Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis'e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi

javascript:;about:blank#blockedBu çalışmada bazı pestisitlerin Tetranychus urticae ve Phytoseiulus persimilis'e etkileri incelenmiştir. Çalışmada etoxazole, bifenthrin, cyromazine ve acequinocyl etkin maddelerine sahip ilaçlar kullanılmıştır. İlaçlar her iki akara da tarla uygulama dozunda larva ve  ergin dönemlerine petri kabı-ilaçlama kulesi yöntemi ile uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerden yararlanarak ilaçların etkisi Abott formülüne göre hesaplanmıştır. Farklı etkin maddeye sahip ilaçların T. urticae ve P. persimilis’ e karşı etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre bifenthrin ve acequinocyl T. urticae ve P. persimilis'nin  her iki dönemine de  % 90 – 100 arasında etki göstermiştir. Etoxazole ve cyromazine  ise P. persimilis''nin  her iki döneminde % 90' ın üzerinde etki göstermiştir. Etoxazole T. urticae'nin larva dönemine %100 etki göstermiştir. Cyromazine ise T. urticae'nin her iki döneminde önemli bir etki göstermemiştir. 

In this study, the effects of some pesticides against Tetranychus urticae and Phytoseiulus persimilis was investigated. Pesticides having active ingredients such as etoxazole, bifenthrin, cyromazine, acequinocyl were used. Recomended dosages of all pesticides were applied to larvae and adult of both mites by petri dish spray tower method. According to the mortality data, the effect of the pesticides was calculated using  the Abbott formula. Effect of the pesticides having various active agents on Tetranychus urticae and Phytoseiulus persimilis were compared  regarding their efficiency. According to the results, bifenthrin and acequinocyl showed  efficiency between 90-100% on both life stages of T. urticae and P. persimilis. Etoxazole and cyromazine showed an effect on over 90% on both stage of P. persimilis. Etoxazole showed effects 100% on larvae of T. urticae. Cyromazine has not showed significant effect on both stages of T. urticae.

___

  • Abbott, WS. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18(1): 256–267.Alzoubi, S., & Cobanoglu, S. (2007). Effects of sublethal dose of different pesticides on the two-spotted spider mite" Tetranychus urticae Koch" and its predatory mites under greenhouse conditions. World J. Agric. Sci, 3(6), 764-770.Alzoubi, S., & Cobanoglu, S. (2008). Toxicity of some pesticides against Tetranychus urticae and its predatory mites under laboratory conditions. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 3(1), 30-37.Argolo, P. S., Jacas, J. A., & Urbaneja, A. (2014). Comparative toxicity of pesticides in three phytoseiid mites with different life-style occurring in citrus: Euseius stipulatus, Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis. Experimental and applied acarology, 62(1), 33-46.Attia, S., Grissa, K. L., Lognay, G., Bitume, E., Hance, T., & Mailleux, A. C. (2013). A review of the major biological approaches to control the worldwide pest Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) with special reference to natural pesticides. Journal of Pest Science, 86(3), 361-386.Ay, R. (2005). Determination of susceptibility and resistance of some greenhouse populations of Tetranychus urticae Koch to chlorpyrifos (Dursban 4) by the petri dish–Potter tower method. Journal of Pest Science, 78(3), 139-143.Blümel S, Walzer A. (2002). Efficacy of different release strategies of Neoseiulus californicus McGregor and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for the control of two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) on greenhouse cut roses. Sys. Appl. Acarol. 7:35–48.Bresch, C., Ruiz, G., Poncet, C., & Parolin, P. (2015). Predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis chose plants with domatia. J. Mediterranean Ecol. 13:13-20.Chacón-Hernández, J. C., E. Cerna-Chávez, F. Reyes-Zepeda, G. Gaona-García, M. Rocandio-Rodríguez, y J. LanderosFlores. 2017. Respuesta funcional de Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot sobre cuatro estados de desarrollo de Tetranychus urticae Koch sobre discos de rosal. Southwest Entomol. 42: 485-492.Chacon-Hernandez, J. C., Camacho-Aguilar, I., Cerna-Chavez, E., Ordaz-Silva, S., Ochoa-Fuentes, Y. M., & Landeros-Flores, J. (2018). Effects Of Tetranychus urticae and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarı: Tetranychıdae: Phytoseııdae) on the chlorophyll of rosal plants (Rosa sp.). Agrocıencıa, 52(6), 895-909.Cote, K. W., Lewis, E. E., & Schultz, P. B. (2002). Compatibility of acaricide residues with Phytoseiulus persimilis and their effects on Tetranychus urticae. HortScience, 37(6), 906-909.Ditillo, J. L., Kennedy, G. G., & Walgenbach, J. F. (2016). Effects of insecticides and fungicides commonly used in tomato production on Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phtyoseiidae). Journal of economic entomology,6: 2298–2308.Escudero, L. A., and F. Ferragut. (2005). Life-history of predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on four spider mite species as prey, with special reference to Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biol. Control. 32: 378-384.Fathipour, Y., Karimi, M., Farazmand, A., & Ali, A. T. (2017). Age-specific functional response and predation capacity of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Phytoseiidae) on the two-spotted spider mite. Acarologia, 58(1), 31-40.Grbic, M., Van Leeuwen, T., Clark, R. M., Rombauts, S., Rouze, P., Grbic, V., Osborne, E.J., Dermauw, W., and Ngoc, P .C. (2011). The genome of Tetranychus urticae reveals herbivorous pest adaptations. Bulletin of the Entolomological Society of Egypt LVIII: 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10640Gyuris, E., Szép, E., Kontschán, J., Hettyey, A., & Tóth, Z. (2018). Efficiency against the Two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and prey-age-related choice of three predatory mites. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 64(1), 75-90.Hassan, S. A. (1992). Side Effect Tests for Phytoseiids and Their Rearing Methods. Meeting of the Working Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 15(3), 61–74.Heinz K.M., Van Driesche R.M., Parrella M.P. (2004). Biocontrol in protected culture. Batavia, II. West Chicago, US, Ball Publishing. 560 p.HelleW.,SabelisM.W., (1985) Spidermites, their biology, natural enemies and control (Vol.1P.458)— Amsterdam, Elsevier Alipour Z., Fathipour Y., Farazmand A. (2016). Age stage predationcapacity of Phytoseiulus persimilis and Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on susceptible and resistant rose cultivars — Int. J. Acarol.,42(4): 224-228. doi:10.1080/01647954.2016.1171797Hussey N.W., Scopes N. (1985). Biological Pest Control The Glasshouse Experience. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 50–51.Irigaray, F. J. S. D. C., Zalom, F. G., & Thompson, P. B. (2007). Residual toxicity of acaricides to Galendromus occidentalis and Phytoseiulus persimilis reproductive potential. Biological Control, 40(2), 153-159.Jeppson, L. R., Keifer, H. H. & Baker, E. W. (1975): Mites injurious to economic plants. – Uni¬versity of California Press, California, 528 ppJhonson W.T., Lyon, H.H. (1991). Insects that feed on trees and shrubs. Cornell University, IthacaKropczynska D., Tomczyk, A. (1996). Development of Tetranychus urticae Koch and Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisd. populations on sweet pepper and Phytoseiulus persimilis (AH.) effectiveness in their control. IOBC WPRS Bulletin 19: 71_74.Maleknia B., Fathipour Y., Soufbaf M. (2016b). Intraguild predation among three phytoseiid species, Neoseiulus barkeri, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Amblyseius swirskii. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 21: 417-426.McMurtry J.A., De Moraes G.J., Sourassou N.F. (2013). Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 18: 297-320. doi:10.11158/saa.18.4.1Whalon, M.E., R.M. Mota-Sanchez, R.M., Hollingworth L. Duynslager, Arthropods Resistant to Pesticides Database (ARPD). , 2014 (accessed 30.10.14).Niu, Z. M., Xie, P., Yu, L., & Bi, J. L. (2014). Efficacy of selected acaricides against the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on strawberries in greenhouse production. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 3(1), 235-239.Numa, S., Rodríguez, L., Rodríguez, D., & Coy-Barrera, E. (2015). Susceptibility of Tetranychus urticae Koch to an ethanol extract of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius leaves under laboratory conditions. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 338.Sarwar, M. (2014). Influence of host plant species on the development, fecundity and population density of pest Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) and predator Neoseiulus pseudolongispinosus (Xin, Liang and Ke)(Acari: Phytoseiidae). New Zealand journal of crop and horticultural science, 42(1), 10-20.Skirvin D.J., Williams M., Fenlon K., Sunderland J. (2002). Modelling the effects of plants on biocontrol effectiveness in ornamental nursery crops. Journal Applied Ecology: 469–480.Sterk G., Hassan S.A., Baillod M., Bakker F., Bigler F., Blümel S., Bogenschütz H., Boller E., Bromand B., Brun J., et al. (1999). Results of the seventh joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms’. BioControl 44: 99–117Van Leeuwen, T., Vontas, J., Tsagkarakou, A., Dermauw, W., & Tirry, L. (2010). Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: a review. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology, 40(8), 563-572.Van Leeuwen, T., Tirry, L., Yamamoto, A., Nauen, R., & Dermauw, W. (2015). The economic importance of acaricides in the control of phytophagous mites and an update on recent acaricide mode of action research. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 121, 12-21.
Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-7050
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2004
  • Yayıncı: Namık Kemal Üniv. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Hatay ili havuç ekim alanlarında bulunan yabancı ot türleri, yaygınlıkları, yoğunlukları ve durumlarının değerlendirilmesi

İlhan ÜREMİŞ, SONER SOYLU, Şener KURT, EMİNE MİNE SOYLU, Erdal SERTKAYA

Farklı Yeşil Fasulye Çeşitlerinin Kısıtlı Sulama Altında Verim ve Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi

Sinan SÜHERİ, Noor Muqdad HUSSEIN HUSSEIN, ERTAN SAİT KURTAR, Nurcan YAVUZ, Yeşim DAL

Tarımsal Kirliliğin Trakya Bölgesi Sucul Habitatları Üzerine Etkilerinin Temel Bileşen Analizi Kullanılarak Değerlendirilmesi: Makro – Mikro Elementler

İpek ATILGAN HELVACIOĞLU, Cem TOKATLI

Determination and antifungal activities of laurel and fennel essential oils against fungal disease agents of cypress seedlings

Merve KARA, SONER SOYLU, MUSA TÜRKMEN, Durmuş Alpaslan KAYA

Ramifications of Households Non-farm Income on Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Rural Area of Pakistan

Salamun RASHİDİN, Sara JAVED, Bin LİU

Tarım İşletmelerinde Duygusal Bağlılığın Yenilikçilik İş Davranışına Etkisi

Kemalettin AĞIZAN, Zeki BAYRAMOĞLU

Laboratuvar Koşullarında Tetranychus urticae ve Avcı Akar Phytoseiulus persimilis'e Bazı Pestisitlerin Etkilerinin incelenmesi

Recep AY, Mustafa Hakan BALCI, Mehmet Ali İNANICI

POTASYUM VE ÇİNKOLU GÜBRELEMENİN ENGİNARDA VERİM VE VERİM UNSURLARINA ETKİLERİ

Ayla KORKMAZ, Mehmet ZENGİN, Fatma GÖKMEN YILMAZ

Yield and Quality of Two Soybean Cultivars in Response to Drought and N Fertilization

Oqba BASAL, Andr s SZAB

Tekirdağ ili Çorlu ilçesinde kanola üretim alanlarında görülen zararlı böcek türleri üzerine araştırmalar

Nihal ÖZDER, İkbal ALTIN