Research Note: Toward A Maqasid Al-Sharia Based Radicalization Index

Radicalization denotes the process by which an individual or group adopts or exhibits a violent form of action directly linked to an extremist ideology be it; socio-political, or religious, which is not consistent with the conventional value construct. But radicalization assessment mechanism is obscure. Its structure, scope, and implementation strategy still remain largely unsettled. Central to this mechanism are the risk assessment tools which are used as indicators to assess individual(s) vulnerability. But scholarship on such tools, however, is dominated by the Behavioral Science. Thus, militating against the tools’ suitability within the realm of the religious content of the individual’s thinking. This research note, therefore, takes the religious approach to identify suitable indicators relative to the individual’s value construct. Using the Maqasid Al-Sharia framework, it articulates vulnerability assessment tools which were tested through Focus Discussion (FD) involving ten students (four female and six male) drawn from two universities in Northwest Nigeria. Hence the paper discovered the operational utility of the tools which proved valuable toward providing policy direction at the two levels of aggregation: micro and macro levels of vulnerability risk assessment.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Maqasid al-Sharia, Vulnerability Assessment, Radicalization, Focus Discussion, Index

PDF

___

Abdulkadir, A. (2012). A Diary of Ethno-religious Crises in Nigeria: Causes, effects, and solutions. Religious Forum Academia. National Association of Religious Scholars. Vol. II No. 1 &2: 270-280.
Fishman, S. (2010). Community-level Indicators of Radicalization: A Data and Methods Task Force. “Report to the Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S Department of Homeland Security. https//:www.start.umd.edu/pubs/START_HFD_CommRadReport.pdf
Horgan, J. & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the Terrorists?: Challenges in Assessing the Effectiveness of De-radicalization Programs. Terrorism and Political Violence. Taylor and Francis Group. Vol. 22 No. 2: 267-291.
Horgan, J. & Taylor, M. (2011). Dis-engagement, De-radicalization and the arc of Terrorism: Future Directions for Research in Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalization Challenge, edited by Coolsae, R. (2011): 176. www.mei.edu
Ibn Asakir (1990). Tarikh Madinatu Dimashq. Vol. 31. Darul Fikr, 169.
Iskow. E. (2018). Index of Radicalization: Islamic Radicalization in Michigan, International institute for counter terrorism.
Jaser, A. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic law: A Systems Approach. Biddles Limited, 18.
Maddy, C. (2017). What went wrong with France’s de-radicalization program. www.theatlantic.com
Muhamed, U.C. (2008). The Islamic vision of Development in the Light of Maqasid Al-Sharia.DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4188.5047
Muhammad, S.S. (2017). Countering ISIS Call for Hijra (Emigration): A Review through the Lens of Maqasid Ash-Sharia. Journal for deradicalization. 2(12).
Neuamnn, P. (2013). The Trouble with Radicalization. International Affairs. Vol. 89, Iss. 4, 873-893.
Otuka, J.O. (2004). Educational Research Methods, a National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) Course Manual, Macmillan Publishers, 87.
Rahim, A.R, Mohammed, A.R, and Muhammad, A. (2017). Confronting the Religious Extremism in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study between the Concept of Wasatiyya and Moderate. Research Gate. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i12/3601
Rita, A.K. (2018). Measuring radicalization: risk assessment conceptualizations and practice in England and Wales. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. 12(6):1-18. DOI: 10.1080/193472.2018.1509105
Salman, A.S. (2017). Developing an Index of Socio-Economic Development Consistent with Maqasid Al-Sharia. Journal of King Abdul Aziz University, Islamic Economics, 30(1): 117-129.
Salman, S.A. and Hamid, H. (2014). Toward a Maqasid Al-Sharia Based Development Index. IRTI, 14.
Shekhar, K.J. and Chitra, S. (2014). Educational Research. Pacific Books International, 86.
Tazul, I. (2020). De-radicalization of Jihadism: An Analysis of Maqasid Approach. 7th International Conference Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. https://oarep.usim.edu.my/jspui
UNDP Report, (2016). Preventing Violent Extremism through Promoting Inclusive Development, Tolerance, and Respect for Diversity: A Development to Addressing Radicalization and Violent Extremism. http://www.undp.org