___

• Ancsin, G., Hohenwarter, M., & Kovacs, Z. (2011). GeoGebra goes mobile. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 1(1), 1-10.
• Baki, A. (2002). Öğrenen ve öğretenler için bilgisayar destekli matematik (1. bs.). İstanbul: BİTAV-Ceren Yayın Dağıtım.
• BECTA (2004). Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: A guide for secondary schools. Retrieved November 8, 2009 from http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/15091.pdf
• Dikovic, L. (2009). Applications GeoGebra into teaching some topics of mathematics at the college level. Computer Science and Information Systems, 6, 191–203.
• Dill, M. J. (2008). A Tool to Improve Student Achievement in Math: An Interactive Whiteboard. Doctorate Thesis, Ashland University.
• Ersoy, Y. (2005). Matematik eğitimini yenileme yönünde ileri hareketler-I: teknoloji destekli matematik öğretimi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4 (2), Article 7.
• Geer, R., & Barnes, A. (2007). Cognitive concomitants of interactive board use and their relevance to developing effective research methodologies. International Education Journal 8(2), 92-102.
• Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2002). The introduction of interactive whiteboards into schools in the United Kingdom: Leaders, led, and the management of pedagogic and technological change. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(24).
• Hohenwarter, M. (2006). GeoGebra - didaktische materialien und anwendungen für den mathematikunterricht (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Salzburg, Salzburg.
• Hohenwarter, M., & Jones, K. (2007). Ways of Linking Geometry and Algebra: The Case of GeoGebra. Proceedings of British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27, 3.
• Hohenwarter, M., & Lavicza, Z.(2007). Mathematics teacher development with ICT: Towards an ınternational GeoGebra institute. Proceedings of British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27 (3), 49-54.
• Hohenwarter, M., Jarvis D., & Lavicza, Z. (2009). Linking geometry, algebra, and mathematics teachers: GeoGebra software and the establishment of the international GeoGebra institute. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 83-86.
• Karasar, Ş. (2004). Eğitimde yeni iletişim teknolojileri -İnternet ve Sanal Yüksek Eğitim-. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(4), 117-125.
• Kaya, G., Akçakın, V., & Bulut, M. (2013). The effects of interactive whiteboards on teaching transformational geometry with dynamic mathematics software. Eighth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8). Erişim tarihi: 16.07.2013 http://cerme8.metu.edu.tr/wgpapers/WG15/WG15_Kaya.pdf
• Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2003). The influence of a technology-rich classroom environment on elementary teachers’ pedagogy and children’s learning. In J. Wright, A. McDougall, J. Murnane & J. Lowe (Eds.), Young children and learning technologies (pp. 65-70). Sydney: Australian Computer Society.
• Kimmins, D. (1995).Technology in school mathematics: A course for prospective secondary school mathematics teachers. Eighth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, Houston, Texas.( http://archives.math.utk.edu/ICTCM/EP-8/C89/pdf/paper.pdf Erişim tarihi: 2011).
• Kimmins, D., & Bouldin, E. (1996). Making mathematics come alive with technology. Proceedings of the Mid-South Instructional Technologhy Conference, 1 st, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, March 31April 2). (http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED400796.pdf Erişim tarihi 25.01.2012.
• Lavicza, Z., & Papp-Varga, Z. (2010). Integrating GeoGebra into IWB-equipped teaching environments: Preliminary results. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 245–252.
• Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technology, 13(4), 291–303. doi: 10.1007/s10639-008-9070-z.
• McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
• MEB, (2013). Ortaöğretim Matematik Dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı, Ankara
• Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2005). Presentation and pedagogy: the effective use of interactive whiteboards in mathematics lessons, in D. Hewitt and A. Noyes (Eds), Proceedings of the sixth British Congress of Mathematics Education held at the University of Warwick, pp. 105-112. Available from www.bsrlm.org.uk.
• Niess, M. (2006). Preparing Preservice Teachers to Teach Mathematics With Technology Developing a TPCK. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006, 3788-3795. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Preiner, J. (2008). Introducing dynamic mathematics software to mathematics teachers:the case of GeoGebra. Doctoral dissertation in Mathematics Educatio, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Salzburg, Austria.
• Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literatüre. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91–101.
• Tatar, E., Okur, M. ve Tuna, A., (2008). Ortaöğretim matematiğinde öğrenme güçlüklerinin saptanmasına yönelik bir çalışma. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 16 (2), 507-516.
• Tatar, E., Zengin, Y., Kağızmanlı, T. B., ve Çiftci, O. (2013). Dinamik Matematik Yazılımı ile Diferansiyel Kavramının Görselleştirilmesi. I. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Sempozyumu. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, 20-22 Haziran 2013, Trabzon.
• Tezer, M., & Deniz, A. K. (2009). The effect of using an interactive board in mathematics course on the learning of equation solving. 9th International Educational Technology Conference (IETC2009), 500-506. Ankara, Turkey
• Türel, Y. K., & Demirli, C. (2010). Instructional interactive whiteboard materials: Designers’ Perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences (WCLTA 2010), 9, 1437–1442.
• Umameh, M. A. (2012). The potential of the joint use of GeoGebra and interactive whiteboard for teaching and learning straight line graphs.Unpublished master thesis Education, Technology and Society in the Faculty of Social Sciences and Law- University of Bristol.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. bs.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research (designand methods).California: Sage Publication Zengin, Y., Tatar, E., Kağızmanlı, T. B., ve Çiftci, O. (2013). Fonksiyonların Grafik Çiziminde Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin Kullanımı. 7. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu. Atatürk Üniversitesi, 6-8 Haziran 2013, Erzurum. Ekler
• Ek Görüş Formunda Kullanılan Açık Uçlu Soru Etkileşimli tahta ile dinamik matematik yazılımı, matematik öğretiminde kullanılmalı mıdır? Size göre en önemli nedenleri gerekçeleriyle açıklayınız. Ek Öğretmen Adaylarıyla Yapılan Görüşmelerde Kullanılan Sorular Etkileşimli tahta üzerinde dinamik matematik yazılımı kullanılarak yapılan etkinlikler hakkında neler düşünüyorsunuz? Etkileşimli tahta ile dinamik matematik yazılımının birlikte kullanıldığı etkinlikler sürecinde yaşadığınız zorluklar nelerdir? Etkileşimli tahta ile matematik öğretim etkinliklerinin yürütülmesinde öğrencilerin derse olan ilgisi nasıl olur?