Sumru ÇITAK, Nihal YÜCEL, Neslihan GÜNDOĞAN

Ankarada Tüketilen Pastörize Sütlerin Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesi

Bu çalışmada, Ankara’da değişik marketlerden toplanan 54 adet kutu ve pastörize süt örnekleri mikrobiyolojikkaliteleri yönünden incelenmiştir. Toplam canlı bakterinin %37’sinin, koliform’un %24’ünde,E.coli’ nin %7.4’ünde,psikrotrofik mikroorganizmaların %31.4’ünde tespit edilen koloni sayımı 102-103%22.2’sinde, Enterokok’un %9.52‘ sinde tespit edilen koloni sayımı 2.0x101adet/ml olarak bulunmuştur. Araştırmasonuçları, üretim sırasındaki hijyen koşullarının kötü olduğunu göstermektedir. Buna ilave olarak, şişe ve kutupastörize süt örneklerinin iyi bir bakteriyolojik kaliteye sahip olmadıkları ve halk sağlığı açısından riske sahip olduğubelirlenmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Pastörize süt, bakteriyolojik kalite

Research On The Microbiological Quality Of The Pasteurized Mılk Presenting To The Consumption On Ankara

In this research, totally 54 samples of bottled and cartoned pasteurized milk from different markets in Ankarawere examined in order to determine the microbiological quality. There were 102-103total viable bacteria per ml in37% of samples, 102-103coliform per ml in 24%, 102-103E.coliper ml in 7.4%, 102-103psychrotrophicmicroorganisms per ml in 31.4%, 2.0x101S.aureusper ml in 22.2 %, 2.0x101Enterococcusper ml in 9.52% ofsamples. The results of the survey indicate that the problems are related to poor hygiene during production. Inaddition to, bottled and cartoned pasteurized milk samples have got risk for the public health and haven’t got a goodbacteriological quality

Keywords:

Pasteurized milk, bacteriological quality,

PDF

___

Thomas SB, The microflora of bulk collected milk. Part 2. Dairy Industries 1974; 39: 279-282.
Collins EB, Heat resistant psychrotrophic microorganisms. Dairy Science, 1981; 64: 157-160.
Nelson FE, The microbiolgy of market milk. In: Robinson RK. Dairy Microbiolgy, vol 1. Applied Science Publishers. London, 1981; 165-207.
Harrigan WF, Mc Cance ME. Laboratory methods in food and dairy microbiology. Academic Press, London, ; pp 452 .
Chyan AT, Chan JH, Chiou TT and Hu CH. An investigation on Bacillus cereus,Staphylococcus aureus, coliforms and Escherichia colior rice products in Taiwan. Ann Rept. NLFD Taiwan, ROC, 1989; 7: 131-134.
Svec P, Sedlacek I. Occurrence of Enterococcus spp. in waters. Folia Microbiology. 1999; 44 (1), 3-10.
Kapadnis BP, Panse MV. Bacteriological quality of pasteurized milk from Poona city. Indian J Microbiol. 1986; 26 (3-4): 294-296.
Mahari T, Gashe B. A survey of the microflora of raw and pasteurized milk processing plant in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Dairy Research. 1990; 57: 233-238.
TSE. Pastörize süt TS 1019. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara 1988.
Anonim, gıda maddelerinin ve umumi sağlığı ilgilendiren eşya ve levazımın hususi vasıflarını gösteren tüzük. Titiz Ofset Matbaası. Ankara, 1982; 16-17.
Sing RS, Ranganathan. Incidence and distribution of E . c o l iin dairy products. Indian J Dairy Sci. 1978; 31 (1): 82-84.
Rowe M, Gilmour A. The present and future importance of psychrotrophic bacteria. Dairy Industries International, 1985; 50 (11).
Bramley A J. Infection of the udder with coagulase negative micrococci and Corynebacterium bovis. In: Proc. Sem. on Mastitis Control. Dodd FH, Griffin TK, Kingwill RG. (eds) International Dairy Federation Doc. No 85. Brussels. 1975.
Holmerg SD, Blake PA. Staphylococcal food poisoning in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1984; 251, 487-489.
Magdy SE. Bacteriological quality of pasteurized milk in Tripoli city. In: Proceedings of 3rd world Congress of Foodborne Infections and Intoxications, 1992; 189.
Stanescu V, Chırıla F, Sahleanuc Vana V, Dawian A. The level of coliform and E.colititre as hygienic quality index of raw and pasteurized milk of chicken meat. In: Proceeding of 3rd World Congress of Foodborne Infections and Intoxications, Berlin, 1992; 351-354.
Ambarcı I. Ankara piyasasında satılan pastörize sütlerin mikrobiyolojik nitelikleri üzerinde araştırmalar. Bornova Vet. Araşt. Enst. Derg. 1972; 24 (13): 4-49.