Aybike TAZEGÜL PEKİN, Çetin ÇELİK, Suna ÖZDEMİR, Sait İÇEN, Özlem SEÇİLMİŞ KERİMOĞLU, Nasuh Utku DOĞAN

11394

GEBELİKTE TANI KONULAN RETROPERİTONEAL KİTLEYE YAKLAŞIM: OLGU SUNUMU

13 haftalık gebeliği bulunan olgunun rutin kontrollerinde tesbit edilen 11 cm ‘lik adneksial kitlesine yaklaşım değerlendirilmiştir. Çekilen abdominal MR’da; pelvik bölgede uterusu ve sigmoid kolonu belirgin derecede sağa deplase eden 112x87x104 mm boyutlarında keskin sınırlı, belirgin derecede vaskülaritesi mevcut olan solid özellikte lezyon ve sol böbrekte pelvikalisiyel yapılar ve sol üreter belirgin derecede genişlemiş görünümde izlendi. Hasta 13 haftalık gebeliği mevcut iken üroloji kliniği ile birlikte operasyona alınıp, retroperitoneal alandan kaynaklanan 12x12 cm lik kitle ekstirpasyonu yapıldı. Perioperatif gelişen mesane injurisi primer onarılarak, sol hipogastrik arter ligasyonu, sol a.uterina ligasyonu yapıldı. Gebelik sırasında adneksiyal kitlelere yaklaşım hastanın semptomlarına, gebelik haftasına ve kitlenin büyüklük ve özelliklerine göre belirlenir. Olgumuzda kitlenin 12 cm den büyük olması, MR’da solid görünümlü olması, ve malign bir kitleyi düsündürmesi, bası semptomlarının olması nedeniyle laparotomi gerçekleştirilmiştir
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Gebelik, Retroperitoneal Kitle, Üreteroneosistostomi.

The approach towards an 11cm adnexal mass found during routine checks of a patient in her 13th week of gestation has been evaluated. The abdominal MRI scan shows a sharp edged solid lesion with significant vascularity and dimensions of 112x87x104mm. The lesion visibly displaces the uterus and the sigmoid colon to the right in the pelvic region. The MRI scan also shows pelvicalyceal structures in the left kidney and that the left ureter is significantly enlarged. The 13 weeks pregnant patient was operated together with the urology clinic and an excision was performed on a 12x12cm mass in the retroperitoneal space. Primary repair of bladder injury performed perioperatively. Left hypogastric artery ligation, and left a.uterina ligation were also performed. The approach to adnexal masses during pregnancy depends on the patient's symptoms, the pregnancy week, the size and the characteristics of the mass. Since the mass was larger than 12cm, looked solid in the MRI scan, was indicative of a malignant mass, and had certain symptoms, laparotomy was performed on the patient.
Keywords:

Pregnancy, Retroperitoneal Mass, ureteroneocystostomy,

PDF

___

  • 1. Mukherji SK, Rojiani AM, Younathan CM, Ros P. CT findings of retroperitoneal malignant mesenchymoma. Abdom Imaging 1994; 19:82-83.
  • 2. Pai MR, Raghuveer CV. Primary retroperitoneal tumours a 25 year study. Indian J Med Sci 1995; 49:139-41.
  • 3. Wolpert A, Beer-Gabel M, Lifschitz O, Zbar A.P. The management of presacral masses in the adult. Tech coloproctol. 2002; 6: 43-59.
  • 4. Dozois RR. Rectorectal tumors: spectrum of disease, diagnosis and surgical management. Perspect Colon Rectal Surg. 1990;3:241-5
  • 5. Benissa N, Soualy K, Alouta N, Kafih M, Zerouali NO. Primary retroperitoneal tumors in adults: report of 11 cases. Ann Urol. 2003 Oct; 37(5): 252-7.
  • 6. Whitecar P, Turner S, Higby K. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: A review of 130 cases undergoing surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:19-24.
  • 7. Spillane AJ, Thomas JM. Gyneacological presentation of retroperitoneal tumors. BJOG 2000; 107(2): 170-3.
  • 8. Isaacs JH, Dolan JR. Nongynecologic Conditions Encountered by the Gynecologic Surgeon. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD,eds. Te Linde’s Operative Gynecology,ed 50. Lippincott-Raven, 1997:1305-28.
  • 9. Beck HH. Retroperitoneal tumors: diagnosis and treatment. In: Isaacs JH, Byrne MP, eds. Pelvic surgery: a multidisciplinary approach. Mt Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing, 1987:91. 10. Bromley B, Benacerraf B. Adnexal masses during pregnancy: Accuracy of sonographic diagnosis and outcome. J Ultrasound Med 1997;16:447-52
  • 11. Hess LW, Peaceman A, O’Brien WF, Winkel CA, Cruikshank DP, Morrison JC. Adnexal mass occurring with intrauterine pregnancy: report of fifty-four patients requiring laparotomy for definitive management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 1029- 34..
  • 12. Platek DN, Handerson CE, Goldberg GL. The management of a persistent adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1236-40.
  • 13. Sherard GB 3rd, Hodson CA, Williams HJ, Semer DA, Hadi HA, Tait DL. Adnexal masses and pregnancy: a
  • 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 358- 62.
  • 14. Condous G, Okaro E, Bourne T. The conservative management of early pregnancy complications: a review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:420-30.
  • 15. Schmeler KM, Mayo-Smith WW, Peipert JF, Weitzen S, Manuel MD, Gordinier ME. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: surgery compared with observation. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1098-103.
Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-5372
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Derneği
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Berna DİLBAZ, Burak KARADAĞ

POSTMENOPOZAL VAJİNAL KANAMALI OLGULARDA TRANSVAJİNAL ULTRASONOGRAFİ VE BİOPSİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Alper BAŞBUĞ, Derya BAŞBUŞ, Müşerref ERKAN, Mete ÇAĞLAR, Ali YAVUZCAN

GEBELİKTE TANI KONULAN RETROPERİTONEAL KİTLEYE YAKLAŞIM: OLGU SUNUMU

Aybike TAZEGÜL PEKİN, Çetin ÇELİK, Suna ÖZDEMİR, Sait İÇEN, Özlem SEÇİLMİŞ KERİMOĞLU, Nasuh Utku DOĞAN

ERKEN EVRE ORTA RİSKLİ SERVİKS KANSERİNDE CERRAHİ SONRASI ADJUVAN RADYOTERAPİ VE KEMORADYOTERAPİ

Ömer DİZDAR, Özden ALTUNDAĞ, Ferah YILDIZ

EPİTELİAL OVER KANSERLERİNDE SAĞKALIMI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN İNCELENMESİ

Tekin EKİNCİ, Ali YAVUZCAN, Pelin ÖZÜN ÖZBAY, Selda UYSAL

ERKEN EVRE OVER KANSERLERİNDE PROGNOZ VE STANDART TEDAVİ UYGULAMALARI

M.coşan TEREK, Enes TAYLAN, Levent AKMAN, Ali AKDEMİR