Effect of Different Pruning Severity on Vegetative Growth in Peach (Prunus persica)

Bu çalışmada; sekiz yaşlı ‘Red Haven’ ve ‘Dixired’ şeftali çeşidi ağaçlarında, seçilen dallara altı farklı şiddette kesim uygulanarak, budama şiddetinin dalların vegetatif büyümesi üzerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Dallara uygulanan kesim şiddetleri şöyledir: 1) Hiç budanmamış (kontrol), 2) Uç alma (1-2cm), 3) Dalın 1/3’ünün kesilmesi, 4) Dalın 1/2'sinin kesilmesi, 5) Dalın 2/3’ünün kesilmesi, 6) Dalın 3-6cm’den kesilmesi. Üç yıl süreyle Ocak sonu Şubat başı arasında dallar üzerinde kesimler yapılmış, bir yıl sonra iki yaşlı dal uzunluğu, çapı ve göz sayısı, bu dallardan oluşan yeni sürgünlerin sayısı, uzunluğu, çapı ve içerdikleri göz sayısı belirlenmiş ve elde edilen veriler analiz edilerek değerlendirilmiştir

Effect of Different Pruning Severity on Vegetative Growth in Peach (Prunus persica)

In this study, the effect of vegetative growth of branches was investigated by using six different pruning severity on eight-year-old ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Dixired’ peach trees was investigated. The pruning severity applied on the branches were as follows: 1) Non pruning (control), 2) Tipping (1-2cm), 3) Pruning of 1/3 of the branch, 4) Pruning of 1/2 of the branch, 5) Pruning of 2/3 of the branch, 6) Pruning above 3-6cm of the branch. Pruning of branches was performed between end of January and beginning of February during three years. After one year form each pruning, the length, diameter and bud amount of 2-year-old branches, and the length, diameter and bud amount of 1-year-old shoots grown from 2-year-old branches were determined and analysed

___

  • Andersen, P.C., 1984. Training and pruning deciduous fruit trees. Bulletin No.40, pp:27. http://mtngrv.missouristate.edu.
  • Bussi, C., Lescourret, F., Mercier, V., 2010. Effects of winter pruning and of water restriction on fruit and vegetative growth, water potential and leaf gas exchange during the final stage of rapid growth in an early maturing peach cultivar. Europ. J. Hort. Sci., 75 (1). S. 15-19.
  • Demirtas, M.N., Bolat, İ., Ercisli, S., Ikinci, A., Olmez, H.A., Sahin, M., Altindag, M., Celik, B., 2010. The effects of different pruning treatments on the growth, fruit quality and yield of ‘Hacıhaliloglu’ apricot. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 9 (4), 183-192
  • Genard, M., Pages, L., Kervella, J., 1998. A carbon balance model of peach tree growth and development for studying the pruning response. Tree Physiology 18,351-362.
  • Günver-Dalkılıç, G., Dalkılıç, Z., Mestav, H.O., 2005. Effect of different pruning severity on vegetative growth and rooting of shoots in walnut (Juglans regia L.). BAHÇE Ceviz 34(1): 247-251 (in Turkish).
  • Hassan, A.H., 1990. Effect of nutrition and severity of pruning on peaches. Acta Horticulturae 274, 187-193.
  • Ikinci, A., 2014. Influence of pre- and postharvest sommer pruning on the growth, yield, fruit quality, and carbohydrate content of early season peach cultivar. Hindawi Publishing Corporation The Scientific World Journal Volume 2014, Article ID 104365, 8 pages.
  • Kappel, F., Bouthillier, M., 2011. Rootstock, severity of dormant pruning and summer pruning influences on peach tree size, yield, and fruit quality. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 491-496.
  • Mediene, S., Jordan, M.O., Pages, L., Lebot, J., Adamowicz, S., 2002. The influence of severe shoot pruning on growth, carbon and nitrogen status in young peach trees (Prunus persica). Tree Physiology 22, 1289–1296
  • Miller, S.S., Byers, R.E., 2000. Response of winter- injured HortTechnology 10(4) 757-765. to pruning.
  • Özçağıran R., Ünal, A., Özeker, E., İsfendiyaroğlu, M., 2011. Temperate-Zone Fruit Crops Vol. I: Stone Fruit Crops, Aegean Univ., Fac. Agric. Pub. No: 553, pp:1-58, Bornova-İzmir, TURKEY (in Turkish).
  • Siham, M., Bussi, C., Lescourret, F., Genard, M., Habib, R., Gilreath, J., 2005. Pruning intensity and fruit load influence on vegetative and fruit growth in ‘Alexandra’ peach. Proc. Fla. State Hort.Soc. 118: 266- 269.
  • Suare, M., 1981. Der Obstbaumschnitt als Eingriff in pflanzliche Regelungsvorgänge – Beitrag zum Verständnis der Schnittwirkungen / Schuß aus Nr.4/1981. Erwerbsobstbau 23:113-120
Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-3647
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. Mevlüt AKÇURA
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Effect of Mechanical Damage on to Emergence Rate and Emergence Force of Some Wild Sunflower (Helianthus L. Spp.) Seeds

Nazan DAĞÜSTÜ, Seda ÖZER

Influence of N fertilization and predecessors on Triticale yield structure characteristics

Mariya GERDZHIKOVA

Dikegulac-Sodium Effect on Micropropagation and Biochemical Parameters in the Cherry Rootstocks CAB-6P and Gisela 6

Virginia SARROPOULOU, Kortessa DIMASSITHERIOU, İoannis THERIOS

Root and Shoot Growth Ratio in Different Growth Stages of Wheat and Barley Grown under Greenhouse Conditions

Hayati AKMAN, Ali TOPAL

The Comparison of Elemental Composition of Deveci and Santa Maria Pear Varieties

Serhat GÜREL, Haluk BAŞAR

Isolation and Identification of Binucleat Rhizoctonia spp. from Wheat Field Soils in the Central Anatolia Region, Turkey

Filiz ÜNAL, F. Sara DOLAR, A. Faik YILDIRIM, Erkol DEMİRCİ

Effect of Silicon on Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes and Photosynthesis in Leaves of Cucumber Plants (Cucumis sativus L.)

Adelina HARIZANOVA, Zlatko ZLATEV, Lyubka Koleva Agricultural UNİVERSİTYPLOVDİV, - PLOVDİV, - BULGARİA

Agricultural and Rural Development In Serbia: Governance, Policy Cycle And Coordination

Sinisa BERJAN, Hamid EL BILALI, Borko SORAJIC, Vesna MRDALJ, Jovana RAICKOVIC, Noureddin DRIOUECH

Effect of Organic Fertilizer and Dry Bread Yeast on Growth and Yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Abdel monnem Sadalaha KAHLEL

Effects of Humic Acid on the Emergence and Seedling Growth of Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.)

Dilek BAŞALMA