Kırsal bölgelerde yaşayan akciğer kanserli hastaların özellikleri
Bu çalışmada, kırsal bölgede yaşayan akciğer kanserli hastaların özelliklerini araştırmayı ve kentsel bölgede yaşayan olguların özellikleri ile karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. 1992-1995 yılları arasında merkezimizde tanı konulan 3211 primer akciğer kanseri olgusu retrospektif olarak incelendi. Kırsal bölgede yaşayan 607 olgu ile kentsel bölgede yaşayan ve sistematik örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 1214 akciğer kanseri olgusu çalışmaya alındı. Kadın hasta oranı kentsel grupta daha yüksek idi (p< 0.005). Yaş ortalaması kırsal grupta 60 ± 10.2 yıl, kentsel grupta 57.3 ± 9.9 yıl olarak bulundu (p> 0.05). Ellialtı yaş ve üzeri olgu sayısı, kırsal grupta anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p< 0.01). Sigara içen olguların oranı kırsal grupta %83.8, kentsel grupta %79.8 idi (p< 0.05). Epidermoid hücreli karsinom oranı kırsal grupta daha yüksek olup (p= 0.05), diğer tümör tipleri açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı bir fark yoktu. Çiftçi (%69.9) ve madenci (%16.3) olgular kırsal grupta, şoför (%12.3), tekstil (%11), büro (%10.2) ve inşaat çalışanları (%8.6) kentsel grupta daha yüksek oranda idi. Çalışmamızın sonuçları kırsal bölgede yaşayan akciğer kanseri olgularının, kentsel olgulardan farklılıklar gösterdiğini işaret etmektedir.
Characteristics of patients with lung cancer living in rural areas
İn this study we aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with primary lung cancer living in rural areas and to compare with these of patients living in urban areas. 3211 patients with primary lung cancer diagnosed at our center between 1992 and 1995 were analyzed retrospeclively. The study included 607 patients living in rural areas and 1214 patients selected by systematic sampliny and living in urban areas. Ralio of female patient was higher in urban group (p< 0.005). The mean age mas 60 ± 10.2 years in rural group and was 57.3 ± 9.9 years in urban group. The number of patients with advanced age (>56 years) was higher in rural group (p< 0.01). The ratio of smoker cases was 83.8% in rural group and 79.8% in urban group. Squamous cell carcinoma was higher in urban group than in urban group and there was not significant difference between the groups with respect to other tumor types. Among patients living in rural areas, farmers 69.9% and miners 16.3% were the most freguently seen occupations and among patients living in urban areas, driver 12.3%, textile-relaled jobs 11%,office-workers 10.2%, and building 8.6% were the most frequently seen occupations. Our results suggested that rural group had different characteristics from urban group.
___
- 1. Travis WD, Lubin J, Ries L, Deuesa S. United States lung cancer incidence trends: Declining for most histologic types among matesi increasing among females. Cancer 1996; 77.- 2464-70.
- 2. Beckett WS. Epidemiology and etiology of lung cancer. In: Matthay RA (ed). Clinics in chest medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 1993: 1-15.
- 3. Davila DG, Williams DE. The etiology of lung cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68: 170-82.
- 4. Osann KE, Ernster VL, Mustacchi P. Epidemiology of lung cancer. In: Murray JF, Nadel JA, Mason RJ, Boushey HA (eds). Textbook of respiratory medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 2000: 1395-414.
- 5. Barbone F, Bovenzi M, Cavallieri F, Stanta G. Air pollution and lung cancer in Trieste, Italy. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 1161-9.
- 6. Goldsmith JR. The "urban factor" in cancer: Smoking, industrial exposures, and air pollution as possible explanations. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 1980; 3: 205-17.
- 7. Chen JG. Distrubition pattern and risk factors of lung cancer in Qidong rural area. Chung Hua Chung Liu Tsa Chih 1989; 11:361-4.
- 8. Engholm G, Palmgren F, Lynge E. Lung cancer, smoking, and enviroment: A cohort study of the Danish population, BMJ 1996; 312: 1259-63.
- 9. Levin ML, Haenszel W, Carrol BE. Cancer incidence in urban and rural areas of New York state. J Natl Cancer Inst 1960; 24: 1243-57.
- 10. Curwen MP, Kennaway EL, Kennaway NM. The incidence of cancer of the lung and larynx in urban and rural districts. Br J Cancer 1954; 8: 181-98.
- 11. Travis WD, Colby TV, Corrin B, et at. Collaboratos from 14 countries: World Health Organization Pathology Panel: World Health Organization. Histological typing of lung and pleural tumors: International histological classification of tumors. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag 1999:162.
- 12. Xu ZY, Blot WJ, Xiao HP, et al. Smoking, air pollution and the high rates of lung cancer in Shenyand, China: J Natl Cancer Inst 1989; 8: 1800-6.
- 13. Lubin JH, Blot WJ. Assesment of lung cancer risk factors by histologic category. J Natl Cancer inst 1984; 73: 383-9.
- 14. lves JC, Buffler PA, Greenberg SD. Environmental association and histopathologic patterns of the lung: The challange and dillemma in epidemiologic studies. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 125: 195-209.
- 15. McDuffle HH, Klaassen DJ, Dosman JA. Determinants of cell type in patients with cancer of the lungs. Chest 1990; 98: 1187-93.
- 16. Potter JD, Sellers TA, Folsom AR, et al. Alcohol, beer, and lung cancer in postmenopausal women: The Iowa women's health study. Ann Epidemiol 1992; 2:587-95.
- 17. Greenberg ER, Dain B, Freeman D, et al. Referral of lung cancer patients to university hospital cancer centers: A population-based study in two rural states. Cancer 1988; 62: 1647-52.
- 18. Pawlega J, Niezabitowski A. Histological types of lun cancer in urban and rural inhabitants of the Krakow region. Pneumonol Pol 1989; 57: 466-70.
- 19. Gürsel G, Levent E, Öztürk C, Karalezli A. Hospital based survey of lung cancer in Turkey, a developing country, where smoking is highly prevalent. Lung Cancer 1998; 21: 127-32.