Investigating the Influence of Attitudes and Behaviours of Knowledge Professionals on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management System: A Study on Turkish Corporations

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bilgi profesyonelleri olarak bilinen bilgi işçilerinin ve bilgi sağlayıcılarınıntutum ve davranışları ile bilgi yönetim sürecinin etkinliğinin bilgi yönetim sistemi üzerindeki etkileriniaraştırmaktır. Araştırma örneklemini Türkiye'de faaliyette bulunan çeşitli özel şirletlerde çalışan bilgiprofesyonelleri (N = 304) oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmek içinfaktör, korelasyon, duncan ve regresyon testleri yapılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, bilgi profesyonellerininidari davranışları, tutumları ile bilgi yönetim sistemi üzerinde olumlu etkisini ortaya koyarken, bilgiyönetim sisteminin etkinliği arasında anlamlı bir ilişkiye rastlanmamıştır.

Bilgi Yönetim Sisteminin Etkinliği Üzerinde Bilgi Profesyonellerinin Tutum ve Davranışlarının Etkisinin İncelenmesi: Türk Firmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between attitudes, behaviours of knowledgeprofessionals, and the efficiency of knowledge management process on the effectiveness of knowledgemanagement system in Turkish p rivate sector comp anies. The data were gathered f rom knowledgeprofessionals (N=304) currently employed in different sectors, located in Turkey. The factor, correlation,duncan and regression tests were conducted to analyze the relationship between the variables. Theempirical findings indicate that attitudes of knowledge professionals and administrative behaviours ofemployees have a significant positive effect on effectiveness of knowledge management system. Therehas been no significant relationship found between the efficiency of process and the effectiveness of thesystem.

___

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
  • Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research ıssues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 107-136.
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Bilgi yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık.
  • Beijerse, R. P. (1999). Questions in knowledge management: defining and conceptualizing a phenomenon. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2), 94-109.
  • Bellinger, G., Castro, D. and Mills, A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. Retrieved from Jan 16, 2012 http://www.mrhanson.org/Data%20İnformation%20Knowledge%20Wisdom.pdf
  • Bhatt, G.D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68 – 75.
  • Blackmore, J. (2002). Globalisation and the restructuring of higher education for new knowledge economies: new dangers or old habits troubling gender equity work in universities?. Higher Education Quarterly, 56, 419–441.
  • Brinkley, I. (2006). Defining the knowledge economy, research paper. London: The Work Foundation. Retrieved from Jun 11, 2014 http://www.theworkfoundation.com/assets/docs/publications/65_ defining%20knowledge%20economy.pdf
  • Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management ınfluence ınnovation and competitiveness?. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 87-98.
  • Chen, R. F., Burstein, F., (2006). A dynamic model of knowledge management for higher education development. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, 10 July 2006 to 13 July 2006 (pp. 173-180). Sydney NSW Australia: University of Technology.
  • Chou, T. C., Chang, P. L., Tsai, C. T. and Cheng, Y. P. (2005). Internal learning climate, knowledge management process and perceived knowledge management satisfaction. Journal of Information Science, 31(4), 283-296.
  • Çapar B, (2005). Bilgi yönetimi, üretimi ve pazarlanması. Bilgi Hizmetlerinin Organizasyonu ve Pazarlanması Sempozyumu, Kadir Has Üniversitesi, 22-24 Eylül, İstanbul. Retrieved May 18, 2014 from http://kaynak.unak.org.tr/bildiri/unak05/u05-8.pdf
  • Çetin, C. and Karabay, M. E. (2010). An empirical investigation through the efficient usage of knowledge in Turkish banking sector, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 12(2), 27-56.
  • Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. USA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Davenport, T. H. (2005). Thinking f or a living: How to get better p erf ormances and results f rom knowledge workers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • David, P. A. and Foray, D. (2002). An introduction to the economy of the knowledge society. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), 9-23.
  • Dragunov, A. N., Dietterich, T. G., Johnsrude, K., McLaughlin M., Li, L. and Herlocker, J. L. (2005). TaskTracer: A desktop environment to support multi-tasking knowledge workers. In Proceedings of IUI (pp. 75-82). San Diego, California: ACM Press.
  • Eagly, A. H. and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. FortWorth, Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
  • Faucher, P. L. Jean-Baptiste, Everett, A. M. and Lawson, R. (2008). Reconstituting knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(3), 3-16.
  • Fayyad, U., Shapiro, G.P. and Smyth, P. (1996). The KDD process for extracting useful knowledge from volumes of data. Communications of the ACM, 39, 27-34.
  • Fitchett, J. (1998). Managing your organization’s key asset: Knowledge. The Healthcare Forum Journal, 41(3), 56-60.
  • Geng, Q., Townley, C., Huang, K. and Zhang, J. (2005). Comparative knowledge management: A pilot study of chinese and american universities. Journal of the American Society for İnformation Science and Technology, 56(10), 1031-1043.
  • Gholipour, R., Jandaghi, G. and Hosseinzadeh, S.A.A. (2010). Explanation of knowledge management enabler as a latent variable: A case study of SMEs in Iran. Af rican Journal of Business Management, 4(9), 1863-1872.
  • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A.H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management İnformation Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
  • Gupta, A. K. and Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge management’s social dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel. Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 71–80.
  • Halawi, L. A., Aronson, J. and Mccarthy, R. (2005). Resource- based view of knowledge management for competitive advantage. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2), 75-86.
  • Havens, C., and Knapp, E. (1999). Easing into knowledge management. Strategy & Leadership, 27(2), 4-9.
  • Hicks, R. C., Dattero, R. and Galup, S.D. (2006). The five-tier knowledge management hierarchy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1),19-31.
  • Hipp, C. and Grupp, H. (2005). Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Research Policy, 34, 517–535.
  • Ichijo, K., Von Krogh, G. and Nonaka, I. (1998). Knowledge enablers. In von Krogh, G., Roos, J. and Kleine, D. (Eds), Knowing in firms. Understanding, managing and measuring knowledge (pp. 173-203) London: Sage.
  • Jensen, M. C. ve Meckling, W. H. (1996). Specific and general knowledge, and organizational structure. In P. S. Myers (Ed.), Knowledge management and organizational design (pp. 17–38). Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Kamath, G. B. (2007). The intellectual capital performance of the Indian banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 96-123.
  • Karabay, M. (2010). Bilgi ekonomisine geçiş sürecinde finansal sektörde stratejik rekabet olgusu: bankacılık sektörü üzerine bir uygulama, Unpublished Dissertation, M. Ü. Institute of Banking and Insurance, İstanbul.
  • Karabay, M. (2011). Assessing the measurement of intangible assets in telecommunication sector: evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Business And Management Studies, 3(1), 239- 252.
  • Kavak, B. and Vatansever, N. (2007). Hizmet sektöründe örgüt içi iletişim bileşenleri, işgören verimliliği bileşenleri ve işgören verimliliği üzerindeki etkileri: Ankara’daki beş yıldızlı otel işgörenlerinin düşünceleri. Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 120-140.
  • Khalifa, M., Lam, R. and Lee, M. (2001). An integrative framework for knowledge management effectiveness. Twenty-Second International Conference on Information Systems. New Orleans: ICIS 2001 Proceedings.
  • Kulkarni, U. R., Ravindran, S. and Freeze, R. (2007). A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation, Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 309-347.
  • Lee, H. and Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228.
  • Li, Sheng-Tun and Tsai, M-H. (2008). A dynamic taxonomy for managing knowledge assets. Technovation, 39(4), 284-298.
  • Liaw, S.-S., Chen, G. D. and Huang, H-M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Comp uters & Education, 50(3), 950–961.
  • Lim, K. K., Pervaiz K. A. and Zairi, M. (1999). Managing for quality through knowledge management. Total Quality Management, 10(4/5), 615-621.
  • Malhotra, Y. (1998). Knowledge management for the new world of business. Journal f or Quality & Particip ation, [Special issue on Learning and Information Management], 21(4), 58–60.
  • Materska, K. (2004). Librarians in the knowledge age. New Library World, 105(3/4), 142 – 148.
  • Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Flanagan, K., Bilderbeek, R., den Hertog, P., Huntink, W. and Bouman, M., (1994). Knowledge-intensive business services: Their roles as users, carriers and sources of ınnovation. Manchester: Prest.
  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company how japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Oltra, V. (2005). Knowledge management effectiveness factors: The role of HRM. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4),70–87.
  • Ong, C. S. and Lai, J. Y. (2007). Measuring user satisfaction with knowledge management systems: scale development, purification, and initial test. Comp uters in Human Behaviour, 23(3), 1329-1346.
  • Oort, F.V. and Raspe, O. (2005). The knowledge economy and the dutch cities. European Regional Science Conference, Amsterdam. Retrieved Jul 25, 2014 http://www-sre.wu-wien.ac.at/ersa/ ersaconfs/ersa05/papers/165.pdf
  • Özdemirci, F. and Aydın, C. (2008). Kurumsal bilgi kaynakları ve bilgi yönetimi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 22(1), 59-81.
  • Powell, W.W. and Snellman, K. (2004).The Knowledge economy, Annual Review of Sociology , 30, 199- 220.
  • Robert, K. (2005). Knowledge for future competitive advantage. Acing Today, June, 20-21.
  • Saari, L. M. and Judge, T. A. (2004). Employee attitudes and job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 43(4), 395–407.
  • Sabherwal, R. and Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2003). An empirical study of the effect of knowledge management processes at individual, group, and organizational levels. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 225-260.
  • Sağsan, M. (2007). Knowledge management from practice to discipline: A field study. AID TODAIE’s Review of Public Administration, 1(4), 123-157.
  • Sveiby, K. E. and Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work-An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 420–433.
  • Todd, R. J. and Southon, G. (2001). Educating for a knowledge management future: perceptions of library and information professionals. The Australian Library Journal, 50(4), 313-327.
  • Toit, A.D. (2003). Competitive intelligence in the knowledge economy: What is in it for south african manufacturing enterprises? International Journal of Information Management, 23, 111-120.
  • Tonta, Y. (2004). Bilgi yönetiminin kavramsal tanımı ve uygulama alanları. Kütüphaneciliğin Destanı Semp ozyumu, 21-24 Ekim 2004, Ankara içinde (ss. 1-9). Retrieved Jun 08, 2014 http://yunus. hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/BilgiYonetimi.pdf
  • Tonta, Y. and Küçük, M. (2005). Main dynamics of the transition from industrial society to information society. A. Erdinç (Ed.). In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on “Society, Governance, Management and Leadership Approaches in the Light of the Technological Developments and the Information Age (pp.3-16). Ankara: Genelkurmay Atase Başkanlığı.
  • Uçkan, Ö. (2006). Bilgi politikası ve bilgi ekonomisi: Verimlilik, istihdam, büyüme ve kalkınma. Bilgi Dünyası. Retrieved Sep 11, 2014 http://bd.org.tr/index.php/bd/article/view/291/295
  • Wiig, K. M. (2003). People-focused knowledge management. Texas: Schema Press, Texas. (pp. 1-7). Retrieved Aug 28, 2014 from http://www.krii.com/downloads/people_focused_content.pdf
  • Yahya, S. and Goh, W.K. (2002). Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 457 – 468.
  • Yeh, Y-J., Lai, S-Q. and Ho, Chin-Tsang. (2006). Knowledge management enablers: A case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(6), 793-810.
  • Yeşilorman, M. and Koç, F. (2014). Bilgi toplumunun teknolojik temeleri üzerine eleştirel bir bakış. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(1),117-135.
  • Zack, M. (2002). Developing a knowledge strategy. Calif ornia Management Review, 41(3), 125-145.
  • Zaim, H. (2005). Bilginin artan önemi ve bilgi yönetimi. İstanbul: İşaret Yayınları.