Buğdayın Farklı Gelişme Dönemlerinde Yapraktan “Biyolojik Gübre” Uygulamalarının Verim ve Bazı Verim Öğeleri Üzerine Etkisi

Bu araştırma, ekmeklik buğdayın farklı gelişim dönemlerinde yapraktan “biyolojik gübre” (BG) (%8 N, %1 P2O5, %9 K2O, %3 Fe, %0,06 Zn, Bacillus subtilis (GBO3), Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ve Bacillus pumilus) uygulamalarının verim ve kalite parametreleri üzerine etkilerini belirlemek için planlanmıştır. Bu amaçla yürütülen denemeler, Doğu Akdeniz Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü arazilerinden Doğankent lokasyonunda 2017-2018 ve 2018- 2019 buğday ekim sezonlarında yapılmıştır. Yürütülen araştırmada buğdayların farklı gelişim dönemlerinde yapraktan “biyolojik gübre” uygulamaları yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla, kontrol, kardeşlenme, kardeşlenme + sapa kalkma ve sapa kalkma dönemleri olmak üzere 4 konu çalışılmıştır. Biyolojik gübrenin birinci yıl 100 gr / da ikinci yıl ise 0,75 gr/da dozları araştırılmıştır. Tüm deneme konularına temel gübreleme olarak; ekimle birlikte dekara 15 kg DAP, kardeşlenme döneminde ise 29 kg Üre verilmiştir. Yapılan araştırma sonucunda; buğday tarımında hem kardeşlenme hem de sapa kalkma dönemlerinde yapraktan “biyolojik gübre” uygulamaları kontrol konusuna göre birinci yıl %12,67, ikinci yıl ise %13,16 oranında daha fazla verim artışı sağlamıştır. Yapraktan “biyolojik gübre” uygulamalarının buğdayın kalite parametreleri üzerinde istatistiki olarak önemli bir etkisi görülmemiştir

The Effect of Leaf Applications “Bio-fertilizers” on Yield and Some Yield Components of Wheat at Different Development Periods

This study was conducted to determine the effects of “biofertilizers” (N 8%, P2O5 1%, 9% K2O, 3%Iron, 0.06% Zinc, Bacillus subtilis (GBO3), Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillusamyloliquefaciens ve Bacillus pumilus) eaf applications on yield and quality parameters of breadwheat at different developmental stages. The experiment carried out for this purpose was conductedin the wheat sowing seasons of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 at Doğankent location of the EasternMediterranean Agricultural Research Institute. In this research, “biofertilizers” leaf applications wereapplied to the wheat in different stages of development. For this purpose, 4 themes were worked outas; control, tillering, tillering + stem elengation and stem elengation. Biofertilizers doses of 100 gr/dain the first year and 0.75 gr/da in the second year were investigated. As a basic fertilizer for allexperiment subjects; 15 kg DAP per decar were given during sowing period and 29 kg Urea duringthe tillering period, as a result of the research carried out; using biofertilizers in wheat farming, bothin tillering and stem elengation periods, increased the yield 12.67% more efficiency in the first yearand 13.16% more in the second year than the control subject. There were no statistically significanteffects on quality parameters of wheat by using “biofertilizers” in foliar applications

___

  • AACCI. 2010. American Association of Cereal Chemists International, Approved Methods of the AACCI., Method No: 46–30 The Association: St. Paul. MN., USA.
  • Allison LE, Moodie CD. 1965. Carbonate. In: C.A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Agronomy 9:1379- 1400. Am. Soc. Of Agron. Inc. Madison. Wisconsin. U.S.A.
  • Amer GA, Utkheda RS. 2000. Development of Formulation of Biological Agents for Management of Root Rot of Lettuce and Cucumber. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 46: 809-816.
  • Aydın A, Yıldırım E, Karaman MR, Turan M, Demirtaş A, Şahin F, Güneş A, Esringü A, Dizman M, Tutar A. 2012. Humik asit, PGPR ve kimyasal gübre uygulamalarının brokoli (Brassica oleracea) bitkisinin bazı verim parametreleri üzerine etkisi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Dergisi, 14(1): 309-316.
  • Barneix AJ. 2007. Physiology and biochemistry of sourceregulated protein accumulation in the wheat grain. Journal of plant physiology, 164(5): 581-590.
  • Barut H, Ezici A, Karaduman Y, Akın A, Aşıklı S, Eker S. 2018. Vejetatif ve generatif dönemlerde yapraktan üre, potasyum sülfat ve çinko sülfat uygulamalarının ekmeklik buğdayın verim, mineral element ve kalite parametreleri üzerine etkisinin araştırılması. Tagem Proje Sonuç Raporu. Proje No: TAGEM/TSKAD/15/A13/P04/05; Yayın No: 12.01 DATAEM.F.F04.2018.01
  • Barut H, Karaduman Y, Akın A, Aykanat S, Ezici AA. 2019. Effects of Foliar Urea, Potassium and Zinc Sulphate Treatments Before and After Flowering on Glut Peak, Some Protein Quality and Farinograph Properties of Wheat. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 7(10): 1730-1742.
  • Barut H. 2019. Effects of foliar urea, potassium and zinc sulphate treatments before and after flowering on grain yield, technological quality and nutrient concentrations of wheat. Applied ecology and environmental research, 17(2): 4325- 4342.
  • Bashan Y, Holguin G. 1997. Azospirillum-plant relationships: Environmental and physiological advances (1990-1996). Can. J. Microbial. 43: 103-121.
  • Bayrak D, Ökmen G. 2014. Bitki gelişimini uyaran kök bakterileri. Anadolu Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1):1-13. h International PGPR Workshop, 29 October- 3 November 2000, Cordoba Argentina.
  • Belimov AA, Kojemiakov PA, Chuvarliyeva CV. 1995. Interaction between barley and mixed cultures of nitrogen fixing and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Plant Soil 173: 29–37.
  • Bent E, Breuil C, Enebak S, Chanway CP. 2002. Surface colonization of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latiflia [Dougl. Engelm.]) roots by Pseudomonas fluorescens and Paenibacillus polymyxa under gnotobiotic conditions. Plant Soil 241: 187-196.
  • Bouyoucous GD. 1951. A recablibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanic analysis of the soil. Agronomy Journal 43:434-438.
  • Burdman S, Jurkevitch E, Okon Y. 2000. Recent advances the use of plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in agriculture. In Microbiol Interactions in Agriculture and Forestry. Subba, R.N., Dommergues, Y.R. (eds). Vol II Chp. 10: 29-250. Pub. Inc. UK.
  • Burdman S, Kigel J, Okan Y. 1997. Effects of Azospirillum brasilense on nodulation and growth of common bean. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 29: 923-929.
  • Caceres EAR, Anta GG, Lopez R, DiCiocco CA, Basurco JP, Parade J.L. 1996. Response of field-grown wheat to inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus polymyxa in the semiarid region of Argentina. Arid Soil Res Rehabil. 10: 13-20.
  • Cakmak I, Pfeiffer WH, Mcclafferty B. 2010. Biofortification of durum wheat with zinc and iron. Cereal Chemistry 87(1): 10-20.
  • Carson PL. 1980. Recommended potassium test. P. 20-21. In: Recommended chemical soil test procedures for the North Central REgion. Rev. Ed. North Central. Regional Publicaton no. 221. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. North Dakota State University, FArgo USA.
  • Chabot R, Antoun H, Cescas MP. 1996. Growth promotion of maize and lettuce by phosphate-solubilizing Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli. Plant and Soil, 184:311-321.
  • Çakmakçı R, Dönmez F, Aydın A, Şahin F. 2006. Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 38 (6): 1482-1487.
  • Çakmakçı R, Erat M, Erdoğan Ü, Dönmez MF. 2007. The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on growth and enzyme activities in wheat and spinach plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170: 288-295.
  • Çakmakçı R, Erdoğan Ü, Turan M, Öztaş T, Güllüce M, Şahin F. 2008. Bitki gelişimini teşvik edici bakteri ve gübre uygulamalarının buğday ve arpa gelişme ve verimi üzerine etkisi. 4. Ulusal Bitki Besleme ve Gübre Kongresi, 8-10 Ekim 2008, Konya.
  • Çakmakçı R, Kantar F, Algur ÖF. 1999. Sugar beet and barley yield in relation to Bacillus polymyxa and Bacillus megaterium var. phosphaticum inoculation. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 162: 437442. Çakmakçı R, Kantar F, Şahin F. 2001. Effect of N2-fixing bacterial inoculations on yield of sugar beet and barley. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 164: 527-531.
  • Çakmakçı R. 2002. Azot fiksasyonu ve fosfat çözücü bakteri aşılamalarının şeker pancarı verim ve kalitesine etkisi. II. Şeker Pancarı Üret. Semp., Verim, Kalit. Yük., 257-270.
  • Çakmakçı R. 2005. Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Eden Rizobakterilerin Tarımda Kullanımı Atatürk Üniv. Zir. Fak. Derg. 36 (1): 97- 107, 2005 ISSN 1300-9036.
  • De Freitas JR. 2000. Yield and N assimilation of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., var Norstar) inoculated with rhizobacteria, Pedobiologia, 44: 97-104.
  • Drepper T, Raabe K, Giaourakis D, Gendrullis M, Masepohl B, Klipp W. 2002. The Hfq-like protein NrfA of the phototrophic purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus controls nitrogen via regulation of nif A and anf A expression. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 215: 221-227.
  • Elbadry M, Gamal-Eldin H, Elbanna K. 1999. Effects of Rhodobacter capsulatus inoculation in combination with graded levels of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of rice in pots and lysimeter experiments. World J. Microb. Biot. 15: 393-395.
  • Eşitken A, Kalidag H, Ercisli S, Turan M, Sahin F. 2003. The Effects of Spraying a Growth Promoting Bacterium on the Yield, Growth and Nutrient Element Composition of Leaves of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.cv. Hacıhaliloglu). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 54: 377-380.
  • Feller U, Fischer A. 1994 Nitrogen metabolism in senescing leaves. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.13: 241–273.
  • Gagne S, Dehbi L, Le Quere D, Cayer F, Morin JL, Lemay R, Fournier N. 1993. Increase of greenhouse tomato fruit yields by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculated into the peat-based growing media. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 25(2):269-272.
  • Glick BR. 1995. The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can. J. Microbial, 41: 109-117.
  • Gurfinkel BS, Petricari A, 2000. Nitrogen fixing rhizobacteria and their relationship with soilborne fungi. Vth International PGPR Workshop, 29 October- 3 November 2000, Cordoba Argentina.
  • Gül A, Özaktan H, Kıdoğlu F. 2008. Seçilmiş kök bakterilerinin farklı substratlarda baş salata yetiştiriciliğine etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Proje Kesin Raporu, Proje No: 2007 ZRF 027. Bornova, İzmir.
  • Güllüce M, Agar G, Şahin F, Turan M, Güneş A, Demirtaş A, Esringü A, Karaman MR, Tutar A, Dizman M. 2012. Pb ve Cd ile kirletilmiş alanlarda yetiştirilen turp bitkisinin verim parametreleri üzerine Humik asit ve PGPR uygulamalarının etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Dergisi, 14(1): 509-517.
  • Hububat Raporu. 2016. T.C. Toprak Mahsulleri Ofisi Genel Müdürlüğü, 2016 Yılı Hububat Raporu. ICC. 2018. ICC Standards, Standarts No: 116-1; 106-2 International Association for Cereal Science and Technology (ICC), Vienna, Austria.
  • Jackson ML. 1959. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey.
  • Jakhro AA and Jamro GH. 2000. Effect of foliar fertilization of urea on the quantitative and qualitative traitsof wheat (cv. Sarsabz). Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering Veterinary Sciences (Pakistan).
  • Kayın GB, Öztüfekçı S, Akın HF, Karaata EU, Katkat AV, Turan MA. 2015. Effect of Bacillus subtilis Ch-13, Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Yield, Protein and Gluten Content of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), U. Ü. ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ, Cilt 29, Sayı 1, 19-28 (Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University)
  • Keshta MM, El-Khouly MH. 2000. Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Crop Production. Int. Symp. FAO/RNE, ARC and ESAM, Cairo.
  • Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir ZA. 2004. Screening plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 96 (3):473–480.
  • Khan MR, Talukdar NC, Thakuria D. 2003. Detection of Azospirillum and PSB in rice rhizosphere soil by protein and antibiotic resistance profile and their effect on grain yield of rice. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2: 246-250.
  • Khan P, Memon MY, Imtiaz M, Aslam M. 2009. Response of wheat to foliar and soil application of urea at different growth stages. Pak. J. Bot,41(3): 1197-1204.
  • Kloepper JW, Lifshitz R, Zablotowicz RM. 1989. Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends in Biotechnology, 7: 38-44.
  • Kumar V, Narula N. 1999. Solubulization of Inorganic Phosphates and Growth Emergence of Wheat as Affected by Azotobacter chroococcum. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 28: 301-305.
  • Kutman UB, Yildiz B, Cakmak I. 2011a. Effect of Nitrogen on Uptake, Remobilization and Partitioning of Zinc And İron Throughout the Development of Durum Wheat. Plant Soil. 342: 149-164.
  • Kutman UB, Yildiz B, Cakmak I. 2011b. İmproved Nitrogen Status Enhances Zinc And İron Concentrations Both İn The Whole Grain and The Endosperm Fraction of Wheat. Journal of Cereal Science. 53: 118-125.
  • Kutman UB, Yildiz B, Ozturk L, Cakmak I. 2010. Biofortification of durum wheat with zinc through soil and foliar applications of nitrogen. Cereal Chem. 87: 1-9
  • Kutman UB. 2010. Roles of Nitrogen and Zinc Nutrient in Biofortification of Wheat Grain. Sabanci Üniversity. Phd Thesis. Lasztity R. 1996. The Chemistry of Cereal Proteins 2nd Ed. Crc Press Inc., Florida.
  • Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc. iron. manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42:421-428.
  • Lucy M, Reed E, Glick BR. 2004. Application of free-living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 86 (1): 1-25.
  • Marschner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd Edn. Academic Press, London.
  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ. 939. U.S. Cov. Print Office. Washington D.C.
  • Öztekin GB, Tüzel Y, Ece M. 2015. Azot Tutucu Bakteri Kullanımının Sera Domates Yetiştiriciliğinde Bitki Gelişimi, Verim ve Meyve Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri, Iğdır Üni. Fen Bilimleri Enst. Der. / Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech. 5(1): 21-27.
  • Öztürk A, Cağlar O and Sahin F. 2003. Yield response of wheat and barley to inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria at various levels of nitrogen fertilization. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 166: 1-5
  • Öztürk L, Erenoğlu EB, Kaya Y, Altıntaş Z, Haklı E, Andiç E, Yılmaz Ö, 2011. Çinko'nun Buğday Tanesine Taşınmasını Etkileyen Fizyolojik Mekanizmaların Araştırılması. TÜBİTAK PROJESİ. Proje No: 108T436.
  • Pal SS. 1999. Interaction of an acid tolerant strain of phosphate solubilizing bacteria with a few acid tolerant crops. Plant Soil 213: 221-230
  • Saber MSM. 2001. Clean Biotechnology for sustainable farming. Eng. Life Sci, 1: 217-223.
  • Shridhar SB. 2012. Review: Nitrogen fixing microorganisms. International Journal of Microbiological Research, 3(1): 4652.
  • Srinivasan M, Petersen DJ, Holl FB. 1996. Influence of indoleacetic-acid-producing Bacillus isolates on the nodulation of Phaseolus vulgaris by Rhizobium etli under gnotobiotic conditions Can. J. Microbiol. 42:1006-1014.
  • Sudha SN, Jayakumar R, Sekar V. 1999. Introduction and expression of the cry1Ac gene of Bacillus thuringiensis in a cereal-associated bacterium Bacillus polymyxa, Current Microbiology, 38: 163-167.
  • Sudhakar P, Chattopadhyay GN, Gangwar SK, Ghosh JK. 2000. Effect of Foliar Application of Azotobacter, Azospirillum and Beijerinckia on Leaf Yield and Quality of Mulberry (Morus Alba). Journal of Agricultural Science. 134: 227-234.
  • Şahin E, Karagöz K, Çakmakcı R, Tosun M. 2010. Azot Fiksasyonu ve Fosfat Çözücü Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Edici Bakteri Aşılamalarının Arpa Gelişimine Etkisi, Türkiye IV. Organik Tarım Sempozyumu, 28 Haziran-1 Temmuz, Erzurum, (Sunulu Bildiri)
  • Şahin F, Cakmakcı R, Kantar F. 2004. Sugar Beet and Barley Yields in Relation to Inoculation with N2-Fixing and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria. Plant and Soil. 265:123- 129.
  • Urashima Y, Hori K. 2003. Selection of PGPR which promotes the growth of spinach. Japanese J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 74: 157-162.
  • US Salinity Laboratory Staff. 1954. Diagnosis and İmprovement of. Saline and Alkaline Soils (Ed L. A. Richards). USDA Agriculture Handbook B. No: 60. U. S. Gov. Printing Office. Washington. 160 P.
  • Walley FL, Germida JJ. 1997. Response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) to interactions between Pseudomonas species and Glomus clarum NT4. Biol. Fertil. Soils 24: 365- 371.
  • Yılmaz A, Ekiz H, Torun B, Aydın A, Çakmak İ. 1995. Determination of zinc application methods in zinc-defficient wheat growing areas of Central Anatolia. Pp. 91-95. Soil Fertilty and Fertilizer Management 9 th İnternational Symposium of CIEC.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Fertility Traits of Kangal Akkaraman Sheep Reared in Breeder Conditions in Sivas Province

Yusuf Ziya OĞRAK

Türkiye'de Iğdır İli Domates Bitkilerini Enfekte Eden Clover Proliferation Grup Üyesi Candidatus Phytoplasma Trifolii'nin Tespiti ve Moleküler Karakterizasyonu

Mustafa USTA, Abdullah GÜLLER

The Effect of Oestrus Synchronization on Reproductive Performance and Birth Weight in Hair Goats during The Breeding Season

Ebru ŞİRİN, Emre ŞİRİN, Serdar GENÇ

The Existence of Enterococcus spp. In Civil Cheese

Sevda Urçar GELEN, Ziya Gökalp CEYLAN

Atak-S Horozlarında Farklı Barındırma Sistemlerinin Bazı Morfolojik Özellikler ve Asimetri Üzerine Etkisi

Hasan ELEROĞLU, Beyhan YETER, Ökkeş AKYAR

Determination of Antioxidant Activity and Total Tannin from Drumstick (Moringa oleifera Lam.) Leaves Using Different Solvent Extraction Methods

Mohammad Afzal HOSSAIN, Nadia Khan DISHA, Jahid Hasan SHOUROVE, Pappu DEY

Analysis of Wheat Farming Enterprises according to Farm Accounting Data Network (FADN) System in Çanakkale

Duygu AKTÜRK, Gülşah DEMİREL

Evaluation of the Effect of Dissolved Metals Detected in Değirmendere Dam (Amasya, Turkey) on Drinking and Irrigation Water Quality

FİKRET USTAOĞLU

The Effects of Different Mycorrhiza Species, Compost and Rock Phosphate Applications on the Growth of Sorghum Plant

ÇAĞDAŞ AKPINAR, Ahmet DEMİRBAŞ, İBRAHİM ORTAŞ

Sivas İli Yetiştirici Koşullarındaki Kangal Akkaraman Koyunlarda Dölverimi Özellikleri

Yusuf Ziya OĞRAK