Anthropometric characteristics of Indian volleyball players in relation to their performance level

The purpose of this study was to find out the differences in anthropometric characteristics of volleyball players in relation to their performance level (i.e., inter-university and inter-college). For this study, two hundred and forty (N=240) male volleyball players (inter-university level, N1=120, inter-college level, N2=120) of age ranging from 18-25 years were selected as subjects from various colleges and universities of North India. The purposive sampling technique was used to select the subjects. All subjects were assessed for height, weight, lengths, circumference and diameters. The independent samples t-test revealed that inter-university volleyball players had significantly higher height (p<0.05), weight (p<0.05), leg length (p<0.05), lower leg length (p<0.05) than inter-college volleyball players. However, inter-college volleyball players had significantly greater forearm length (p<0.05). The inter-university volleyball players also had significantly greater upper arm circumference (p<0.05), forearm circumference (p<0.05), thigh circumference (p<0.05) and calf circumference (p<0.05) than inter-college volleyball players. The inter-university volleyball players had significantly wider elbow diameter (p<0.05), shoulder diameter (p<0.05) and lesser hip diameter (p<0.05) than inter-college volleyball players. It is concluded that there were significant differences between inter-university and inter-college volleyball players with regard to anthropometric characteristics. Inter-university players showed better anthropometric measurements as compared to inter-college volleyball player.

-

The purpose of this study was to find out the differences in anthropometric characteristics of volleyball players in relation to their performance level (i.e., inter-university and inter-college). For this study, two hundred and forty (N=240) male volleyball players (inter-university level, N1=120, inter-college level, N2=120) of age ranging from 18-25 years were selected as subjects from various colleges and universities of North India. The purposive sampling technique was used to select the subjects. All subjects were assessed for height, weight, lengths, circumference and diameters. The independent samples t-test revealed that inter-university volleyball players had significantly higher height (p

___

  • Bandyopadhya A. Anthropometry and body composition in soccer and volleyball players in West Bengal, India. J Physiological Anthropology, 2007; 26(4): 501-505.
  • Bayios IA, Bergeles NK, Apostolidis NG, Noutsos KS, Koskolou MD. Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype differences of Greek elite female basketball, volleyball and handball players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2006; 46(2): 271–280.
  • Duncan MJ, Woodfield L, Al-Nakeeb Y. Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of junior elite volleyball players. Br J Sports Med, 2006; 40(7): 640-651.
  • Ercolessi D. La caduta dal salto. Super Volley, 1999; 1: 79-82.
  • Fattahi A, Ameli M, Sadeghi H, Mahmoodi B. Relationship between anthropometric parameters with vertical jump in male elite volleyball players due to game’s position. J Hum Sport Exerc, 2012; 7(3): 714-726.
  • Gabbett T, Georgieff B. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of Australian junior national, state, and novice volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res, 2007; 21: 902-908.
  • Gaurav V, Singh M, Singh S. Anthropometric characteristics, somatotyping and body composition of volleyball and basketball players. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Management, 2010; 1(3): 28-32.
  • Hadzic R, Belica D, Popovic S. Comparative study of anthropometric measurement and body composition between elite basketball and volleyball players. PESH, 2012; 1: 103-108.
  • Jankovic V, Marelic N. Odbojka (Volleyball). Fakultet za fizičku kulturu (Faculty of Physical Education Zagreb), 1995, 7-9.
  • Milicerowa H. Somatic traits as a main criterion in the process of sport selection. AWF Warszawa. 1973, 5, 51-109. (In Polish).differ in somatic characteristics from the general population.
  • Norton K, Olds T. Morphological evolution of athletes over the 20th century. Sports Medicine, 2001; 31: 763-783.
  • Petroski EL, Fraro JD, Fidelix YL, Silva DAS, Pires-neto CS, Dourado AC, Rocha MA, Stanganelli LCR, Oncken P, Viera FS. characteristics of athletes of the Brazilian Men’s volleyball team: an 11-year descriptive study. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum, 2013; 15(2): 184-192. and somatotype
  • Singh S, Singh K, Singh M. Anthropometric measurements, body composition and somatotyping of high jumpers. Brazilian Journal of Biomotricity, 2010; 4(4): 266-271.
  • Stec M, Smulsky V. The estimation criteria of jump actions of high performance female volleyball players. Research Yearbook, 2007; 13: 77-8.
  • Toriala AL, Adeniran S, Ogunremi RT. Body composition and anthropometric characteristics of elite male basketball and volleyball players. J Sports Med, 1987; 27: 235-239.
  • Ugarkovic D. Biomedicinske osnove sportske medicine (Biomedical foundations of sports medicine). Novi Sad, 2004.
  • Viswanathan J, Chandrasekaran K. Optimizing position-wise anthropometric models for prediction of playing ability among elite Indian basketball players. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering, 2011; 5(2): 67-76.
Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1999
  • Yayıncı: Selçuk Üniversitesi, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi