Genderwise Investigation of Empahty Skills in Child Athletes

Genderwise Investigation of Empahty Skills in Child Athletes

This study intends to investigate the empathy skills in child athletes with regard to gender. The study group comprises 226children selected randomly from various clubs in Ankara. 56.7% of the total number is female and 40.3% is male. When thesports age of the group with a mean age of 12.16 is examined, it can be seen that 40.7% have been doing sports for 1-2 years,42.0% have been doing sports for 3-4 years and 17.3% have been doing sports for 5-6 years. The study group is distributedinto branches, with 29.2% pertaining to volleyball, 42% to handball, and 28.8% to basketball. In the study, 'Empathy Scale forChildren' developed by Bryant (3) and adapted to Turkish by Yüksel (23) was used as data collection tool. The frequency,percentage distributions and the mean values of the sub-dimensions of the scales were calculated. Independent Samples Ttest was used to determine the empathy levels of the child athletes. When the findings were examined, it was seen that theempathy levels of the child athletes differed according to gender and this difference was statistically significant in favor ofgirls (p=.00). As a result, the activities aiming to improve the sportspeople’s taking roles and perspectives along withempathetic thinking skills should be included in the process of creating empathetic people thus empathetic sensitivityshould be increased

___

  • 1. Akkoyun F. Empathetic tendency and moral judgment. Journal of Psychology, 1987; 21(6): 91-97.
  • 2. Ang RP, Goh DH. Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2010; 41(4): 387-397.
  • 3. Bryant B. An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 1982; 53: 413-425.
  • 4. Cotton K. Developing empathy in children and youth. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1992:2-4.
  • 5. Davis HM. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Sychology, 1983; 44(1): 113-126.
  • 6. Duquin MB, Schroeder K. Power, empathy, and moral conflict in sport. Peace and Conflict, 1996; 2(4): 351-367.
  • 7. Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Sadovsky A. Empathy-related responding in children. Handbook of Moral Development, 2006: 517-549.
  • 8. Eisenberg N, Strayer J (Eds.). Empathy and its development. CUP Archive, 1990:60-68.
  • 9. Eisenberg-Berg N, Mussen P. Empathy and moral development in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 1978; 14(2): 185-186.
  • 10. Klein KJK, Hodges SD. Gender differences, motivation, and empathetic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001; 27(6): 720–730.
  • 11. Landazabal MG. A comparative analysis of empathy in childhood and adolescence: Gender differences and associated socio-emotional variables. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 2009; 9(2): 217-235.
  • 12. Lorimer R, Jowett S. Empathetic accuracy, meta-perspective, and satisfaction in the coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2009; 21(2): 201-212.
  • 13. Rogers CR. Empathetic: An unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist, 1975; 5(2), 2-10.
  • 14. Sezen-Balçıkanlı G, Sezen M. Professional sports and empathy: relationship between professional futsal players’ tendency toward empathy and fouls. Physical Culture and Sport Studies and Research, 2017; 73(1): 27-35.
  • 15. Sezen-Balçıkanlı G, Sezen M. The relationship between empathy and antisocial-prosocial behaviours in youth field hockey players. International Journal of Learning and Change, 2019; 11(1): 57-65.
  • 16. Sezen-Balçıkanlı G, Yıldıran İ. Professional players' sportsmanship orientations and empathetic tendency levels. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2011; 9(2): 49-56.
  • 17. Sezen-Balçıkanlı G, Yıldıran İ. Sportspersonship orientation and empathy: a study of professional football players. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2012; 12(1): 18.
  • 18. Sezen-Balçıkanlı G, Yıldıran İ. The relationship between empathetic skill and prosocial behavior in elite inline hockey players. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2018; 23(1): 1-8.
  • 19. Sezen-Balçıkanlı G. Fair play and empathy: A research study with student teachers. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 2009a; 6(4): 79-84.
  • 20. Sezen-Balçıkanlı G. Fair play in professional sports: Sportspersonship orientations of futsal players. FairPlay, Revista de Filosofia, Ética y Derecho del Deporte, 2014; 2(1): 33- 49.
  • 21. Sezen-Balçıkanlı G. The relationship between professional players' fair play behavior and empathetic tendency levels. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University, 2009b, Ankara.
  • 22. Shields LL, D Bredemeier JB, Brenda JL. Chracter development and physical activity. USA: Human Kinetics, 1994:90-93.
  • 23. Yüksel A. The effect of empathy education program on the empathetic skills of primary school students. Uludağ University Journal of Faculty of Education, 2004; 17(2): 341-354.