___

• Allred, K. D. ve Smith, T. W. (1989). The hardy personality: cognitive and psychological responses to evaluative threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 257-266.
• Banaz, M. (1992). Lise öğrencilerinde sosyal des- tek kaynakları ve stres ile ruh sağlığı arasındaki ilişki. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• Callahan, C. D. (2000). Stress, coping and personality hardiness in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Rehabilitation
• Psychology, 45 (1), 38-48.
• Deneve, K.M. ve Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality a metaanalysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197- 229.
• Durak, M. (2002). Predictive role of hardiness on psychological symtomatology of university students experienced earthquake. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Eker, D. ve Arkar, H. (1995). Çok boyutlu algıla- nan sosyal destek ölçeği’nin faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 34, 45-55.
• Eker, D., Arkar, H. ve Yaldız, H. (2001). Çok bo- yutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeği’nin gözden geçi- rilmiş formu’nun faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12 (1), 17-25.
• Florian, V., Mikulincer, M. ve Taubman, O. (1995). Does hardiness contribute to mental health during a stressful real life situtaion? The roles of appraisal and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (4), 687-695.
• Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 939-952.
• Folkman, S. ve Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing.
• Funk, S. ve Houston, B. K. (1987). A critical analysıs of the hardiness scale's validity and utility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (3), 572-578.
• Ganellen, R. ve Blaney, P. H. (1984). Hardiness and social support as moderators of the effects of life stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (1), 156-163.
• Holt, P., Fine, M. ve Tollefson, N. (1987). Mediating stress: Survival of the hardy. Psychology In The Schools, 24 (1), 51-58.
• Hull, J.G., Van Treuren, R. R. ve Virnelli, S. (1987). Hardiness and health: a critique and alternative approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 24-36.
• Kamya, H. (2000). Hardiness and spiritual well- being among social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 36 (2), 231-241.
• Kobasa, S. (1979). Stressful life events, personality and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1-11.
• Kobasa, S. (1982). Commitment and coping in stress resistance among lawyers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (4), 707-717.
• Kobasa, S., Maddi, S. R. ve Kahn, S. (1982). Hardiness and health: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 168-177.
• Kobasa, S. ve Puccetti, M. C. (1983). Personality and social resources in stress resistance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (4), 839-850.
• Kosaka, M. (1996). Relations between hardiness and psychological stress response. Journal of Performance Studies, 3, 35-40.
• Maddi, S. R., Khoshaba, D. M., Persıco, M., Harvey, R. ve Bleecker, F. (2002). The personality construct of hardiness. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 72-85.
• May, R. (1969). Existential Psychology. (2 nd. Ed.) Random House, N. Y.
• Nicholas, P. K. ve Leuner, J. D. (1999). Hardiness, social support, and health status: Are there differences in older african-american and anglo-american adults? Holistic Nurses Practice, 13 (3), 53-61.
• Groesser, S. A. (1998). The relationship of hardiness and perceived social support to nurses’ appraisals of stress. Master of Science in Nursing, The Grand Valley State University, Allendale.
• Olsen, S., Marshall, E. S., Mandleco, B. L., Allred, K., Dyches, T. T. ve Sansom N. (1999). Support, communication and hardiness in families with children with disabilities. Journal of Family Nursing, 5 (3), 275-292.
• Patterson, J. M. (1992). Promoting resilience in families experiencing stress. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 42, 47-63.
• Pengilly, J. W. (1997). Hardiness and social support as moderators of stress in college students. Doctor of Philosophy, Kent State University, Ohio.
• Pengilly, J. W. ve Dowd, E. T. (2000). Hardiness and social support as moderators of stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56 (6), 813-820.
• Rhodewalt, F. ve Zone, J. B. (1989). Appraisal of life change, depression and ıllness in hardy and nonhardy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 81-88.
• Robitschek, C. ve Kashubeck, S. (1999). A structural model of parental alcoholism, family functioning and psychologicl health: The mediating effects of hardiness and personal growth orientation. Jornal of Counseling Psychology, 46 (2), 159-172.
• Sinclair, R. R. ve Tetrick, L. E. (2000). Implications of ıtem wording for hardiness structure, relation with neuroticism, and stress buffering. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 1-25.
• Skau, M. (1994). Intern Hardiness, Coping and Satisfaction. New York: University at Albany.
• Sorias, O. (1988). Sosyal destek kavramı. Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 27 (1), 353-357.
• Yıldırım, İ. (1994). Akademik Düzeyleri Farklı Olan Öğrencilerin Sosyal Destek Algıları. Türk Psikolo- ji Dergisi, v: 2, n: 9, 33-38.
• Yıldırım, İ. (2005). Algılanan sosyal destek ölçe- ği’nin revizyonu. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17, 221-236.
• Wallace, K.A, Bisconti, T. L. ve Bergeman, C. S. (2001). The mediational effect of hardiness on social support and optimal outcomes in later life. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23 (4).
• Weiss, M. J. (2002). Hardiness and social support as predictors of stress in mothers of typical children, children with autism, and children with mental retardation. The National Autistic Society, 6 (1), 115- 130.
• Wiebe, D. (1991). Hardiness and stress moderation: A test of proposed mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (1), 89-99. Şerife Terzi Vol: III No: 29
• Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal
• THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL HARDINESS AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL
• SUPPORT OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
• Social support is the degree to benefit from social sources (mother, father, wife, lover, friends, teachers...) by the means of trusted relations. It has been stated that social support sources support the individual in different shapes, and most common ones are material, emotional, and mental supports.
• In literature (Kobasa, 1979; Kobasa ve Puccetti, 1983; Folkman ve Lazarus, 1984; Wiebe, 1991; Patterson, 1992; Florian, Mikulincer ve Taubman, 1995; Pengilly, 1997; Pengilly ve Dowd, 2000; Wallace, Bisconti ve Bergeman, 2001), researches about the relationship between stress and illness are focused on buffer effect of psychological variables socail support and psychological hardiness.
• Purpose of this research is to find out if there is a meaningful relationship between psychological hardiness and perceived social support for university students. METHOD
• The sample of this study was consisted of 140 (66 female, 74 male) students attending Gazi University, Faculty of Education and Faculty of Industrial Art Education.
• All the participants were presented with Psychological Hardiness-IIIR adapted to Turkish culture by Durak (2002) and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support adapted to Turkish culture by *
• Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Eğitim Fakültesi, serife@gazi.edu.tr
• Psychological Hardiness and Perceived Social Support
• Eker, Arkar, Yaldız (2001). Pearson product moment
• correlation coefficient were applied for statistical analysis. RESULTS
• As a result of the analysis that have been due to the purposes of the research, correlation coefficient between total points the students get from, Psychological Hardiness-IIIR, and total points the students get from Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support is meaningful in a sinifance level of 0.01 (r=.83). DISCUSSION