GALA GÖLÜ MİLLİ PARKI’NDA MAKROFITLER İLE MIKROCRUSTACEA (CLADOCERA, COPEPODA) İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Bu çalışma, Gala gölü milli parkında dominant olarak bulunan Typha spp., Ceratophyllum spp. ve Nymphaea spp. üzerinde yaşayan Cladocera ve Copepoda nın tespiti ve makrofit tercihlerini ortaya çıkarılması amacıyla gerçekleştirildi. Typha spp., Ceratophyllum spp. ve Nymphaea spp. üzerinde 8 Cladocera, 5 Copepoda türü bulunmuştur. Cladocera dan Chydorus sphaericus tüm makrofitler üzerinde bulunurken; C. latus Ceratophyllum spp. yi; Pleuroxus aduncus Nymphaea spp. yi; Alona guttata, A.costata A.rectangula, A.guadrangularis, Oxyurella tenuicaudis Typha spp. yi tercih etmektedir. Copepoda dan Nitocra hibernica yine tüm makrofitlerde yaşarken; N.lacustris Typha spp. ve Ceratophyllum spp. yi; Onychocamptus mohammed Nymphaea sp yi; Horsiella breviconis, H.trisetosa Typha spp. yı tercih etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Zooplankton, Makrofit, Gala Gölü

A STUDY ON ASSOCIATED MICROCRUSTACEA (CLADOCERA, COPEPODA) WITH MACROPHYTES IN GALA LAKE NATIONAL PARK

This study was performed in order to determine the Cladocera and Copepoda living on Typha spp., Ceratophyllum spp. and Nymphaea spp. constituting the dominant species in Gala Lake National Park and to reveal their macrophyt preferences. 8 Cladocera and 5 Copepoda species were determined on these plants. The cladoceran Chydorus sphaericus was found on all macrophytes while C. latus preferred Ceratophyllum spp., Pleuroxus aduncus preferred Nymphaea spp. and Alona guttata, A.costata, A. rectangula, A.guadrangularis and Oxyurella tenuicaudis preferred Typha spp. The Copepoda species Nitocra hibernica was found on all macrophytes while N. lacustris preferred Typha spp. and Ceratophyllum spp., Onychocamptus mohammed prefered Nymphaea spp. and Horsiella breviconis and H.trisetosa prefered Typha spp.

Keywords:

Zooplankton, Macrophytes, Gala Lake,

PDF

___

POSTOLOV, A. M., MARINOV, T. M. Fauna Bulcarica 18, Copepoda, Harpacticoida. In aedibus academiae A scientiarum Bulcaricae, Sofia. 384 pp. 1988. ının Bugünkü Durumu ve Taksonomik revizyonu, Doğa Bilim
BALIK, S. Trakya Bölgesi İç Su Balıklar Dergisi, A2, 9, 2., 1985. ter copepods and rotifers: predators and their prey, Hydrobiologia, 546 : 475-489, 2005 BRANDL, Z. Freshwa
DOWNİNG, J.A. and CYR, H. Quantitative estimation of epiphytic invertebrate populations. Can.J.Fish.Aq.Sci :1570-1579, 1985. es Copepodes des Eaux Continentales d' Europe Occidentale, Tome I, Calanoides et DUSSART, B. L
Harpacticoides., Editions N. Boubee, et cie, Paris, 499 pp. 1967. distribution of littoral rotifers., Freshwater Biology, 46,777-786, 2001. (11) : 1579-1583, 2005. tiere Crustacea Kiemen und Blattfussar Brachiopoda Fischlause, Branchiura, Tierwelt- FLÖSSNER, D. Krebs
Deusch. 60 Veb. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 105-161, 1972. marina sspp. intermedia (Wolfgang) Casper, Hydrobiologia, 506-509: 583-589, 2003.
Annual Raport, Vol. 3, 78-84, 1995. la Gölü ve Çevresinin (Edirne) Ornitho Faunası Üzerine Araştırmalar, Trakya
KAYA, M., KURTONUR, C. Ga Üniversity Journal Science, 4(2) : 169-179, 2003.
RGARİTORA, F. Cladocerı (Crustacea : Cladocera)., Inst. di., zoologia, dell Univ. Roma, 169 pp. 1983. Hydrobiol., v. 4, p. 14-36, 1980. auna of four macrophytes in a lotic system. Freshwat.Biol.14:507-513, 1984.
ROOKE, J.B. The invertebate SEÇMEN, Ö., LEBLEBİCİ, E. Aquatic flora of Thrace (Turkey)., Willdenowia 20:, 53-66, 1991.
SMIRNOV, N. N. Fauna of USSR Crustacea Chydoridae, Vol. 1, No 2.,English Transl. Israel Prog. Sci., 238- , 1974.