Transition from enmity to 'common fate' rhetoric: Water ıssue in Turkish-Iraqi-Syrian relations

Transition from enmity to 'common fate' rhetoric: Water ıssue in Turkish-Iraqi-Syrian relations

Starting from the fact that the water issues are the ones which challengetraditional security understanding, this article tries to analyze the basic reason(s)why Turkey, Syria and Iraq have not come to an agreement over the fairdistribution of Euphrates-Tigris waters so far. The study presupposes thatdespite the rapprochement between Turkey, Iraq and Syria on the basis of‘common fate’ rhetoric and good neighborhood strategy, water still exists as adormant issue due to the security oriented priorities of the three countries. Inaddition, the ambitious plans of each country to divert the waters of theEuphrates-Tigris waters, and the lack of legally binding agreement are amongthe other reasons. The argument of the study is that the current problem ofwater between three countries is more than a resource problem; therefore, theGAP project is one of the concerns of the article. In addition, the article willfocus on the fact that, unlike the 1990s, the three neighboring countries’previous negative rhetoric and attitude in dealing with their problems regardingwater shortage have changed, to a large extent, into a positive one.

___

  • GAP ; the Master Plan: An Executive Summary , Ankara, State Planning Organization, 1989
  • Ayşegül Kibaroğlu, “Building a Regime for the Waters of the Euphrates-Tigris River Basin”, Kluwer Law International, 2002, p. 15.
  • 3Samira Al Zoughbi, “The State of Food Security: Recent Trends in Syria”, Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform, National Agriculture Policy Center, Working Paper No: 17, 2006.
  • Patrick Mac Quarrie, Water Security in the Middle East; Growing Conflict over Development in the Euphrates-Tigris Basin, MPhil Thesis, Dublin, International Peace Studies, Trinity College, 2004, p. 31.
  • 5John Waterburry and Alan Richards, A Political Economy of the Middle East, Boulder, Westview Press, 1990, p. 32.
  • 6“Iraq: Food Insecurity on the Rise Say Officials”, IRIN Middle East, 23 November 2009, .
  • 7“Drought-Stricken Iraq Urges to Release More Water”, Hürriyet Daily News and Economic Review, 03 September 2009, .
  • Miriam R. Lowi, Water and Power: The Politics of a Scarce Resource in the Jordan River Basin, London, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
  • lter Turan, “Water and Turkish Foreign Policy”, The Future of Turkish Foreign Policy, eds. Martin G. Lenore and Dimitris Keridis, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2004, pp. 191-208.
  • 10Ofra Bengio, The Turkish-Israeli Relationship: Changing Ties of Middle Eastern Outsiders, New York, Palgrave, 2004, pp. 71-103.
  • 11Idem
  • 12Murhaf Jouejati, “Water Politics As High Politics; the Case of Turkey and Syria”, Reluctant Neighbour; Turkey’s Role in the Middle East, ed. Henry J. Barkey, Washington D.C., US Institute of Peace Press, 1996, p. 143.
  • 13Ali Çarkoğlu and Mine Eder, “Domestic Concerns and the Water Conflict over the Euphrates-Tigris River Basin”, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1 (2001), p. 56. Joint Technical Committee meetings were held to provide and share data concerning the riparian countries’ needs for present and future projects to prepare a statement of main principles and procedures in order to reach an agreement on water rights. “Three Stage Plan” for Optimum Equitable Research and Reasonable Utilization of the Transboundary Watercourses of the Tigris-Euphrates Basin aimed to allocate water resources based on the systematic assessment of water needs for irrigation of all parties.
  • 14Ayşegül Kibaroğlu and Olcay Ünver, “An Institutional Framework for Facilitating Cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris River Basin”, International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2000), pp. 311-330.
  • 15Altan Tan, “Erdoğan’ın Kredisi Yüksek” Yeni Şafak, 26 November 2007. ; “GAP ‘Kürt Sorununu’ Çözmeye Yeter mi?” Star, 09 June 2008
  • 16“Turkey, Syria and Iraq in Water Crisis Summit”, , (access date : 03 September 2009).
  • 17Behrooz Morvaridi, “Resettlement, Rights to Development and the Ilısu Dam, Turkey”, Development and Change, Vol. 35, No. 4 (2000), pp. 719-741.
  • 18“Ilısu Dam Project in for Hard Times Despite Government Plans”, Turkish Politics in Action, 26 July 2009,
  • 19Özden Zeynep Oktav, “The October 1998 Crisis: The Change of Heart of Turkish Foreign Policy Towards Syria?”, CEMOTİ Chaiers D’Etudes Sur La Mediterranee Orientale Et Le Monde Turco-Iranien, 2001, p. 146.
  • 20K. Gajendra Singh,. “A New Age for Turkey-Syria Relations”, Al-Jazeerah, 14 April 2005; People’s Daily Online, 06 January 2004.
  • 21“Joint Irrigation Project with Syria”, Bianet News in English, 26 August 2002, .
  • 22“Etle Tırnak Gibiyiz”, Milliyet , 01 November 2009. 23“Turkey Syria Sign Strategic Deal Lift Visa”. , (access date: 17 September 2009).
  • “Davutoğlu: Irak’la Su Meselesine Ortak Kader Olarak Bakıyoruz”, Turkish Journal, 11 August 2009.
  • 24“Turkey Says More Water for Iraq and Syria is Unlikely”, Syria Comment, 4 September 2009. .
  • 25Idem.
  • 26For example, in the face of Iraqi Water Minister Latif Rashid’s complaint that Turkey had broken its promise to increase water flows down the Euphrates River, Energy Minister of Turkey, Yıldız said: “We are not pleased with the talks in the Iraqi parliament either. Turkey is being criticized in an unfair way although it sticks to its commitments on water issues.”
  • 27Patrick Wrigley, “Dam Dispute Strains Turkey-Iraq Ties”, Asia Times, 02 October 2009
  • 28Ahmet Davutoğlu, Stratejik Derinlik; Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu, İstanbul, Küre Yayınları, 2001, p. 401.
  • 29Bülent Keneş, “World Water Forum and Need for ‘Pax Water’ around Turkey” Todays Zaman, 16 March 2009.
  • 30“Drought-Stricken Iraq Urges to Release More Water”, Hürriyet Daily News and Economic Review, 03 September 2009,
  • 31“Iraq, Turkey Want to Integrate Economies”, Son Gazetesi, 18 September 2009, .
  • 32“Savaşın Eşiğinden Sınırsız Dostluğa”, Zaman, 14 October 2009.
  • 33“Turkey’s Budding Relations with Syria and Iraq”, Turkish Weekly, 02 November 2009, .
  • 34Jr. Karl DeRouen and Shaun Goldfinch, “Democracies Prefer to Negotiate: Institutionalized Democracy, Diversion, and Statecraft during International Crises”, New Directions For International Relations, eds. Alex Mintz and Bruce Russett, Oxford, Lexington Books, 2005, pp. 158-159.
  • 35Curtin Fiona, “Emerging Trends in Water Resources Conflict Prevention: Public Purticipation and Role of Civil Society”, Water Development and Cooperation-Comperative Perspective: Euphrates-Tigris and Southern Africa, ed. Lars Wirkus, Bonn, International Center for Conversion, 2006.
  • 36“South Eastern Anatolian Project Action Plan, 2008-2012”, .
  • 37“Erdoğan GAP Eylem Planını Açıkladı”, Hürriyet, 27 May 2008. 38Matthew Paterson, “Green Politics”, Theories of International Relations, eds. Andrew Linklater, et.al., New York, Palgrave, 2005, p. 244.