___

• Akalin S (2005). Comparison between traditional teaching and microteaching during school experience of student-teachers. Eurasia Journal of Educational Research, 20, 1-13.
• Amobi, F. A. (2005). Preservice teachers' reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 115-130.
• Bell, N.D. (2007). Microteaching: What is it that is going on here? Linguistics and Education, 18, 24– 40.
• Benton-Kupper, J. (2001). The microteaching experience: student perspectives. Education, 121, 830- 835.
• Berthoff, A. (1987). The teacher as researcher. In D. Goswaqmi & P. Stillman (Eds.), Reclaiming the classroom: teacher research as an agency for change (pp. 28-39). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook- Heinemann.
• Britzman, D. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York press.
• Bullough, R.V., & Gitlin, A. (1989). Toward educative communities: Teacher education and the quest for the reflective practitioner. Qualitative Studies in Education, 2(4), 285-298.
• Burnaford, G., Fischer, J., & Hobson, D. (1996). Teachers doing research: Practical possibilities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Calderhead, J. (1989) Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 43-51.
• Cannings, T., Talley, S. (2003). Bridging the gap between theory and practice in preservice education: The http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/860000/857102/p17- cannings.pdf?key1=857102&key2=7964584921&coll=DL&dl=ACM&CFID=5838513&CFT OKEN=52089848 on April 3, 2010. vase studies. Retrieved from
• Clarke, A. (1995). Professional development in practicum settings: Reflective practice under scrutiny. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243-261.
• Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S.L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. S. (1999). Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249–301.
• Copeland, W., Birmingham, C., De la cruz, E., & Lewin, B. (1993) The Reflective Practitioner in Teaching: towards a research agenda. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 347-359.
• Courneya, C.A., Prat, D.D., & Collins, J. Through What Perspective Do We Judge the Teaching of Peers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 69-79.
• Frank, M. L. (1990). What myths about mathematics are held and conveyed by teachers? Arithmetic Teacher, 37(5), 10-12.
• Gimenez, T. (1999). Reflective teaching and teacher education contributions from teacher training. Linguagem .rle.ucpel.tche.br/php/edicoes/v2n2/F_gimenez.pdf on March 10, 2010 2(2), 129-143. Retrieved from http://www
• Goodlad, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Göker, S. D. (2006). Impact of peer coaching on self-efficacy and instructional skills in TEFL teacher education. System, 34(2), 239-254.
• Grossman, G.M., & Onkol, P.E., & Sands, M. (2007). Curriculum reform in Turkish teacher education: attitudes of teacher educators towards modernization in an EU candidate nation. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 138–150.
• Handler, M.G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Computers and Education, 20, 147-156.
• Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards a definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.
• Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008) Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education,24(7), 1884-1892.
• I'anson, J., Rodrigues, S., & Wilson, G. (2003). Mirrors, reflections and refractions: The contribution of microteaching to reflective practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 189- 199.
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), pp. 65–90.
• Kpanja, E. (2001). A study of the effects of video tape recording in microteaching training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 483-486.
• Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• McKenna, L., & French, J.(2010). A step ahead: Teaching undergraduate students to be peer teachers, Nurse Education in Practice (2010), doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2010.10.003
• McNamara, O., Roberts, L., Basit, T., & Brown, T. (2002). Rites of passage in initial teacher training: Ritual performance, ordeal and numeracy skills test. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 863–878.
• Metcalf, K. K. (1993). Critical factors in on-campus clinical experience. Teaching Education, 5, 164- 174.
• Metcalf, K. K., Ronen Hammer, M. A., & Kahlich, P. A. (1996). Alternatives to field-based experiences: The comparative effects of on-campus laboratories. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 271-283.
• Molebash, P. (2004). Preservice teacher perceptions of a technology-enriched methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(4), 412-432.
• Peker, M. (2009) The use of expanded microteaching for reducing preservice teachers’ teaching anxiety about mathematics. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(9), 872-880 retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/sre/PDF/pdf2009/Sep/Peker.pdf on February 12, 2010.
• Putnam, J., & Grant, S.G. (1992) Reflective Practice in the Multiple Perspectives Program at Michigan State University, in Valli, L. (Ed.) Reflective teacher education: Cases and critique (pp.92- 98). Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Ross, D. D., Johnson, M., & Smith, W. (1992). Developing a professional teacher at the university of Florida. In L. Valli (Ed.), Reflective teacher education: Case and critiques (pp. 24–39). Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Schelfhout, W., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., Struyven, K., Gielen, S., & Sierens, E. (2006). Educating for learning-focused teaching in teacher training: The need to link learning content with practice experiences within an inductive approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 874-897.
• Sherin, M.G. & van Es, E.A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491.
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
• Strauss, A. & Corbin, Juliet M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research, grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Subramaniam K (2006). Creating a microteaching evaluation form: the needed evaluation criteria. Education, 126(4), 666-667.
• Tairab, H. (2003). The role of reflection in facilitating pre-service primary school teachers’ professional growth. Journal of Faculty of Education, 18(20), 5- 25.
• Tobias, S. (1979). Anxiety research in educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 573-582.
• Tsang, W.K. & Wong, M. (1996). Journaling as a reflective tool for pre-service teacher trainees. The Journal of Teaching Practice. 15(1), 24-39.
• Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 67-88.
• Vare, J. W. (1994). Partnership contrasts: microteaching activity as two apprenticeships in thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 209-217.
• YÖK (1998). Eğitim fakülteleri öğretmen yetiştirme programlarının yeniden düzenlenmesi. Ankara: YÖK.
• YÖK (2007). Oğretmen yetiştirme ve Eğitim fakülteleri (1982-2007). Ankara: YÖK.
• Zeichner, K. (1993) Traditions of Practice in US Preservice Teacher Education Programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 1-13.
• Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• About the Author(s):
• * Suzan KAVANOZ earned her doctorate in foreign languages education from the Middle East Technical University in
• She is an assistant professor in Foreign Languages Education Department at Yıldız Technical University, Turkey. Her
• research interests include EFL teaching methodoloy, teacher cognition, and multiculturalism in teacher education.
• e-mail: shatip@yildiz.edu.tr
• ** H.Gülru YÜKSEL is an assistant professor of applied linguistics and TEFL in the Department of Foreign Languages,
• Yıldız Technical University, Turkey. Her research areas are reading skills development, lexical knowledge, teaching English
• to young learners and second language acquisition. Currently, in addition to teaching undergraduate courses and supervision
• of students, she also acts as the chair of the department.
• Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Education, Istanbul, TURKEY Tel: +90212 3834860 Fax: +90212 3834808 GSM:+90532 6923680
• URL: http://www.yarbis.yildiz.edu.tr/hayuksel
• e-mail: hayuksel@yildiz.edu.tr