Influence of Agronomic biofortification on Maize

Influence of Agronomic biofortification on Maize

An experiment was carried out at the ICAR-KVK Research farm, HansRoever Campus, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India during the Kharif season (July to October), 2020 to study the effect of agronomic biofortification through integrated nutrient management on hybrid maize (biofortified and non-biofortified). The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design having 36 treatment combinations of hybrids and nutrients and replicated thrice. The treatment sources consisted of two main plots of maize hybrids (M1: Non-biofortified and M2: biofortified), and six sub-plots of nutrients (S1: 100 % Recommended Dose of Fertilizer RDF through Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, S2: 100 % RDF through Farm Yard Manure, S3: 50% RDF through NPK + 50% RDF through FYM, S4: S1+ Iron and Zinc as foliar application @0.5% conc, S5: S2 + Iron and Zinc as foliar application @0.5% conc, S6: S3 + Iron and Zinc as foliar application @0.5% conc.). The recommended dose of fertilizer was NPK 150:75:75 kg ha-1. Application of 50% RDF through NPK + 50% RDF through FYM with Fe and Zn as foliar application @0.5% conc (S6) at 45 (active vegetative stage) and 90 (grain filling stage) days after sowing, significantly increased all the growth and yield attributes, grain and stover yield, quality attributes and nutrient uptake by maize. Among the nutrient levels, higher grain yield (8.2 t ha-1) and stover yield (10.16 t ha-1), quality attributes, and nutrient uptake were recorded with the application of 50% RDF through NPK + 50% RDF through FYM with Fe and Zn as foliar application @0.5% conc (S6). Similarly, significant net return (INR 78,767) and benefit cost ratio (3.07) were noted with the application of 100% RDF through NPK (S1) followed by 50% RDF through NPK + 50% RDF through FYM with Fe and Zn as foliar application @0.5% conc (S6). Hence, integrated nutrient management with agronomic biofortification @0.5% conc., at 45th and 90th DAS should be adopted to obtain maximum grain yield, net profit, and nutrient uptake by Kharif maize

___

  • GRES software package. 2020. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.
  • Agyenium SB, J Zickermann, M Kornoohrens. 2006. Poultry manure effect on growth and yield of maize. West Africa J. Appl. Ecol., 9: 1-11.
  • Ahmad W, Jan MT, Ilyas M, Shah T, Moinullah KA, Ahmad A, Khan S. 2017. Phenology and yield components of maize as influenced by different forms of dairy manure with supplemental nitrogen management. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Research 3(1): 137146.
  • Ali M, Ali A, Tahir M, Yaseen M. 2012. Growth and Yield response of hybrid maize through integrated phosphorus management. Pakistan Journal of Life and social sciences 10:59-66.
  • Amanullah MM. 1997. Effect of intercropping fertilizer levels and organic manures on the growth and yield of cassava (Manihot escluenta crantz). PhD Dissertation, TNAU, Coimbatore.
  • Augustine R, Kalyanasundaram D. 2020. Agronomic biofortification through micronutrient management in maize. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 12: 430-437.
  • ASTM. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2001. In American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive: West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  • Ayoola OT, EA Makinde. 2009. Maize growth, yield and soil nutrient changes with N-enriched organic fertilizers. African Journal of food, agriculture, nutrition and development, 9(1): 580-592.
  • Babannvar VP, Pleshi CM, Balachandra N. 1990. Effect of organic matter on crop yield, physical and chemical properties of a Vertisols. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 38:426-429.
  • Bukesh MA, Ahmad R, Iqbal J, Maqbool MM, Ali A, Ishaque M, Hussainc S. 2012. Nutritional and physiological significance of potassium application in maize hybrid crop production. Pak. J. Nutr., 11(2): 187-202.
  • Cakmak I, Pfeiffer WH, McClafferty B. 2010. Biofortification of durum wheat with zinc and iron. Cereal Chem., 87(1): 10-20.
  • Chakraborti M, Prasanna BM, Hossain F, Singh AM, Guleria S.K. 2009. Genetic evaluation of kenel Fe and Zn concentrations and yield performance of selected maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes. Range Management and Agro-forestry, 30: 109-114.
  • Global food policy report 2016. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedure for agricultural research. II edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 680p.
  • Guleria SK, Chahota RK, Kumar P, Kumar A, Prasanna BM, Hossain F, Gupta HS. 2013. Analysis of genetic variability and genotype x year interactions on kernel zinc concentration in selected Indian and exotic maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 83: 836-841.
  • Hythum M, Nasser Kh. 2012. Importance of Micronutrients and its Application Methods for Improving Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield Grown in Clayey Soil. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 12(7): 954-959
  • Ibrikci H, Ulger AC, Korkmaz K, Okdem A, Buyuk G, Amar B, Konuskan O, Karnez E, Ozgenturk G, Oguz H, Ryan J. 2009: Genotypic responses of corn to phosphorus fertilizer rates in calcareous soils. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 40, 1418– 1435.
  • Impa SM, Johnson-Beebout, SE. 2012. Mitigating zinc deficiency and achieving high grain Zn in rice through the integration of soil chemistry and plant physiology research. Plant Soil 361: 3-41.
  • Kannan RL, Dhivya M, Abinaya D, Krishna RL, Kumar SK. 2013. Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Soil Fertility and Productivity in Maize. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., 2(8): 61-67.
  • Kolawale E, Samson UR. 2009. Growth and Yield of Maize as Influenced by sowing date and Poultry Manure Application. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj., 37(1): 199-203.
  • Korkmaz K, Akgün M, Özcan MM, Özkutlu F, Kara SM. 2021. Interaction effects of phosphorus (P) and zinc (Zn) on dry matter, concentration and uptake of P and Zn in chia. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(5), 755-764.
  • Kruczek A. 2005. Effect of row fertilization with different kinds of fertilizers on the maize yield. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Agricultura (Poland).
  • Kumar P, Halepyati AS, Pujari BT, Desai BK. 2007. Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of maize (Zea mays L.) under rainfed condition. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(3): 462-65.
  • Kumari N, Singh AK., Pal SK, Thakur R. 2010. Effect of organic nutrient management on yield, nutrient uptake and nutrient balance sheet in scented rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 55(3):220-23.
  • Kutman UB, Yildiz B, Ozturk L, Cakmak I. 2010. Biofortification of durum wheat with zinc through soil and foliar applications of nitrogen. Cereal Chem., 87:1-9.
  • Jat, ML, Satyanarayana T, Majumdar K, Parihar CM, Jat SL, Tetarwal JP, Jat RK, Saharwat YS. 2013. Fertilizers best management practices for maize systems. Indian Journal of Fertilizers, 9(4): 80-94.
  • Maidul H, Tushar KR, Manirul Islam KM, Younus Ali SM, Noor Muhammad, Ataur R, Nitay CB. 2018. Growth and Yield of Hybrid Maize as Influenced by Fertilizer Management. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology, 6(12): 1727-1733.
  • Masuka B, Atlin GN, Olsen M, Magorokosho C, Labuschagne M, Crossa J, Banziger M, Pixley KV, Vivek BS, Von Biljion A. 2017. Grains in genetic improvement in Eastern and Southern Africa: I. CIMMYT hybrid breeding pipeline. Crop Sci., 57:168-179.
  • Monika G, Natasha S, Saloni S, Payal K, Aman K, Venkatesh C, Priya A. 2018. Biofortified Crops Generated by Breeding, Agronomy, and Transgenic Approaches Are Improving Lives of Millions of People around the World. Frontiers in Nutrition, 5: 12.
  • Moehn S, Pencharz PB, Ball RO. 2012. Lessons learned regarding symptoms of tryptophan deficiency and excess from animal requirement studies. Journal of Nutrition, 142:2231.
  • Muhammad S, Gulam J, Ejaz R, Muhammad EA, Arshad NC. 2012. Impact of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Maize under Rain-Fed Conditions. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 11: 27-33.
  • Nikhil K, Salakinkop SR. 2018. Agronomic Biofortification of Maize with Zinc and Iron Micronutrients. Modern Concepts & Development in Agronomy, 1(5): 2-5.
  • Okoroafor I, Okelola E, Edeh O, Nemehute V, Onu C, Nwaneri T, Chinaka G. 2013. Effect of organic manure on the growth and yield performance of maize in Ishiagu, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. IOSR J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 5: 28-31.
  • Pawar RB. 1996. Dynamics of earthworm soil plant relationship in semiarid tropics. PhD Dissertation, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.
  • Pfeiffer WH, McClafferty B. 2007. Harvest Plus: breeding crops for better nutrition. Crop Science, 47: S88-S105.
  • Prasad R. 2009. Ferti-fortification of grains – an easy option to alleviate malnutrition of some micronutrients in human beings. Indian J. Fert., 5(12): 129-133.
  • Reddy BG, Reddy MSN. 1998. Effect of organic manures and nitrogen levels on soil available nutrient status in maize- soybean cropping system. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 46(3): 474-476.
  • Rengel Z, GD Batten, DE Crowley. 1999. Agronomic approaches for improving the micronutrient density in edible portions of field crops. Field Crop Research, 60: 27-40.
  • Sadiq N, Abdur R, Muhammad I, Muhammad AB, Muhammad Faraz A, Fiaz A. 2018. Organic manures: an efficient move towards maize grain. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 7: 189-197.
  • Saleem I, Javid S, Bibi F, Ehsan S, Niaz A, Ahmad ZA. 2016. Biofortification of maize grain with zinc and iron by using fertilizing approach. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 7(4):1-6.
  • Saleh GB, Abdullah D, Amar AR. 2002. Performance, heterosis and heritability in selected tropical maize single double and three way cross hybrids. Journal of Agriculture Science, 138(1):21-28.
  • Samsami S. 2016. Effect of vermicompost on yield and yield components of two corn cultivars. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 1(3): 445-447.
  • Sharma RC, Banik P. 2012. Effect of integrated nutrient management on baby corn-rice cropping system; economic yield, system productivity, nutrient-use efficiency and soil nutrient balance. Ind. J. Agric. Sci., 82(3):220-224.
  • Singh GP, Singh PL, Panwar AS. 2011. Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to biofertilizer, organic and inorganic sources of nutrient in north east India. Legume Research, 34(3): 196-201.
  • Steur HD, Blansquaert D, Strobbe S, Lambert W, Gellynck X, Straeten DVD. 2015. Status and market potential of transgenic biofortified crops. Nature Biotechnology, 33: 25- 29.
  • Tanumihardjo SA, Anderson C, Kaufer-Horwitz M, Bode L, Emenaker NJ, Haqq AM, Satia JA, Silver H, Stadler DD. 2007. Poverty, Obesity and malnutrition: an international perspective recognizing the paradox. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107: 1966-1972.
  • Undie UL, Uwah DF, Attoe EE. 2012. Effect of intercropping and crop arrangement of yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of south southern Nigeria. J. Agric. Sci., 4:37-50.
  • Uwah DF, Udoh AU, Iwo GA. 2011. Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia Esculenta L..) Schott). Int J Agr Sci., 3.1:33-38.
  • Yuan L, Wu L, Yang C, Lv Q. 2012. Effects of iron and zinc foliar application on rice plants and their grain accumulation and grain nutritional quality. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 93:254-261.
  • Zeidan MS, Mohamed MF, Hamouda HA. 2010. Effect of foliar fertilization of Fe, Mn and Zn on wheat yield and quality in low sandy soils fertility. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(6): 696-699
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Influence of Treatment with Sodium Benzoate and Packaging on quality of Catla (Catla catla) steaks during Chilled Storage

Jaydip G Kedar, Asif U Pagarkar, Nikheel Bhojraj Rathod, Taufin E Baug

Changes in Udder Surface Temperature and Milk Quality Characteristics in Cows during the Hot Season

Hüseyin Erdem, İbrahim Cihangir Okuyucu

Total Antioxidant and Oxidant Status and DPPH Free Radical Activity of Euphorbia eriophora

Falah Saleh Mohammed, Hasan Akgül, Mustafa Sevindik, Muhittin Doğan, Eylem Kına3, İmran Uysal

Diferansiyel PCR, Konvansiyonel PCR ve Nested PCR Testleri ile Canine Parvovirus'un Karşılaştırmalı Tespiti: Diferansiyel PCR ile Antijenik Varyantların Tespiti

Sibel Hasırcıoğlu, Hatice Pelin Aslım

The Effect of Semen Dilution on the Number of Spermatozoa Entering the Spermatheca of the Queen Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.)

Yasin Kahya, H. Vasfi Gençer

The Length-Weight Characteristics of Five Elasmobranch Species (Pisces: Chondrichthyes) from Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea Coast of Turkey): Spring 2018

Ali Kara, Burcu Taylan, Bahar Bayhan, Cemil Sağlam, Ali Özcan Babaoğlu

Forecasting Area, Production and Productivity of Vegetable Crops in Nepal using the Box-Jenkins ARIMA Model

Sandip Subedi, Babak Jamshidi, Rabin Thapa, Shivahari Devkota

Determination of the Antimethanogenic Properties of Sumac Leaves (Rhus coriaria L.) Subsitution at Different Ratios İnstead of Corn Silage in Sheep Rations by in Vitro Gas Production Method

Adem Kaya, Tuğba Bakır, Atilla Başer, Bilal Selçuk, Ali Kaya

Melissopalynological Characterization of Honey Samples from Southeastern, Nigeria

Nkechinyere Nweze, Reginald Njokuocha, Chiori Agwu, Nchedochukwu Ikegbunam, Okwong Walter

Temporal Variation in the Viability of Spermatozoa in the Spermathecae of Queen Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.)

Yasin Kahya, H. Vasfi Gençer