Hatice Kolak, Hüseyin Samet Aşıkkutlu, Latif Gürkan Kaya

Analysis of the Spatial Perception of Antalya Vocational and Technical Anatolian High School as a Historical Building

This study aimed to analyze the spatial perception of educational buildings with historical significance by users. In this context, Antalya Vocational and Technical Anatolian High School, which is a historical building, was discussed as a material. A questionnaire was applied to individuals who graduated from this high school to examine how the facade design and garden layout were perceived in the spatial evaluation of the high school discussed in the study. Three different facade designs (modern, traditional, and mixed) based on the building complex were prepared using the AutoCAD, 3D Max, and Photoshop CS3 programs to be used in the questionnaire form consisting of open-ended and closed-ended questions. The frequency analysis was performed using the SPSS program to evaluate the data obtained after the questionnaire. According to the obtained results, it was determined that the middle age group was highly interested in the traditional and mixed facade design. It was observed that the participants further preferred the modern facade design as their level of education increased. It was observed that the participants preferred the mixed facade design more as their income level increased. Furthermore, it was determined that the mixed facade design was generally preferred more by the participants. In conclusion, the quality of historical buildings from the past should be updated with a modern perspective. Thus, positive effects will be achieved for the continuity of the building and its compliance with the environment. It is foreseen to provide positive effects both in terms of functionality and in the field of visual admiration and comfort by evaluating the changing needs of society over time and environmental factors together. On the other hand, while positive elements ensure the continuity of buildings and building complexes, it will also be possible to contribute to their becoming an urban image.

PDF

___

Abusaada H, Elshater A. 2021. Revealing distinguishing factors between Space and Place in urban design literature. Journal of Urban Design, 26(3): 319-340. doi: 10.1080/13574809. 2020.1832887
Allen K, Kern ML, Vella-Brodrick D, Hattie J, Waters L. 2018. What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1): 1- 34. doi: 10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8
Andaç Güzel T. 2021. A Research on entryway decoration and user design preferences in residences. Online Journal of Art and Design, 9(1): 153-162. Available from: http://www. adjournal.net/articles/91/9110.pdf [Accessed 28 July 2022]
Anonymous 2020a. Antalya Provincial Directorate of National Education Archive.
ANTEMDER, 2020. Antalya Technical and Industrial Vocational High School Alumni Association Archive.
Bundschu-Mooney E. 2003. School Garden Investigation: Environmental Awareness and Education. Educational Resources Information Center, (Reproductions suppliedby EDRS), DominicanUniversity of California, USA, 39 s.
Demir Yildiz C, Dönmez B. 2017. Anadolu Liseleri Tip Projelerinin Millî Eğitim Bakanliği Eğitim Yapilari Asgari Tasarim Standartlari Açisindan Değerlendirilmesi. In: Akbaba Altun S, Örücü D, Beycioğlu K, Kondakçi Y, Koşar S (editors). Research in Educational Administration, Ankara, PEGEM Akademi. pp. 204-220. e-ISBN 978-605-241-155-1
Di̇nç P, Onat E. 2013. Evaluating a primary school in contexts of building program and design. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 17(3): 35- 55. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ gazimmfd/issue/6653/89019 [Accessed 27 July 2022]
Eryi̇ği̇t ZB, Aniktar S. 2021. Space perception in re-functioned industrial buildings. IDEALKENT, 12: 708–734. doi: 10.31198/idealkent.802512
Fullilove MT. 1996. Psychiatric implications of displacement: contributions from the psychology of place, American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(12): 1516 23. doi: 10.1176/ajp. 153.12.1516
Gabellieri N. 2021. Placematters: Geographical Context, Place Belonging and the Production of Locality in Mediterraneannoirs. GeoJournal, doi: https://doi.org/10.100 7/s10708-021-10470-x
Gooding L, Erdogan B, Dino IG. 2021. Involving End Users in Retrofit of Higher Education Buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 44: 102633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe. 2021.102633
Huxtable AL. 2004. Building Facade. Available from: http://www.class.uidaho.edu/communityresearch/facade_re modeling.htm. [Accessed 20 June 2020]
Inalhan G, Finch E. 2004. Place attachment and sense of belonging. Facilities, 22(5/6): 120-128. doi: 10.1108/02632770410540333120
Karaman Ö, Tarim B. 2018. Investigation of the correlation between belonging needs of students attending university and well-being. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(4): 781–788. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060422
Kitchen P, Williams AM, Gallina M. 2015. Sense of belonging to local community in small-to-medium sized Canadian urban areas: A comparison of immigrant and Canadian-born residents. BMC Psychology, 3(28): 1-17. doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0085-0
Kutlu İ, Ergün R. 2021. A systematic approach for re-using processes in historical buildings; example of Atik Valide Kulliye. European Journal of Science and Technology, 25: 172-184. doi: 10.31590/ejosat.889402
Lynch N. 2022. Remaking the obsolete: critical geographies of contemporary adaptive reuse. GeographyCompass, 16(1): 1- 14. e12605. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12605
Magalhães CD, Carmona M. 2006. Innovations in the management of public space: reshaping and refocusing governance. Planning Theory and Practice, 7(3): 289-303. doi: 10.1080/14649350600841461
Oral B. 2019. Geleneksel mimariye öykünme bağlaminda günümüz Safranbolu sivil mimarisi. İnsan ve İnsan, 6(21): 597-631. doi: 0.29224/insanveinsan.526182
Pallasmaa J. 2011. Tenin Gözleri: Mimarlik ve Duyular. (Translate Kiliç AU), YEM Publishing. İstanbul.
Sadikoğlu H, Özsoy A. 2016. Residence use as a preference of high-income user groups. IDEALKENT, 7(18): 226-245. Available from: https:/dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article- file/464553 [Accessed 28 July 2022]
Sağocak M. 2007. Socio-cultural dimension of design. MEGARON, 2(4): 254-265. Available from: https://jag.journalagent.com/megaron/pdfs/MEGARON- 04696-ARTICLE-SAGOCAK.pdf [Accessed 28 July 2022]
Sözen M. 1972. Anadolu Medreseleri, 2nd Volume., Istanbul Technical University Faculty of Architecture Press, İstanbul. SPSS Inc. 2002. SPSS 11.0 Guide to Data Analysis. Prentice Hall Public, New Jersey, 637 s.
Tatar B. 2022. Mekân ve insan. KADEM Kadin Araştirmalari Dergisi, 7(2): 135-148. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2217936 [Accessed 28 July 2022]
Tate WF, Hogrebe MC. 2018. Show Me: Diversity and isolation indicators of spatial segregation with in and across Missouri's School Districts. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(1): 5-22. doi: 10.1080/0161956X.2017.1403170
Ünal S. 2008. Symbolic Meaning of House Facades Both in Local and Foreign House Styles. MSc Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
URL-1, 2020. Antalya İlinin ve Muratpaşa İlçesinin konumu. Available from: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muratpa%C5%9Fa (Accessed 25 September 2020)
Varol EB. 2004. The Role of the Public Art in Public Space to Man-Environment Interaction. PhD Dissertation. The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Wise N, Jimura T. 2020. Tourism, Cultural Heritage and Urban Regeneration: Changing Spaces in Historical, First Edition. Springer. ISBN-10: 303041907X