A Consumer Perception Study on Functional Dairy Products Among Consumers in Istanbul, Turkey

The aim of this study is to understand Turkish consumers’ perception of functional dairy products in three different categories, namely milk, yogurt, and cream cheese, as well as their willingness to buy products with health claims. In this study, 50 untrained participants from the city of İstanbul, Turkey, were enrolled to evaluate three types of milk (calcium & vitamin fortified, soy, and whole), three types of yogurt (probiotic, strawberry flavoured probiotic, and plain) and four types of cream cheese (calcium, phosphate & vitamin fortified, reduced fat, light, and regular) using free listing testing and check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions together with Yes/No questions. Twenty-five participants were recruited from Yeditepe University’s Food Engineering Department and 25 participants from public places to form two clusters. In the free listing analysis, the number of frequent terms related to health dramatically decreased after the tasting session for all products, whereas sensory related terms became more important. CATA analysis showed that consumers look for different product properties in different dairy categories. The findings of both analyses showed that, regardless of their education and awareness, consumers still are not willing to compromise on the taste of dairy foods independent of how healthy the product might be. Their preference of functional dairy products was only 22%, 26% and 14% for fortified milk, probiotic yogurt, and fortified cream cheese, respectively. Moreover, only 30% of the participants were found to believe the health claims on the package, which is another obstacle the functional food industry has to face.

___

Annunziata A, Vecchio R. 2013. Consumer perception of functional foods: A conjoint analysis with probiotics. Food Qual Prefer, 28: 348-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.009.

Aschemann-Witzel J, Maroscheck N, Hamm U. 2013. Are organic consumers preferring or avoiding foods with nutrition and health claims? Food Qual Prefer, 30: 68-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.04.011.

Ares G, Gámbaro A. 2007. Influence of gender, age, and motives underlying food choice on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods. Appetite, 49:148-158. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2007.01.006.

Ares G, Besio M, Giménez A, Deliz R. 2010a. The relationship between involvement and functional milk desserts intention to purchase. Influence on attitude towards packaging characteristics. Appetite, 55: 298-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.016.

Ares G, Giménez A, Deliz R. 2010b. Influence of three nonsensory factors on consumer choice of functional yogurts over regular ones. Food Qual Prefer, 21: 361-367. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.09.002.

Ares G, Barreiro C, Deliza R, Giménez A, Gámbaro A. 2010c. Consumer expectations and perception of chocolate milk desserts enriched with antioxidants. J Sens Stud, 25: 243-260. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00293.x.

Bimbo F, Bonanno A, Nocella G, Viscecchia R, Nardone G, De Devitiis B, Carlucci D. 2017. Consumers’ acceptance and preferences for nutrition-modified and functional dairy products: A systematic review. Appetite, 113: 141-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.031.

Bornkessel S, Bröring S, Omta SWF, van Trijp H. 2014. What determines ingredient awareness of consumers? A study on ten functional food ingredients. . Food Qual Prefer, 32: 330- 339. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.09.007.

Bower JA, Saadat MA, Whitten C. 2003. Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit. Food Qual Prefer, 14: 65-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00019-8.

Büyükkaragöz A, Bas M, Sağlam D, Cengiz ŞE. 2014. Consumers' awareness, acceptance, and attitudes towards functional foods in Turkey. Int J Consum Stud, 36: 628-635. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12134.

Carillo E, Prado-Gasco V, Fiszman S, Varela P. 2013. Why buying functional foods? Understanding spending behavior through structural equation modeling. Food Res Int, 50: 361- 368. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.10.045.

Conti-Silva AC, de Souza-Borges PK. 2019. Sensory characteristics, brand and probiotic claim on the overall liking of commercial probiotic fermented milks: Which one is more relevant? Food Res Int, 116: 184-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.011.

Coxa DN, Koster A, Russell CG. 2004. Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory. Appetite, 43: 55-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2004.02.003.

Fenko A, Lotterman H, Galetzka M. 2016. What’s in a name? The effects of sound symbolism and package shape on consumer responses to food products. Food Qual Prefer, 51: 100-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.021.

Gulseven O, Wohlgenant M. 2014. Demand for functional and nutritional enhancements in specialty milk products. Appetite, 81:284-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.105.

Grunert KG, Bech-Larsen T, Bredahl L. 2000. The issues in consumer quality perception and acceptance of dairy products. Int Dairy J, 10: 575-584. DOI: 10.1016/S0958- 6946(00)00085-6.

Hailu G, Boecker A, Henson S, Cranfield J. 2009. Consumer valuation of functional foods and nutraceuticals in Canada. A conjoint study using probiotics. Appetite, 52: 257-265. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2008.10.002.

Johansen SB, Næs T, Øyaas J, Hersleth M. 2010. Acceptance of calorie-reduced yoghurt: Effects of sensory characteristics and product information. Food Qual Prefer, 21: 13-21. DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.07.003.

Johansen SB, Næs T, Øyaas J, Hersleth M. 2011. Motivation for choice and healtiness perception of calorie-reduced dairy products. A cross-cultural study. Appetite, 56: 15-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.11.137

Jaeger SR, Cadena RS, Torres-Moreno M, Antunez L, Vidal L, Gimenez A, Hunter DC, Beresford MK, Kam K, Yin D, Paisley AG, Chheang SL, Ares G. 2014. Comparison of check-all-that-apply and forced-choice Yes/No question formats for sensory characterization. Food Qual Prefer, 35: 32-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.004.

Kaur N, Singh DP. 2017. Deciphering the consumer behavior facets of functional foods: A literature review. Appetite. 112:167-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.033.

Karagözlü C. 2015. Fonksiyonel süt ürünleri piyasasında tüketici eğilimleri. https://www.sutdunyasi.com/haberler/fonksiyonel-suturunleri-piyasasinda-tuketici-egilimleri/ (12.12.2018)

Krutulyte R, Grunert KG, Scholderer J, Hagemanna KS, Elgaarda P, Nielsena B, Graverholt JP. 2008. Motivational factors for consuming omega-3 PUFAs: An exploratory study with Danish consumers.Appetite, 5:137-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.01.005.

Krutulyte R, Grunert KG, Scholderer J, Lähteenmäki L, Hagemann KS, Elgaard P, Nielsen B, Graverholt JP. 2011. Perceived fit of different combinations of carriers and functional ingredients and its effect on purchase intention. Food Qual Prefer, 22: 11-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.06.001.

Leathwood PD, Richardson DP, Strater P, Todd PM, van Trijp HC. 2007. Consumer understanding of nutrition and health claims: Sources of evidence. Brit J Nutr, 98: 474-484. DOI: 10.1017/S000711450778697X.

Lindeman M, Sirelius M. 2001. Food choice ideologies. The modern manifestations of normative and humanist views of the world. Appetite, 37: 175-184. DOI: 10.1016/appe.2001.0437.

Lozano PR, Darke M, Benitez D, Cadwallader KR. 2007. Instrumental and sensory characterization of heat-induced odorants in aseptically packaged soymilk. J Agric Food Chem, 55:3018-3026. DOI: 10.1021/jf0631225.

Menezes E, Deliza R, Chan HL, Guinard J-X. 2011. Preferences and attitudes towards açaí-based products among North American consumers. Food Res Int, 44:1997-2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.048.

Nocella G, Kennedy O. 2012. Food health claims-What consumers understand. Food Policy, 37: 571-580. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.06.001.

Ozen AE, Pons A, Tur JA. 2012. Worldwide consumption of functional foods: A systematic review. Nutr Rev, 70: 472- 481. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00492.x

Özen AE, Bibiloni M, Pons A, Tur JA. 2014. Consumption of functional foods in Europe; a systematic review. Nutr Hosp, 29: 470-478. DOI: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.3.7148.

Pappalardo G., Lusk JL. 2016. The role of beliefs in purchasing process of functional foods. Food Qual Prefer, 53: 151-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.009.

Pinto VRA, Freitas TBO, Dantas MIS, Lucia SMD, Melo LF, Minim VPR, Bressan J. 2017. Influence of package and health-related claims on perception and sensory acceptability of snack bars. Food Res Int, 101: 103-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.08.062.

Shepherd R. 1999. Social determinants of food choice. Proc Nutr Soc, 58: 807-812. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665199001093.

Siegrist M, Stampfli N, Kastenholz H. 2008. Consumers' willingness to buy functional foods. The influence of carrier, benefit and trust. Appetite, 51:526-529. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.003.

Siró I, Kápolna E, Kápolna B, Lugasi A. 2008. Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance-- a review. Appetite, 51: 456-467. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060.

Urala N, Lähteenmäki L. 2007. Consumers' changing attitudes towards functional foods. Food Qual Prefer, 18: 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.06.007.

Van Kleef E, Van Trijp HCM, Luning P. 2005. Functional foods: Health claim-food product compatibility and the impact of health claim framing on consumer evaluation. Appetite, 44: 299-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2005.01.009.

Verbeke W. 2006. Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health? Food Qual Prefer, 17:126- 131. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.003.

Williams P. 2005. Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods. Nutr Rev, 63: 256-264. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00382.x
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-127X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Turkish Science and Technology Publishing (TURSTEP)
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

First Report on Identification of Fusarium graminearum Species Complex Members from Turkey and Iran

Berna TUNALI, Emre YÖRÜK, Özlem SEFER, BAYRAM KANSU, Bahram SHARİFNABİ

Amik Ovası Koşullarında Börülce (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Çeşitlerinin Tarımsal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Cahit ERDOĞAN

Fındık Üretimi Yapan İşletmelerin Tarım Sigortası Yaptırmaya Karar Verme Sürecinde Etkili Olan Faktörlerin Logit Regresyon Analizi ile Tahminlemesi: Düzce İli Örneği#

Harun KABAOĞLU, Avni BİRİNCİ

Assessing Fruit Tree Species Diversity in Home Garden Agro-Forestry and Their Role Supporting Local People’s Livelihoods in Burie District, Ethiopia

Alebachew ABEBE, Habtamu KİROS

Some Chemical Properties of Infrared Dried Neem Fruit in Turkey

Tunahan ERDEM

Investigation of Virus Diseases and Molecular Detection of Little Cherry Virus 1 on Cherry Plants at Niğde Province

Qurat SAJİD, EMİNUR ELÇİ

Çukurova Bölgesi Koşullarında Farklı Zamanlarda Ekimi Yapılan Brüksel Lahanalarında Bitki Gelişimi, Verim ve Baş Kalitesi

İbrahim YILMAZ, Nebahat SARI

Fungicide Management of Faba Bean Gall (Olpidium viciae) in Ethiopia

Wulita WONDWOSEN, Mashilla DEJENE, Negussie TADESSE, Seid AHMED

Bilgisayarlı Görüntüleme Sistemi: Gıda Endüstrisinde Kullanımı ve Uygulamaları

Pınar BALKIR, Kemal KEMAHLIOĞLU, Ufuk YÜCEL

Bölge Orijinli İçme Sütü Profilleri İçin Tüketicilerin Ödeme İstekliliği ve Piyasa Payları: Iğdır İli Örneği

Yavuz TOPCU