___

• Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147-178.
• Bartholomew, K. ve Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (2), 226-244.
• Brennan, K. A., Clarck, C. L. Ve Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. J. A. Simpson ve W. S. Rholes (Ed.), Attachment theory and close relationships içinde (46-76) Newyork: Guilford Press.
• Büyükşahin, A. (2005). Çok boyutlu ilişki ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 16 (2), 97-105.
• Büyükşahin, A., Hasta, D. ve Hovardaoğlu, S. (2005). İlişki istikrarı ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 8 (16), 25-37.
• Büyükşahin, A. ve Hovardaoğlu, S. (2004). Çiftlerin aşka ilişkin tutumlarının Lee'nin çok boyutlu aşk biçimleri kapsamında incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19 (54), 59-72.
• Choice,P. ve Lamke, L. K.(1999). Stay/leave decision-making processes in abusuive dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 6, 351-367.
• Dağ, I. (1991). Rotter'in iç-dış kontrol odağı ölçeği'nin (RÎDKOÖ) üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(26), 10-16.
• Davis, L . E. ve Strube, M . J. (1993). An assessment of romantic commitment among Black and White dating couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23 (3), 212-225.
• Demirtaş, H. A. ve Dönmez, A. (2006). Yakın ilişkilerde kıskançlık: Bireysel, ilişkisel ve durumsal değişkenler. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 17(3), 181-191.
• Dönmez, A. (1987). Bazı kişilerarası ilişki durumlarını algılama ve değiştirme zihinsel ve psiko-sosyal isteğinde cinsiyet farkı. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (1-2), 143-158.
• Drigotas, S. M. ve Rusbult, C. E. (1992). Should I stay or should I go? A dependence model of breakups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (1), 62-87.
• Duffy, S. ve Rusbult, C. E. (1986). Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 1-23.
• Etcheverry, P. A. ve Le, B. (2005). Thinking about commitments: Accessibility of commitment and prediction of relationship persistence, accomodation, and willingness to sacrifice. Personal Relationships, 72,103-123.
• Farrell, D. ve Rusbult, C. E. (1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 78-95.
• Feeney, J. A. (1994). Attachment style, communication patterns and satisfaction across the life cycle of marriage. Personal Relationships, i, 333-348.
• Feeney, J. A. (2002). Attachment, marital interaction, and relationship satisfaction: A diary study. Personal Relationships, 9, 39-55.
• Feeney, J. A. ve Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style as predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (2), 281-291.
• Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M. ve Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956-974.
• Fitzpatrick, J. ve Sollie. D. L (1999). Unrealistic gendered and relationship spesific beliefs: Contributions to investments and commitment in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16 (6), 852-868.
• Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Polek, D. S. ve McNeill-Hawkins, K. (1988). Factors associated with patterns of dating violence toward collage women. Journal of Family Violance, 3, 169-182.
• Gaertner, L. ve Foshee, V. (1999). Commitment and the perpetration of relationsip violence. Personel Relationships, 6, 227-239.
• Hasta, D. ve Büyükşahin, A. (2006). A Comparison of university students with romantic Relationships and married couples for the Love styles and the reasons for maintaining the relationship. International Association for Relationship Research Conference, Crete, Greece.
• Hendrick, S., Hendrick, C. ve Dicke, A (1998). The relationships assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137-142.
• Holmes, J. G. (2000). Social relationships: The nature and function of relationship schemas. Eurupen Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 447-495.
• Hortaçsu, N. (1989). Current and dissolved relationships: Descriptive and attributional dimensions and predictors of involvement. Journal of Social and Personal Relatinships, 6, 373-383.
• Hortaçsu, N. ve Karancı, A.N. (1987). Premarital breakups in a Turkish sample: Perceived reasons, attributional dimensions and affective reactions. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 57-74.
• Hovardaoğlu, S. (1996). Sosyal mübadele: Evlilikle ilgili değerlendirmelere etkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 11 (36), 12-24.
• îmamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivisim in a model and scale of balenced differentation and integration. Journal of Psychology, 132, 95-105.
• Johnson, M. P. (1973). Commitment: A conceptual structure and empirical application. Sociological Quarterly, 14, 395-406.
• Johnson, D. J. ve Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6), 967-980.
• Karakurt, G. (2001). The impact of adult attachment styles on romantic jealousy. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ODTÜ, Ankara.
• Kirkpatrick, L. A. ve Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,502-512.
• Le, B. ve Agnew, C. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta- analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
• Lee, J. A. (1988): Love styles. R. J. Sternberg ve M. L. Barnes (Ed.), The psychology of love. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Lehmiller, J. J. ve Agnew, C. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32 (1), 40-51.
• Levinger, G. (1965). Marital cohesiveness and dissolution: An integrative review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 27, 19-78.
• Lin, Y-H, W. ve Rusbult, C. E. (1995). Commitment to dating relationships and cross-sex friendships in America and China. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12 (1), 7-26.
• Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. ve Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15 (6), 755-773.
• Miller, R. S. (2003). On being admired but overlooked: Reflections on "attention to alternatives" in close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3-4),284-288.
• Morgan, H. J. ve Shaver, P. R.(1999). Attachment processes and commitment to romantic relationships. J. M. Adams, ve W. H. Jones (Ed.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability içinde (3-33). New York: Kluwer Academic.
• Morrow, G. D., Clark, E. M. ve Brock, K. F. (1995). Individual and partner love styles: Implications for the quality of romantic involvements. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12 (3), 363-387.
• Öner, B. (2000a). Future time orientation and relationships with the opposite sex. The Journal of Psychology, 134 (3), 306-314.
• Öner, B. (2000b). Relationship satisfaction and dating experience: Factors affecting future time orientation in relationships with the opposite sex. The Journal of Psychology, 134 (5), 527-536.
• Öner, B. (2001). Factors predicting future time orientation for romantic relationships with the opposite sex. The Journal of Psychology, 135 (4), 430-438.
• Panayiotou, G. (2005). Love, commitment, and response to conflict among Cypriot dating couples: Two models, one relationship. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 108-117.
• Pistole, M. C, Clark, E. M. ve Tubbs, A. L. (1995). Love relationships: Attachment style and the investment model. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 17, 199-209.
• Richardson, D. R., Medvin, N. ve Hammock, G. (1988). Love styles, relationship experience, and sensation seeking: A test of validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 9 (3), 645-651.
• Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A teşt of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
• Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A Longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (1), 101-117.
• Rusbult, C. E. (2003). Satisfaction / alternatives / investments scales. 14 Mart 2003, http:// www.unc.edu/depts/socpsych/cr/Satisfaction.html.
• Rusbult, C. E. ve Arriage, X. B. (1997). Interdependence theory. S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships içinde (221-250). England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• Rusbult, C. E. ve Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An Interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10 (2), 175-204.
• Rusbult, C. E., Coolsen, M. K., Kirchner, J. L. ve Clarke, J. (baskıda). Commitment. A. Vangelisti ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships. New York: Cambridge.
• Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J. ve Morrow, G. D. (1986). Prediction satisfaction and commitment in adult romantic involvements: An assessment of the generalizability of the investment model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49 (1), 81-89.
• Rusbult, C. E. ve Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in a abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558-571.
• Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M. ve Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
• Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L. ve Hannon, P. A. (2004). Commitment and relationship maintance mechanisms. H. T. R. Reis ve C. E. Rusbult (Eds), Close relationships içinde (287-303). USA: Taylor & Francis Books, Inc.
• Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F. ve Lipkus, I. (1991). Accomadation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary emprical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53-78.
• Rusbult, C. E., Zembrodt, I. M. ve Gunn, L. K. (1982). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1230-1242.
• Sakalı-Uğurlu, N. (2003). How do romantic relationship satisfaction,gender stereotypes,and gender relate to future time orientation in romantic relationships? The Journal of Psychology, 137(3), 294-303.
• Selçuk, E., Günaydın,G., Sümer, N. ve Uysal, A. (2005). Yetişkin bağlanma boyutları için yeni bir ölçüm: Yakın ilişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri-II'nin Türk örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 8 (6), 1-11.
• Shaver, P. R. ve Brennan, K. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the "big five" personality traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationships outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 536-545.
• Snyder, M. ve Simpson, J. A. (1984). Self monitoring and dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1281 -1291.
• ' Snell, W. E., Jr., Schicke, M. ve Arbeiter, T. (2002). The Multidimensional Relationship Questionnaire: Psychological dispositions associated with intimate relations. W. E. Snell, Jr. (Ed.), New directions in the psychology of intimate relations: Research and theory. Cape Girardeau, MO: Snell Publications.
• Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social support determinants of relationship commitment. Social Psychology Quartely, 51 (4), 318-328.
• Sümer, N. (2006). Yetişkin bağlanma ölçeklerinin kategoriler ve boyutlar düzeyinde karşılaştırılması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21 (57), 1-22.
• Sümer, N. ve Güngör, D. (1999). Yetişkin bağlanma stilleri ölçeklerinin Türk ömeklemi üzerinde psikometrik değerlendirmesi ve kültürlerarası bir karşılaştırma. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14 (43), 71-109.
• Thibaut, J. W. ve Kelley, H. H. (1959). Social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
• Weigel, D. J., Bennett, K. K. ve Reisch, D. S. B.(2003). Family influences on commitment: Examining the family of origin correlates of relationship commitment attitudes. Personal Relationships, 10, 453-474.
• Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A. ve Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17,942-966.