Türk Saanen Keçilerinde Elle Sağım ile Makineli Sağımın Süt Verimi, Süt Bileşenleri ve Kalıntı Süt Bakımından Karşılaştırılması

Süt sığırlarına benzer şekilde uzun laktasyon süresine sahip olan süt tipi keçilerin makineli sağımı hakkında ülkemizde önemli ölçüde bilgi üretimine gereksinim bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türk Saanen keçilerinde makineli sağım ve elle sağım, süt verimi ve süt bileşenleri bakımından karşılaştırılırken, ayrıca makineli sağımda memede kalan “kalıntı süt” miktarı ve bileşenleri incelenmiştir. Çalışma, laktasyonlarının 5. ayında bulunan 3-4 yaşlı 24 baş keçi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. On altı baş keçi elle ve makine ile sağımın yapıldığı sekizer başlı iki gruba ayrılırken, diğer sekiz baş keçiden makine ile sağımdan sonra memede kalan süt elle sağılarak alınmıştır. Süt bileşenleri Milk-Lab Minor süt analiz cihazıyla tespit edilirken, yağ analizi ayrıca Gerber yağ analiz cihazı ile de yapılmıştır. Keçilerde sağım denetimlerinde periyot başına belirlenen süt verimleri elle 1.073 L ve makineli sağımda 1.095 L birbirine benzer bulunmuştur P= 0.8807 . Sabah sağımında akşam sağımına göre 140 mL daha fazla süt alınırken, akşam sağımında elde edilen süt, daha yüksek oranda süt bileşenlerine sahip olmuştur P

Comparison of Milk Yield, Milk Composition and Residual Milk of Machine and Hand-Milked in Turkish Saanen Goats

Dairy goats have quite long lactation periods like dairy cows, but there is significant lack of knowledge and information about machinery milking of goats. The present study was conducted to compare milk yields and milk components in manual and machinery milking of Turkish Saanen goats and to investigate the amount of “residual milk” and milk components of machinery milking. Experiments were carried out on 24 goats aged 3-4 years and on the 5th month of their lactation period. Of these goats, sixteen were separated in groups of eight goats. The first group was hand-milked and the other group was milked with a milking machine. The remaining eight were also milked with a milking machine and then the residual milk in udders was hand-milked. Milk components were analyzed with Milk-Lab Minor milk analysis device and fat analysis was carried out with Gerber fat analysis device. Milk yields of milking periods were similar in hand milking 1.105 L and machinery milking 1.095 L P= 0.8807 . While morning milking had 140 mL more milk than evening milking, evening milk had higher component values than morning milk P

___

  • Anderson R R, Hindery G A, Parkash V & Turner C W (1968). Effectiveness of subcutaneously administered oxytocin upon removal of residual milk. Journal of Dairy Science 51(4): 601-605
  • Anonim (2010). www. milk-lab.co.uk Milk-Lab Ninor milk analyzer Operation manual.
  • Anonim (2014). Laboratory catalogue form milk analysis. (18.10.2014)
  • Boyazoglu J & Morand-Fehr P (2001). Mediterranean dairy sheep and goat products and their quality. A critical review. Small Ruminant Research 40: 1-11
  • Bruckmaier R M, Ritter C, Schams D & Blum J W (1994). Machine milking of dairy goats during lactation: Udder anatomy, milking characteristics, and blood concentrations of oxytocin and prolactin. Journal of Dairy Research 61: 457-466
  • Capote J, Castro N, Caja G, Fernandez G, Briggs H & Argüello A (2008). Effects of the frequency of milking and lactation stage on milk fractions and milk composition in Tinerfena dairy goats. Small Ruminant Research 75: 252-255
  • Caroprese M, Albenzio M, Marino R, Muscio A, Zezza T & Sevi A (2007). Behavior, milk yield, and milk composition of machine and hand-milked Murgese mares. Journal Dairy Science 90: 2773-2777
  • Carreiro F M, Rebello de Andrade C S C & Almeida L M (1989). Aptitude to machine milking of merino Beira Baixa ewes. II. Productive behaviour face to hand milking and machine milking. In: Eitam M (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Machine Milking of Small Ruminants, Sept. 13-19, Tel Aviv, Israel, pp. 530-544
  • Da Costa W K A, de Souza E L, Beltrao-Filho E M, Vasconcelos G K V, Santi-Gadelha T & de Almeida Gadelha C A (2014). Comparative protein composition analysis of goat milk produced by the Alpine and Saanen breeds in Northeastern Brazil and related antibacterial activities. PLoS ONE 9(3): e93361. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093361
  • De la Fuente L F, San Primitivo F, Fuertes J A & Gonzalo C (1997). Daily and between-milking variations and repeatabilities in milk yield, somatic cell count, fat, and protein of dairy ewes. Small Ruminant Research 24: 133-139
  • Delgado-Pertinez M, Alcalde M J, Guzman-Guerrero J L, Castel J M, Mena Y & Caravaca F (2003). Effect of hygiene-sanitary management on goat milk quality in semi-extensive systems in Spain. Small Ruminant Research 47: 51-61
  • Fuertes J A, Gonzalo C, Carriedo J A & San Primitivo F (1998). Parameters of test day milk yield and milk components for dairy ewes. Journal Dairy Science 81: 1300-1307
  • Gürhan R & Çetin M (2003). Küçükbaş hayvan süt sağım makinalarında nabız karakteristiklerinin PIC yardımıyla kontrolü. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9(2): 147-152
  • Katanos J, Skapetas B & Laga V (2005). Machine milking ability and milk composition of some imported dairy goat breeds and some crosses in Greece. Czech Journal of Animal Science 50(9): 394-401
  • Labussiere J (1988). Review of physiological and anatomical factors influencing the milking ability of ewes and the organization of milking. Livestock Production Science 18: 253-274
  • Linares J P, Gomez Gil J L & Lopez J G (1984). Estudio comparativo de los metodos de ordeno en oveja Manchega [Comparative study of the milking methods in ewes Manchega]. In: Sever-Cuesta (Ed), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Machine Milking of Small Ruminants, May, 16-20, Valladolid, Spain, pp.188-197
  • Metin M (2006). Süt ve Mamülleri Analiz Yöntemleri (Duyusal, Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Analizler). Ege Ü. Ege MYO Yayınları No: 24, Ege Üniversitesi Basım Evi Bornova, İzmir, 439 s
  • Millogo V, Ouédraogo G A, Agenäs S & Svennersten- Sjaunja K (2009). Day-to-day variation in yield, composition and somatic cell count of saleable milk in hand-milked zebu dairy cattle. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(3): 151-155
  • Morand-Fehr P, Bourbouze A, Le Houerou H N, Gall C & Boyazoglu J G (1983). The role of goats in the Mediterranean area. Livestock Production Science 10: 569-587
  • Pala A & Savaş T (2006). Relationship between daily, morning, evening and peak yield and persistency in Turkish Saanen goats. Animal Science Journal 77: 532-537
  • Rushen J, De Passille A M B & Munksgaard L (1999). Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 720-727
  • Salama A A K, Such X, Caja G, Rovai M, Casals R, Albanell E, Marin M P & Marti A (2003). Effects of once versus twice daily milking throughout lactation on milk yield and milk composition in dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 1673-1680
  • Salama A A K, Caja G, Such X, Peris S, Sorensen A & Knight C H (2004). Changes in cisternal udder compartment induced by milking interval in dairy goats milked once- or twice-daily. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 1181-1187
  • SAS (1999). Institute Inc., SAS Online Doc®, Version 8, Cary, NC
  • Sinapis E (2007). The effect of machine or hand milking on milk production, composition and SCC in mountainous Greek breed (Boutsiko) ewes. Small Ruminant Research 69: 242-246
  • Torres A, Castro N, Hernández-Castellano L E, Argüello A & Capote J (2012). Short communication: Effects of milking frequency on udder morphology, milk partitioning, and milk quality in 3 dairy goat breeds. Journal Dairy Science 96: 1071-1074
  • Torres A, Castro N, Argüello A & Capote J (2013). Comparison between two milk distribution structures in dairy goats milked at different milking frequencies. Small Ruminant Research 114: 161-166
  • Torres A, Capote J, Argüello A, Sánchez-Macías D, Morales-delaNuez A & Castro N (2014). Effects of oxytocin treatments on milk ejection in dairy goats traditionally milked once a day. Small Ruminant Research 120: 231-233
  • Tölü C & Savaş T (2008). Süt keçiciliğinde makineyle sağım şart. Hasad Hayvancılık 281: 30-33
  • Tölü C, Yurtman İ Y & Savaş T (2010). Gökçeada, Malta ve Türk Saanen keçi genotiplerinin süt verim özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması. Hayvansal Üretim 51(1): 8-15
  • Tölü C, Yurtman İ Y, Baytekin H, Ataşoğlu C & Savaş T (2012). Foraging strategies of goats in a pasture of wheat and shrubland. Animal Production Science 52(12): 1069-1076
  • Zan M, Stibilj V & Rogelj I (2006). Milk fatty acid composition of goats grazing on alpine pasture. Small Ruminant Research 64: 45-52
Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Halit APAYDIN
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Ağırlıklı Ters Uzaklık İnterpolasyon Yöntemiyle Çukurova'da Kimi Toprak Karakteristiklerinin Konumsal Dağılımının Tahmini

Fırat ATALAY, Tülay TUNÇAY, İlhami ÜNVER, İlhami BAYRAMİN

Hamsi Balığı Engraulis encrasicolus Dönerinin Soğuk Depolama Sırasındaki Kalite Değişimleri

Levent İZCİ, Şengül BİLGİN, Ali GÜNLÜ, Soner ÇETİNKAYA, Abdullah DİLER, İsmail Yüksel GENÇ, Yıldız BOLAT

Sakarya Nehri’nin Kirmir Çayı’ndaki Balık Populasyonlarının Yoğunluğu ve Biyoması

Özge ZENCİR TANIR, A Şeref KORKMAZ

Some Chemical and Physical Properties, Fatty Acid Composition and Bioactive Compounds of Wheat Germ Oils Extracted From Different Wheat Cultivars

Hasan Hüseyin KARA, Mithat GÜVEN

Yelpaze Hüzmeli Meme Orifislerinde Şekilsel Üretim Hatalarının Eliptik Fourier Tanımlayıcılarıyla Tespiti

Bahadır SAYINCI

Gölbaşı Bölgesi’nde Sulama Suyu Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Gökşen ÇAPAR, Çiğdem Coşkun DİLCAN, Cenk AKŞİT, Şebnem ARSLAN, Mehmet ÇELİK, Süleyman KODAL

Gerçek Zamanlı Nitrat Analiz Sistemleri İçin Değişken Düzeyli Ekstraktant Sağlama Yöntemi

Saadettin YILDIRIM

Fluoresan Pseudomonas spp. ile Pamuk Fide Kök Çürüklüğü Hastalıklarının Biyolojik Mücadelesi

Oktay ERDOĞAN, Yüksel BÖLEK, M Erhan GÖRE

Farklı Sulama Programlarının Krizantemin Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri

Yusuf UÇAR, Soner KAZAZ

Evaluation of Irrigation Water Quality in Gölbaşı District

Gökşen ÇAPAR, Çiğdem Coşkun DİLCAN, Şebnem ARSLAN, Süleyman KODAL, Cenk AKŞİT, Mehmet ÇELİK