Background: In this study, the Family Caregiver Quality of Life scale developed specifically for family caregivers of heart failure patients was translated into the Turkish language, and its reliability and validity was performed.Methods: The scale was first translated into Turkish and back-translated, adapting it to the Turkish culture. The Turkish questionnaire of the scale was applied to 200 family caregivers. To evaluate the reliability of the scale and all subscales, test-retest was applied, and the Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were calculated. The structural validity of the scale was examined through the factor analysis.Results: The internal consistency reliability (=0.82) of the Turkish Questionnaire of the scale was proved. Two-week test-retest reliability was supported by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.91. The questionnaire’s factor structure demonstrated acceptable fit, indicating that it could be applied to the Turkish population. The item loads found by the factor analysis ranged from 0.32 to 0.99, explaining %63 of the variance (eigenvalue=2.61-4.06). Criterion-related validity was supported by correlations with the Short Form-36 General (r=0.473, p<0.01) and Mental (r=0.406; p<0.01) Health subscales.Conclusion: The Turkish version of this scale can measure the quality of life of family caregivers of heart failure patients with adequate reliability and validity. "> [PDF] Reliability and validity of Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale in heart failure | [PDF] Reliability and validity of Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale in heart failure Background: In this study, the Family Caregiver Quality of Life scale developed specifically for family caregivers of heart failure patients was translated into the Turkish language, and its reliability and validity was performed.Methods: The scale was first translated into Turkish and back-translated, adapting it to the Turkish culture. The Turkish questionnaire of the scale was applied to 200 family caregivers. To evaluate the reliability of the scale and all subscales, test-retest was applied, and the Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were calculated. The structural validity of the scale was examined through the factor analysis.Results: The internal consistency reliability (=0.82) of the Turkish Questionnaire of the scale was proved. Two-week test-retest reliability was supported by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.91. The questionnaire’s factor structure demonstrated acceptable fit, indicating that it could be applied to the Turkish population. The item loads found by the factor analysis ranged from 0.32 to 0.99, explaining %63 of the variance (eigenvalue=2.61-4.06). Criterion-related validity was supported by correlations with the Short Form-36 General (r=0.473, p<0.01) and Mental (r=0.406; p<0.01) Health subscales.Conclusion: The Turkish version of this scale can measure the quality of life of family caregivers of heart failure patients with adequate reliability and validity. ">

Reliability and validity of Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale in heart failure

Reliability and validity of Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale in heart failure

Background: In this study, the Family Caregiver Quality of Life scale developed specifically for family caregivers of heart failure patients was translated into the Turkish language, and its reliability and validity was performed.Methods: The scale was first translated into Turkish and back-translated, adapting it to the Turkish culture. The Turkish questionnaire of the scale was applied to 200 family caregivers. To evaluate the reliability of the scale and all subscales, test-retest was applied, and the Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were calculated. The structural validity of the scale was examined through the factor analysis.Results: The internal consistency reliability (=0.82) of the Turkish Questionnaire of the scale was proved. Two-week test-retest reliability was supported by an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.91. The questionnaire’s factor structure demonstrated acceptable fit, indicating that it could be applied to the Turkish population. The item loads found by the factor analysis ranged from 0.32 to 0.99, explaining %63 of the variance (eigenvalue=2.61-4.06). Criterion-related validity was supported by correlations with the Short Form-36 General (r=0.473, p

___

  • 25. Başara BB, Güler C, Yentür GK, editörler. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2013. Ankara: Sentez Matbaacılık ve Yayıncılık; 2014.
  • 24. Hu X, Hu X, Su Y, Qu M. Quality of Life among Primary Family Caregivers of Patients with Heart Failure in Southwest China. Rehabil Nurs 2016 Jun 28.
  • 23. Engel KS, Moosbrugger H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online 2003;8:23-74.
  • 22. Çolakoğlu ÖM, Büyükekşi C. Açımlayıcı faktör analiz sürecini etkileyen unsurların değerlendirilmesi. Karaelmas Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 2014;2:58-64.
  • 21. Ercan İ, Kan i. Ölçeklerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;30:211-6.
  • 20. Karakoç FY, Dönmez L. Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışmalarında Temel İlkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 2014;40:39-49.
  • 19. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Kısa form-36 (kf-36)'nın türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999;12:102-6.
  • 18. Çapık C. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2014;17:196-205.
  • 17. Weitzner MA, McMillan SC, Jacobsen PB. Family caregiver quality of life: differences between curative and palliative cancer treatment settings. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999;17:418-28.
  • 16. Weitzner MA, Jacobsen PB, Wagner H Jr, Friedland J, Cox C. The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 1999;8:55-63.
  • 15. Harkness KI, Tranmer JE. Measurement of the caregiving experience in caregivers of persons living with heart failure: a review of current instruments. J Card Fail 2007;13:577-87.
  • 14. Demirtepe D, Bozo Ö. Bakıcı İyilik Ölçeği’nin uyarlama, güvenirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 2009;12:28-37.
  • 13. Lee S, Colditz GA, Berkman LF, Kawachi I. Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. women: a prospective study. Am J Prev Med 2003;24:113-9.
  • 12. Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 1999;282:2215-9.
  • 11. Chung ML, Moser DK, Lennie TA, Rayens MK. The effects of depressive symptoms and anxiety on quality of life in patients with heart failure and their spouses: testing dyadic dynamics using Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. J Psychosom Res 2009;67:29-35.
  • 10. Chung ML, Lennie TA, Mudd-Martin G, Dunbar SB, Pressler SJ, Moser DK. Depressive symptoms in patients with heart failure negatively affect family caregiver outcomes and quality of life. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2016;15:30-8.
  • 9. Pressler SJ, Gradus-Pizlo I, Chubinski SD, Smith G, Wheeler S, Sloan R, et al. Family caregivers of patients with heart failure: a longitudinal study. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2013;28:417-28.
  • 8. Özkan Y, Taştan S. Kardiyak Semptom Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2016;24:480-8.
  • 7. Bakas T, Pressler SJ, Johnson EA, Nauser JA, Shaneyfelt T. Family caregiving in heart failure. Nurs Res 2006;55:180-8.
  • 6. Vieira GCA, Cavalcanti ACD, da Silva SA, Flores PVP. Quality of life of caregivers to patients with heart failure: integrative review. J Nurs UFPE on Line 2015;9:750-8.
  • 5. Özer S. Kalp yetersizliğinde aile/bakım verici yükü. Türk Kardiyol Dern Kardiyovasküler Hemşirelik Dergisi 2010;1:3-7.
  • 4. Yılmaz MB, Akar AR, Ekmekçi A, Nalbantgil S, Sade LE, Eren M ve ark. Advanced heart failure and future of mechanical assist devices: a Consensus Report on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2016;24:201-12.
  • 3. Nauser JA, Bakas T, Welch JL. A new instrument to measure quality of life of heart failure family caregivers. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2011;26:53-64.
  • 2. Değertekin M, Erol Ç, Ergene O, Tokgözoğlu L, Aksoy M, Erol M, et al. Türkiye’deki kalp yetersizliği prevalansı ve öngördürücüleri: HAPPY çalışması. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 2012;40:298-308.
  • 1. Ambrosy AP, Fonarow GC, Butler J, Chioncel O, Greene SJ, Vaduganathan M, et al. The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1123-33.
Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-5680
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1991
  • Yayıncı: Bayçınar Tıbbi Yayıncılık
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Masif pulmoner embolili olguda patent foramen ovaleye tuzaklanmış biatriyal geniş trombüs

Tayfun ŞAHİN, Serdar BOZYEL, Şadan YAVUZ, Emir DERVİŞ, Müjdat AKTAŞ

Göğüs cerrahisi sonrasında venöz tromboembolinin risk faktörlerinin analizi: 167 olguluk klinik çalışma

Wang FEİ, Zhang JİAN, Gao ZHİ, Wang RONG, Li JİANXİN, Gu YONGQUAN, Wang WEİPİNG

Profesyonel futbolcuda travmatik posterior tibial arter oklüzyonu: Olgu sunumu

Erdal ASLIM

Reliability and validity of Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale in heart failure

Aysel GÜRKAN, Ceren DÜLGEROĞLU

Prostetik kapak patolojisinden kaçınmak için kapak tamiri: Mitral kapak tamirinde orta dönem sonuçlar

Rezan AKSOY, Ünsal VURAL, Günseli ABAY, Mehmet KIZILAY, Fatih ÖZDEMİR, Cevdet DÖNMEZ, Serdar AKANSEL, Ahmet Yavuz BALCI

Hayvan modelinde alfa-lipoik asit önkoşullaması ile spinal kord iskemi-reperfüzyon hasarından korunma

İpek Işık GÖNÜL, Gökçen EMMEZ, Ulaş KUMBASAR, Zuhal YILDIRIM, Harun DEMİRCİ, Memduh KAYMAZ, Hakan EMMEZ

Koroner arter fistüllerinin tanısında çok kesitli bilgisayarlı tomografinin yeri

Ayşe EMRE, Sinan ŞAHİN, Demet DOĞAN, Hasan ŞAHAN, Seviye Bora ŞİŞMAN

Mekanik kalp kapağı olan gebe kadınlarda antikoagülasyon tedavisi

Cemal Levent BİRİNCİOĞLU, Muhammet Onur HANEDAN, Anıl ÖZEN, Veysel BAŞAR, Ertekin Utku ÜNAL, Hakkı Zafer İŞCAN, Adem DİKEN

Hızlı Yüzeyel Solunum İndeksinin kullanımı koroner arter baypas greftleme yapılan hastalarda ekstübasyon süresini kısaltır

Sertan ÖZYALÇIN, Adnan YALÇINKAYA, Adem İlkay DİKEN, Özlem ERÇEN DİKEN

Palmar hiperhidrozisli hastalarda farklı torakoskopik sempatektomi tekniklerinin etkinliği, başarı oranları ve komplikasyonları

Cengiz OVALI, Mustafa Behçet SEVİN