde düzenli bir değişim olmadığı, hücre duvarı bileşen miktarı (NDF, ADF, ADL) ve kül içeriğinin arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada KM, ADF ve kül içeriklerinin önemli düzeyde değiştiği tespit edilmiştir (P0.05). Bu çalışmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre, besleme değerliliği açısından en uygun hasat zamanının 7. gün olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler:

arpa, hidroponik, in vitro gaz üretimi, hasat zamanı

Effects of Harvesting Time on Nutritional Value of Hydroponic Barley Production

In this study aimed that the effects of different harvesting times on the nutritional value of barley fodder producing in hydroponic system. Barley fodders were harvested on the 4th, 7th, 10th and 13th days following sowing date. Analysis performed for determining the chemical composition and organic matter digestibility (OMD) and ME content with in vitro gas production technique. It was determined that the DM content was decreased, the CP content was not changed significantly, cell wall contents (NDF, ADF, ADL) and ash content were increased by the maturation of the sprouts. In this study DM, ADF and ash contents were changed significantly (P0.05). According to the results, suitable harvesting date was 7th day following the sowing in term of nutritional value of the fodder

Keywords:

barley, hydroponics, in vitro gas production, harvest time,

PDF

___

Al-Karaki, G. N. and M. Al-Hashmi. 2010. Effect of Mineral Fertilization and Seeding Rate on Barley Green Fodder Production and Quality under Hydroponic Conditions. Proceedings of Exhibition on Soilless Culture", 8-13 March 2010, Singapore. Conference &
Al-Karaki, G. N., Al-Momani, N. 2011. Evaluation of Some Barley Cultivars for Green Fodder Production and Water Use Efficiency under Hydroponic Conditions. Jordan J. Agricultural Science 7 (3):448–456.
ANKOM, 2005. Procedures for NDF, ADF and ADL Analysis, URL: http://www.ankom.com.
Anonim, 2011. Hydroponic Fodder Production. An Analysis of Practical and Commercial Opportunity. The New Zealand Merino Company.
AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15.th Edition Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
Chavan, J., Kadam, S. S., 1989. Nutritional Improvement of Cereals by Sprouting. Critical Review. Food Science Nutrition, 28 (5): 401-437.
El-Morsy, A. T., Abul-Soud, M., Eman, M. S. A., 2013. Hydroponic Localized Technology as a Climate Change Adaptation under Egyptian Conditions. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 9 (6): 341-350. Green Forage
Falkenmark, M., 2007. Shift in Thinking to Address the 21 st Century Hunger Gap Moving Focus from Blue to Green Water Management. Water Resource Manage, 21: 3-18.
Fazaeli H., Golmohammadi H., A., Tabatabayee S., N., Asghari-Tabrizi M., 2012. Productivity and Nutritive Value of Barley Green Fodder Yield in Hydroponic System. World Applied Sciences Journal 16 (4): 531-539.
Fazeli, H., Golmohammadi, H. A., Shoayee, A. A., Montajebi, N., Mosharraf, Sh., 2011. Performance Hydroponics Fodder Barley. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 13: 367- 375. Calves Fed
Hoffman, M. T., Vogel, C. 2008. Climate Change Impacts on African Rangelands. Rangelands 30:12–17.
Hoffman, P.C., K.M. Lundberg, L.M. Bauman, R.D. Shaver, 2003. The Effect of Maturity on NDF Digestibility. Focus on Forage, 5: 1-3.
Larbi A., Smith J.W., Kurdi I.O., Adeknle I.O., Raji A.M., Ladipo Composition, Rumen Degradation, and Gas Production Multipurpose Fodder Trees and Shrubs During Wet and Dry Seasons in the Humid Tropics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72, 81–96.
Lorenz, K., 1980. Cereal Sprouts: Composition, Nutritive Value, Food Applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 13: 353-385.
Menke K. H. ve Steingass H., 1988. Estimation of the Energetic Feed Value Obtain from the Chemical Production Using Rumen Fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28:7–55.
Menke K. H., Raab L., Salewski A., Steingas H., Fritz D. ve Schneider H., 1979. The Estimation of the Digestibility and Metabolisable Energy Content of Ruminant Feedingstuffs from the Gas Production When They are Incubated with Rumen Liquor. Journal of Agriculture Science Camb., 93: 217–222.
Naik, P. K., Dhuri, R. B., Swain, B. K., Singh, N. P., 2012. Nutrient Changes with the Growth of Hydroponics Fodder Maize. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 29 (2): 161-163.
Nsahlai I.V., Siaw D.E.K.A., Osuji P.O., 1994. The Relationship between Gas Production and Chemical Composition of 23 Browses of the
Genus Sesbania. J. Sci. Food Agric. 65, 13–20.
SAS, 1999. Institute Inc., SAS OnlineDoc®, Version 8.0, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Tudor G., D., Darcy T., Smith P., C., Shallcross F., Allen J., G., 2004. Is there a Role for Hydroponics in the Beef Industry? Animal Production in Australia, 25:233.
Tudor, G., Darcy, T., Smith, P. and Shallcross, F. 2003. The Intake and Live Weight Change of Drought Master Steers Fed Hydroponically Grown, Young Sprouted Barley Fodder (Auto Grass). Department of Agriculture Western Australia.
Van Soest P., J., Robertson J., B., ve Lewis B., A., Symposium: 1991. Methodology, Metabolism and Nutritional Implications in Dairy Cattle. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber and Non-starch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J. Dairy Sci 74: 3583-3597.
Yılmaz, N., 2007. Arpa. Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü T. E. A. E- Bakış, 9 (2): 1-4.