Fen eğitiminde yapılandırmacı yaklaşım ve öğrencilerin kavram yanılgıları

Son yirmi beş yıldan beri yapılandırmacı öğrenme kuramı (constructivism), başta Amerika ve İngiltere olmak üzere pek çok ülkede hem eğitimde önemli bir araştırma alanı olarak hem de fen eğitiminde uygulanmaya çalışılan bir yaklaşım olarak güncelliğini sürdürmektedir. Literatürde yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımı konusunda çeşitli çalışmalar bulunmakla birlikte, bu çalışmalar genelde yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın kuramsal temellerine odaklanmıştır. Bu makalenin amacı, yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın ve özellikle anlamlı öğrenmenin temelini oluşturan öğrencilerin kavram yanılgıları konusu üzerinde de durarak, yapılandırmacı öğrenmeyi daha bütüncül bir şekilde ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışmanın ilk bölümünde yapılandırmacı yaklaşım güncelliğini kazanmadan önce, 1960'lı ve 70'li yıllarda eğitim-öğretim sürecini etkileyen ve yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın gelişimine de katkıda bulunan Bruner ve Piaget'nin görüşlerine kısaca yer verilmektedir. Daha sonra yapılandırmacı yaklaşımın ve kavram yanılgıları alanındaki araştırmaların kuramsal temellerine önemli katkılar sağlayan Ausubel, Kelly ve Vygotsky'nin öğrenme ile ilgili düşünceleri açıklanmıştır. Öğrencilerin kavram yanılgılarının gelişimi ve nedenleri açıklandıktan sonra çeşitli araştırmalardan öğrencilerin kavram yanılgıları ile ilgili örnekler verilmiştir. Son bölümde, yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımının fen sınıflarında uygulanması ile ilgili görüşler üzerinde durulmuştur.

Constructivist approach in science education and students' misconceptions

Since the last 25 years, constructivism keeps its popularity in many countries mainly in USA and England, both as an important research area in education and, as an approach which is tried to be practiced in science education. Although there are several studies in the literature about constructivist approach, these studies focus mainly on the theoretical underpinnings of constructivism. The aim of this study is to provide a holistic understanding of the constructivist approach taking into students' misconceptions consideration, that they form the basics of constructivist approach and of particularly meaningful learning. In the first part of this study, before constructivist approach has popularity, Bruner and Piaget's views that influenced teaching-learning process in 1960s and 1970s, and also contributed the development of constructivism, are briefly reviewed. Then, the views of Ausubel, Kelly and Vygotsky, who provided the theoretical foundations of constructivism and of the research concerning the misconceptions, are explained. After explained the development and reasons of students' misconceptions, some examples of students' misconceptions are presented in the light of the research literature. The study is concluded with the views concerning the practice of constructivist approach in science classes.

___

  • Anderson, B., "Pupils' Conceptions of Matter and Its Transformations" Studies in Science Education, Sayı: 18, 53-85, 1990.
  • Anning, A., The First Years at School. Buchingham: Open University Press, 1997.
  • Ausubel, D. P., Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1968.
  • Ayas, A., Çepni, S., Johnson, D. ve Turgut, M. F., Kimya Öğretimi. YÖK/DB Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi Yayınları, Ankara, 1997.
  • Bell, B., "Students' Ideas about Plant Nutrition: What are They?", Journal of Biological Education, Sayı: 19 (3), 213-218, 1985.
  • Bell, B. F. & Freyberg, P., Language in the Science Classroom, İçinde Learning in Science The implications of children's science. J. Osborne and P. Freyberg (Eds.) London: Heinemann, 1985.
  • Blanck, G., Vygotsky: The man and His Cause. İçinde L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology, (pp. 31-58) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • Brooks, J.G., & Brooks M.G., In Search of Understanding: The Case For Constructivist Classrooms. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1999.
  • Brown, A. L. & Metz, K. E. & Campione, J. C., Social interaction and individual understanding in a community of learners: The influence of Piaget and Vygotsky, İçinde Piaget - Vygotsky The Social Genesis of Thought. Anastasia Tryphon, J. Jacques Voneche (Editörler) Psychology Pres: East Sussex, 1996.
  • Bruner, J. S., Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
  • Bruner, J. S., The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
  • Carey, S., Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge: Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1985.
  • Contento, I., "Children's Thinking about Food and Eating - A Piagetian-Based Study", Journal of Nutrition Education, Sayı: 13(1), 86-90, 1981.
  • Çakıcı, Y., "Exploring Turkish Upper Primary Level Pupils' Understanding of Digestion", International Journal of Science Education, Sayı: 27(1), 79-100,2005.
  • De Vries, R. & Zan, B. (1995), Creating a Constructivist Classroom. Young Children, 51(1), 4-13.
  • Driver, R. & Easley, J., "Pupils and Paradigms: A review of Literature related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students", Studies in Science Education. Sayı: 5, 61-84, 1978.
  • Driver, R. & Child, D. & Gott, R. & Head, J. & Johnson, S. Worsley, C. & Wylie, F., Science in Schools at age 15: Report No.2, Report to the DES, DENI, and the Welsh Office on the 1981 survey of 15 year olds. London: Assessment of Performance Unit, 1984.
  • Driver, R. & Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A., Some Features of Children's Ideas and Their implications for Teaching, İçinde Driver, R., Guesne, E. ve Tiberghien, A., (Editörler), Children's Ideas in Science, Buckingham, England, Open University Press, s. 191-201, 1985.
  • Driver, R. & Oldham, V., "A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science", Studies in Science Education, Sayı: 13, 105-122, 1986.
  • Driver, R. & Leach, J. & Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C., "Young People's Understanding of Science Concepts: Implications of Cross-age Studies for Curriculum Planning", Studies in Science Education, Sayı: 24, 75-100,1994
  • Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F., Learning in Science - From Behaviourism Towards Social Constructivism and Beyond. International Handbook of Science Education. Part One. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
  • Ergün, M. & Özsüer, S., "Vygotsky'nin Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi", Afyon Karahisar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 2, 269-292, 2006.
  • Fosnot, C. T., Constructivism: A Psychological Theory of Learning. İçinde C. Fosnot (Ed.) Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press, 1996.
  • Freyberg, P. S. & Osborne, R. J., Who Structures the Curriculum: the Teacher or Learner? İçinde J. Osborne and P. Freyberg (Eds.) Learning in Science, The Implications of Children's Science. London: Heinemann, 1981.
  • Gilbert, J. K. & Osborne, R. J. & Fensham, P. J., "Children's Science and Its Consequences for Teaching", Science Education, Sayı: 66 (4), 623- 633, 1982.
  • Glasersfeld, E. V., "Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching", Synthese, Sayı: 80, 121-140, 1989.
  • Glasersfeld, E. V., Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: The Falmer Press, 1995.
  • Gott, R. & Duggan, S., Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum. Developing Science and Technology Education. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995.
  • Harlen, W., The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools. Second Edition. London: David Fulton Publishers, 1996.
  • Howe, A. C., "Development of Science Concepts within a Vygotskian Framework", Science Education, Sayı: 80 (1), 35-51, 1996.
  • Jenkins EW., From Armstrong To Nuffield, Studies in Twentieth Century Science Education in England and Wales, London: Cox & Wyman Ltd, UK, 1979.
  • Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T., "Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction", Journal of Distance Education, Sayı: 13 (1), 57-75, 1998.
  • Kelly, G. A., "The Psychology of Personal Constructs ", New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1955.
  • Lanier, J. &, Little, J. W., Research On Teacher Education. İçinde M. Witttrock (Ed.) Handbook of Research On Teaching. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
  • Leach, J. & Driver, R. & Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C., Progression in Understanding of Ecological Concepts by Pupils Aged 5 to 16. Leeds, UK: The University of Leeds, Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education. Univesity of Leeds, 1992.
  • Longden, K. A., Understanding of Dissolving Shown by 11-12-year- old Children. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Oxford, 1984.
  • Marek, E. A. & Cavallo, A., The Learning Cycle. Portsmouth, Nh: Heinemann, 1997.
  • Mestre, J.P., Cognitive Aspects of Learning and Teaching Science. İçinde S.J. Fitzsimmons & L.C. Kerplelman (Eds.) Teacher Enhancement for Elementary and Secondary Science and Mathematics: Status, Issues, and Problems. Washington D.C.: National Science Foundation, 1994.
  • Millar, R. & Driver, R., "Beyond Processes", Studies in Science Education, Sayı: 14, 33-62, 1987.
  • Millar, JR., "Constructive Criticisms", International Journal of Science Education, Sayı: 11, 587-596, 1989.
  • Mintzes, J. J. & Wandersee, J. H., Reform and Innovation in Science Teaching: A Human Constructivist View. İçinde J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee and J. D. Novak, Teaching Science for Understanding. A Human Constructivist View. London: Academic Press, 1998.
  • Novak, J. D., "An Alternative to Piagetian Psychology for Science and Mathematics Education", Science Education, Sayı: 61, 453-472, 1977.
  • Osborne, R. J. &, Wittrock, M. C., "Learning Science: A Generative Process", Science Education, Sayı: 67 (4), 489-508, 1983.
  • Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (Eds.), Learning in Science: The Implications of Children's Science. London: Heinemann, 1985.
  • Osborne, J., Young Children's Understanding of Science in 4 Domains and Its Development Through A Constructivist Approach to Teaching. Ph.D Thesis. London University. London, 1994.
  • Osborne, J., "Beyond Constructivism", Science Education, Sayı: 80 (1), 53-82,1996.
  • Pfundt, H. & Duit, R., Bibliography Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. 4'th Edition. IPN-Kurzberichte: Institute for Science Education, 1994.
  • Piaget, J., Piaget's Theory. In CarmichaeVs Manual of Child Psychology. Vol. 1. 3'rd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970.
  • Pines, A. L. & Novak, J. D., "The Interaction of Audio-tutorial Instruction with Student Prior Knowledge: A Proposed Qualitative, Case study Methodology", Science Education, Sayı: 69 (2), 213-228, 1985.
  • Pines, A. L. & West, L. H. T., "Conceptual Understanding and Science Learning: An Interpretation of Research within a Sources-of- Knowledge Framework", Science Education, Sayı: 70 (5), 583-604, 1986.
  • Richardson, V.(Ed.), Constructivist Teacher Education. Building a World of New Understandings. London: The Falmer Press, 1997.
  • Sander, M., "Erroneous Ideas about Respiration: The Teacher Factor", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Sayı: 30, 919-934, 1993.
  • Shapiro, B. L., What Children Bring to Light: Towards Understanding What the Primary School Science Learner Is Trying to Do. İçinde Peter Fensham (Ed.) Development and Dilemmas in Science Education. London: Falmer Press, 1988.
  • Simpson, M. &, Arnold, B., "Availability of Prerequisite Concepts for Learning Biology at Certificate Level", Journal of Biological Education, Sayı: 16(1), 65-72, 1982.
  • Storey, R. D., "Textbook Errors and Misconceptions in Biology: Photosynthesis", American Biology Teacher, Sayı: 51, 271-274,1989.
  • Solomon, J., "Social Influences on the Construction of Pupils' Understanding of Science", Studies in Science Education, Sayı: 14, 63-82, 1987.
  • Solomon, J., "The Rise and Fall of Constructivism", Studies in Science Education, Sayı: 23, 1-19, 1994.
  • Stofflett, R., "The Accommodation of Science Pedagogical Knowledge: The Application of Conceptual Change Constructs to Teacher Education", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Sayı: 31 (8), 787-810, 1994.
  • Sutton, C., Words, Science and Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1992.
  • Stavy, R., "Children's Conception of Changes in the State of Matter: from Liquid (or solid) to Gas", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Sayı: 27 (3), 247-266, 1990.
  • Şimşek, H., 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde Paradigmalar Savaşı: Kaostaki Türkiye, İstanbul: Sistem yayıncılık, 1997.
  • Tamir, P. & Gal-Choppin, R. & Nussinovitz, R., "How do Intermediate and Junior High School Students Conceptualize Living and Nonliving?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Sayı: 18, 241-248, 1981.
  • Vasta, R. & Haith, M. M. & Miller, S. A., Child Psychology: The Modern Science. New York, NY: Wiley, 1995.
  • Vygotsky, L. S., Thought and Language. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press, 1962.
  • Vygotsky, L. S., Mind in society: The development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pres, 1978.
  • Wandersee, J. H. &, Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J., Research on Alternative Conceptions in Science. İçinde D. L. Gabel (Ed.) Handbook of Research On Science Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan, 1994.
  • Weiss, I., National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Research Triangle Park: Centre for Educational Research and Evaluation, 1994.