Van Gölü Havzası Fasulye Genotipleri (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin Fenotipik ve Moleküler Yöntemlerle Belirlenmesi

Van Gölü havzasının değişik yörelerinden toplanmış olan 95 fasulye genotipinin genetik akrabalık ilişkileri hem fenotipik hem de moleküler yöntemlerle incelenmiştir. Fenotipik yöntemde, 71 adet morfolojik özellik incelenmiş ve bunlar arasında yüksek korelasyon gösterenler değerlendirme dışı bırakılarak fasulye genotiplerine ait 61 adet ölçüm veya gözlemden yararlanılmış; moleküler yöntemde ise 28 primerden elde edilen 219 adet polimorfik ISSR belirteci ve 10 primerden elde edilen 76 adet polimorfik RAPD belirteci kullanılmıştır. Fasulye genotipleri arasındaki genetik akrabalık dereceleri, fenotipik ve moleküler veriler kullanılarak elde edilen değişik matrislerden (Öklid ve Jaccard katsayı matrisleri) dendrogram oluşturularak incelenmiştir. Fenotipik olarak incelenen genotiplerin %69,5’inin Güney Amerika (Andean) ve %30,5’inin Orta Amerika (Mesoamerican) orijinli olduğu ve genotipler arasında yüksek genetik çeşitliliğin olduğu saptanmıştır. Fenotipik ve moleküler verilerin birlikte incelenmesi sonucunda, Güney Amerika ve Orta Amerika orijinli genotiplerin; bodur ve sırık genotiplerin; beyaz, diğer tek renkli ve çok renkli tohumlara sahip genotiplerin ayrı kümelenmelerde yer aldıkları gözlenmiştir.

Determination of Genetic Diversity Using Phenotypic and Molecular Methods among Bean Genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Lake Van Basin

The genetic relationships among 95 bean genotypes collected from different districts of Lake-Van Basin were determined by both phenotypic and molecular markers. In the phenotypic method, 71 morphological traits were examined and those with high correlations were excluded from the evaluation; then 61 measurements or observations of bean genotypes were employed. In the molecular method, 219 polymorphic ISSR markers obtained from 28 primers and 76 polymorphic RAPD markers obtained from 10 primers wereemployed. The genetic relationships among the bean genotypes were studied by examining dendrogram resulted from Euclidean distance obtained from phenotypic data and Euclidean distance and Jaccard’s coefficient obtained from molecular data.In the phenotypic characterization, the genotypes were originated 69.5 % to South America (Andean) and 30.5 % to Central America (Mesoamerican), and there were high genetic diversity among the genotypes.In the evaluation of combined phenotypic and molecular data, it wasobserved that the genotypes originated from Andean and Mesoamerican; dwarf and climbing genotypes; genotypes with white, other one-colored, and mottled seeds were clustered separately.

___

  • Adams MW, Coyne DP, Davis JHC, Grahaw PH, Francis CA. 1985. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). In: Grain Legume Crops. R.J. Summefield and E.H. Roberts (eds.), Collins Professional and Technical Books.
  • Akashi Y, Fukuda N, Wako T, Masuda M, Kato K. 2002. Genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships in East and South Asian melons, Cucumis melo L., based on the analysis of five isozymes. Euphytica, 125: 385-396.
  • Angioi SA, Rau D, Attene G, Nanni L, Bellucci E, Logozzo G, Negri V, Spagnoletti Zeuli PL, Papa R. 2010. Beans in Europe: origin and structure of the European landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Theor. Appl. Genet., 121: 829-843.
  • Anonim, 2016. FAOSTAT. Statistic Database. http://faostat.fao.org/
  • Asfaw A, Blair MW, Almekinders C. 2009. Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the East African highlands. Theor Appl. Genet., 120: 1-12.
  • Benchimol LL, Campos T, Carbonell SAM, Colombo CA, Chioratto AF, Formighieri EF, Gouvea LRL, Souza AP. 2007. Structure of genetic diversity among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties of Mesoamerican and Andean origins using new developed microsatellite markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 54: 1747-1762.
  • Blair MW, Diaz JM, Hidalgo R, Diaz LM, Duque MC. 2007. Microsatellite characterization of andean races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet., 116: 29- 43.
  • Blair MW, Giraldo MC, Buendia HF, Tovar E, Duque MC, Beebe SE. 2006. Microsatellite marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet., 113: 100- 109.
  • Ceylan A, Ocal N, Akbulut M. 2014. Genetic diversity among the Turkish common bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as assessed by SRAP, POGP and cpSSR markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 54: 219–229.
  • Chacon SMI, Pickersgill B, Debouck DG. 2005. Domestication patterns in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and the origin of the Mesoamerican and Andean cultivated races. Theor. Appl. Genet., 110: 432-444.
  • Chiorato AF, Carbonell SAM, Dias LAS, Moura RR, Chiavegato MB, Colombo CA. 2006. Identification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) duplicates using agromorphological and molecular data. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 29 (1): 105-111.
  • Chiorato FC, Carbonell AMC, Benchimol LL, Chiavegato MB, Dias LAS, Colombo CA. 2007. Genetic diversity in common bean accessions evaluated by means of morphoagromonical and RAPD data. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz), 64 (3):256-262.
  • Cruz PE, Gepts P, Garcia-Marin PC, Villareal DZ. 2005. Spatial distribution of genetic diversity in wild populations of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Guanajuato and Michoacan, Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52: 589-599.
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochem. Bull., 19: 11-15.
  • Duarte JM, Santos JB, Melo LC. 1999. Genetic divergence among common bean cultivars from different races based on RAPD markers. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22 (3): 419-426.
  • Duran LA, Blair MW, Giraldo MC, Macchiavelli R, Prophete E, Nin JC, Beaver JC. 2005. Morphological and molecular characterization of common bean landraces and cultivars from the Caribbean. Crop Science, 45: 1320-1328.
  • Ekincialp A, Şensoy S. 2018. Phenotypic and molecular determination of anthracnose disease resistance in Lake Van Basin’s bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Research, 41(1): 135-142.
  • Erdinc C, Ekincialp A, Yıldız M, Kabay T, Türkmen O, Sensoy S. 2013. Molecular genetic diversity in Lake Van basin melons (Cucumis melo L.) based on RAPD and ISSR markers. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(3): 264-270.
  • Erdinc C, Turkmen O, Dasgan HY, Sensoy S. 2017. Phenotypic and molecular genetic diversity among some Turkish bean genotypes. JAPS, Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 27(6): 1963-1973.
  • Furan MA, Gebologlu MD. 2017. Yetiştiriciliği Yapılan Bazı Türk Kişniş (Coriandrum sativum L.) Çeşitlerinde Genetik Çeşitliliğin ISSR ve SRAP Markörleri Yardımıyla Değerlendirilmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 27 (2): 245-251.
  • Galvan MZ, Menendez-Sevillano MC, De Ron AM, Santalla M, Balatti PA. 2005. Analysis of diversity in wild and cultivated common beans from Argentina. Annu. Rpt. Bean Improvement Coop., 48: 14-15.
  • Galvan MZ, Menendez-Sevillano MC, De Ron AM, Santalla M, Balatti PA. 2006. Genetic diversity among wild common beans from Northwestern Argentina based on morphoagronomic and RAPD data. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 53: 891-900.
  • Gostimsky SA, Kokaeva ZG, Konovalov FA. 2005. Studying plant genome variation using molecular markers. Russian Journal of Genetics, 41(4): 378-388.
  • Gülşen O, Mutlu N. 2005. Bitki biliminde kullanılan genetik markırlar ve kullanım alanları. Alatarım, 4 (2): 27-37.
  • Jose FC, Sudheer Mohammed MM, Thomas G, Varghese G, Selvaraj N, Dorai M. 2009. Genetic diversity and conservation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) landraces in Nilgiris. Current Science, 97 (2): 227-235.
  • Kaçar O, Çakmak F, Çöplü N, Azkan N. 2004. Bursa koşullarında bazı kuru fasulye çeşitlerinde (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) bakteri aşılama ve değişik azot dozlarının verim ve verim unsurları üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (1): 207-218.
  • Khaidizar MI, Haliloglu K, Elkoca E, Aydin M, Kantar F. 2012 Genetic diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces grown in Northeast Anatolia of Turkey assessed with Simple Sequence Repeat Markers. Turk. J. Field Crops., 17(2):145-150.
  • Kumar LS. 1999. DNA markers in plant improvement: An overview. Biotechnology Advances, 17: 143-182.
  • Kwak M, Gepts P. 2009. Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet., 118: 979-992.
  • Lioi L, Piergiovanni AR, Pignone D, Puglisi S, Santantonio M, Sonnante G. 2005. Genetic diversity of some surviving on farm Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Plant Breeding, 124: 576-581.
  • Madakbas SY, Sarıkamış G, Başak H, Karadavut U, Yüksel Özmen C,. Daşçı MG, Çayan S. 2016. Genetic characterization of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) accessions from Turkey with SCAR and SSR markers. Biochem. Genet., 54: 495-505.
  • Madakbaş SY, Hız MC, Gültekin Y, Sayar MT. 2009. STS/SCAR belirteçler kullanılarak taze fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) hat ve çeşitlerinde antraknoza (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc&Magnus) Lambs. Scrib) dayanıklılık genlerinin tespiti üzerine araştırmalar. XVI. Biyoteknoloji Kongresi, 13-16 Aralık 2009, Antalya, 162-166.
  • Marotti I, Bonetti A, Minelli M, Catizone P, Dinelli G. 2006. Characterization of some Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces by RAPD, semi-random and ISSR molecular markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54 (1): 175-188.
  • Martins SR, Vences FJ, Saenz de Miera LE, Barroso MR, Carnide V. 2006. RAPD analysis of genetic diversity among and within Portuguese landraces of common white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 108: 133- 142.
  • Metais I, Aubry C, Hamon B, Jalouzot R, Peltier D. 2000. Description and analysis of genetic diversity between commercial bean lines (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet., 101: 1207-1214.
  • Onus AN. 1999. Capsicum'da bazı marker genler arasında linkage çalışmaları. Türkiye III. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi, 14-17 Eylül, Ankara, 474-477. Pradeep Reddy M, Sarla N, Siddiq EA. 2002. Inter simple sequence repeat ISSR polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica, 128: 9-17.
  • Rodino AP, Santalla M, Ron AMD, Singh SP. 2003. A core collection of common bean from the Iberian peninsula. Euphytica, 131: 165-175.
  • Rohlf FJ. 1997. NTSYS-Pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exeter Software, New York.
  • Sarıkamış G, Yaşar F, Bakır M, Kazan K, Ergül A. 2009. Genetic characterization of gren bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes from eastern Turkey. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8 (3): 880-887.
  • Sensoy S, Büyükalaca S, Abak K. 2007. Evaluation of genetic diversity in Turkish melons (Cucumis melo L.) based on phenotypic characters and RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54(6): 1351-1365.
  • Sicard D, Nanni L, Porfiri O, Bulfon D, Papa R. 2005. Genetic diversity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. coccineus L. Landraces in central Italy. Plant Breeding, 124: 464-472.
  • Singh SP. 2001. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars: A Review. Crop Science, 41: 1659-1675.
  • Şehirali S, Özgen M, Karagöz A, Sürek M, Adak S, Güvenç İ, Kenar D. 2005. Bitki genetik kaynaklarının korunma ve kullanımı. TMMOB Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası VI. Teknik Kongresi, 253-273.
  • Tertivanidis K, Koutita O, Papadopoulos I, Tokatlidis IS, Tamout EG, Pappa-Michailidou V, Koutsika-Sotiriou M. 2008. Genetic diversity in bean populations based onrandom amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Biotechnology, 7 (1): 1-9.
  • Tiwari M, Singh NK, Rathore M, Kumar N. 2005. RAPD markers in the analysis of genetic diversity among common bean germplasm from Central Himalaya. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52: 315-324.
  • Vural M. 2003. Türkiye’nin tehlike altındaki bitkileri. FAO/BM Tematik Grubu, Türkiye’de Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Organik Tarım Çalıştay Raporu, 15-16 Nisan 2003, 168-183.
  • Weir BS. 1990 Genetic data analysis. Methods for discrete population genetic data. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
  • Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JK. 1997. POPGENE, the user Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. University of Alberta, Canada. Molecular Biology and Biotechnlogy Centre.
  • Yıldız M, Ekbic E, Keles D, Sensoy S, Abak K. 2011. Use of ISSR, SRAP and RAPD markers to assess genetic diversity in Turkish melons, Scientia Horticulturae, 130: 349-353.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sırakaraağaçlar Deresinde (Sinop-Karadeniz Bölgesi) Anyonik Deterjan Kirliliğinin Araştırılması

Ayşe GÜNDOĞDU, Erdi GÜLTEPE, Uğur ÇARLI

Van Gölü Havzası Fasulye Genotipleri (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Arasındaki Genetik Çeşitliliğin Fenotipik ve Moleküler Yöntemlerle Belirlenmesi

Aytekin EKİNCİALP, SUAT ŞENSOY

Challenges for a Transition from Peasant Agriculture to a Business Agriculture in Burkina Faso

Babou SOGUEI, HANDAN AKÇAÖZ

Effect of Polyamine on Pigmentation, Reactive Oxidative Species and Antioxidant under Drought in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Sharmin AKTER, Golam RASUL, Mohammad ZAKARIA, Mahathir SARKER, Irin Sultana NİLA, Sudipta DUTTA, Masudul HAQUE, Motiar ROHMAN

Determination of Resistance Cumhuriyet-75 and Selimiye-95 Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Varieties Against to Some Abiotic Stress Factories

NEZAHAT TURFAN, EKREM MUTLU

Seralarda farklı Yöntemlere göre hesaplanan yakıt tüketiminin gerçek yakıt tüketimi ile karşılaştırılması

Ali ÇAYLI, Abdullah Nafi BAYTORUN, Adil AKYÜZ, Sait ÜSTÜN, Zeynep ZAİMOĞLU

Comparison of Greenhouse Fuel Consumption Calculated Using Different Methods with Actual Fuel Consumption

ABDULLAH NAFİ BAYTORUN, BİNNAZ ZEYNEP ZAİMOĞLU, ADİL AKYÜZ, SAİT ÜSTÜN, ALİ ÇAYLI

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeİn ovo ve/veya Yeme İlave Yoluyla Etlik Piliçlerin Bağırsak Histolojileri, Sekal Mikrobiyotaları ve Büyümelerini İyileştirdi

İsa COŞKUN, Salih GÜLEN

Orman yollarının Karaçam ormanlarındaki Ips sexdentatuszararı üzerine etkiler

Burak ARICAK, Korhan ENEZ, Gonca Ece ÖZCAN

Land Ownership and Profitability of Greenhouse Production: Antalya Case

RAHMİYE FİGEN CEYLAN, Cengiz SAYIN, MAKBULE NİSA MENCET YELBOĞA, Meral ÖZALP, Eda İLBASMIŞ, OYA SAV