An investigation of causes of conflict men and women officers working at the General Directorate of Sports

The aim of this study was to determine the causes of conflict male and female civil servants working in theGeneral Directorate of Sports (GDS). In this study, between the ages of 20 to 55 different positions in differentdepartments and employees participated in 44 male 33 female officers. 1-20 years of work of the officers, and 42participants were married, 33 were single. In the study, Conflict Assessment Questionnaire consisting of 18questions was used. In addition to age, gender, marital status and year of work were asked demographicinformation. The information obtained in the tables was arranged. Moreover chi-square test in 0.05 level wasapplied in order to understand whether there was a difference between answers. As a result of statisticalcomparisons, the answers given to the participants age, marital status, gender, and year of work according to thelevel of significance of the differences observed (p<0,05). As a result, the working parts of the participants isunable to communicate due to the reason of the conflict, the top authorities to take into account wishes of thestaff and subordinates for keeping under constant control of the working environment was originated.

-

The aim of this study was to determine the causes of conflict male and female civil servants working in the General Directorate of Sports (GDS). In this study, between the ages of 20 to 55 different positions in different departments and employees participated in 44 male 33 female officers. 1-20 years of work of the officers, and 42 participants were married, 33 were single. In the study, Conflict Assessment Questionnaire consisting of 18 questions was used. In addition to age, gender, marital status and year of work were asked demographic information. The information obtained in the tables was arranged. Moreover chi-square test in 0.05 level was applied in order to understand whether there was a difference between answers. As a result of statistical comparisons, the answers given to the participants age, marital status, gender, and year of work according to the level of significance of the differences observed (p

___

  • Basak B. Conflict and conflict management: public and private universities in Izmir comparison. Master's Thesis, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, 2010.
  • Cross G, James JH, Beck D. Conflict and Human Interaction. Kendall Hunt: Dubugue, IA. p.5, 1979.
  • Borisoff D. Conflict Management, (Second Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998.
  • Eren E. Organizational Behavior and Management Psychology. İstanbul, 2001.
  • Stoner J, Freeman E. Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1989.
  • Swanström N, Weissmann M, Conflict, Conflict Prevention and Conflict Management and beyond: a conceptual exploration. Concept Paper, Central Asia- Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, 2005.
  • Erturk M. Business Management and Organization. İstanbul, 2000. 8. Gibson JL, Ivanchevich JM, Donnelly JH. Organizations, Behavior, Structure and Processes. Third Edition, Business Publications Inc. 1979.
  • Turkel A. Total Quality in the Context of Group Dynamics and Conflict Management, İstanbul, 2000.
  • Robbins PS. Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2003.
  • Robert M. Managing Conflict from the Inside Out. Austin: Learning Concepts, 1982.
  • Koçel T. Business Administration, Management and
  • Organizational Organization,
  • Modern-Contemporary and Current Approaches. Beta
  • Publishing, İstanbul, 2003 Behavior, Classic- 13. Kılıç M. Management and Organization.
  • Organizational Conflict and Conflict Management,
  • Nobel Publishing, Ankara, 2007.