Muhammet SAYAN, Ali ÇELİK, İlknur TEBER, Şevki Mustafa DEMİRÖZ, Kerim TÜLÜCE, İsmail Cüneyt KURUL

Sefalik cut-down yöntemi ile santral venöz port implantasyonu

Central venous port implantation with cephalic vein cut-down method

PDF

___

1. Povoski SP. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:496-502.
2. Chang HM, Hsieh CB, Hsieh HF, Chen TW, Chen CJ, Chan DC, et al. An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006;32:90-3.
3. Di Carlo I, Cordio S, La Greca G, Privitera G, Russello D, Puleo S, et al. Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: a retrospective study on early and late complications. Arch Surg 2001;136:1050-3.
4. Biffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Pace U, Bonomo G, Monfardini L, et al. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2009 ;20:935-40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn701.
5. Nocito A, Wildi S, Rufibach K, Clavien PA, Weber M. Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports. Br J Surg 2009;96:1129-34. doi: 10.1002/ bjs.6730.
6. Jablon LK, Ugolini KR, Nahmias NC. Cephalic vein cut- down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices. Am J Surg 2006;192:63-7.
7. Sarveswaran J, Burke D, Bodenham A. Cephalic vein cut- down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices. Am J Surg 2007;194:699.