Bitkilerin Kuraklığa Dayanıklılığını Artırmaya Yönelik Uygulamalar

Terminal kuraklık bitki gelişimini, metabolizmasını olumsuz etkileyen ve verimi sınırlayan en büyük tehdittir. Su stresi bitkilerde morfolojik, fizyolojik ve biyokimyasal birçok değişikliğe neden olmaktadır. Kuraklık stresi bitki boyu, kök uzunluğu, yaprak alanı, taze ve kuru biyokütleyi azaltmaktadır. Ayrıca su stresi nisbi nem içeriğinin azalmasına, stomaların kapanmasına, fotosentez ve klorofil içeriğinin azalmasına neden olmaktadır. Antioksidan enzimlerden glutatyon redüktaz (GR), süperoksit dismütaz (SOD), askorbat peroksidaz (ASC), glutatyon (GSH), katalaz (CAT) enzim aktiviteleri ile oksidatif stresin bir göstergesi malondialdehit (MDA) ve prolin seviyeleri de kurak koşullarda değişmektedir. Kurak koşullarda özellikle tane gelişim dönemi öncesi bitki besin elementi alımı gerilediği veya engellendiği için bitki besin elementi uygulaması ve beraberinde mikroelementlerin remobilizasyonu önem taşımaktadır. Osmotik koruyucular (sitokinin, mannitol, absisik asit, prolin, glisinbetain, poliamin vb.) reaktif oksijen türlerinin (ROS) olumsuz etkilerini ortadan kaldırmakta ve kuraklık stresini iyileştirmektedir. Dışarıdan bitki gelişimini teşvik eden rizobakterilerin (PGPR) uygulanması bitki kök sistemi ile kolonize olarak bitki büyümesini teşvik etmekte ve bitkilerin su stresine dayanıklılığını artırmaktadır. Ayrıca kurak dönemlerde koruyucu toprak işleme sistemi de çiftçiler tarafından kullanılabilir.

The Applications to Increase Drought Tolerance of Plants

Terminal drought is a major threat that adversely affects crop growth and metabolism, and limits the yield. Water stress causes many morphological, physiological and biochemical changes in plants. Plant height, root length, leaf area, fresh and dry biomass are reduced under drought stress. Besides, water stress causes the reduction of relative water content, the closure of stomata and decrease in photosynthesis and chlorophyll content. Antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione reductase (GR), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), ascorbat peroxidase (ASC), glutatiton (GSH), catalase (CAT) enzyme activities, the indicator of oxidative stress malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline levels also changes in drought conditions. Nutrient uptake by plants is prevented or restricted before grain development stage during drought conditions. Therefore the application of plant nutrients followed by micronutrient remobilization within plant is great importance. Osmoprotectants (cytokinin, mannitol, abscisic acid, proline, glycine betaine, polyamine etc.) detoxify adverse effect of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and alleviate drought stress. Exogenous plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) application encourage plant growth by colonizing the plant root and increase plants' resistance to water stress. Besides, the farmers can use conservation tillage system in dry periods.

___

  • Agboma PC, Peltonen-Sainio P, Hinkkanen R, Pehu E. 1997. Effect of foliar application of glycinebetaine on yield components of drought-stressed tobacco plants. Expl Agric., 33:345-352.
  • Aghanejad M, Mahfoozi S, Sharghi Y. 2015. Effects of Late- Season Drought Stress on some Physiological Traits. Yield and Yield Components of Wheat Genotypes Biological Forum-An International Journal, 7(1):1426-1431.
  • Akbarian A, Arzani A, Salehi M, Salehi M. 2011. Evaluation of triticale genotypes for terminal drought tolerance using physiological traits. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 81(12):1110-1115.
  • Akıncı Ş, Lösel DM. 2012. Plant Water-Stress Response Mechanisms, Water Stress. Ismail Md. Mofizur Rahman (Ed.), Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books /water-stress/plant-water-stress-response-mechanisms [Accessed: 11.11.2015].
  • Alaei Y. 2011. The Effect of Amino Acids on Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Bread Wheat Genotypes under Drought Stress Conditions. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 10 (1): 99-101.
  • Amiri M, Delkhosh B, Shirani Rad AH, Rashidi S. 2013. Effect of mycorrhiza fungi and rhizobium bacteria on agronomic traits in soybean (Glycine max L.), under water stress condition Annals of Biological Research, (2):327-33.
  • Anjum, SA, Xie X, Wang L, Saleem MF, Man C, Lei W. 2011. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(9): 2026-2032.
  • Anonim. 2015. Available from: http://www.aganytime.com /Pages/Article.aspx?name=Drought-Effects-on-Grain-and- Pod-Fill-in-Corn-and-Soybean& fields=article&article=158 [Accessed 05.06.2015].
  • Aown M, Raza S, Saleem MF, Anjum SA, Khaliq T, Wahid MA. 2012. Foliar application of potassium under water deficit conditions improved the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 22(2):431-437.
  • Asghari R, Ebrahimzadeh H. 2006. Drought Stress Increases the Expression of Wheat Leaf Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxyenase Protein. Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction A. 30 (A1):1-7.
  • Askari E, Ehsanzadeh P. 2015. Drought stress mitigation by foliar pplication of salicylic acid and their interactive effects on physiological characteristics of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) genotypes. Acta Physiol Plant., 37:4.
  • Auge RM, Stodola JW. 1990. An apparent increase in symplastic water contributes to greater turgor in mycorrhizal roots of droughted Rosa plants. New Phytol., 115: 285-295.
  • Baranyiova I, Klem K, Kren J. 2014. Effect of exogenous application of growth regulators on the physiological parameters and the yield of winter wheat under drought stress. MendelNet, 2014. Proceedings of International PhD Students Conference, At Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Agronomy, Czech Repoublic. 442-446.
  • Beigzadeh S, Fatahi K, Sayedi A, Fatahi F. 2013. Study of the Effects of Late-Season Drought Stress on Yield and Yield Components of Irrigated Barley Lines within Kermanshah Province Temperate Regions. World Applied Programming, 3(6): 226-231.
  • Belimov AA, Safronova VI, Mimura T. 2002. Response of spring rape to inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria carboxylate deaminase depends on nutrient status of the plant. Can. J. Microbiol., 48: 189-199.
  • aminocyclopropane-1
  • Bhardwaj J, Yadav SK. 2012. Comparative Study on Biochemical Parameters and Antioxidant Enzymes in a Drought (Macrotyloma uniflorum) under Drought Stress. American Journal of Plant Physiology, DOI: 10. 3923/ajpp.2012.
  • Bing Yi, Yu-fei Z, Min-yue G, Zhuang Z, Guang-dong Y, Wenjuan Xu, Rui-dong H. 2014. Effect of Drought Stress During Flowering Stage on Starch Accumulation and Starch Synthesis Enzymes in Sorghum Grains. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(11): 2399-2406.
  • Chutia J, Borah SP. 2012. Water Stress Effects on Leaf Growth and Chlorophyll Content but Not the Grain Yield in Traditional Rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) Genotypes of Assam, India II. Protein and Proline Status in Seedlings under PEG Induced Water Stress. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 3: 971-980.
  • Çarman K, Demir F, Gücan A, Topal A, Soylu S, Marakoğlu T, Akgün N. 2009. Hububat ve Baklagil Tarımında Koruyucu Toprak İşleme ve Doğrudan Ekim Uygulamaları. Proje No: 105 O 492, Aralık, Konya, s:66.
  • Çelik S, Ünyayar S. 2015. The Effects of Exogenous Application of Ascorbate and Glutathione on Antioxidant System in Cultivated Cicer arietinum and Wild Type C. reticulatum under Drought Stress. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(1): 91-97.
  • da Silva Lobato AK, da Silveria JAG, da Costa RCL, de Oliveira Neto CF. 2013. Tolerance to Drought in Leguminous Bradyrhizobium. /10.5772/54094 [Accessed 12.06.2015]. from: http://dx.doi.org Available
  • Delfine S, Loreto F, Alvino A. 2001. Drought-stress effects on physiology, growth and biomass production of rainfed and irrigated Bell Pepper plants in the Mediterranean region. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Sciences, 126:297-304.
  • Dornbos DL, Mullen RE, Shibles RE. 1989. Drought stress effects during seed fill on soybean seed germination and vigor. Crop Science, 29(2):476:480.
  • Farooq M, Hussain M, Siddique KHM. 2014. Drought Stress in Wheat during Flowering and Grain-filling Periods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 33(4):331-349.
  • Flexas J, Ribas-Carbó M, Bota J, Galmés J, Henkle M, Martínez-Cañellas S, Medrano H. 2006. Decreased Rubisco activity during water stress is induced by stomatal closure, not Phytologist., 172:73-82. water content. New
  • Galmés J, Ribas-Carbó M, Medrano H, Flexas J. 2011. Rubisco activity in Mediterranean species is regulated by the chloroplastic CO2 concentration under water stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(2): 653-665.
  • Ghazi N, Al-Karaki. 1998. Benefit, cost and water-use efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal durum wheat grown under drought stress. Mycorrhiza 8: 41-45.
  • Ghafarian AH, Zarghami R, Zand B, Bayat V. 2013.Wheat Performance as Affected by foliar Application of Molybdenum (Mo) Under Drought Stress Condition. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4 (11): 3050-3056.
  • Gholamin R, Khayatnezhad M. 2011. The effect of end season drought stress on the chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield in maize cultivars Scientific Research and Essays, 6 (25):5351-5357.
  • Grant OM. 2011. Understanding and Exploiting the Impact of Drought Stress on Plant Physiology. Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants, 89-104.
  • Heidari M, Galavi M, Hassani M. 2011. Effect of sulfur and iron fertilizers on yield, yield components and nutrient uptake in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under water stress. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10 (44):8816-8822.
  • Hernanz JL, Sánchez-Girón V, Navarrete L, Sánchez MJ. 2014. Long-term (1983-2012) assessment of three tillage systems on the energy use efficiency, crop production and seeding emergence in a rain fed cereal monoculture in semiarid conditions in central Spain. Field Crops Research, 166: 26- 37.
  • Hu Y, Burucs Z, Schmidhalter U. 2008. Effect of foliar fertilization application on the growth and mineral nutrient content of maize seedlings under drought and salinity. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 54, 133-141.
  • Hubbard M, Germida JJ, Vujanovic V. 2013. Fungal endophytes enhance wheat heat and drought tolerance in terms of grain yield and second-generation seed viability. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 116 (1).
  • Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Wahid A, Farooq M, Al-Juburi HJ, Somasundaram R, Panneerselvam R. 2009. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11 (1):100-105.
  • Kanani SM, Kasraie P, Abdi H. 2013. Effects of late Season Drought Stress on Grain Yield, Protein, Proline and ABA of Bread Wheat Varieties. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4 (11): 2943-2952.
  • Karim Md. R, Zhang YQ, Zhao R-R, Chen XP, Zhang FS, Zou CQ. 2012. Alleviation of drought stress in winter wheat by late foliar application of zinc, boron, and manganese. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 175:142-151.
  • Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Gaur PM, Upadhyaya HD, Varshney RK, Tobitac S. 2013. Traits of relevance to improve yield under terminal drought stress in chickpea (C. arietinum L.). Field Crop Research, 145: 88-95.
  • Khoshkholghsima NA, Rohollahi Biochemical Response of Some Selected Perennial Grasses under Drought Stress in Iran. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol., 56(3):383-390. I. 2015. Evaluating
  • Koocheki AR, Yazdansepas A, Mahmadyorov U, Mehrvar MR. 2014. Physiological-based Selection Criteria for Terminal Drought in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 16: 1043-1053.
  • Koolachart R, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Wonghaew S, Holbrook CC, Jongrungklang N, Kesmela T, Patanothai A. 2013. Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to terminal drought. Field Crops Research, 149:366-378.
  • Kuznetsov VV, Kholodova VP, Kuznetsov VV, Yagodin BA. 2003. Selenium regulates the water status of plants exposed to drought. Doklady Biol. Sci., 390: 266-268.
  • Ma JF. 2004. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 50: 11-18.
  • Ma QQ, Wang W, Li YH, Li DQ, Zou Q. 2006. Alleviation of photoinhibition aestivum) by foliarapplied glycinebetaine. J. Plant Physiol., 163: 165-175. wheat (Triticum
  • Mafakheri A, Siosemardeh A, Bahramnejad B, Struik PC, Sohrabi Y. 2010. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. AJCS., 4(8):580-585
  • Malik S, Ashraf M. 2012. Exogenous application of ascorbic acid stimulates growth and photosynthesis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought. Soil Environ., 31(1):72-77.
  • Marcinska I, Czyczylo-Mysza I, Skrzypek E, Filek M, Grzesiak S, Grzesiak MT, Janowiak F, Hura T, Dziurka M, Dziurka K, Nowakowska A, Quarrie SA. 2013. Impact of osmotic stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics in drought-susceptible and drought-resistant wheat genotypes. Acta Physiol Plant, 35: 451-461.
  • Mohammad M, Pan WL, Kennedy AC. 1995. Wheat responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation of soils from eroded toposequences. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59: 1086-1090.
  • Naidu BP, Cameron DF, Konduri SF. 1998. Improving Drought Tolerance of Cotton by Glycinebetaine Application and Selection. Australian Agronomy Conference. 1998 9th AAC.
  • Nezhadahmadi A, Prodhan ZH, Faruq G. 2013. Drought tolerance in Wheat. The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 610721, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/610721 12.06.2015]. Available from: [Accessed
  • Palta JA, Turner NC, French RJ. 2004. The yield performance of lupin genotypes under terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55(4):449-459.
  • Palta Ş, Demir S, Şengönül K, Kara Ö, Şensoy H. 2010. Arbüsküler Mikorizal Funguslar (AMF), Bitki ve Toprakla İlişkileri, Mera Islahındaki Önemleri. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(18):87-98.
  • Pan Y, Wu LJ, Yu ZL. 2006. Effect of salt and drought stress on antioxidant enzymes activities and SOD isoenzymes of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch). Plant Growth Regul., 49:157-165.
  • Parry MAJ, Andralojc PJ, Khan S, Lea PJ, Keys A. 2002. Rubisco Activity: Effects of Drought Stress. Annals of Botany, 89: 833-839.
  • Pirdashti H, Sarvestani ZT, Nematzadeh G, Ismail A. 2008. Study of water stress effects in different growth stages on yield and yield components of different rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11(10):1303.
  • Pouresmaiel H, Saberi MH, Fanaei H. 2013. Evaluation of Terminal Drought Stress Tolerance of Sesamum Indicum L. Genotypes under the Sistan Region Conditions. International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, 2(16):58- 61.
  • Rahbarian R, Khavari-Nejad R, Ganjeali A, Bagheri A, Najafi F. 2011. Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations in tolerant and susceptible chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 53/1: 47-56.
  • Romero-Perezgrovas R, Verhulst N, De La Rosa D, Hern´andez V, Maertens M, Deckers J, Govaerts B. 2014. Effects of tillage and crop residue management on maize yields and net returns in the Central Mexican highlands under drought conditions. Pedosphere, 24(4): 476-486.
  • Rosales MA, Ocampo E, Rodríguez-Valentín R, Olvera-Carrillo Y, Acosta-Gallegos J, Covarrubias AA. 2012. Physiological analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 56:24-34.
  • Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azon R, Gomez M. 1995. Effects of arbuscularmycorrhizal Glomus species on drought tolerance: physiological and nutritional plant responses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61: 456-460.
  • Saeedipour S, Moradi F. 2011. Effect of Drought at the Post- anthesis Stage on Remobilization of Carbon Reserves and Some Physiological Changes in the Flag Leaf of Two Wheat Cultivars Differing in Drought Resistance. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3 (3):81-92.
  • Sairam RK, Deshmukh PS, Saxena DC. 1998. Role of antioxidant systems in wheat cultivars tolerance to water stress. Biologia Plantarum, 41: 387-394.
  • Sairam RK, Saxena DC. 2000. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in wheat cultivars: possible mechanism of water stress tolerance. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 184, 55-61.
  • Sakhabutdinova AR, Fatkhutdinova DR, Bezrukova MV, Shakirova FM. 2003. Salicylic acid prevents the damaging action of stress factors on wheat plants. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol., 21: 314-319.
  • Samarah NH, Alqudah AM, Amayreh JA, McAndrews GM. 2009. The effect of late-terminal drought stress on yield components of four barley cultivars. J. Agronomy & Crop Science, DOI: 10. 1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00387.x
  • Sandal Erzurumlu G, Erman Kara E. 2014. Mikoriza Konusunda Türkiye'de Yapılan Çalışmalar. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 7 (2): 55-65.
  • Sayfzadeh S, Rashidi M. 2011. Response of antioxidant enzymes activities of sugar beet to drought stress. ARPN Journal of Agricultural Biological Science, 6:1:4.
  • Sepanlo N, Talebi R, Rokhzadi A, Mohammadi H. 2014. Morphological and physiological behavior in soybean (Glycine max) genotypes to drought stress implemented at pre- and post-anthesis stages. Acta Biologica Szegediensis, 58(2):109-113.
  • Shaharoona B, Naveed M, Arshad M, Zahri ZA. 2008. Fertilizer dependent efficiency of pseudomonads for improving growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 79: 147-155.
  • Shahbaz M, Masood Y, Perveen S, Ashraf M. 2011. Is foliar- applied glycinebetaine effective in mitigating the adverse effects of drought stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 84: 192-199.
  • Siddiqui, MH, Al-Khaishany MY, Al-Qutami MA, Al-Whaibi MH, Grover A, M Ali H, Al-Wahibi MS, Bukhari NA. 2015. Response of Different Genotypes of Faba Bean Plant to Drought Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci.,16:10214-10227.
  • Singh B, Usha K. 2003. Salicylic acid induced physiological and biochemical changes in wheat seedlings under water stress. Plant Growth Regul., 39: 137-141.
  • Travaglia C, Cohen AC, Reinoso H, Castillo C, Bottini R. 2007. Exogenous accumulation and redistribution to the grains in wheat grown under field conditions of soil water restriction. J. Plant Growth Regul., 26: 285-289. increases carbohydrate
  • Ullah F, Bano A, Nosheen A. 2012. Effects of plant growth regulators on growth and oil quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under drought stress. Pak. J. Bot., 44(6):1873- 1880.
  • Wang Y, Suo B, Zhao T, Qu X, Yuan L, Zhao X, Zhao H. 2011. Effect of nitric oxide treatment on antioxidant responses and psbA gene expression in two wheat cultivars during grain filling stage under drought stress and rewatering. Acta Physiol. Plant., 33: 1923-1932.
  • Wei J, Li C, Li Y, Jiang G, Cheng G, Zheng Y. 2013. Effects of External Potassium (K) Supply on Drought Tolerances of Two Contrasting Winter Wheat Cultivars. PLoS ONE 8(7): e69737. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069737
  • Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q, Liu L. 2003. Involvement of abscisic acid and cytokinins in the senescence and remobilization of carbon reserves in wheat subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Cell Environ., 26: 1621-1631.
  • Zafar S, Nasri M, Moghadam HRT, Zahedi H. 2014. Effect of zinc and sülfür foliar appliactions on physiological characteristics of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under water deficit stres. International Journal of Biosciences, 5 (12):87-96.
  • Zhang M, Duan L, Zhai Z, Li J, Tian X, Wang B, He Z, Li Z. 2004. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Water Deficit- Induced Yield Loss in Soybean. Australian Agronomy Conference. 12 th AAC, 4 th ICSC.
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Esmer Sığırlarda Süt Verimine Etkili Çevre Faktörleri ile Fenotipik, Genetik ve Çevresel Yönelimler ve Bazı Genetik Parametrelerin Belirlenmesi

MUHAMMET HANİFİ SELVİ, Mete YANAR

Effect of Different Processing Methods on Anti-Nutrients Content and Protein Quality of Improved Lupin (Lupinus Albus L.) Cultivar Seeds

Mohamed Ahmed M OMER, ElShazali Ahmed MOHAMED, Isam A. Mohamed AHMED, Abu ELGASİM A YAGOUB, Elfadil E. BABIKER

Bitkilerin Kuraklığa Dayanıklılığını Artırmaya Yönelik Uygulamalar

İLKAY YAVAŞ, HÜSEYİN NAİL AKGÜL, AYDIN ÜNAY

Effect of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on the Refrigerated Storage of Mantı

SİNAN UZUNLU, IŞIL VAR ÖNGEL

Effect of Drying Methods and Pre-Treatments on Nutritional Value and Sensory Quality of Fish (Oreochromis niloticus, Pylodictis olivaris and Cyprinus carpio) Species Commonly Used in Gambella Region

Dagne TARLE, Mitiku GUYA, Solomon ABERA, Getachew Bekele FEREJA

In Vitro Direct Organogenesis Using Mature Embryo With Cotyledons In Chickpea

Ali AMMAR, Mahmood AYYAZ, Ahsan IRSHAD, Syeda Farhana BUKHARİ, Ghulam YASİN, Seema MAHMOOD, Shoaib ur REHMAN

Effect of Modified Pre-Milking Sanitizing Approaches on Raw Milk Quality Obtained from the Dairy Farmers of Tawau Area, Sabah

Sim Kheng YUEN, Mohammad Raisul ALAM

The Estimation of Heritability of Weekly Body Weights in Japanese Quails with MINQUE(Minimum Quadratic Unbiased Estimation) Method

GÖKHAN TAMER KAYAALP, MİKAİL BAYLAN, SİBEL CANOĞULLARI DOĞAN

Karadeniz Bölgesi için Üçgül (Trifolium sp.) Cinsinin Önemi

ÖZLEM ÖNAL AŞCI

Study on Prevalence of Mycoflora in Wheat Seeds

Pratishtha ADHİKARİ, Gopal Bahadur CHHETRİ KHATRİ, Sundar Man SHRESTHA, Santosh MARAHATTA