Disasters adversely affect human life. Many people face sheltering problems after disasters. Temporary shelter areas are very important in terms of meeting people's post-disaster sheltering needs. In this study, it was aimed to determine temporary shelter areas in the city center of Burdur. The AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method was used to determine temporary shelter areas. According to certain criteria and spatial standards, six temporary shelter areas were determined in the city center of Burdur, and their adequacy was tested. Temporary shelters are located in urban open and green lands. Temporary shelter areas determined under today's conditions are adequate. However, it is predicted that temporary shelter areas will be inadequate in the upcoming process. Some recommendations were made about the problems and the path to be followed in the upcoming process. These recommendations will be useful for the post-disaster process.
___
AFAD, 2020. Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. Acil Toplanma Alanı Sorgulama. Avaible from: https://www.turkiye.gov.tr/afet-ve-acil-durum-yonetimiacil- toplanma-alani-sorgulama [Accessed 20 September 2020]
Allan P, Bryant M. 2011. Resilience as a framework for urbanism and recovery. Journal on Landscape Architecture, 6: 34-45. doi:10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453
Anhorn J, Khazai B. 2015. Open space suitability analysis for emergency shelter after an earthquake. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15: 789–803. doi:10.5194/nhess-15- 789-2015
Anonymous, 2020a. Google Earth. Avaible from: https://www.google.com/earth/ [Accessed 20 November 2020]
Anonymous, 2020b. OpenDem. Download SRTM based Contour Lines. Avaible from: https://www.opendem.info/ download_contours.html [Accessed 20 November 2020]
Aşıkkutlu HS, Aşık Y, Yücedağ C, Kaya LG. 2021. Determination of adequacy of ermegency assembly areas for Burdur city at the neigborhood scale in case of potential earthquakes. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 8(1): In Press.
Baradran-Shoraka M. 2009. Site Selection of Temporary Shelter for Municipality District No.1 of Tehran Based on Damage Assessment (in Persian). Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Disaster Management. Graduate Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Iranian.
Cetin M. 2020. The changing of important factors in the landscape planning occur due to global climate change in temperature, Rain and climate types: A case study of Mersin City. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(12): 2695-2701.
Çınar AK, Akgün Y, Maral H. 2018. Analyzing the planning criteria for emergency assembly points and temporary shelter areas: Case of İzmir-Karsiyaka. Planning, 28(2):179-200. doi: 10.14744/planlama.2018.07088
Deliry Sİ, Uyguçgil H. 2020. GIS-Based land suitability analysis for sustainable urban development: A case study in Eskisehir, Turkey. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Science and Engineering, 20(4): 634-650. doi: 10.35414/akufemubid. 679980
Desouza KC, Flanery TH. 2013. Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual framework. Cities, 35: 89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
Dou X, Song J, Wang L, Tang B, Xu S, Kong F, Jiang X. 2018. Flood risk assessment and mapping based on a modified multi-parameter flood hazard index model in the Guanzhong Urban Area, China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 32: 1131-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00477-017- 1429-5
Emin N, Mutlu E, Güzel AE. 2020. Determination the effectiveness of the cytotoxic analysis on the water quality assessments. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(2): 478-483.
EM-DAT, (2021). The International Disaster Database. Avaible from: https://public.emdat.be/ [Accessed 11 January 2021]
Gerdan S, Şen A. 2019. Evaluation of qualifications of assembly points for disaster and emergency: Case of Kocaeli, Izmit. İdealkent, 10(28): 962-983. doi: 10.31198/idealkent.514077
Gökgöz Bİ, İlerı̇soy ZY, Soyluk A. 2020. Evaluation of emergency shelter areas with the AHP method. European Journal of Science and Technology, (19): 935-945. doi: 10.31590/ejosat.739544
Hoang HTT, Truong, QH, Nguyen AT, Hens L. 2018. Multicriteria evaluation of tourism potential in the central highlands of Vietnam: Combining geographic information system (GIS), analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA). Sustainability, 10: 3097. doi: 10.3390/su10093097
Hurley WJ. 2001. The analytic hierarchy process: a note on an approach to sensitivity which preserves rank order. Computers & Operations Research, 28(2): 185-188. doi: 10.1016/s0305-0548(99)00125-2
Jahangiri K, Borgheipour H, Gendeshmin SB, Matin A, Monazami Tehrani G. 2019. Site selection criteria for temporary sheltering in urban environment. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 11: 58-70. doi: 10.1108/ijdrbe-06-2018-0025
Jayakody RRJC, Amarathunga D, Haigh R. 2018. Integration of disaster management strategies with planning and designing public open spaces. Procedia Engineering, 212: 954-961. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.123
Junian J, Azizifar V. 2018. The evaluation of temporary shelter areas locations using geographic information system and analytic hierarchy process. Civil Engineering Journal, 4(7): 1678-1688. doi: 10.28991/cej-03091104
Kılcı F, Kara BY, Bozkaya B. 2015. Locating temporary shelter areas after an earthquake: A case for Turkey. European Journal of Operational Research, 243: 323-332. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.035
Kırçın PN, Çabuk SN, Aksoy K, Çabuk A. 2017. Ülkemizde yeşil alanların afet sonrası toplanma alanı olarak kullanılma olanaklarının artırılması üzerine bir araştırma, 4. Uluslararası deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, 11-13 Ekim 2017. Avaible from: http://www.tdmd.org.tr/TR/Genel/4UDMSK/pdf2017/3843. pdf [Accessed 25 September 2020]
Kim N, Joo J, Kim M, Park K. 2020. Development of a multicriteria evaluation framework and its application for earthquake shelter selection. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 20: 197-205. doi: 10.9798/kosham.2020.20.2.197
Kordi M, Brandt SA. 2012. Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36: 43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.07.004
La Rosa D. 2014. Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecological Indicators, 42: 122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.011.
Li Y, Liu Y, Jiao J. 2013. A GIS-based suitability analysis of Xiamen’s green space in park for earthquake disaster prevention and refuge. Urban Planning and Design Research, 1(1): 1-8.
Liu Q, Ruan X, Shi P. 2011. Selection of emergency shelter sites for seismic disasters in mountainous regions: Lessons from the 2008 Wenchuan Ms 8.0 Earthquake, China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 40: 926-934. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.07.014
Mougiakou E, Photis YN. 2014. Urban green space network evaluation and planning: Optimizing accessibility based on connectivity and raster gis analysis. European Journal of Geography, 5(4): 19-46.
Mutlu E, Güzel AE. 2019. Evaluation of some physicochemical water quality parameters of Gümüşsuyu Pond (SinopErfelek). Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 7(sp3): 72-77.
MTA, 2020. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü. Yerbilimleri harita görüntüleyici ve çizim editörü. Avaible from: http://yerbilimleri.mta.gov.tr/anasayfa.aspx [Accessed 20 September 2020]
Nappi MML, Nappi V, Souza JC. 2019. Multi-criteria decision model for the selection and location of temporary shelters in disaster management. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 4(1): 16. doi:10.1186/s41018-019-0061-z
Nappi MML, Souza JC. 2015. Disaster management: hierarchical structuring criteria for selection and location of temporary shelters. Natural Hazards, 75(3): 2421-2436. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1437-4
Ozbay E, Çavuş Ö, Kara BY. 2019. Shelter site location under multi-hazard scenarios. Computers & Operations Research, 106: 102-118. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2019.02.008
Peng X, Dai F. 2009. Information systems risk evaluation based on the AHP-fuzzy algorithm. In 2009 International Conference on Networking and Digital Society, 2: 178-180. doi: 10.1109/icnds.2009.124
Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Groffman PM, Band LE, Boone CG, Burch WR, Grimmond CSB, Hom J, Jenkins JC, Law NL, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Warren PS, Wilson MA. 2008. Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the baltimore ecosystem study. BioScience, 58: 139-150. doi: 10.1641/b580208
Ramadhan RH, Al‐Abdul Wahhab HI, Duffuaa SO. 1999. The use of an analytical hierarchy process in pavement maintenance priority ranking. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 5: 25-39. doi:10.1108/13552519910257041
Ramalho CE, Hobbs RJ, 2012. Time for a change: dynamic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27: 179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.008
Saaty RW. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9: 161–176. doi: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
Saaty TL. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (Decision Making Series). New York: McGraw‐Hill. ISBN: 978-0070543713.
Şentürk E, Erener A. 2017. Determination of temporary shelter areas ın natural disasters by gis a case study for Gölcük/Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2: 84–90. doi: 10.26833/ijeg.317314
Tanyaş M, Günalay Y, Aksoy L, Küçük B. 2013. Disaster logistics management: A new model proposal for Rize. II. Rize Development Symposium Proceedings Book, pp. 256- 268.
Taylor TK, Sichinsambwe C, Chansa B. 2016. Public perceptions on location of filling stations in the city of Kitwe in Zambia. Developing Country Studies, 6(6): 133-151.
Turğut BT, Taş G, Herekoğlu A, Tozan H, Vayvay O. 2011. A fuzzy AHP based decision support system for disaster center location selection and a case study for Istanbul. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 20: 499-520. doi: 10.1108/09653561111178943
TÜİK, 2020. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi. Avaible from: https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ medas/?kn=95&locale=tr [Accessed 08 December 2020]
UN, 2018. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. Avaible from: https://population.un.org/wup/ [Accessed 03 January 2021]
UNHCR, 2007. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Handbook for Emergencies (3rd Ed.). UNHCR, Geneva. Avaible from: https://www.ifrc.org/PageFiles/95884/D.01.03.%20Handboo k%20for%20Emergencies_UNHCR.pdf [Accessed 08 December 2020]
Unal M, Uslu C. 2016. GIS-Based accessibility analysis of urban emergency shelters: The case of Adana city. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W1: 95- 101. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w1-95-2016
Zhu C, Wang Y, Ren W, Luo I, Yin Y, Xie W, Liu W. 2016. The planning of green spaces to prevent and avoid urban disasters in Dujiangyan. International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science & Technology, 17(46): 271-276. doi: 10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.46.27