___

• ABET. (2003). CriteriaforAccreditingPrograms. http://www.abet.org/criteria_eac.htm 28 p.
• Adams, C., Chamberlin, S., Gavin, M. K., Schultz, C., Sheffield, L. J., & Subotnik, R. (2008). The STEM promise: recognizing and developing talent and expanding opportunities for promising students of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Washington, DC: Math / Science Task Force, NAGC.
• Belet Ş. D., & Türkan, B. (2007). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin yazılı anlatım ve resimsel ifadelerinde algı ve gözlemelerini ifade biçimleri (Avrupa birliği örneği). VI. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Eğitimi Sempozyumu (27-29 Nisan 2007) Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Bilen, K., Irkıçatal, Z., & Ergin, S. (2014). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilim insanı ve mühendis algıları. XI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitapçığı, 11-14 Eylül, 2014.
• Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304-328.
• Cunnignham, C. M., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing elementary school students’ conceptions of engineering and technology. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
• Dejarnette, N.K. (2012). America’s children: providing early exposure to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84.
• Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73.
• Grubbs, M. (2013). Robotics intrigue middle school students and build STEM skills. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 72(6), 12-16.
• International Technology Education Association (ITEEA). (2009). The overlooked STEM imperatives: Technology and engineering. Reston, VA: Author.
• Johnson, A. P. (2014). Eylem araştırması el kitabı (Y. Uzuner, & M. Özten Anay, Çev.). Ankara: Anı.
• Karataş, F. O., Micklos, A., & Bodner, G. M. (2011). Sixth-grade students’ views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 123-135.
• Katzenmeyer, C., & Lawrenz, F. (2006). National science foundation perspectives on the nature of STEM program evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 109, 7-18.
• Kearney, S. K., & Hyle, E. A. (2004). Drawing out emotions: the use of participant produced drawings in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research, 4(3), 361-382.
• Khandani, S. (2005). Engineering design process. Unpublished Education Transfer Plan, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
• Lyons, J., & Thompson, S. (2006). Investigating the long-term impact of an engineering based GK-12 program on students’ perceptions of engineering. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
• Mann, E. L., Mann, R. L., Strutz, M. L., Duncan, D., & Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Integrating engineering into K-6 curriculum: developing talent in the STEM disciplines. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(4), 639-658.
• MEB. (2007). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına Bağlı Okul ve Kurumlarda Yapılacak Araştırma ve Araştırma Desteğine Yönelik İzin ve Uygulama Yönergesi. http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/2594_1.html adresinden alınmıştır.
• MEB. (2015). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi. http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2015_09/18101802_bilimvesanatmerkezleriynergesi.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
• Melanlıoğlu, D. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin Türkçe dersi algılarına yönelik yaptıkları çizimler. Okuma Yazma Eğitimi Araştırmaları, 3(1), 27-38.
• Merrill, C. (2009). The future of TE masters degrees: STEM. Presentation at the 70th Annual International Technology Education Association Conference, Louisville, Kentucky.
• Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (S. Turan, Çev.). Ankara: Nobel.
• NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC:The National Academic Press.
• National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and national science education standarts. Washington, DC: National Academy.
• Oware, E., Capobianco, B., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2007). Gifted students’ perceptions of engineers a study of summer outreach program. American Society for Engineering Education.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Silver, A., & Rushton, B. S. (2008). Primary-school children's attitudes towards science, engineering and technology and their images of scientists and engineers. Education 3, 13. 36(1), 51-67.
• Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. A. (2005). A study examining change in underrepresented student views of engineering as a result of working with engineers in the elementary classroom. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Zians, A. W. (1997). A qualitative analysis of how experts use and interpret the kinetic school drawing technique. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Toronto Üniversitesi, Kanada.
• URL-1-www.mühendis.nedir.com
• URL-2-http://www.balarilarimuhendisoluyor.com/