Biyodinamik Tarım ve Organik Tarımın Karşılaştırılması

Modern tarımsal uygulamalar ürünlerin dayanıklılık ve verimliliğini en üst düzeye çıkarmak için farklı biyolojik, fiziksel ve kimyasal işlem basamakları içerir. Bu işlemler arasında özellikle kimyasal girdi kullanımının giderek artması sonucunda ortaya çıkan çevresel etkiler konusundaki endişeler nedeniyle, modern tarımsal uygulamalar için alternatif felsefeler ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu alternatif yaklaşımlar birçok yönden geleneksel uygulamalara benzerken göze çarpan birkaç farklılık ile gelenekselden ayrılmaktadır. 18. yüzyılın sonlarında başlayan endüstriyel devrimle birlikte, artan nüfus ve küresel ısınma, gezegenimizin bozulduğunun farkına varılmasına neden olmuş ve günümüzde organik ve biyodinamik gibi alternatif tarım metotları ile insan, çevre, su ve toprakların korunması gündeme gelmiştir. Biyodinamik tarım; 1924'te filozof Rudolf Steiner ve agronom E. Pfeiffer tarafından kurulan bir sistem olup insan-doğa-evren kavramını esas alan antropolojik bir teoriye dayanmaktadır. Biyodinamik tarım birçok açıdan daha iyi bilinen organik tarıma benzer ve her ikisi de temel olarak kimyasal girdi (gübre, böcek ilacı, herbisit, hormon) kullanımına olan felsefi muhalefetleriyle şekillenmiştir. Biyodinamik tarımın organik tarımdan farkı, felsefi ve tarihi yönleri dışında, hayvansal organlarla fermente edilen özellikli bitki veya mineraller içeren biyodinamik preparatların kullanımında yatmaktadır. Bu derlemede, biyodinamik tarım uygulanmasının avantajları ortaya konularak iki sistem (organik ve biyodinamik) arasındaki farklara yer verilecektir.

Comparison of Biodynamic and Organic Agriculture

Modern agricultural applications contain various biologic physical and chemical process steps to maximize the durability and fertility of the products. Because of the apprehensions that come out as a result of increase in usage of chemical input in these processes, some alternative concepts have been come to exist for modern agricultural applications. Even these approaches match with traditional applications, they differ by their some outstanding features. By the help of industrial devolution in 18TH century, the increasing popularity and global warming caused the people to notice the ecologic deformation on the earth and accordingly saving the ecology and the earth became one of the main topics of current issues. The biodynamic agriculture system is founded in 1924 by Rudolf Steiner (philosopher) and E. Pfeiffer (agronomist) and built on an anthropologic theory that based on human-nature-universe concept. Biodynamic agriculture is familiar with organic agriculture. Mainly both of them are originated by oppositional perspective on using chemical input (manure, pesticide, herbicide, hormone e.g.). The main dissimilitude of biodynamic agriculture with organic apart from philosophical and historical aspects is, using the biodynamic preparations includes some minerals or specific herbs those are fermented with animal organs. In this review study, the differences between organic and biodynamic agriculture are analysed by emphasizing the main advantages of biodynamic agriculture.

___

  • Aishwath OP. 2007. Concept, background and feasibility of organic agriculture and biodynamic agriculture. Asian Agri- History. Vol.11, No:2, (119-132).
  • Anonim. 2015. Bee fields farm. https://www.beefieldsfarm.com/ read/2015/08/moon-over (Erişim: 12 Haziran 2017) Anonim. 2017a. Demeter. http://www.demeter.net/statistics (Erişim: 12 Haziran 2017)
  • Anonim. 2017b. Biodynamic calendar. http://www.monthlycalendar2017 .net/calendar-template/biodynamic-calendar-2143.html (Erişim: 21 Aralık 2017)
  • Babita, Ahmet N, Thakur M. 2015. Organic farming: a holistic approach towards sustainable fruit production. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research. 2(6): 108-115.
  • Carpenter-Boggs L, Reganold JP, Kennedy AC. 2000. Effects of biodynamic preparations on compost development. Biol Agric Hort. 17: 313-328.
  • Fritz J, Athmann M, Meissner G, Kauer R, Köpke U. 2017. Quality characterisation via image forming methods differentiates grape juice produced from integrated, organic or biodynamic vineyards in the first year after conversion. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture Vol. 33, Iss. 3.
  • Heimler D, Vignolini P, Arfaioli P, Isolani L, Romani A. 2012. Conventional, organic and biodynamic farming: differences in polyphenol content and antioxidant activity of Batavia lettuce. Journal Sci Food Agr. 92: 551–556.
  • İpek S, Çil YG. 2010. Uluslararası Ticari Boyutuyla Organik Tarım ve Devlet Destekleri. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi. (5:1) 2010.
  • Jarienė E, VaitkevičienėN, Danilčenko H, Tajner-Czopek A, Rytel E, Kucharska A, Sokół-Łętowska A, Gertchen M, Jeznach M. 2017. Effect of biodynamic preparations on the phenolic antioxidants in potatoes with coloured-flesh. Journal Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. Pages 172- 182.
  • Jariene E, Vaitkeviciene N, Danilcenko H, Gajewskı M, Chupakhına G, Fedurajev P, Ingold R. 2015. Influence of Biodynamic Preparations on the Quality Indices and Antioxidant Compounds Content in the Tubers of Coloured Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Not Bot Horti Agrobo. 43(2):392-397.
  • Koepf HH. 1993. Research in Biodynamic Agriculture: Methods and Results. Bio-Dynamic Farming and Gardening Association Inc., Kimberton, Pennsylvania.
  • Niggli U, Earley J, Ogorzalek K. 2007. “Organıc Agrıculture And Envıronmental Stability Of The Food Supply”, International Confference On Organic Agriculture and Food Security, 3-5 May 2007, OFS/2007/3, Fao, Rome, Italy, s.2.
  • Paramesh V, Lakshmipathy M, Arun Kumar P. 2015. Sustainability of environment through biodynamic agriculture. Asian J. Environ. Sci. 10(1): 50-56.
  • Parpinello GP, Rombolà AD, Simoni M, Versari A. 2015. Chemical and sensory characterisation of Sangiovese red wines: Comparison between biodynamic and organic management. Food Chemistry. 167, 145–152.
  • Pathak RK, Ram RA. 2003. Successful Conversion of Conventional to Organic/Biodynamic: a Case Study. Chapter 4: Establishing an Organic Export Sector. 61-70.
  • Paull J, 2011. Biodynamic Agriculture: The Journey From Koberwitz to the World, 1924-1938. Journal of Organic Systems, 6(1).
  • Pfeiffer E. 1984. Using the Biodynamic compost preparations and sprays in garden, orchard and farm. Biodynamic Farming and Gardening Association, Inc, Kimberton, PA, 1984; 64.
  • Ponzio C, Gangatharan R, Neri D. 2013. Organic and Biodynamic Agriculture: A Review in Relation to Sustainability. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2(1): 95-110.
  • Reeve JR, Carpenter-Boggs L, Reganold JP, York AL, McGourty G, McCloskey LP. 2005. Soil and winegrape quality in biodynamically and organically managed vineyards. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,56(4), 367–376.
  • Reeve RJ, 2003. Effects of Biodynamic Preparations on Soil, Winegrape, and Compost Quality on a California Vıneyard. Washington State University Department of Crop and Soil Sciences. Master of Scıence.
  • Reganold, JP. 2014. Soil quality and profitability of biodynamic and conventional farming systems: A review. Organic Farming & Biodynamic Agriculture Training resource book. 65-75.
  • Schreier Ulrich. 2015. Biodynamics a promising road to tomorrow's sustainable agriculture. www.eco-dyn.fr
  • Tassoni A, Tango N, Ferri M. 2013. Comparison of biogenic amine and polyphenol profiles of grape berries and wines obtained following conventional, organic and biodynamic agricultural and oenological practices Food Chemistry. 139, 405–413.
  • Turinek M, Grobelnik-Mlakar S, Bavec M, Bavec F. 2009. Biodynamic agriculture research progress and priorities. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems: 24(2); 146–154 doi:10.1017/S174217050900252X
  • Yürüdür E, Kara H, Arıbaş K. 2010. Türkiye’nin Organik (Ekolojik) Tarım Coğrafyası. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences. Spring-2010. V.9, Is.32.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Kuzeydoğu Akdeniz'den elde edilen Yüzücü Mavi Yengeç'in (Portunus segnis, Forskal, 1775) Amino Asit Kompozisyonu

İlkan Ali OLGUNOĞLU, Engin ARTAR

Effects of Some Environmental Factors on Birth Weight of Anatolian Buffalo Calves

ERTUĞRUL KUL, GÖKHAN FİLİK, AZİZ ŞAHİN, HAYRETTİN ÇAYIROĞLU, EMRE UĞURLUTEPE, HÜSEYİN ERDEM

The Role of University Partners in the Innovation Adoption Process to Rice Seed Farmers in Aceh Province

Setia BUDİ, Ahmad Humam HAMİD, Fajri ., Agussabti .

Organik ve Konvansiyonel Üzüm Yetiştiriciliği Yöntemlerinin Asmadaki Bitki Besin Maddesi İçeriklerine Etkisi

Fadime ATEŞ, BÜLENT YAĞMUR, ÇİĞDEM TAKMA

Morphology, Pathogenicity and Management of Coniella Fruit Rot (Coniella granati) on Pomegranate

Aysun UYSAL, ŞENER KURT, EMİNE MİNE SOYLU, MERVE KARA, SONER SOYLU

Yarı Kurak Bir Bölgedeki Karaçam Ağaçlandırmasının Toprak Erozyonu ve Toprak Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Sezgin HACISALİHOĞLU

Extent of Microbial Contamination of Refined and Unrefined Vegetable oils sold in South-west Nigeria

Oluwafemi FLORA, Oni Eniola OLUYEMİSİ, Kareem Sarafadeen OLATEJU, Omemu Adebukunola MOBOLAJİ, Kolapo Lawrence ADELODUN

Biyodinamik Tarım ve Organik Tarımın Karşılaştırılması

Özlem ÇAKIR, HİLAL YILDIZ, NEVA KARATAŞ

Greenhouse Tomato Producers’ Views on Soilless Agriculture in Antalya

BİLGE GÖZENER, Halime DERELİ

Kek ve Pilice İnoküle Edilen Salmonella Enteritidis’in Termal İnaktivasyonu

CEYDA DADALI, DUYGU KIŞLA